The PokéCommunity Forums

The PokéCommunity Forums (https://www.pokecommunity.com/index.php)
-   Off-Topic (https://www.pokecommunity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
-   -   North Korea fires on South Korea - 2 dead for now (https://www.pokecommunity.com/showthread.php?t=237308)

Yuoaman November 24th, 2010 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LadySurreal (Post 6305714)
Point out my hatred of Liberals. All I said is that LIBERALS should hold a "punch anyone who gives us a bad image day". You know, 95% of US liberals aren't even Liberal? Just following the crowd. Giving them a bad image, protest anything and everything, you know. Slitting their wrists and stuff like that.

So all US Liberals are depressed teenagers wanting attention from their parents? :\

Netto Azure November 24th, 2010 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LadySurreal (Post 6305714)
Point out my hatred of Liberals. All I said is that LIBERALS should hold a "punch anyone who gives us a bad image day". You know, 95% of US liberals aren't even Liberal? Just following the crowd. Giving them a bad image, protest anything and everything, you know. Slitting their wrists and stuff like that.

Now isn't that just painting a great amount of people with a wide and really bad brush.

Do you even know what is a Liberal? Because even under that word is a lot of definitions:

Social Liberal: Wants to provide for people's necessities
Economic Liberal: Wants no Government intervention in the Economy
Culturally Liberal: Wants no Government regulation of religion, beliefs etc.
Politically Liberal: Most modern democracies are this allowing for government elections and such

But this is just replying to a flamebait so to get back on topic the US is urging China to act on North Korea.

LadySurreal November 24th, 2010 3:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yuoaman (Post 6305772)
So all US Liberals are depressed teenagers wanting attention from their parents? :\

I never knew 95% = All Liberals.

Ask a Democrat politician and what he/she stands for. Then ask a kid who thinks Punk Rock is alive. Now compare that politician to the majority of Democrat supporters.

Ask a stone head about why Marijuana should be legalized, then ask an Attorney why he/she supports legalizing Marijuana. Those "Liberals" that managed to glue themselves to the political ideology are doing it in self-interest. My support for gay rights is not because I want to make-out with a girl in public, but because I truly believe it is their right as citizens to be able to marry and the such. Now compare that to those who simply want to see Lesbians naked in public.

Horrible bands to create Pseudo-Liberals is like Mosques, Churches, whatever preaching what is deemed Conservative to our standards.....and if you don't support that view.....you're going to hell.

Nick November 24th, 2010 7:16 PM

Let's try to stay on topic shall we? This thread isn't about liberals. It's about the consistent problems going on in North and South Korea.

22sa November 24th, 2010 7:28 PM

I'd like to hear some good things about North Korea for a change. Although when someone says North Korea has a higher literacy rate than the South.. well, that's not very impressive imo.

Very sad event. I definitely do not want to live in Korea right now. I have no idea how the South should handle this situation. I do not understand the purpose of the North. China is opening up and is busily expanding its middle class and its share of developing consumer products for the world, but what's North Korea's purpose? :\ If the North has a peaceful goal--what is it?

Trap-Eds November 24th, 2010 8:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Went (Post 6303314)
In an unexpected turn of events, Kim Jong Il wants to grant his son and future dictator a war so the country will accept him as a leader in those "difficult moments" without questioning it too much:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2010/nov/23/north-korea-fires-south-korea

...What?? What is the point of all this? What will bombing S. Korea prove?

[QUOTE=Went;6303675]
So it's okay to leave a crazy pseudo-communist dictatorship with an incredibly opressed population who have never heard of human rights or anything similar to bomb the crap out of one of your allies, a democratic republic, member of the OECD and the G-20, creating a crazy wave of unstability in the Asian zone (which is just what we need to get out of the world crisis).
[QUOTE]

Yeah. Unless they ASK us to go help, why can't South Korea and China handle it themselves? Seriously?

Livewire November 24th, 2010 9:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 22sa (Post 6306546)
I'd like to hear some good things about North Korea for a change. Although when someone says North Korea has a higher literacy rate than the South.. well, that's not very impressive imo.

Very sad event. I definitely do not want to live in Korea right now. I have no idea how the South should handle this situation. I do not understand the purpose of the North. China is opening up and is busily expanding its middle class and its share of developing consumer products for the world, but what's North Korea's purpose? :\ If the North has a peaceful goal--what is it?

I think you'd be hard pressed to find anything good about North Korea.

But I agree, This is not the place to be right now. North and South have had skirmishes in the past, but this seems a bit more real in terms of the possibility of outright warfare. I think there needs to be UN or NATO peacekeeping involvement. Not like the UN is gutsy enough to call their bluff.

