The PokéCommunity Forums

The PokéCommunity Forums (https://www.pokecommunity.com/index.php)
-   Previous Generations (https://www.pokecommunity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=200)
-   -   5th Gen What do you think the new "Dragonite" spot is going to be? (https://www.pokecommunity.com/showthread.php?t=224275)

hever July 2nd, 2010 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [email protected]! (Post 5932352)
There are 13 legal dragon types. There are over 50 water types. Don't tell me that. We need more dragons.

I think he meant we need more pokemon in which types are very rare and scarce. (ei. poison, bug, ice, ghost) Most everybody uses dragon types and we need something out of the other rare types to dominate and represent their groups, respectively.

Palkia July 2nd, 2010 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Azure-Supernova (Post 5931506)
It might be the because it has armour, which a lot Digimon tended to get when they Digivolved. There isn't a set template for either, but Digimon have always been a bit more radical in their design whilst Pokémon were more reserved and natural.

I think it looks pretty sweet, hoping it's a Dragon/Steel (even though we don't need another Dragon -_-)

Same with to water and grass types. Dragon types are nagged about too much for being common. Anything else i will not mind. It will probabaly be a bit like tyranitar. (Rock/Dragon type possible.)

hever July 2nd, 2010 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Para-Dox (Post 5932370)
Same with to water and grass types. Dragon types are nagged about too much for being common. Anything else i will not mind. It will probabaly be a bit like tyranitar. (Rock/Dragon type possible.)

It looks like him too. I bet the little pokemon revealed days ago (the beta sketch) right beside the new girl character will be the pre-evo of the aforementioned "Tyranitar look-alike."

mooglehunter July 2nd, 2010 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [email protected]! (Post 5932352)
There are 13 legal dragon types. There are over 50 water types. Don't tell me that. We need more dragons.

the reason there are so few dragon types is that its supposed to be rare. they are supposed to be psuedolegendary. its an effing DRAGON!!! that said, i don't want another dragon psuedo-legendary. a dark-fighting would be cool.

beca July 2nd, 2010 11:05 AM

A new dark type would be awesome, along with some new dark attacks. There really needs to be more of those ~_~

Amore July 2nd, 2010 11:29 AM

@ Person who said there are no good Ice-types:Lol. Mamoswine, Weavile, Froslass, Glaceon anybody???

I was a poison-type.....sadly, it'd have to be good to overtake my love of Koffing/Weezing and, to a lesser extent, the other 1st Gen poison-types.

Yeah, I'd love a grass-type! Although they are common.....how about a Ghost-type? Just a pure ghost? Or electric....

Nikorasu July 2nd, 2010 12:50 PM

I would of enjoyed somewhat a dark pokemon :X

hever July 2nd, 2010 1:01 PM

I more powerful bug types.

Infinity Mk.II July 2nd, 2010 1:17 PM

Axesaur as an Steel-Rock type.

Or maybe an Steel-Dark type? A Metagross/Tyranitar crossover.

The 4x weakness to fighting is quite bad... but Dragonite and Salamence have the same to Ice.

But what I would really want to see is an Ice-Steel. It takes two weaknesses away though it adds a 4x to fighting and fire and one to ground, but adds many resistences to make it worth it.

It will show Ice types aren't crappy defensive failures.

Azure-Supernova July 2nd, 2010 1:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [email protected]! (Post 5932352)
There are 13 legal dragon types. There are over 50 water types. Don't tell me that. We need more dragons.

Well here was me thinking the whole idea of dragons were their rarity and power?

dante1w July 2nd, 2010 3:51 PM

it shloud be an dragon with 4 wings

StratusJm July 2nd, 2010 3:55 PM

tbh i hope its not axe dragon i mean its brilliant but it doesnt look like a psuedo to me i dont know why.. i think it reminds me too much of rampardos and how much i hated that thing

MistahDude July 2nd, 2010 4:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StratusJm (Post 5933089)
tbh i hope its not axe dragon i mean its brilliant but it doesnt look like a psuedo to me i dont know why.. i think it reminds me too much of rampardos and how much i hated that thing

Rampardos's design is made to make him look like a strong physical attacker. Ononokusu has Armor and a Weapon, which makes me believe that he will be powerful both offensively and defensively.

StratusJm July 2nd, 2010 4:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MistahDude (Post 5933111)
Rampardos's design is made to make him look like a strong physical attacker. Ononokusu has Armor and a Weapon, which makes me believe that he will be powerful both offensively and defensively.

oh sorry really i just meant there stance, short arms, kind of similar heads (without the axe thing) and really its just hard for me to imagine it being a psuedo im not dissing it! i dunno what i want to be the new dragointe really i just want it to be good and not ugly. but gamefreaks never failed me with psuedos before so fingers crossed!!

