![]() |
Quote:
|
I don't think the graphics are all that bad. I still might get this game. It looks interesting enough.
|
Quote:
You are ridiculous. Can´t you at least try to act like a civilized person? I think someone needs a doctor, and some tranquilizers too. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
A person's opinion about a game shouldn't lead anyone to such heated arguments. Simply accept the fact that some people like graphics, and some people like gameplay, and discuss maturely what could be done, what doesn't need to be done, what could be improved, etc. Discussions like these boil down to your own personal opinion, which you should definitely share, but not try to force onto anyone else. |
Quote:
Then when we state our opinion, he shoves down our throats his opinion of "LOL the grafiks suk on dis game!1" And Acrof, watch this video, and before you watch it, hit the Normal Size button next to the full screen button. Then talk about the graphics. =\ If the game has a narrator that speaks every Pokemons name and announces death, switches and entrys, plus the game has to contain all the attack animations, plus all the Pokemon models and arenas models, plus mathmatical info, stat info, AR/GS detecting system and everything else, its almost 100% assursed the graphics aren't perfect because GF used so much information and data to start. And have you, may I ask, seen the game on your own personal living room TV? Or have you watched Youtube videos? I saw it at my friends house, and the graphics are equal (if not better) than previous Pokemon console graphics. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
As for your comment about the screenshot: why post a screenshot of an unedited battle system if you're going to edit it? That's just pointless. ._. Also, don't you find it ironic that you posted an edited D/P screenshot with low-resolution, limited pallet Pokémon sprites, but your own game has just as big resolution/colour differences? It's also ironic how you claim to be so darn good at judging games, but post a default RPGMaker system 'Pokémon game' and apparently think it's good? |
Uhg, these bad graphics are a real disappointment.
|
Quote:
By the way, Smarties-Kun, you just owned Acrof. =D |
Quote:
|
I suppose GF could go the cel-shaded route. It's a thought anyway.
On topic, don't forget that all you've seen so far are previews, and not the full game as such yet. Don't judge until you have played a copy. (PS You've got plenty of time to save up, so don't worry about the cost) |
Quote:
|
May be true, but I still find it to be just like the other stadium games but with other upgrades. It looks worth, I like the graphics and the game overall from what I see.
|
Quote:
And while this is probably the longest on going argument ever, I really find you all rather sad about arguing it. A) Yutss just owned you's all who say "THA GRAFIX SUXX!!!!" who have probably only watched it on YouTube's crappy quality. If you read his post it showed the normal size of the video, and the graphics look way sharper. B) This game is Nintendo's first game for the Wii. Like Xbox 360 and their crappy first footie titles, they get better progressivly once they figure out every Wii mechanic to squeeze that every detail out. We know Nintendo didnt make the most of GBA graphics, and as some people may claim, the DS graphics (which I disagree on...ish) C) WHY THE HELL DO I EVEN CARE!? I dont even HAVE A Wii!!! |
...I know I said that I was getting out of the discussion, but really quickly:
Quote:
*points at Warioware: Smooth Moves* *POINTS AT THE LEGEND OF ZELDA: TWILIGHT PRINCESS* |
Quote:
|
The graphics are better than the other Pokémon games but still it's Game Cube graphics, not Wii. The Pokémon looks plastic:(
|
Quote:
To wrap up this arguemen: Acrof: The stadium graphics are for nostalgia. The Pokehexagon is the stupidest thing to ever complain about. The Pokeball disappearing is a glitch, not lazy programming. The graphics "Suck" only because you're watching stretched videos, not minimizing them to actual size. The "GSC" graphics in D/P is irrelavant to the subject, as we're talking about PBR. You can still tell it's Typhlosion and Charizard battling, also. You haven't yet seen them on your TV yet, have you? What if the graphics suck only because of Youtues crappy quality, your crappy computer or both? (In defense, you're probably going to say "U HAVNT CEEN T ON UR TV!!!1". And infact, I haven't. I saw it on a friends TV. He imported from Japan. =/ And one more thing. Bad Graphics don't make a bad game (With the exception of the 300 video game. Good god.) And bad construction sures hell doesn't make a bad game either. Lack of good gameplay, text errors and severe glitches, THOSE make bad gameplay. And now to other people: When has this become an Opinion thread? It looks like a rant thread to me, and Acrof is starting a flame war. I urge you people to stop replying, and play the freaking game, without being critical of a minor "Fault in Graphics" (Oh god) of the game. |
Yes, the Pokémon do look plastic, but that's not because of the quality of the graphics, it's because the lack of real textures. But what's done is done and I don't see how complaining about it will make things any better. =| And as Yutss (and IIRC, me too) already pointed out, bad graphics don't make a bad. 'Sides, the attack effects are freakin' awesome. <3
|
I'll have to say Pokémon can't and won't look better than in Game Cube. Why? Because they're not real. They are supposed to be cartoonish, so nothing can be done about it, unless you want to see a real horse with fire on its back and a horn that doesn't resemble the Rapidash you used to know.
