The PokéCommunity Forums

The PokéCommunity Forums (https://www.pokecommunity.com/index.php)
-   Previous Generations (https://www.pokecommunity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=200)
-   -   5th Gen Old Pokemon, New Evolutions. Which do you want? (https://www.pokecommunity.com/showthread.php?t=218756)

Townlain03 May 21st, 2010 2:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheChroniclesofLance (Post 5817680)
pre-evolved forms of trio legendaries

kitten forms of Raikou Entei and Suicune
baby chick forms of Zapdos, Articuno, and Moltres

others:

Heracross
Skarmory
Mawile

dont think they'll ever do that and Raikou Entei and Suicune are dogs tard

knook May 21st, 2010 2:12 PM

To be honest I'd just like forms of Pokémon that don't already have evolutions.

And Townlain... They resemble Big Cats... They're called the legendary dogs but everyone already knows they're cats.

Bunny69 May 21st, 2010 2:13 PM

we need a Kangaskahn pre Evo, as hatching out a baby kangaskahn with a baby kangaskahn IN it doesn't make sence.

EJ May 21st, 2010 2:14 PM

Both of you are technically incorrect, they're called the Legendary Beasts since they exhibit both canine and feline attributes.

Also, I think that anything in the OU does not need an evo.

knook May 21st, 2010 2:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by .EJ (Post 5818153)
Both of you are technically incorrect, they're called the Legendary Beasts since they exhibit both canine and feline attributes.

Also, I think that anything in the OU does not need an evo.

But it's always fun to debate their origins.
I know the correct term is 'Legendary Beasts' but I do strongly feel that they are more feline than canine.

Townlain03 May 21st, 2010 2:17 PM

the only one i could ever see being anything liek a cat would be raikou because of the teeth making it a saber-toothed tiger type thing but u can tell suicune is a dog and entei well kinda in between

EJ May 21st, 2010 2:20 PM

Kangaskhan pre-evo, YES!

Quote:

Originally Posted by knook (Post 5818157)
But it's always fun to debate their origins.
I know the correct term is 'Legendary Beasts' but I do strongly feel that they are more feline than canine.

No worries; everybody's got their opinion.

knook May 21st, 2010 2:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by .EJ (Post 5818164)
Kangaskhan pre-evo, YES!

What about an evolution for Kangaskhan as well?
Then again Kangaskhan is already very powerful so perhaps it wouldn't be the best idea.

About8Zombies May 21st, 2010 2:23 PM

Gastrodon [would be cool]
Skarmory [some kind of steel/Dark type evo]
Roselia [ should have a male evo]
Heracross [an almighty bug destroyer of worlds]
Marowak [could use an evo]

Kingler5 May 21st, 2010 2:25 PM

Mawile-Jawile
Kingler-Prawnler
Scizor-Blador

LOL. these ideas might not work, but I think these are pretty good ideas.

EJ May 21st, 2010 2:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knook (Post 5818170)
What about an evolution for Kangaskhan as well?
Then again Kangaskhan is already very powerful so perhaps it wouldn't be the best idea.

I'm training a Kangaskhan right now (like exactly right now) so I would say it is decently strong. Some pokemon are just meant to be UU.

About8Zombies May 21st, 2010 2:30 PM

Spiritomb-Spiriton
Herracross-Herraking
Hariyama-Hariyhamma
Exeggutor-Exeking

Highly unlikley though

knook May 21st, 2010 2:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by .EJ (Post 5818189)
I'm training a Kangaskhan right now (like exactly right now) so I would say it is decently strong. Some pokemon are just meant to be UU.

I don't really know many people who play Pokémon and... I don't post much here. Feel free not to answer as it may seem stupid to ask but is Kangaskhan and under-used Pokémon?

EJ May 21st, 2010 2:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knook (Post 5818195)
I don't really know many people who play Pokémon and... I don't post much here. Feel free not to answer as it may seem stupid to ask but is Kangaskhan and under-used Pokémon?

Yep, Kangaskhan is UU. It simply can't complete well with the likes of the OU tier. It's not impossible to win with one but it's just harder to do it.

knook May 21st, 2010 2:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by .EJ (Post 5818200)
Yep, Kangaskhan is UU. It simply can't complete well with the likes of the OU tier. It's not impossible to win with one but it's just harder to do it.

So you'd support him receiving a new evolutionary form?

EJ May 21st, 2010 2:39 PM

Nah no way. Some pokemon just don't need an evolution. You'd be risking another Magmortar/Electivire screw-up addition.

knook May 21st, 2010 2:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by .EJ (Post 5818213)
Nah no way. Some pokemon just don't need an evolution. You'd be risking another Magmortar/Electivire screw-up addition.

Or Rhyperior... God that thing almost made me want to cry.

Dr Glocktor May 21st, 2010 5:21 PM

Eevee needs a dragon type evo to round off its covering of all the special type, and a normal type evo just cause.

Hessian May 21st, 2010 5:42 PM

Every single-evo poke in OU needs a pre-evo so I can run them in UU :PPPPPP

Xanatos13 May 21st, 2010 5:52 PM

Tauros fan club? ^_^

I want a Tauros pre-evo & evo, a Kangaskhan pre-evo, and... A Lapras pre-evo. ^_^

blaze_the_cat May 21st, 2010 6:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr Glocktor (Post 5818621)
Eevee needs a dragon type evo to round off its covering of all the special type, and a normal type evo just cause.

Id rather a Steel or Poison Eevee evo.

seeker May 22nd, 2010 4:19 AM

After seeing Gen 4's attempts at adding more pokemon to the evolution chain of pokemon that were made prior, I'm not too keen on seeing some more in B&W. In saying that though, if they could come up with a few decent evolutions it would be nice to see. I'm not sure if we need any more eveelutions but I think pokemon will probably aim to have an eeveelution for every type for example; a steel type eeveelution. I also think Dunsparce is in the need of an evo seeing as it's pretty dull as it is. I would also say Shuckle but given it's defence stats currently I can't imagine it will get any more powerful, unless it takes a horozontal evolution and swtiches it's attack with it's defence or something.

I don't hope for too many new evolutions, some chains need a little polishing off so I can see there being pokemon added to those but overall I hope to see new pokemon and evolution chains rather than adding on to what we currently have.

Mew~ May 22nd, 2010 8:10 AM

What I really want the most is a branch evolution for teddiursa!!! Or at least some more branch evolutions!

coolkidmitch May 22nd, 2010 9:30 AM

Jynx needs a next evolution, in my opinion. I love using her but she really needs some extra help. There are a lot of additions I would love to actually see, but I know will probably never happen. I think things like Lovedisc and Corsola could use a little boast, and I agree with Dunsparce comment, totally needs a little added boost. Even Stantler could use a next chain evolution. I would just like to the game to round itself off that way you have more options in battle as opposed to having to stick with OU pokes all the time, it's a little annoying.

redskinsfan May 22nd, 2010 12:01 PM

I'd like to see evos for pinsir, marowak, persian, zangoose, and absol. I know it seems like a lot, but it would make these pokemon a lot cooler and a lot better.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 8:54 AM.


Like our Facebook Page Follow us on Twitter © 2002 - 2018 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.

Acknowledgements
Use of PokéCommunity Assets
vB Optimise by DragonByte Technologies Ltd © 2023.