The PokéCommunity Forums

The PokéCommunity Forums (https://www.pokecommunity.com/index.php)
-   Deep Discussion (https://www.pokecommunity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=39)
-   -   News James Holmes declared guilty: insanity not found (https://www.pokecommunity.com/showthread.php?t=352334)

Her July 16th, 2015 7:16 PM

James Holmes declared guilty: insanity not found
 
link

Quote:

Will James Holmes face death for killing 12 people inside an Aurora, Colorado, movie theater?

That could be the next question jurors will be asked after finding Holmes guilty Thursday of first-degree murder in the July 2012 shooting.

Holmes faced two counts of first-degree murder for each of the 12 victims. The jury found him guilty on all 24 counts.

Holmes, who had pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity, showed no reaction as the verdict against him was announced. He stood at the defense table with his attorney, his hands in his pockets. He faced a total of 165 charges.

The jury also found Holmes guilty of attempted murder on all of the 140 counts against him for the 70 people wounded in the shooting. Additionally, he was found guilty of one count of possession or control of an explosive or incendiary device.
While I usually don't give attention to these news stories out of a principle to not give mass murderers any more attention than they already get, I think it's good to talk about how he was not able to get the insanity plea he desired. I also think it's good to talk about what should be done now that the verdict has been delivered - sentencing. It's highly likely he'll be given the death penalty, with a definite influence on the juror's minds from the death penalty given to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev a few weeks ago.

What do you think should happen in this case? Death or life in prison? Do you think he should have been deemed insane instead?

Klippy July 16th, 2015 7:44 PM

He committed an atrocious crime and deserves the justice he will get. Death row is an inarguable burden on the taxpayers and many men sit on death row that have long been sentenced. If he's allowed anywhere near gen pop in prison, he's a goner anyway. But I guess we'll see. I'm glad he's going away.

esperance July 16th, 2015 8:36 PM

Let him go to prison. He'll die much faster there.

I think the real problem, though, is that it took 3 years to get to this point.

Kanzler July 16th, 2015 9:04 PM

I read somewhere that insanity defences are neither common nor successful (most of the time). I do wonder what he had going on though, because there must have been some bumps on his road to lead him to where he is today. He might not be legally insane, but something tells me he had other mental illnesses that, given his personal situation, took him to extreme levels of violence.

I don't know if he can avoid death though, just judging from the severity of his crimes. I think there is a very strong urge to give him death, other mental illnesses notwithstanding. I'm not sure if it's the right thing to do though. He seems really really lost.

One thing though: I think we should point out that the word "insane" doesn't have any real meaning. It's not a psychiatric diagnosis, and therefore there's no set of criteria you could point to that determine whether one is insane. I'm actually curious what criteria a jury would use to determine whether someone is "legally insane", although my hunch is that insanity is anyone whose mental health situation sways the jury - basically no clear criteria at all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lost Heart (Post 8849617)
Let him go to prison. He'll die much faster there.

I think the real problem, though, is that it took 3 years to get to this point.

I don't think that's a problem. Due process should be afforded to all persons, and if it means spending 3 years to have a proper trial, then so be it. What's a 3 years trial mean to anybody anyways? If he's to die, he'll be dead (or at least on death row) sooner or later.

Her July 16th, 2015 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kanzler (Post 8849636)
One thing though: I think we should point out that the word "insane" doesn't have any real meaning. It's not a psychiatric diagnosis, and therefore there's no set of criteria you could point to that determine whether one is insane. I'm actually curious what criteria a jury would use to determine whether someone is "legally insane", although my hunch is that insanity is anyone whose mental health situation sways the jury - basically no clear criteria at all.

I remember hearing something about this on a news program years ago when they were talking about the possible verdict for an NZ guy who lost it (on meth) and brutally attacked people with a samurai sword. Very iconic case here in NZ mainly because of his even more iconic facial expressions. Anyway, while a crime committed while on the world's craziest meth high is very much different to mental illness, they broke the theoretical insanity plea down to the accused having no sense of right or wrong during the time of their actions, a big indicator to someone's state of mind and their legal state of sanity. They also mentioned something which Google now tells me is called an irresistible impulse test, a test which gauges whether the accused is incapable of choosing whether to obey right or wrong, even if they knew the difference between them.

