The PokéCommunity Forums

The PokéCommunity Forums (https://www.pokecommunity.com/index.php)
-   Pokémon General (https://www.pokecommunity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=17)
-   -   legendary evolutions (https://www.pokecommunity.com/showthread.php?t=214335)

Ziraider April 9th, 2010 4:38 PM

legendary evolutions
 
I looked through the Search and didn't see a thread about my topic so here we go.

I was thinking how cool would it be to see legendary pokemon evolutions. Shaymin elvoves so what if we had evolutions for Zapdos, Articuno, Moltres, Lugia and Ho-Oh
and the many other legendary pokemon there are. Ones that I think have an evolution would be the three lake pokemon Uxie, Melsprit, Azelf, Celebi, Jirachi, Entei, Raikou, and Suicune.

Eurydice April 9th, 2010 5:15 PM

no legendary pokemon have evolutions not even shaymin, it just has two forms (sky and normal). i dont like the idea of giving any legendary an evolution.

Shubshub April 9th, 2010 5:26 PM

You stole the words right out of my mind Eury

Destiny Bond April 9th, 2010 5:35 PM

No, that won't make them unique anymore. Legendaries have to be unique and probably powerful as well.
It just wouldn't work.

Eurydice April 9th, 2010 6:13 PM

and if you think about it, they are stronger then most other pokemon so if they were to evolve they would be way overpowered.

Hamilton April 9th, 2010 6:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destiny Bond (Post 5700520)
No, that won't make them unique anymore. Legendaries have to be unique and probably powerful as well.
It just wouldn't work.

well if the y're so unique why are there so many?
i actually think legendaries should have evo's.. not any of the old ones, but maybe a new one?

Ziraider April 9th, 2010 7:35 PM

I mean it shouldn't over power them.

vibratingcat April 9th, 2010 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hamilton (Post 5700689)
well if the y're so unique why are there so many?
i actually think legendaries should have evo's.. not any of the old ones, but maybe a new one?

they're all unique and OP in they're own way. they all have their own legend behind them.
new legendary pokemon evolution would be cool, but making new ones of old ones would be silly.
How about a legendary pokemon which has been sealed in a weak pokemon and evolves when a world apocalypse is about to take place and needs to stop it.

Tree_x April 9th, 2010 10:48 PM

How about No :3 Legendaries are already annoying and pointless as is let alone to give them evos why? it is just simply unnecessary

zommy08 April 9th, 2010 11:52 PM

Legendaries shouldn't evolve. That'd stop them being unique.

Rocket Executive Josh April 10th, 2010 12:13 AM

No way. I just wouldn't like that.

SolarAbusoru April 10th, 2010 12:48 AM

It was explained before in one of the games I'm sure that the reason Legendaries don't evolve is cause they are already genetically perfect by evolutions standards, that they are already at the height of their power, already fully developed.
least I think that was described briefly in a game

GlitchCity April 10th, 2010 4:34 AM

Im not all pumped up about legendary evolutions. But different legendary forms I wouldnt mind.

coolcatkim22 April 10th, 2010 4:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ziraider (Post 5700335)
I was thinking how cool would it be to see legendary pokemon evolutions.

I don't think you grasp the concept of a ledgey...

Although, understanding ledgies is like understanding breeding, most knowledge that is known on it is fan based facts.

Germaniac April 10th, 2010 6:57 AM

No, Shaymin not evolve, Well, it's better if there just 1 legendary

Relith April 10th, 2010 7:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ziraider (Post 5700335)
I looked through the Search and didn't see a thread about my topic so here we go.

I was thinking how cool would it be to see legendary pokemon evolutions. Shaymin elvoves so what if we had evolutions for Zapdos, Articuno, Moltres, Lugia and Ho-Oh
and the many other legendary pokemon there are. The ones that I think who need the most to have an evolution would be the three lake pokemon Uxie, Melsprit, Azelf, Celebi, Jirachi, Entei, Raikou, and Suicune.

Shaymin doesn't evolve. It has another form, the sky form. And the Land Form. Anyway, I always thought of this too, but I think that the three Dogs shouldn't have evolution, including Celebi and Jirachi, because they are the "Baby" or "WishMaker and Time Traveler"

Ayselipera April 10th, 2010 8:53 AM

I rather not have any legendary evolutions. First of all I've never even used a legendary Pokemon in my team so an evolution would be pointless for me. Plus I can barely stand the ones we have I don't think I could take it if they all of a sudden had prevos and evos. >:(

Ziraider April 10th, 2010 5:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relith (Post 5702480)
Shaymin doesn't evolve. It has another form, the sky form. And the Land Form. Anyway, I always thought of this too, but I think that the three Dogs shouldn't have evolution, including Celebi and Jirachi, because they are the "Baby" or "WishMaker and Time Traveler"


I wasn't saying that they should have evolutions, Like all of them I was giving examples, pretty much. What I would like to see is some (new) legends have evolve fourms.


[YES, I worded my OP wrong.]


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 8:15 PM.


Like our Facebook Page Follow us on Twitter © 2002 - 2018 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.

Acknowledgements
Use of PokéCommunity Assets
vB Optimise by DragonByte Technologies Ltd © 2023.