The PokéCommunity Forums

The PokéCommunity Forums (https://www.pokecommunity.com/index.php)
-   Pokémon Anime (https://www.pokecommunity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   The Official PokéCommunity Shipping Debates (https://www.pokecommunity.com/showthread.php?t=240179)

Mew~ May 30th, 2011 4:50 AM

Heh, I would support Human and Pokémon marriage being legalised. I've always wanted to get married to a Stunfisk.

Brock x James is hilarious, I remember that episode whilst they were watching that contest and James hugged brock.
http://otaku.absolutelypointless.net/gallery/pokemon/slash.gif D'awwww...

NamikazeKyuubi May 30th, 2011 7:07 AM

Ya I support Pikashipping only if Pikachu is female, honestly Im an open-minded person. For some reason, I really find Ash x Pokemon pairings to be interesting especially legendaries!

Ooh recovershipping eh, hmm now that I know that I may write a fanfic with it~ If anyone wants to know my fanfiction.net account its: xNamikazeKyuubix

Another pairing I find interesting is Ash x Melody, thought she looked quite beautiful for a girl her age. I think my mainshipping is still either Rayshipping or Pearlshipping for human/human while Altoshipping and Pikashipping for human/pokemon. Also what is Ash x Bayleef known as?

Mew~ May 30th, 2011 7:23 AM

Ash x Bayleef is called BodyslamShipping, I guess because it always bodyslams him. xD

You can use this site here for the incomplete list of shipping names. (It's also located in the References in the first post) Ctrl + F helps in firefox.


NamikazeKyuubi May 30th, 2011 7:25 AM

Oh thanks! ^^ I find Ash and Bayleef to be cute together as well, namely because of Bayleef's over enthusiastic attempts at garnering Ash's attention and affection.

Frostik May 30th, 2011 7:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mew~ (Post 6667518)
Brock x James is hilarious, I remember that episode whilst they were watching that contest and James hugged brock.
http://otaku.absolutelypointless.net/gallery/pokemon/slash.gif D'awwww...

You know, that isn't even a disguise. Bets say he secretly knew it was James all along. <3

NamikazeKyuubi May 30th, 2011 7:46 AM

Was scrolling through that shipping list when I came across something that reminded me I forgot to post another of my favourite couple. Ash x Zoroark, I became interested in this couple after the Zoroark movie!

ponyboy May 30th, 2011 1:22 PM

who here makes yotube videos?

RubyJB88 May 30th, 2011 5:51 PM

Thanks for posting those screenshots. Yes that's exactly why I fell for Brock x James all over again.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frostik
=( I'm sad now. Human/pokemon doesn't have to equal sex. It's cute, it's adorable, it's comforting.

You know, that isn't even a disguise. Bets say he secretly knew it was James all along. <3

When it comes to ships, it goes straight for that. That's what people want, what they think of relationships. It's sad, really.

lolz.

gameplayer56 May 30th, 2011 6:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NamikazeKyuubi (Post 6666163)
Is it? To my knowledge, Alto is Ash/Latias? I find them to be quite a sweet and cute couple and possibly one of the most possible Ash/Pokemon pairings due to Latias shapeshifting ability. The movie also had 'hints' of Latias growing affections towards Ash.

Also let's face it, based on all the seasons so far. I would confidently say that Ash has a higher rate of marrying a pokemon than an actual human female... His world revolves around pokemon, I bet he would jump for joy if Latias wanted to date him.

I know I would..

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSmartOne (Post 6666459)
*gags* human x pokemon ewwww

Brock x James is adorable though. <3 It makes me rather sad that there isn't much out there for it. :/

I don't see how this is gross.

Frostik May 30th, 2011 6:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdvancedK47 (Post 6668722)
Shipping = Love. In the end, Love = Sex. Therefore, Shipping = Sex.

Nobody can deny it. You don't 'ship' a couple unless you can imagine their nightly activities (Not necessarily at their current age). Otherwise, you're just plushing over two characters at the same time.

Oh, that is bull. Not all kinds of romantic love equals sex. Seriously, it does not. Most, yes; it's how we happily survive. All? That's a very damn fine box you're not thinking outside of, if that's how you perceive sexuality. Incredibly naive, nice to know.

I 'ship Absol/Skuntank. I love imagining them being cute together, and having kits and being a family. Do I need to imagine how those kits got there? Hell no. I would rather not. Because as much as we see pokémon as more than animals (treating them like humans), that's what they still look like. People are uncomfortable imagining bestiality, or even sex between animals, but if they still claim they 'ship Pikashipping? =P Oh yes, they 'ship it.

ponyboy May 30th, 2011 9:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdvancedK47 (Post 6668722)
Shipping = Love. In the end, Love = Sex. Therefore, Shipping = Sex.