Though I don't know if a medical analysis alone automatically defines whether someone is 'legally insane' or if the analysis has to be 'voted in' by the jury.

Kanzler July 17th, 2015 6:39 AM

I think the jury determines guilt, so even if they hear the details of someone's psychiatric analysis, regardless of the outcome, it's still their choice whether to find them culpable or not.

esperance July 17th, 2015 8:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kanzler (Post 8849636)
I don't think that's a problem. Due process should be afforded to all persons, and if it means spending 3 years to have a proper trial, then so be it. What's a 3 years trial mean to anybody anyways? If he's to die, he'll be dead (or at least on death row) sooner or later.

I agree, everyone deserves a fair trial and all that entails. What I mean is that it's ridiculous the process is so slow, especially when it concerns a case like this. It really only serves to show how corrupt the whole process is.

Kanzler July 17th, 2015 8:40 AM

I disagree. Patience is a virtue. Just because they're taking their time doesn't mean that the process is corrupt. What if the information the jury needs to process is that extensive and needs a lot of time to explain to the court? What if there are legitimate arguments and counterarguments that don't make it an open-and-shut case? Trying to tease out the effects of mental illness on culpability is a pretty hard question.
http://38.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m438pgC4Ls1r017k2.gif

Anyways, the trial didn't take too long. A lot of the delay is in selecting a jury (which as you can imagine can be mighty difficult, especially considering the situation of the case at hand), as well as in the psychiatric examinations. The prosecution also need to decide what kind of charges they're going to push for and strategy. Big trials get a lot of attention from everybody, including the public as well as the lawyers involved, meaning it's ever more important that nothing is rushed. Also, since the prosecution plans to give Holmes death, you can imagine that the defence would do everything in their power to fight against it.

Esper July 17th, 2015 8:59 AM

I think I read that the defense team in this trial was intentionally trying to draw the proceedings out, probably to get some distance from the events so that they weren't as fresh in people's minds. But, really, in a case like this there's not much room for discussing what happened and who did what, just what the appropriate response/punishment should be.

I'm also okay with it taking as long as it did. Maybe in this case it was just stalling, but there are plenty of other cases where you really want to take your time. You don't want to railroad someone, as has been done too many times to count.

I also think it's important to remember the people who were killed and injured, rather than the killers. So here are the names of those people:

Jonathan Blunk
Alexander J. Boik
Jesse Childress
Gordon Cowden
Jessica Ghawi
John Larimer
Matt McQuinn
Micayla Medek
Veronica Moser-Sullivan
Alex Sullivan
Alexander C. Teves
Rebecca Wingo

Also, Ashley Moser (mother of Veronica, who was 6) who survived as is now quadriplegic. Caleb Medley who suffered serious brain damage. I hope that these survivors, their families, and the families of all the victims can take some solace and find a way to keep moving forward.

Sir Codin July 17th, 2015 1:06 PM

'bout fucking time.

I mean, it's been, what...three years now? If he's going on death row, I got a good solution that will save taxpayers dollars:

- Let him into general population in prison

Nature will handle the rest.

Crizzle July 17th, 2015 4:17 PM

I say...

FINISH HIM!

... and the best way to do that is by life in prison(dem prisoners will handle it, assuming the authorities don't give him special treatment). Death Row is a load of BS. I'd be for the death penalty in this case if it was quick and cheap but it's the exact opposite.

Esper July 17th, 2015 10:26 PM

I wonder what it says about us if we're suggesting we allow him to be killed by other prisoners.

Sir Codin July 18th, 2015 9:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esper (Post 8851104)
I wonder what it says about us if we're suggesting we allow him to be killed by other prisoners.

You WANT your money to pay for this asshole's meals?

