![]() |
The Couriway Town rail ray theory
For those who have the pokemon X and Y guide book; turn to page 384 (the page that talks about berry farming) there, you'll find a "note" with a paragraph. It says:
"In addition to the thirteen berries that can only be cultivated threw mutation, anotther fourteen berries do not appear in pokemon X and pokemon Y, and can be obtained only by trading them from other regions." Uh, how? when you can't transfer berrys via-pokemon bank!? (Gosh, who thought that was a good idea? at least let us transfer A berry) Facts: -there can now be downloaded software/additonal data via-nintendo eshop (wich was not available before). -Also, there are only 69 new pokemon! -There have also been many characters in the games that talk about there/ other regions and one talks about his "the back packer". Many of you seen, or heard oth this chracter before right? But, these "characters" have always been in pokemon games for a long time so, theres not anything much to notify about that. So this is were I introduce the CTRR therory. Because there was a very small quantity of new pokemon (compared to past games) perhaps nintendo has planned that they may add a new region/ new game by merely using nintendo eshop. It's possible, isn't it? Doesn't it seem to early to make a new system after the 3DS? Also, why not make downloadable extra content for more items, regions, pokemon(with a fee of course, remember this would be a sort of new game). Goodness! They could even just stop were there at, and continue using pokemon X and Y for future releases! This is just my therory, and wanted to know what others thought. See yea later! |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJU4yY5r0K0
Marriland has an entire video on this theory, he thinks Gen VI will have another region that will be compatible with XY. As for what I think about it, i'm not completely certain on it, if they introduce one region already it'd be a ways before they cut to another. It might be two years from now like Emerald and Platinum were after their first games, or less. |
Quote:
|
I was thinking we might get railway access through event/dlc
1. The map pointer will hover off the screen on the right side near the mountains by the railway ( entire right side actually ) but the left side is bordered and blocked as normal. 2. The lumiose press editor chief left a note on his/her desk saying he/she will be going in the mountains to look for a mythical pokemon ( my idea is diancie/hoops/volcanion : whichever will be the first if not all 3 are released together is the pkmn editor went looking for. The guy in lumiose press hasn't seen the editor in forever if you talk to him now in xy. So I'm thinking the first event will be a couriway rail ticket maybe given to you by looker and you are tasked with finding missing editor. This will give you access to the mountains to the right side of the map and 1 or all 3 of the legends. ) Just an imaginative theory. Don't think we will get a whole games worth of dlc but I think we will get more story oriented events like celebi event in hgss |
So far, scprepschool's theory sounds the most likely to me.
They wouldn't have thrown a whole railway in the game like that for it to be vacant, I'm sure they'll make use of it and many other things through DLC's. Which is my favorite part about this game being open to them, so many possibilities. I only hope Gamefreak utilizes them properly. |
Quote:
|
Oops! Sorry 'bout that then.
Also, those ideas also sound very possible, and interesting! |
Didn't GF say they're not doing DLC? So why the repeated comments on it?
|
Quote:
I'm not even so sure they said that, and if so I think it may have been a misunderstanding of the question. The celebi event in hgss unlocked an entire short side mission, placing a NPC ( Giovanni ) in game that isn't part of the physical copy without the downloaded celebi ( in the coding yes, but not just plain out in the playable story ). This is dlc by definition. What about all the GameStop distributions? Gf does dlc and always have |
Quote:
Gamefreak has never done DLC content and has expressed that they never will do DLC content. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I believe you mean GF, as Nintendo isn't in charge of the DLC, just it's distribution. The most Nintendo can do is try to make GF change their mind. Also I wouldn't call GF the most unpredictable company nor the most know as being that...