OmegaRuby and AlphaSapphire November 24th, 2010 9:50 PM

I think this will die down over time seeing all the "provocations" the North has done this year...they are just looking for attention...

Melody November 24th, 2010 10:55 PM

I agree. While this could escalate if we feed the troll, North Korea, it can also die in obscurity in time. Of course South Korea has already had enough. They've issued the ultimatum: "Attack us again and there will be severe repercussions"...which amounts to a veiled war threat, sternly worded.

Of course this means if South Korea actually launches a military campaign, the US will no doubt step in too, and offer additional troops and supplies. I'd say it's about time, since North Korea has needed a good punishing, and not just the slaps on the wrist that the UN is so fond of issuing. If South Korea and China weren't so close, I'd say we should drop a big fat juicy N-Bomb on their cocky asses and be done with it. We know that'd set 'em back a good ways, even if we didn't drop the nuke directly on a populated area. I think we might be able to drop a few tiny nukes on them though but even then the damage might be too dire.

LadySurreal November 24th, 2010 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pachy (Post 6306858)
I agree. While this could escalate if we feed the troll, North Korea, it can also die in obscurity in time. Of course South Korea has already had enough. They've issued the ultimatum: "Attack us again and there will be severe repercussions"...which amounts to a veiled war threat, sternly worded.

Of course this means if South Korea actually launches a military campaign, the US will no doubt step in too, and offer additional troops and supplies. I'd say it's about time, since North Korea has needed a good punishing, and not just the slaps on the wrist that the UN is so fond of issuing. If South Korea and China weren't so close, I'd say we should drop a big fat juicy N-Bomb on their cocky asses and be done with it. We know that'd set 'em back a good ways, even if we didn't drop the nuke directly on a populated area. I think we might be able to drop a few tiny nukes on them though but even then the damage might be too dire.

Pretty funny how all I did was voice a harsh opinion that the majority of this forum don't agree on and now I'm considered a troll. That could also mean the mod who got us all into this argument can also be called a troll for mentioning my friend being eaten by a Liberal only because I claim most of them are not even liberals, just following a trend. After all, if she/he would actually read my post and notice there's nothing saying we should slaughter all liberals or leftists, only that most "liberals" are trend followers and don't care what democrats really think, now I am suddenly a troll. I thought the so called "Free-Thinking" and "tolerant" liberals would look beyond just the word "Troll" but rather "Someone with an opinion". Now I am considered a Conservative aren't I, considering what I said previously about my support for Gay Marriage?


All I did was got into an argument, if arguing with someone who share a different view on things is considered trolling, then I suggest PC as a whole stop discussing Politics or anything that can get people to argue on their point-of-view. If you really think this is trolling, I beg you guys to go on Omegle.


I guess I'm a troll as well as everyone else because I say I'm expecting a third World War out of the current situation in Korea.

Livewire November 24th, 2010 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pachy (Post 6306858)
I agree. While this could escalate if we feed the troll, North Korea, it can also die in obscurity in time. Of course South Korea has already had enough. They've issued the ultimatum: "Attack us again and there will be severe repercussions"...which amounts to a veiled war threat, sternly worded.

Of course this means if South Korea actually launches a military campaign, the US will no doubt step in too, and offer additional troops and supplies. I'd say it's about time, since North Korea has needed a good punishing, and not just the slaps on the wrist that the UN is so fond of issuing. If South Korea and China weren't so close, I'd say we should drop a big fat juicy N-Bomb on their cocky asses and be done with it. We know that'd set 'em back a good ways, even if we didn't drop the nuke directly on a populated area. I think we might be able to drop a few tiny nukes on them though but even then the damage might be too dire.

Nuclear Warfare? Over the deaths of two people and some light skirmishing? Doing that would be akin to starting WWIII right here and now. Not a snowball's chance in hell. The repercussions of using a nuclear warhead would be so vast and crippling we'd be the ones set back.

LadySurreal November 24th, 2010 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Live_Wire466 (Post 6306899)


Nuclear Warfare? Over the deaths of two people and some light skirmishing? Doing that would be akin to starting WWIII right here and now. Not a snowball's chance in hell. The repercussions of using a nuclear warhead would be so vast and crippling we'd be the ones set back.

I doubt there'd be a nuclear war, considering how close the borders are. Unless North Korea's suicidal, which we don't even know if they are. All we know is that they attack, kill, make an excuse, get excused.

Ivysaur November 25th, 2010 1:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trap-Eds (Post 6306649)
...What?? What is the point of all this? What will bombing S. Korea prove?