Esper July 19th, 2015 8:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarcharOdin (Post 8852150)
You WANT your money to pay for this asshole's meals?

I want to live in a society where people aren't killed unnecessarily, whether by the government or by individuals. If that means some people have to be locked up and kept away from the rest of society because they're dangerous then I think it's a price worth paying.

Kanzler July 19th, 2015 2:54 PM

I'm going to say life. To me, he doesn't seem "evil" enough to deserve death. I feel that his mental illness, and the delusions and urges coming from it, muddle up what intent he had in killing those people. If you read about his psychiatric report, apparently he wanted to kill people to gain their "life points" which would make his own life more valuable and actually mean something. It's just really off the wall and chaotic which makes me feel that he isn't entirely "here" with us in reality which therefore does not justify death. I feel that the death penalty should be given to the worst of the worst, especially because it's an example of the state taking away one's right to life (which is the most fundamental of all human rights and therefore should be the one violated most cautiously), but that Holmes' being out-of-touch with reality is a mitigating factor that makes death inappropriate.

Sir Codin July 19th, 2015 5:33 PM

Whatever.

All I'm going to say further is if someone or something kills this guy, I'm not shedding a tear.

shadowmoon522 July 19th, 2015 7:13 PM

killing hims not the answer, nor is sending him to prison. their both easy ways out.death would be quick and painless & prison... there are reasons why people who get out of prison often want to go back. humans can adjust to any lifestyle and any environment. what we need is an acupuncture specialist that can hit the most painful nerves without killing him.

Her July 19th, 2015 7:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shadowmoon522 (Post 8853379)
killing hims not the answer, nor is sending him to prison. their both easy ways out.death would be quick and painless & prison... there are reasons why people who get out of prison often want to go back. humans can adjust to any lifestyle and any environment. what we need is an acupuncture specialist that can hit the most painful nerves without killing him.

It always scares me when people give prolonged, horrific, aimless torture as their answer to the death penalty vs life in prison argument. It's an expression of profound cruelty under the masquerade of justice.

shadowmoon522 July 20th, 2015 3:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by God (Post 8853394)
It always scares me when people give prolonged, horrific, aimless torture as their answer to the death penalty vs life in prison argument. It's an expression of profound cruelty under the masquerade of justice.

different people live different lives & get different ideas of whats cruel or not and what is just or not. what i stated was not justice, it was the most fair punishment for the crime committed. death is to much of an unknown variable to be a proper punishment, being sent to prison with 14 kills under his belt? in a place where people brag about their offenses while getting free food, shelter, education and cable? being on protective custody in a jail more of a punishment then that and is actually worse then what i stated. i'd rather have the needles then to go though that. its easier to get a tolerance of pain then it is to deal with isolation.

Kanzler July 20th, 2015 6:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shadowmoon522 (Post 8853775)
what i stated was not justice, it was the most fair punishment for the crime committed. death is to much of an unknown variable to be a proper punishment, being sent to prison with 14 kills under his belt? in a place where people brag about their offenses while getting free food, shelter, education and cable? being on protective custody in a jail more of a punishment then that and is actually worse then what i stated. i'd rather have the needles then to go though that. its easier to get a tolerance of pain then it is to deal with isolation.

Contradiction much? Justice has very much to do with determining the most fair outcome. Also, I'm surprised (if you're in the US) how you describe your prison system because here I am in Canada and your prison system scares me. In a max security prison, cells are tiny! Also, prison food is just messed up. According to this dude at San Quentin (http://www.quora.com/What-is-the-food-like-in-prison) there's just no quality control with food being undercooked/overcooked/served in dirty dishes. It's supposed to be cheap, and in places where catering has been privatized, nobody gives a shit about quality. Like, being Chinese I can appreciate free shit and all, but there really comes a point when the shit's so bad that even being free can't be considered a positive.

