| Tsuroerusu |
August 23rd, 2009 9:28 AM |
Any difference in the final result between legendaries?
First a little background. I have just recently bought factory sealed (Why FS? Because I like new stuff, pristine boxes and manuals etc., for the love of the game!) copies of Pokemon Ruby and Pokemon Emerald on eBay to plug some gaps in my collection. Given the fact that I have two Sapphire games (One I got as part of a larger collection of GBA stuff with no box or manual) I have no need to open Ruby, so I plan to leave that sealed for the heck of it. But given that Emerald has a bunch of stuff that R/S does not, I do plan to open it up and play it.
And here's where my question comes in, in Emerald you can catch both Groudon and Kyogre, but compared to doing so in Ruby and Sapphire, the ones in Emerald are at lv. 70, while the ones in R&S are at lv. 45. Is there any advantage to one or the other from the perspective of what the final result is, by which I mean say we caught a Sapphire Kygore and an Emerald Kygore (Using a Master ball), EVed them in exactly the same way, gave them the same moves etc. and trained them to lv. 100, would there be any significant differences (Leaving IVs aside, as those would obviously differ) ?
The reason I ask, is because if there was advantage to a Ruby Groudon, then it would make sense for me to play Ruby as well, and not just leave it on the shelf as a collector's item. However if there isn't any differences between said examples, then I can leave my new Pokemon Ruby game factory sealed.
Edit: DOH! I just realized this is the wrong forum (Diamond, Pearl, and Platinum (DS)) in which to post this question (Related to Ruby, Sapphire and Emerald), my deepest apologies! Mouseclick habits die hard!
|