Offtopic question: The gender differences also appear in PBR? |
I never even noticed the differences in D/P.
|
Quote:
If it´s possible and cheap (for such big companies) why not to make things better? If we keep saying: Oh! It´s amazing! They will not even TRY to improve anything, because they will still get money from it. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
^I have to agree with you there. I personally think cel-shading would really match the style of Pokémon. Whether or not they've done it before, they should seriously give it a public shot.
|
I also think cell-shading would be great for pokemon games.
I might be referring to an earlier part of this discussion but, Pokemon is not Final Fantasy. It is meant to be turn-based. That's just the style that any Pokemon-Fan fell in love with. A GOOD story line would be great and for information: They are thinking about a MMORPG of pokemon but that'll take some years. |
Quote:
Does PBR have bad graphics? No. Could they have been better? Yes. What a lot of people forget about D/P, PBR, and other Pokemon games is it's Pokemon. They don't have to have the most fancy graphics out there, they don't have to have some nice big fancy FMVs for the games. They like to keep things simple on the graphics side (why does D/P look a lot like the GBA Pokemon games? Because they want to keep it simple, they want to keep it the way it's always been). XD1 PBR1 XD2 PBR2 XD3 PBR3 I tried to keep them close to the same size. But you get the point. PBR might be a step above XD (a little step), but on the graphics side PBR could have been done better. Am I complaining about the graphics of PBR? Nope, because I was fine with Col and XD, I'll be fine with PBR. It's a Pokemon game, I wasn't looking for some great big step above in graphics for PBR. I just want a 3D game where I can battle on the Wii. If I wanted a console with some nice HD flashy fancy graphics then I wouldn't have gotten a Wii (I'm not saying it can't pull off some shocker on graphics, but I look at Final Fantasy XIII and I know the Wii can't do that). And I know that graphics doesn't make the game, as long as the gameplay is good I'll be happy with PBR. If I am let down by PBR it won't be due to the graphics. |
Quote:
If the result were good they should make a commercial game. About cell shading: Great idea, but I still think they should try to make some realistic pokemons, and release the pictures of them in the internet, so we (fans) could judge them. But there are things that I can´t understand: Why did they remove the arena destruction shown in the first preview of PBR? That , I have to say, would be the most amazing feature in PBR. |
While I have disagreed with you mostly Acrof, I must agree with the fact that it was stupid they took out the "Attack effect Arena" addition. That was what I was looking forward to most, and they took it out. It probably required too much data, though.
|
Or they wanted to be stupid and think that "Oh no we cant put THAT kind of violence in weely little kids might be scared of a hyper beam coming from a Space Monster destroying the arena!111
So lets just have a hyper beam coming from a Space Monster!!! Not scary at all =]" Kids suck |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's a matter of marketing, price ranges and the expense of a product. Possibly 1 Mil. PBR copys would be sold after 4 days, minimum. And I've never seen a company that uses TWO discs for one game. |
Quote:
If a game like Happy Feet was put on two discs it would be $65 just because it's a 2 disc game? No. The price of games is based off of development costs, and how well the game is likely to sell. A game like Happy Feet wouldn't have sold well at $50, so they had to bring it down right from the start. And to top it all off, Nintendo said none of their first (and I'm gussing second as well) party games are going to be over $50. PBR couldn't sell 1 million copies in 4 days if it wanted to (well, sure it could. Drop the price down to 5 bucks and it'd sell like crazy). It took Diamond and Pearl 5 days to break 1 mill sells in the US. And a lot of people got both Dimaond and Pearl. There aren't two copies of Pokemon Battle Revolution for everyone to buy. And you have never seen a company that uses more than once disc for a game? I've seen games that have 3 and 4 discs, does that count? You might want to get into gaming a little more. Final Fantasy VII, VIII, and IX all use 3-4 discs for the games (most of the Square games on the PS used at least 2 discs). Tales of Symphonia and Resident Evil Zero both on the GC both used two discs. And Blue Dragon for the XBox 360 is going to use 3 discs. I am let down by what was taken out of PBR. When I saw the first trailer and saw Hyper Beam (or whatever attack it was) dig a groove in the ground and I said to myself "This is what I've been wanting in a console Pokemon game". I had high hopes for the game, not on the graphics side as much as updaing a lot of things (Pokemon really hitting each other, attacks like Hyper Beam digging up the ground, Thunder making rocks fly, Earthquake breaking up the ground, etc). But sadly, PBR just didn't stand up to what I had hoped for. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Nintendo is my side hobby besides football. It's not my life where I buy ever FF game and sit in my room with a bag of M&Ms and a Pepsi, all the while saying "Dah! Flicking fingers on remote make person on TV move! Ahar!" And isn't it remotely sad that people pay for 4 disc video games when they could read a book or take up a sport? My god. Quote:
