![]() |
Difference(s) Between Pokemon Groups, Social Groups, and Other Clubs
Hello. I was wondering if there's any distinction between Pokemon Groups , Other Clubs, and Social Groups...?
Pokemon Groups appears limited only to Pokemon-related clubs/groups; Other Clubs is pretty much for anything else (non-Pokemon-related), but Social Groups appears to be a mixture of both Pokemon groups and non-Pokemon groups... If so, wouldn't one of these three sections be redundant, then...? Thanks for clarification in advance. |
Social groups seem to be the redundant ones, but I think they're more organized and such. Plus there are some things that wouldn't do very well as a normal club (like the Gay/Straight Alliance). And it's easier to have a Social Group dedicated to one Pokemon rather than a thread about it (Vote For Seed bby). Just what I think though. I don't pay attention to any of them, tbh.
|
Heh. We're actually in the midst of talking about this...
But yes, all three of them running at the same time are redundant and we've been discussing possible solutions to this for a few weeks now. |
Thanks for the info, everyone. Nice to see that it's already being discussed. :)
One of the main reason I'm asking this is because I've noticed most of the Pokemon Groups and Other Clubs have userbars. I realized that if I were to join a Pokemon Group (which I'm contemplating), I don't have space in my signature to show support via userbars, as I'm already at the 500 x 300 image limit (actually 480 x 300, but userbars are bigger than the 20 pixels I have left). Later on, I went to my profile and noticed the "Hoenn Fan Club" icon, which still shows my support in my profile without the need to use up signature space for userbars... As for my own input, I would say that the Social Groups have/would retain the most functionality, as not only do you have your standard threads; you have room for other items as well. Pictures and member lists seem to be kept separate so they don't clutter the thread, and there are still introductory/master threads and discussion threads that are also utilized. |
I'd think the forum threads are more redundant than the Social Groups are personally. We could easily assign the remaining moderators to purely moderate Social Groups and make sure that the pointless groups are pruned and the good ones remain. I feel like the social groups are lot more flexible anyways, compared to a single thread where it's essentially a big chatroom with no real topicality being enforced.
|
Quote:
As for me, I think the whole social groups thing is less organized. If I wanted, I could have a group revering the use of breasts in historical art.. it is legitimate, but ridiculous- yet we have groups like these. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is what I believe, but you bring up an understandable point. However, I don't think you should base your entire decision on groups on this club's existence.. which I doubt would happen, but I am just telling you my thoughts, as it could be a deciding factor since you might (and others might) hold the group dear/ personal to you. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:09 AM. |
![]()
© 2002 - 2018 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.
Acknowledgements
Use of PokéCommunity Assets
vB Optimise by DragonByte Technologies Ltd © 2023.