Either way even if Nintendo did presure GF it may come off as odd as they didn't originally plan it...well then again it's said B2W2 weren't originally planned by GF but done so to attract buyers as a typical third version for a dying system proably wouldn't sell highly...so maybe it could work. |
Quote:
And no, the Pokemon you get from Wifi events are not Downloaded content. The Content is already on your system's data. All we get is basic data that brings the content out for us, unlike say Elder Scrolls 5 Skyrim. Both the areas for Dragonborn and Dawnguard do not exist in the games if you do not get the download content or the disc with them already installed. The content itself doesn't exist, coded data or visual packaging. Sims works this way as well. You can't even use certain fan patches and mods if they require you to have specific updates as the content for those mods, items, characters, places do not exist in the data nor visually in the game. Where as a Wifi event gift only gives us a data packet and our games then give the visual coding to create the Pokemon/item in the game using what already exists. Nintendo wouldn't really stand to make any profit as Gamefreak wouldn't make content to be charged, so Nintendo would essentially lose money for using data coverage to even host the DLC and keep it up and running for downloads while we don't have to pay a dime. As opposed to events where the store that runs the event has to pay to host it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The biggest issue is that DLC is strictly to the system and not the game, so if you changed systems for what ever reason, you lost your DLC and have to redownload and pay for it on the new system. (This is assuming the old system was lost/destroyed and not traded in). Nintedo is trying to fix the rebuy issue, lets hope that they do. As for spin off effecting, this isn't the first time. The Anime is technically a spin off and it earned itself a game counterpart. Gen 4 and 3 had trade ability with a spin off titles (PR series and Colosseum series), Gen 1 and 2 also could be impacted by Spin off titles (Stadiums). Gen 5 is the only gen not effected by a spin off honestly, both directly and indirectly (PMD's DLC issue is more an indirect effect as its just the company dislikes the idea thanks to bad representation and execution with a prior title.) There are many things that these easter eggs we (the fans) found in X and Y. As farfetched as the idea is, we could see our first true multi-regional generation in the regards of getting new regions in the same generation, with different stories. Like, we can still get a new region, with no new Pokemon, just play off how Kalos is with a different mix of unavailable Pokemon, different FS configuration, and all kinda edited goodies to make it pass as a different region. Farfetched and unlikely as we may just be able to PokeBank Transfer to the next region by depositing the item attached to a Pokemon and recovering them in the next Gen and unlocking the event that Item may hold. They even may give us info connecting the questionable areas with the new regions. |
They sort of need a new Pokémon as the backpacker hinted at a protector of his region which doesn't resemble any of the Pokémon we currently know, unless of course the image of the item isn't a good match with the legend it's suppose to represent. I assume it's a legend as it's beleived to be a protector...but for all we know it could be like Arcanine.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If its for a different Generation, it can/should be transferred through the Pokebank assuming Pokemon can hold items in the bank. |
Quote:
|
Game freak said that they have no plans of making DLC for there new pokemon game. That being said i really don't think that nintendo would have one of there main franchise not have DLC since it's "new" to them, i mean they did it with fire emblem so why not pokemon X or Y(and they kinda wen't crazy with it releasing one every week or so), i think that the will have DLC, not sure if it will be a new region or not.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sony doesn't make the DLC for the games they sell unless its directly made by Sony. Skyrim's DLC was completely made by Bethesda, Call of Duty DLCs are made by the companies that make the individual games. To the best of my knowledge, none of Nintendo's three large selling titles have DLC for the main games. Mario doesn't support any DLC for any of its titles out for Current Gen consoles. Zelda games don't support DLC for the current gen consoles, and neither does Pokemon. So the big three don't have DLC. I see some reports of New Super Luigi U supposed to be DLC for New Super Mario Bros U, but that was made into its own game so that isn't DLC. See the same about Zelda's Skyward sword...but I own that one and haven't seen any DLC for that...not to mention the article is like 3 years old. Only Pokemon game to get DLC was Mystery Dungeon and that received negative reviews from fans so TPC director agreed with no DLC for the main games. I can't really find any real DLC info for any of the three big titles so Pokemon not getting DLC isn't that hard to comprehend. As for DLC being new to Nintedo, its not. They've had DLC since the Wii. Monster Hunter has DLC and other titles had DLC as well. 3DS games have shown DLC compatibility, but the companies actually in charge of making the games have full control over whether or not they want to do DLC. Nintendo doesn't have any right to say that they have to make DLC or not for any of the games they sell. Quote:
Updates were done however due to the save glitch. They won't really "balance" anything unless there is a severe game destroying glitch. As far as the end product goes, we have what they see as balanced and completed. They don't intend to add more to it. Junichi Matsuda's Interview quote: There’s no download content or microtransaction content developed specifically for Pokémon X and Y. We’ve not come up with any ideas on that yet. I like the idea that Pokémon can be enjoyed with just one piece of software. You buy the game and it can be enjoyed just with that one software that you buy. That’s a key point for Game Freak. |
Those guidebooks aren't written by Gamefreak. That part about the berries is most likely an error because the 14 berries its talking about are useless Poffin ingredients. In gen V these were normally only found in the Dream World, not on the actual games themselves. Only 2 were buyable in BW2 IIRC.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 7:22 AM. |
![]()
© 2002 - 2018 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.
Acknowledgements
Use of PokéCommunity Assets
vB Optimise by DragonByte Technologies Ltd © 2023.