While this games Gameplay and graphics are good, PBR isn't near what Nintendo THEMSELVES said it was going to be. Not many battle arenas, either. (10? Come on!!) The game lacks what it should've had most, but it's graphics are tremendous. Anyone seen the Ice beam attack model? Or the solarbeam one? Both had such good quality, it made me want to import a copy from japan right that second. |
Quote:
DMJ |
Quote:
I AMLOST FORGOT! SURF! THIS ATTACK IS AMAZING IN PBR! But the fact of using some 3D models from stadium, to release this game sooner.... Blarg.... I was really disappointed when I realized that... |
Quote:
While they look similar, they surface tendence is much smoother, most likely due to more segment additions... and the movement seems to flow easier... Not to metnion Nintendo got off their butts to actually make every shiny form of a pokemon now... Also.. I also noticed that you said the "Hexagonal" Pokeball... while I have seen it... have you ever considered it was made that way? to add to the decorative touch? Again, The Fire, Water, and Ice attacks look ungodly awsome.. freshly made particle systems added with awsome animation and graphics.. PBR has THE BEST Graphics on the Wii currently (Besides MP3 and SSBB) Gameplay? Excuse me.. PBR Isnt suposed to have a storyline... its another Stadium... Whats not to love? I mean.. common? Not to mention the Online addition and the custom avatars... Battling via WiFi has never looked so real... sadly... no voice chat (Unless Nintendo decides to add another speaker to the WiiMote, since techniclly, the one used currently is also the ones used in modern cell phones :)) Also, You can change the cair color and length ;) You jsut havent seen it yet... |
Quote:
And as Andrea said, Pokémon Diamond and Pearl combined sold one million after five days and a good portion of the people that bought Diamond also bought Pearl. So it's damn near impossible for PBR to sell quicker than DP, and there are two reasons why. Quote:
I have a girlfriend, full time job, part time studying, am captain of my soccer team, play in a pool team and go out with friends at the weekend. Yet I still find time to play Final Fantasy and other games. My life is pretty damn balanced, so where's the problem there? Just because you're too narrow minded to realise your own hypocrisy, doesn't give you a right to put others down. This I agree on. PBR looked tremendously awesome in the first preveiw, and then WHAM! They took out what was to be the best part. I'm suprised they even kept the "Pokemon Physically Hit Eachother" in. While this games Gameplay and graphics are good, PBR isn't near what Nintendo THEMSELVES said it was going to be. Not many battle arenas, either. (10? Come on!!) The game lacks what it should've had most, but it's graphics are tremendous. Anyone seen the Ice beam attack model? Or the solarbeam one? Both had such good quality, it made me want to import a copy from japan right that second.[/QUOTE] Quote:
|
Quote:
Bulbasaur, Charmander, Squirtle, and respective evolutions were remodeled, but most of them (the old ones) are still using 3D models from Stadium... EX: Arcanine, Slowbro, Exeggutor, etc. |
Quote:
Quote:
Btw, I would like it. I don't judge things on looks and completely ignore everything else. Has anyone actually posted pictures of these for comparing? {{If so, could you post them again? I don't feel like looking through 10 pages.}} I'll bet there are some differences between them. |
here is a picture that i found in another thread
http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f293/acrof/typhlosion.jpg But what I'm scared of is this thread may turn into the other one :t354:~*!*~Queen Boo~*!*~ |
You have to understand that the Wii isn't capable of really super amazing awesome graphics - Nintendo have always been more focused on gameplay. Pokemon games are known for their awesome gameplay, so what have we to worry about? The graphics look amazing for the Wii. Just remember what system this is on - the Wii won't be able to do much more than the PS2 really as far as graphics are concerned.
|
But Zelda has good graphics and Final Fantasy Crystal Cronicles (to GC) have amazing graphics.
|
Quote:
If other companies can make a game with amazing graphics in the GameCube, what should we expect from a company (with lots of money, probaly more than Square itself) making a game for a Wii? |
Twilight Princess's graphics weren't even made for the Wii, originally all that was done on the GameCube. You can get all those graphics on the GameCube, TP looks exactly the same on it.
