![]() |
I'd love to join. Dragons are awesome. And Red Gyarados, Charizard and Dragonite rule.
|
Sorry for my extreme amount of innactivity... I have only really had enough time to check my VM's, and my subscription to thread got cancelled, so I don't know what's going on, except for the most recent topic. Sorry again, hope I haven't been kicked out :(
on topic: Ima gonna have to say... Umm... None, for this reason: almost every legendary from the R/S/E era have been dragon, psycic or both. We need no more legendaries of those typings. |
I do think Dragons a are the best fit to be legendaries, simply because we consider them as legendary in real life too. At least I do.
|
Well let's see, what dragon pokemon is the strongest, and faints all other pokemon just by looking epic...? LOL
I'm kidding, i don't like legendaries, so i wouldn't make Dragonite one! But, Kingdra perhaps...? |
Quote:
|
I could see either Garchomp or Salamence being legendary. Seeing as how they're both in uber now. >_>
|
Quote:
If that's possible. |
I'd say Salamence is too plain for a legendary. Not wise nor savage enough... And too small. Same goes for Garchomp.
I'm such a critic. Anyway, I made this drawing of Reshiram and Zekrom for an upcoming chapter of my comic (the cartoon head in my signature), and I'm actually quite proud of it, so I thought I'd show it off here. Spoiler:
I can post it here, right? Since this is the Dragon Club and all... And if not, I just change the rules, I'm a co-owner! I kid, I kid. |
Quote:
Niiicce, but, a bit scribbled don't you think?! |
Quote:
And size, I believe is hardly an argument for a Pokemon not to be a legendary. We have had legendary Pokemon of any size, even though Dragon type Pokemon might not have been small. Exceptions always exist, and therefore a Dragon type Pokemon of a small height can be a legendary as well. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
And even if that is the case, how are Pokemon like Mewtwo, Rayquaza, Arceus, etc. considered legendary? Haven't we had more than enough instances of their wrath? What I finally want to say is that size, wisdom ( -_- ), etc are not the basis for Pokemon being considered legendary. |
I don't see why any of them should be legendary...
Legendaries suck, so why would anyone want their pretious dragons brought to theur miserable lvl?! 'Nuff trolling, don't you think? :D |
How can you say legendaries as a group suck? Do they all have something in common, except for the fact that they are legendary?
Okay, I guess I was wrong about my arguments about Salamence, but I guess I just couln't really describe what I meant. Try replacing Rayquaza with Salamence in the Emerald cxutscene. Would he fit in? I doubt it, to be honest. That's probably also a bad example, isn't it..? This is a pretty hard subject. |
Quote:
I think I caught something reeeeally bad while I was out in the snow. O_o Quote:
I guess it's being very prejudice, which I'm strongly against (even if it is just Pokemon XD). |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Anyway, you never know. I don't understand why people really hate legendaries. D: |
Darn it, now I feel the need to start a discussion about what makes a legendary a legendary, but I can't because this is the Dragon's Den...
Anyway, I can totally see Dragonair hiding in a holy lake or something. |
Could I please be a member? :) I love dragon types, especially after acquiring a Dragonite..
|
Ummm, do I add the members now or does Amore still do that? We're kind of in a confusing situation right now...
|
Well since Amore hasn't posted quite some time, I'd say you're pretty much on call here... :)
Oh, and welcome Le Creep! :D PS: I love your username! :) |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Oh right, I'll make a members list in the first post I made in the thread.
http://www.pokecommunity.com/showpost.php?p=6146464&postcount=5 Also, I have a new topic! Do you think Dragons evolve at a too high level? It's hard to make topics when everything has been done... |
No, they don't. Dragons are the most powerful Pokemon you'll find. So it's perfecty natural for them to take a while to evolve. Naturally, this doesn't mean that game-freak went overboard with the latest generation, cause lvl.70 for a moth is just too hogh, no matter hoe good the Pokemon is.
|
Hey, I'm back, hope Draggy told ya i'd be gone.
Anyway as for the topic: the ne gen Vs evolve too slowly, it takes so long for them to reach their final form i mean, it's really anoying, dragons aren't the only ones, loads of cool pokemon take a century to get too. :( |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:38 AM. |
![]()
© 2002 - 2018 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.
Acknowledgements
Use of PokéCommunity Assets
vB Optimise by DragonByte Technologies Ltd © 2023.