![]() |
3 on 3 BATTLES!!!!
According to Serebii 3 on 3 battles have been confirmed!! What do you think about it?
|
I think it's freakin' amazing. :D I've wanted 3 on 3 battles since.... D/P, I think? idk... but this game is going to be amazing. I can't wait to hear more about it!
|
i tihnk its beyond FONTASTIC!!!!!
i already know im gonna make a triple battle team :D |
I think back to the old saying of "Two's Company, Three's a Crowd". I personally think that it's a horrible idea. So long as there isn't a bunch of 3 on 3 battles, I'll be OK with it. But I really don't think it's a good idea.
|
Its the worst idea ever!!!!
Why... why would they make it double battles are epic no more needed. Whats next pokebrawls? |
sigh.....
two many pokemon.... although, my aggron, tyranitar, exploud trio will destroy all, it's just not the same. |
Wow there is lot's of whining on this...I like the idea :)
|
They should have left it with 2 on 2. 3 on 3 is like, half of your team, where's the fun in that?
It's a bad feature, that i'm gonna try to avoid in the game, but im sure there will be mandatory 3 on 3 battles. |
Quote:
|
I have been waiting for triple battles for ages... probably since Ruby & Sapphire. Can't wait to see how they are played.
|
If it keeps going, all of your team will be out at once.
That'd be kinda cool. o3o |
Quote:
|
A mixed reaction.
Upon hearing about it: "OMFG!!!! Triple battles?!!! That's insane!!!............................................................................................oh wait, won't that mean a more crowded screen and less exp per pokemon? Neva mind! D: " I can't wait to see it in action :D. |
Update: I'd like to apologize, I locked this thinking it'd be fine in the general update thread, but let's be honest, this alone can offer so much to talk about. I'm not perfect, so I'm gonna reverse this call and leave this open, it's a big deal. Have fun.
*unlocks* |
This would make competitive battling a mess but it should be fun in game.
|
Some of you people need to play more RPGs. There are games where you have to control 4 characters at once, and you have more then 4 moves to choose from! And that was for the majority of the game, too!
Of course, with the size of Pokémon sprites, I could see where 2 Wailords and Kyogre could crowd the screen... Another issue would be move reduction. Earthquake looses 25% power in double battles, and if it loses even more power in a triple battle, well, one of the best moves ever just turned worse then Dig. |
i like the idea of having blastoise, charizard, and venisaur out at the same time
|
Quote:
|
It will be alright. But i dont want it to be a major part in the story. Perhaps a battle fronteir thing or something
|
im very mixed on this one, mainly because i dont have a dsi xl, and 3v3 could be a pain in the butt that way, and also having to know just about everything about anything on pokemon will also be annoying, like abilities and what happens when there are more then one and if it will attack your pokemon and who is fastest and etc and so forth and so on, i think it would be fun though becuase i probably could end up leveling my whole party at once alot faster.
i think i will fail because im to used to red and blue, i dont know what these posion types are and steel and dark, as well as ground and rock and dragon, including bug i get confused because its hard to remember what is x2 and x4 and things get worse with STAB and trying to figure out what will be most effective, all in all i fail at pokemon now a days but i still play it because i like how it takes up my free time. |
2 on 2 was great, But 3 on 3 is just insane. imo
|
This idea is a little ridiculous, in my completely honest opinion. Pokemon began as a game where you pitted each of your little monsters against each of another person's little monsters, and having a whole army at your beck and call at one time sort of ruins the experience for me.
|
Quote:
I'm having mixed feelings about this. I would probably prefer if they upgraded doubles battles more with more and made them a bit more prominent. But maybe they'll do that now, who knows. |
The screen will be crowded with 6 pokemon. 2 on 2 was great, but 3 on 3 is a little overdoing it...
I think I'll send out Dialga, Palkia and Giratina all at once. But that's going to be overkill. ...Come to think of it, then there will be a new type of trainer, called "triplets", I guess...And maybe sisters... ...Imagine a double battle against a gym leaders and a Champion/E4 member, like the one in DPPt and HGSS, now becomes a triple battle against 2 gym leaders and a E4 member, or maybe 3 gym leaders... I have to say, this new feature opens up a whole lot of new possibilities... |
I have mixed feelings over the whole concept. With six Pokemon on the screen at any given time, I feel its going to get cluttered really quickly. Its also going to be really interesting seeing how this goes about tactically; I see counters to counters to counters being played, winding up in a lack of advantage for any of the players.
Despite that though, I do see a lot of interesting scenarios involving three trainers. Now you can beat the bad guys in droves rather than one at a time. Yayz for efficiency. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Let's not give them ideas <.< |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 8:42 AM. |
![]()
© 2002 - 2018 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.
Acknowledgements
Use of PokéCommunity Assets
vB Optimise by DragonByte Technologies Ltd © 2023.