PBR is so jam-packed with moves and sounds and all this stuff that they don't have enough space to go massive on graphics either. We should be grateful that they've put so much into it and STILL has pretty decent graphics. They aren't amazing, for a reason! |
I don't understand.
Why can't we compare Pokémon to other games? Is Pokémon that all holy? I don't need to play the game to realise this: It's Pokémon. In 3D. It's nothing new. Oh wow! Character models! They obviously take up so much that they can't actually put anything new in there! And by the way, the Wii is just a compact GameCube with a gimmick. Oh, and one last thing. Pokémon is outdated. Very very outdated. Even Final Fantasy has broken away from turnbased gameplay. |
Quote:
If Stadium could handle 251 pokemon in 64 megabytes (memory capacity of a N64 cartridge) why cannot a DVD with 8.000 megabytes store more things in PBR? Some will say: What about the shinies, and the gender differences, and the arenas? 1- Stadium 2 had 251 shinies too! Total of 502 3D models in a 64 megabytes cartridge. Some will also think: But PBR models uses much more space than the ones in Stadium 2! That can be true, but do the math: PBR probly has 2 models for each pokemon (2 X 493= 986) Let´s put 100 more to the trainer´s models so in PBR we have < 1086 3D models. Now if we divide the data storage of a DVD with the amount that fits in a N64 cartidge (8.000 / 64= 125) So a DVD can store 125 Stadium 2, right? So a DVD can store 62750 stadium 2 models. O.o Even dividing that by 10 it would fit much more models in a DVD. So we can conclude that: it´s just an excuse! 2- There´s no gender differences in PBR. 3- The arenas are actualy pretty small, just the main circle (where the pokemon battle) is really the arena, all the rest is an empty space fulfilled by visual effects (trees, sky, sun, etc) If one day i buy this game I´ll extrac it´s .iso file just to see how much space it uses in a DVD. |
Quote:
|
What gets me mad about the game was the promise of destruction in the stages. It never happened. I watched movies on youtube over and over and never found any stage get destroyed by a Pokemon's move.
|
Quote:
|
I played Dragon Quest to PS2 yesterday. It was cellshading. The characters looked somewhat 2D, but I wished Pokémon had that graphics.
I still wonder though, how can newer Pokémon games have less good graphics than old ones. BR is not that way, but Stadium looks better than Colloseum, actually. |
Quote:
yea I agree with you on this one. Graphics aren't what Nintendo really focuses on Quote:
also I agree with you as well. When a Pokemon uses dig or earthquake it just shows the side effect and then it dissappears. But this is Pokemon, it doesn't have to make sense :t354:tatsujin gosuto |
Quote:
|
hm PBR looks fine to me, but the video on an Arcanine... looks like they got that Arcanine graphic from Stadium.. and its horrible
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I know that is what bugs me, you just pointed out another Fire type Pokemon that has not so well graphics. I think its just the fire types :t354:tatsujin gosuto |
Quote:
|
but those 2 POkemon dont look as bad as the fire types in my opinion
:t354:tatsujin gosuto |
>_< In my opnion, the most disgraceful 3D pokemon in these large platform games is Ho-oh!!! Know Ho-oh is one of my favorite pokemon, mainly becuase its legend behind it is one of the best. But Just take a look at its feathers on top of its head.... THERE JUST ANGLES!!!! >_< And even the texture is horrible, you can see how it doesn't really fit on it because its stretched in a lot of areas. Know, this is only my opnion..... Huuuuuuuugh.....it just makes me really mad when I see it... Oh, and also, see, they remake Lugia, mainly because of Pokemon XD, but they couldn't remake its closest legend relative, Ho-oh! >_<
|
Yes the same goes to Charizard an Typhlosion, they remodeled Charizard, but Typhlosion...
|
It's kind of strange that Ho-oh wasn't remodeled. After all, it was redone for SSBM, though it didn't have the animations for a Pokémon game.
Is this graphic thing to release BR earlier. I heard so, and if that's the reason, it's a very stupid reason, really. |
ROM hacks are made for fun.
PBR was made by professionals. Big difference. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ok here go: 1- An .iso is the binary code of a game that almost every CD/DVD based videogame use, and can be executed by the system itself or a emulator (just like a GBA ROM) , in this case a Wii. 2-The same program used by Game Freak/Genius Sonority is needed to change anything in PBR´s ISO. 3-I need a Wii or a working emulator to test the results. 4- And finaly I would need a decent computer, because my old Pentium 2 can´t do very much for me at this moment.:P Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
The thing people are seemingly ignoring here is this.
