The PokéCommunity Forums

The PokéCommunity Forums (https://www.pokecommunity.com/index.php)
-   Previous Generations (https://www.pokecommunity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=200)
-   -   5th Gen More Unown? (https://www.pokecommunity.com/showthread.php?t=219436)

Germaniac May 20th, 2010 4:56 PM

More Unown?
 
I think there will be number Unowns, what about You?

Safetyfirst May 20th, 2010 5:02 PM

I think it's a good idea, but I really can't see Nintendo doing it. They will probably have a cave or place where you can get unowns, but I doubt they will make more

Thorns May 20th, 2010 5:03 PM

Who knows, maybe they'll make Unowns in the shape of keyboard symbols XD.

Esper May 20th, 2010 5:06 PM

What...?

Which alphabet do you think these new Unown would come from? They're not going to make Unown for weirder symbols like & # @

Thorns May 20th, 2010 5:08 PM

Hey. you don't have to put MY idea down. :tired:

Timbjerr May 20th, 2010 5:13 PM

It's very unlikely. Unown are a worthless pokemon anyways, and there was very little point to adding ? and ! in GenIII, so I don't see why they'd add any more in GenV. :P

Esper May 20th, 2010 5:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thorns (Post 5816315)
Hey. you don't have to put MY idea down. :tired:

Didn't mean to. You ninja'd me.

But I don't think they'll make more symbols. ! and ? are there because they're really common. % is much less common so aside from every other reason they wouldn't add more Unown why would they add those?

RyanGT May 20th, 2010 5:20 PM

Such useless Pokemon. I hope not.

Volroc May 20th, 2010 5:23 PM

if they make an in game event where catchin all of them results in more than just hippotas then hell ya make number-nowns lol
thanx to quick balls i could catch all of then in an hour :3

TB Pro May 20th, 2010 5:51 PM

Why would they add new Unown to the fifth games, when they didn't for the third or fourth. Anyways, however unlikely it seems, I hope they don't.

.Eevee-Chan May 20th, 2010 6:04 PM

I doubt it, if there are new ones I'd love to see what they'd look like.

15ares May 20th, 2010 6:35 PM

i think they should get a hold item similar to giratinas griseous orb, that like, come from there original dimension, and boosts there stats so theyre not so horrible XD maybe new moves too? HP is not good unless u have high IVs

インフェルノの津波 May 20th, 2010 6:37 PM

Maybe Alphunown and Omegunown? Like Alpha and Omega, hmm hmm?

Ho-Oh May 20th, 2010 6:40 PM

Due to the Zoaroak = Entei/Raikou/Suicune thing, there's likely to be some backstory, possibly connected to Zoaroak, as well as Entei + the unowns. Like going back in time within the game and going to the crystalised tower...

I'd so buy the game if that happened.

Kingler5 May 20th, 2010 6:42 PM

Maybe they'll make an unown that's shaped like a key that unlocks a door to a legendary.
that would build some suspense.

they should make an insanity legendary as well.This brainstorming thing is the BOMB!!

You know what? scratch that!

THEY SHOULD MAKE A LEGENDARY WITH CLAWS!

CLAWS ARE COOL!!!!!

Ok.Ok. I'm rambling here.

I haven't had a brainstorm in a few months (THIS IS SO MUCH FUN!!)

OmegaRuby and AlphaSapphire May 20th, 2010 6:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TB Pro (Post 5816450)
Why would they add new Unown to the fifth games, when they didn't for the third or fourth. Anyways, however unlikely it seems, I hope they don't.

wrong in gen 3 they introduced Unown ! and ? only gen 4 hasn't introduced new Unown's. You know we could always use more symbols like ! and ? or maybe add Spanish alphabet letters like... well the n with the squiggle on top... too bad the keyboard doesn't have one... or maybe Ch or LL these are actual letter... don't know why some are combos though of two letter... maybe because they make different sounds...

Tyrantrum May 20th, 2010 8:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twilight Sky (Post 5816338)
As much as I love the little things, please, no more unown. I think 26(or so) is enough, dontcha think? D:

THIS RIGHT HERE.

We really don't need anymore. Having 26 Unown, as well as two others, is enough. We don't need numbers; especially since numbers go on forever, even though they could stop at a certain number, it'd still be really stupid.

Swift! May 20th, 2010 8:42 PM

They only need to add ten more Unown.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0

Once they've done that they can stop.

TB Pro May 20th, 2010 8:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Magmaruby and Aquasapphire (Post 5816568)
wrong in gen 3 they introduced Unown ! and ? only gen 4 hasn't introduced new Unown's. You know we could always use more symbols like ! and ? or maybe add Spanish alphabet letters like... well the n with the squiggle on top... too bad the keyboard doesn't have one... or maybe Ch or LL these are actual letter... don't know why some are combos though of two letter... maybe because they make different sounds...

Why the hell would we need the Spanish Alphabet? Rather, why the hell do we need the original English Alphabet?

Swift! May 20th, 2010 8:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TB Pro (Post 5816785)
Why the hell would we need the Spanish Alphabet? Rather, why the hell do we need the original English Alphabet?

I thought the point was that humans learned the alphabet from the Unown and designed it around them. That's why I think they should add the numbers, because then they can say humans also learned about numbers from the Unown.

There's a very good story by Rudyard Kipling about the same type of thing, but I don't remember what it's called.

BHwolfgang May 20th, 2010 9:40 PM

Unless if Nintendo and Game Freak decides to add some Ancient Roman alphabet symbols, like omega and alpha, then I can't see any new Unowns being included for the Fifth Generation. There is no point, really. If so, then what's the purpose of a few more Unowns that no one really use?

I'm going to agree with Derk on this one. Twenty-six alaphabetical and two punctuational Unowns are enough.

Eurydice May 20th, 2010 9:47 PM

i really dont think there will be any more unowns. and i really dont want anymore either. if they were actually useable pokemon it might be different but they are too weak to use for battles.

Eeohnex May 20th, 2010 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eurydice (Post 5816856)
i really dont think there will be any more unowns. and i really dont want anymore either. if they were actually useable pokemon it might be different but they are too weak to use for battles.

Exactly, I don't see the point of adding more into the game.

AuraGaurdian May 20th, 2010 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kingler5 (Post 5816551)
Maybe they'll make an unown that's shaped like a key that unlocks a door to a legendary.
that would build some suspense.

I like this idea I think it could work.
The Legend could be called keyra and it could be pure psychic like the uknown and it could have this move where it summons all theese uknown and uses there power to launch a powerful beam!
also this key uknown can only be caught once you have caught all the other uknown!

Wow you were right brainstorming is fun!

BleuVII May 20th, 2010 11:29 PM

I'm smiling at this. First off, I agree: 28 unown is quite enough. They either need to make a new pokemon that is available when you catch all of them or just leave them alone. I think it'd be fun to see a pair of legendaries:
A and Ω (alpha and omega). They could be gold-colored and have decent movesets. Also, Alpha could be male, and Omega could be female. When bred, they produce Unown. The catch: only they can pass down egg moves to the unown.

Also, the linguist in me is crying right now, so allow me a geeky moment. A-Z is not the English alphabet. It's the Latin alphabet, which we adopted and grafted the English language to. Alpha and Omega are from the Greek alphabet (which, consequently, begins with "alpha" and "bet".) And be thankful that we got the Latin alphabet for these buggers; the Japanese kanas would have given us over 40 of the little buggers to catch!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 8:55 AM.


Like our Facebook Page Follow us on Twitter © 2002 - 2018 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.

Acknowledgements
Use of PokéCommunity Assets
vB Optimise by DragonByte Technologies Ltd © 2023.