That Kim Jong Un, KJ Il's son and successor, is a "brave" military leader. He's only 29 and he has just been rised to the top of a crazy dictatorship, and he's now surrounded by 70 year old veterans who fought during the Korean War back in the 50's with his grandfather. They want to see some evidence of his "courage" before trusting him, or else he's risking a coup d'etat once his dad is gone.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trap-Eds (Post 6306649)
Yeah. Unless they ASK us to go help, why can't South Korea and China handle it themselves? Seriously?

Too late, Korea already asked the US for protection 60 years ago. An US aircraft carrier is already on route to SK, so I don't think they can now take it away if the situation gets worse.

Livewire November 25th, 2010 8:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LadySurreal (Post 6306918)
I doubt there'd be a nuclear war, considering how close the borders are. Unless North Korea's suicidal, which we don't even know if they are. All we know is that they attack, kill, make an excuse, get excused.

Kim Jong Il is the head of a fanatical totalitarian Dictatorship. I wouldn't leave anything off the table in terms of what they're willing to do.

LadySurreal November 25th, 2010 9:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Live_Wire466 (Post 6307387)


Kim Jong Il is the head of a fanatical totalitarian Dictatorship. I wouldn't leave anything off the table in terms of what they're willing to do.

Well, if he is that suicidal, China and Russia must get involved if KJI actually tries something like that. US, Japan, South Korea, Philippines, Canada, New Zealand and Australia are signed to a Free-Trade Pact with Russia and China, doing something like this would risk Russia to rot with only Iran and China or others to trade with, but Germany's the world 2nd largest exporter and Iran's biggest trade partner as well as Russia's major trading partner in the West. It would be a chaotic mess.


TL;DR - KJI tries to do that: China and Russia would have no choice but to stop him.

Melody November 25th, 2010 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LadySurreal (Post 6306891)
Pretty funny how all I did was voice a harsh opinion that the majority of this forum don't agree on and now I'm considered a troll. That could also mean the mod who got us all into this argument can also be called a troll for mentioning my friend being eaten by a Liberal only because I claim most of them are not even liberals, just following a trend. After all, if she/he would actually read my post and notice there's nothing saying we should slaughter all liberals or leftists, only that most "liberals" are trend followers and don't care what democrats really think, now I am suddenly a troll. I thought the so called "Free-Thinking" and "tolerant" liberals would look beyond just the word "Troll" but rather "Someone with an opinion". Now I am considered a Conservative aren't I, considering what I said previously about my support for Gay Marriage?


All I did was got into an argument, if arguing with someone who share a different view on things is considered trolling, then I suggest PC as a whole stop discussing Politics or anything that can get people to argue on their point-of-view. If you really think this is trolling, I beg you guys to go on Omegle.


I guess I'm a troll as well as everyone else because I say I'm expecting a third World War out of the current situation in Korea.

You simplemindedly supposed I was talking about you. If you had paid attention to the structure of my sentence, you'd have noted that I said "...troll, North Korea, ...". I set "North Korea" off with commas to signify that I was referring to the country as a troll.

They call that an appositive in English, and it is used to give additional information.

Mr. X November 25th, 2010 10:52 AM

Here is the thing. If NK gets a nuke, its all over. Bye bye world. I wrote this as a joke a while back and all my friends laughed at. They weren't laughing because it was funny. They were laughing because they could see something like this happening.

If NK gets a nuke, its bye bye world. NK would nuke SK, we would nuke NK back. The radation would spread into china and in retaliation they would either nuke us, or nuke the hell out of SK. We in turn nuke China and then Russia nukes everybody just for the hell of it. Soon after every one is tossing nukes left and right. A hundred years later, everyone has three eyes, four arms, and a whole assortment of other mutations.

Marс November 25th, 2010 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. X (Post 6307574)
Here is the thing. If NK gets a nuke, its all over. Bye bye world. I wrote this as a joke a while back and all my friends laughed at. They weren't laughing because it was funny. They were laughing because they could see something like this happening.

If NK gets a nuke, its bye bye world. NK would nuke SK, we would nuke NK back. The radation would spread into china and in retaliation they would either nuke us, or nuke the hell out of SK. We in turn nuke China and then Russia nukes everybody just for the hell of it. Soon after every one is tossing nukes left and right. A hundred years later, everyone has three eyes, four arms, and a whole assortment of other mutations.

This.

And I'm pretty sure 4 or more are dead now.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SK's defense minister just resigned, in other words, was fired, after the attacks. This was expected considering the previous attack on the SK's war ship, in which he was criticized heavily.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LadySurreal November 25th, 2010 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. X (Post 6307574)
Mentally insane people have issues with complex rules of english like the, mentioned above, apositives rule.