Nobody can deny it. You don't 'ship' a couple unless you can imagine their nightly activities (Not necessarily at their current age). Otherwise, you're just plushing over two characters at the same time.

The Infinite Wisdom and Philosophy of AdvancedK47

that's BS, love does NOT equal sex. Love and Sex are two different things. In fact some asexuals have fallen in love but they never desired sex, and some ppl only care about sex, and don't give a damn about romance. that proves your statement false

Spinor May 30th, 2011 9:29 PM

Ah, but first we must define what we mean by love.

Because naturally, attraction occurs because the biological objective of all organisms is to reproduce. Humans just have it more complex than it was millions of years ago.

... or maybe did I mean attraction? I can't seriously be implying that's its possible for N to love Touko? >__> Yes. I meant attraction, because one can love cupcakes, but one shouldn't have sex with cupcakes.

What was I on? weeeeee.... *edits*

Shipping was never about love, it was about pitting two people/pokemon/things/right hands together and claiming they are attracted to each other.

Jorah May 30th, 2011 11:06 PM

Yes, attraction and love aren't the same thing...but I find Pikashipping cute, but that doesn't mean I want Ash and Pikachu to be sexually attracted o.O

Quote:

You don't 'ship' a couple unless you can imagine their nightly activities
This was the part I found disturbing...XD

NamikazeKyuubi May 30th, 2011 11:24 PM

The mystical powers of Arceus shall turn all Pokemon into hot anthro females and then we can safely pair Ash with all of them, end of story!

Aquacorde May 30th, 2011 11:46 PM

I don't get why people find gijinka attractive. I mean really. And they're all portrayed as at least somewhat attractive, but mostly just sexy. Is it just me that finds this annoying?

NamikazeKyuubi May 30th, 2011 11:51 PM

It depends on how they are potrayed, some artists are extremely talented at gijinka and their potrayal of the characters are both accurate yet beautiful and sexy

Aquacorde May 30th, 2011 11:57 PM

Yes, but why gijinka in the first place? What is so appealing about human mixed with (basically) animal?

NamikazeKyuubi May 31st, 2011 12:00 AM

So that we can actually support Human/Pokemon shippings, because they're bored, because they find it fun, because people requested it, because somebody asked themself 'what if I mix a human and a pokemon?' there are so many different reasons

Aquacorde May 31st, 2011 12:07 AM

You can support a Pokemon/human shipping without the Pokemon being anthro. And most of what you listed is more answering "why did they come about" rather than "why are they appealing".

NamikazeKyuubi May 31st, 2011 12:11 AM

Oh woops forgot about the second question! Well for me, Im just curious as to how a Pokemon would look like as a human(female since Im a guy). For other people it can be due to any other reason I guess... And so that Ash can reproduce with them!

Aquacorde May 31st, 2011 12:15 AM

That's more curiosity satisfaction than appeal though, isn't it?

and ew why would anyone want Ash to reproduce?

NamikazeKyuubi May 31st, 2011 12:19 AM

So we can continue Pokemon forever duh? ^^ Cause since Ash isn't immortal and he will grow old and die, we have to make sure he has a kid to follow in his footsteps so we can safely say Pokemon can last forever~

Aquacorde May 31st, 2011 1:28 AM

Oh but Ash is immortal. Forever ten and can never be killed. Or perhaps just aging incredibly slowly like Jack Harkness.
...
/didn't just make that comparison

NamikazeKyuubi May 31st, 2011 2:54 AM

Yup but the novelty of Ash is going to run out sooner or later and a fresh face is required, so why not have Ash's son take his place! And since Ash loves Pokemon more than humans, his wife should be a Pokemon such as Gardevoir or Latias(human form). And if he has a son with Gardevoir, he/she will have the both Psychic and Aura powers... awesome!

Azumi May 31st, 2011 4:10 AM

As long as the ultimate producers don't stop running out of ideas for the Pokemon creatures themselves...

I suddenly had a crazy idea: Ash is going to revolt (how he manages to succeed I have no idea, but seeing he's got Pokemon Of Mass Destruction...) and make Pokemon-human marriages possible, and then he'll marry his Pikachu.
...what the hell am I smoking?! //slaps self


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:10 PM.


Like our Facebook Page Follow us on Twitter © 2002 - 2018 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.

Acknowledgements
Use of PokéCommunity Assets
vB Optimise by DragonByte Technologies Ltd © 2023.