shadowmoon522 July 20th, 2015 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kanzler (Post 8854088)
Contradiction much? Justice has very much to do with determining the most fair outcome. Also, I'm surprised (if you're in the US) how you describe your prison system because here I am in Canada and your prison system scares me. In a max security prison, cells are tiny! Also, prison food is just messed up. According to this dude at San Quentin (http://www.quora.com/What-is-the-food-like-in-prison) there's just no quality control with food being undercooked/overcooked/served in dirty dishes. It's supposed to be cheap, and in places where catering has been privatized, nobody gives a muk about quality. Like, being Chinese I can appreciate free muk and all, but there really comes a point when the muk's so bad that even being free can't be considered a positive.

justice is just behavior or treatment, while fairness is the quality of making judgments that are free from discrimination. to put it into better perspective for you, someone killing someone who killed their loved one is a form of justice, but is not fair due to the revenge seeker's judgement being clouded by emotion. theres quite a few things that people think are the same, but really are not. like right & good and envy & jealousy.
as for the food thing, its not that hard to dull your taste bubs & get over the disgust. i honestly wouldn't be surprised if this guy was eating bugs before he got locked up, he set up preparations before he even committed the crime

Her July 20th, 2015 1:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shadowmoon522 (Post 8853775)
different people live different lives & get different ideas of whats cruel or not and what is just or not. what i stated was not justice, it was the most fair punishment for the crime committed. death is to much of an unknown variable to be a proper punishment, being sent to prison with 14 kills under his belt? in a place where people brag about their offenses while getting free food, shelter, education and cable? being on protective custody in a jail more of a punishment then that and is actually worse then what i stated. i'd rather have the needles then to go though that. its easier to get a tolerance of pain then it is to deal with isolation.

...A maximum security prison is far from the criminal dreamland you've described. It's naive to think that he would have access to cable, for one thing. But I digress - he'd still be living in the prison for life and would have the unending burden of all that life in prison has to offer. Is that not enough? The lingering act of evil he committed provokes the want for a proportionate response, but the proportionate response should not be a proportionate act of evil, which is all that torture is. Likewise, putting him into the general population knowing that he'd be either raped or assaulted or murdered and possibly all three in that order is unquestionably cruel as well. If I lived in America, I'd prefer my money go towards keeping Holmes permanently subdued in the prison system with his own thoughts, the loathing of everyone who will ever lay eyes on him again and the knowledge that he will die in there through age or illness, rather than supporting a system which devises its own divine punishment as it sees fit.

Sir Codin July 20th, 2015 2:08 PM

I want to take this time to voice my thoughts on the whole "insanity plea" thing in general.

I don't really like it being used, especially in this case. If you want to defend the idea of "insanity" being a way to reduce a sentence, then be prepared to make the case that there are sane people out there who, after much deliberation and reflection, decided it was a good idea to abuse a right (possession of firearms-and by extension giving gun owners in general a bad name), go out and shoot up a theater/school/etc.

You will find there isn't a single sane person who would do this, because as far as I'm concerned, doing what he did isn't "sane" by any definition of the word, no matter how much mental gymnastics you want to spin. The point I'm trying to make is "insanity" is a bullshit defense in cases like this because if he were sane, he wouldn't be where he is right now.

Kanzler July 20th, 2015 2:33 PM

But, for the purposes of the court, he was sane. So, according to the jury, he is one of at least one sane person who would commit mass murder at a cinema. Pleading insanity allows one to be removed from guilt altogether, but that was not the case for Holmes.

Sir Codin July 20th, 2015 2:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kanzler (Post 8854540)
But, for the purposes of the court, he was sane. So, according to the jury, he is one of at least one sane person who would commit mass murder at a cinema. Pleading insanity allows one to be removed from guilt altogether, but that was not the case for Holmes.

Yeah, which doesn't make sense to me as far as semantics go. As far as the law was concerned, he was sane, but I personally don't consider what he did the act of someone who has all the cards in their deck.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:52 AM.


Like our Facebook Page Follow us on Twitter © 2002 - 2018 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.

Acknowledgements
Use of PokéCommunity Assets
vB Optimise by DragonByte Technologies Ltd © 2023.