But, back to the topic.

Here is the thing. If NK gets a nuke, its all over. Bye bye world. I wrote this as a joke a while back and all my friends laughed at. They weren't laughing because it was funny. They were laughing because they could see something like this happening.

If NK gets a nuke, its bye bye world. NK would nuke SK, we would nuke NK back. The radation would spread into china and in retaliation they would either nuke us, or nuke the hell out of SK. We in turn nuke China and then Russia nukes everybody just for the hell of it. Soon after every one is tossing nukes left and right. A hundred years later, everyone has three eyes, four arms, and a whole assortment of other mutations.

It's so easy to throw in insults such as "Mentally insane people", sure, use what I have as "Mentally Insane Trainer".

To the topic:
If the Chernobyl Incident in Ukraine does such damage, and 20+ years later turns living things into mutants, we wouldn't have three eyes anyway, because we're all dead.

Mr. X November 25th, 2010 11:26 AM

A trainer is a person. Multipule persons are people. A broad generalization, so lemme fix that.

A mentally insane person might have issues with complex rules of english like the, mentioned above, apositives rule.

And again you forgot to read the entire post. If you had, you would have seen that i said i wrote that as a joke. So please, try not to take a stated joke as fact and/or a possiable future.

But thanks for telling me about Chernobyl incident. I already knew about it but i always thought it occured in Russia.

Edit - Knit picking english errors. The Chernobyl incident already occured so the world to use would be did, not does. Basic english really. I think its taught in the 2nd grade.

LadySurreal November 25th, 2010 1:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. X (Post 6307642)
A trainer is a person. Multipule persons are people. A broad generalization, so lemme fix that.

A mentally insane person might have issues with complex rules of english like the, mentioned above, apositives rule.

And again you forgot to read the entire post. If you had, you would have seen that i said i wrote that as a joke. So please, try not to take a stated joke as fact and/or a possiable future.

But thanks for telling me about Chernobyl incident. I already knew about it but i always thought it occured in Russia.

Edit - Knit picking english errors. The Chernobyl incident already occured so the world to use would be did, not does. Basic english really. I think its taught in the 2nd grade.

If you have read the entire post, you'll see I mention Chernobyl now 20+ years later where mutations of life started to appear. What I am saying is that if only one nuclear accident happened like that, despite the radiation being lower than it was 20 years ago, a full out nuclear war would destroy everyone and everything.


So you are assuming I am naturally born in an English speaking country? Learn Esperanto or Greek and have someone point out your mistakes without throwing in mindless insults.

Guy November 25th, 2010 5:32 PM

Guys, let's please keep this discussion civilized. Refrain from the trolling or feeding any trolls, the snarky comments, and disrespect. Also, stay on topic! Anyone who is to continue trolling or acting on any of the earlier things mentioned will receive an infraction as this is your last warning.

Red1530 November 26th, 2010 11:51 AM

The tension on peninsula has gone up in the past day. North Korea has fired toward the island again. However, the rounds fell in the ocean near the border. Also the North Korean government called the planed US-South Korea military exercises a provocation.

Source: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/11/25/general-visit-scene-nkorea-attack/

OmegaRuby and AlphaSapphire November 26th, 2010 2:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red1530 (Post 6309464)
The tension on peninsula has gone up in the past day. North Korea has fired toward the island again. However, the rounds fell in the ocean near the border. Also the North Korean government called the planed US-South Korea military exercises a provocation.

Source: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/11/25/general-visit-scene-nkorea-attack/

Whoa, Sk said that if NK attacked them again they will retaliate heavily...this can't be good for the North...
I'm beginning to think we might really have the Korean war start again (The Korean war never really technically ended by the way so it's a restart of the war)

Netto Azure November 26th, 2010 5:00 PM

I seriously do wonder how another conventional war would look considering the US has focused most of it's recent military R&D for the past decade on asymmetrical warfare.

Still during the recent (yet now defunct) military war game I did on another site on the possibility of tensions deteriorating (was based off the sinking of the Chenoan ship) towards resumption of hostilities, the main thing that held us back (as South Korea) on using military force was the possibility of the crude nuclear warheads being used as artillery right onto the main cities. Plus of course the mass of North Koreans going over the DMZ.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 5:49 PM.


Like our Facebook Page Follow us on Twitter © 2002 - 2018 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.

Acknowledgements
Use of PokéCommunity Assets
vB Optimise by DragonByte Technologies Ltd © 2023.