Tater Tot July 3rd, 2010 10:01 AM

http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2010/182/3/c/Ononokusu_by_Xous54.png

^This things is real? :< Ugh. It looks like some kind of really well down morph. Tyranilamence or something. :[ Things need to be mixed up a little. ;-;

Migueliscool July 3rd, 2010 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MistahDude (Post 5930826)
Ononokusu:

http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2010/182/3/c/Ononokusu_by_Xous54.png

He looks like he would turn out to be the next pseudo legendary. He looks big, fast and strong. I bet you he might actually be Dragon type.

Either Dragon/Fighting or Dragon/Steel.

I would definitely believe him to be the next pseudo

I think he will be a steel/Dragon Type for sure.

He also looks like it could be steel/poison or steel/ground

kasabian_ July 13th, 2010 11:53 PM

New psuedo-legendarys?!
 
In every Generation so far, new psuedo legendary/s are availible to catch.
Observe here.
The main point of this thread is, what particular type combinations would you like to see on the new psuedo legendaries when they are revealed?

MistahDude July 14th, 2010 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kasabian_ (Post 5967685)
In every Generation so far, new psuedo legendary/s are availible to catch.
Observe here.
The main point of this thread is, what particular type combinations would you like to see on the new psuedo legendaries when they are revealed?

The next Garchomp line:

http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2010/194/5/3/Kickass_Kibago_by_Fi3ndish.pnghttp://fc05.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2010/182/3/c/Ononokusu_by_Xous54.png

The pokemon on the left is Kibago (キバゴ) and the pokemon on the right is Ononokusu (オノノクス). It is very obvious to me that Kibago (キバゴ) will evolve into nonokusu (オノノクス). Both pokemon are confirmed to be real, but the art isn't. The above art is from Deviantart.

Kibago (キバゴ) is the Tusk Pokemon, a Dragon-type. Its abilities are Rivalry and Mold Breaker. It has a new attack called Double Chop (ダブルチョップ), which hits the opponent twice. It is 0.6m tall and weighs 18.0kg.

With this being said I am assuming that Ononokusu will be Fighting/Dragon! If this typing came to reality he would be weak to:

Ice 2x
Dragon 2x
Flying 2x
Psychic 2x

Logiedan July 14th, 2010 12:06 AM

Agreed. Kibago and Ononokusu will probably be close to the Tyranitar Line. I'm assuming they're probably Bug/Dragon or Fighting/Dragon.

Haza July 14th, 2010 12:07 AM

I'm sure Kibago is the new Pseudo-Legendary Pokemon this time around, it's typing is pretty much confirmed to end up half Dragon as Kibago i s a Dragon-Type. Maybe Dragon/Rock or Dragon/Steel or even Dragon/Dark or Dragon/Poison. I can't really tell by looking at Okonokosu (sp?)

Rengoku July 14th, 2010 12:10 AM

Yes, it've been confirmed to be a Dragon type, hopefully with another typing that's epic enough (Dark/Dragon? We never had those!)

MistahDude July 14th, 2010 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logiedan (Post 5967703)
Agreed. Kibago and Ononokusu will probably be close to the Tyranitar Line. I'm assuming they're probably Bug/Dragon or Fighting/Dragon.

I REALLY doubt a pseudo legendary would be Bug and I also doubt that a pure Dragon lizard, that evolves into a bigger lizard, would become bug type. Why would something that shares NOTHING with bug types become a bug type?

Anyways...

Kibago's new move sounds like a fighting move. If it is a fighting move we will finally get a Fighting/Dragon type!

Haza July 14th, 2010 12:15 AM

I don't think Double Chop refers to in like a fighting sense... I'm sure it refers to the blades on it's mouth. Just my speculation.

Pokestick, good times. July 14th, 2010 12:18 AM

Sorry to burst your bubble, but I highly doubt the Ononokusu is official and confirmed. Firstly, the art doesn't look like Ken's usual art, and the icon on the image that basicly yells that it's fanmade. And I haven't found it on any *believable* page, rather I think I've seen it in every single faked BW YouTube video out there.

But if I'm wrong, feel free to correct me (and show some evidence)

And to get on-topic, I personally hope for a Dragon-Electric. But we'll see :3

Guillermo July 14th, 2010 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MistahDude (Post 5967710)
Kibago's new move sounds like a fighting move. If it is a fighting move we will finally get a Fighting/Dragon type!

Just because it can learn a fighting move does not mean it's going to be a fighting-type Pokemon.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 8:54 AM.


Like our Facebook Page Follow us on Twitter © 2002 - 2018 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.

Acknowledgements
Use of PokéCommunity Assets
vB Optimise by DragonByte Technologies Ltd © 2023.