The game is on a next-gen system, arguably the most successful out of the three new systems thus far. So they should be tapping into the best graphics they possibly can. They should be pushing the Wii to its limits, seeing as this is one of Nintendo's signature games. But they didn't. And that's not the only problem. The other big issue is the lack of a plot in this one. I mean, who in their right mind buys an RPG that has no plot?! Seriously. Plot is one of the biggest things RPG fans look for in a new game. And here, it just doesn't seem to be there. It doesn't matter what some fanboys say about graphics and story 'not being everything'. There is no excuse for this. None. Fans like me have been waiting for a Wii Pokemon game since the system came out, and this is what we're expecting now? Are you kidding? I seriously hope something is done about this before the release date. Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Hey Hey
Remember The English Versions Are Always Done Differently Just Wait Till That Comes Out
|
Quote:
And even still, regardless of what fans label this game as, the genre of the game is Role-Playing. Otherwise, you wouldn't find it here. |
Quote:
|
ROM hacks are made by professionals!!!!!! U try making a rom hacks. It takes a LONG time!!!!
|
You try learning how to type properly in English, then you can try and insult me.
now for me to comment on your post... Quote:
Quote:
Now, as far as Pokemon Battle Revolution goes, in my opinion, I could probably say that it was a little lazy of Pokemon Company. But, I know for one that I wouldn't want to have to remodel everything over again, make 100 so new models, then model a bunch of freaking arenas and trainers and junk. You try making a 3D model, it's no walk in the park either. |
Quote:
Different? No, they just translate it. Quote:
And besides now they have high technology on their side, including scanners that can scan a real life object and transform it into a 3D model. For creating 3D models they can scan a sculpture of a pokémon and create a 3D model with it in some hours. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Since when did this topic turn into one about ROM hacks? I thought it was supposed to be about Battle Revolution...
|
If anyone still wants to say anything about the square pokeball, I've seen things in architecture that represent a circular object but are square for some reason. I'm pretty sure it's an implement that's been around since humans first learned to carve.
I'm also slightly happy that they are using the old 3D models but upgrading them with new textures and stuff. If you think that Pokeveterans "deserve more", why don't you consider we're getting something called nostalgia? I personally can't wait to see Poliwhirl flexing while awaiting orders once again. It'll bring back memories. |
Quote:
TOY STORY 1), and it´s incredibly expensive, only big companies can afford one. Quote:
Quote:
Why burn your money with a Wii and PBR if you can get nostalgia playing Stadium 2 in a N64? XD Quote:
Let me explain, you are talking about the animations, the animations are just the same for the old pokémon (that´s why a Poliwhirl will flex it´s body while awaiting orders). I´m not against this, I´m against the FACT that some pokemons are using the same 3D models from 9 years ago, Nintendo 64 models in a Wii game. This means that the new pokemons will get amazing models and textures, but the old ones will be full of sharp corners. |
Quote:
|
Actually, the game looks great.
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f293/acrof/pokball.jpg this: http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f293/acrof/1.jpg http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f293/acrof/2.jpg this: http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f293/acrof/typhlosion.jpg and this: http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f293/acrof/arcanine.jpg Seriously, you should pay more attention to these "details". |
Image 1: Intentional
Image 2: Intentional Image 3: Intentional Image 4: Intentional Image 5: lol, you think that's a problem? Get over it. No, it's not porygon, so it doesn't need them angles, but it's real minor imo. |
Ohemgee. I had no idea minor graphics were SUCH a big problem. =O
Here, Acrof. http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u238/Yutss/Knife.jpg Here's a knife. Kill yourself with it, because life is so awful all because of Arcanines square feet, disappearing Pokeballs, Typhlosions fire spikes (Which are intended) and PokeHexgons. |
Umm... First offending Nintendo, then blaming ROM-hackers and fan game makers, then the post above me, which could be posted much sooner to prevent this sad end.
Let's explain something: ROM-hacking: Modifying data of GBA cartidge Read-Only Memory to get different look, interact in alternate ways and this can be done in many ways. From HEX-editing along with using tools and combining the techniques to get professional-looking result. Fan game making: Building the PC/Mac game inspired by some well-known formats like Pokémon, from zero, using quite similar game system and (but not in all cases) graphics and final goals. Blaming someone for minor details, which, in most cases, were meant to be the way they are: Something which can really change thinking about a certain person. Now something to the thread maker. I won't flame you. You aren't worth of it. I just tell you, that you might act like intelligent, but the problem is in the other place than in talking. Where, it's up to you. After this post, I ask the thread maker to not send me offensing PMs and not to bother me anywhere. Wish you all nice day/night. |
PBR really has good Graphics to me. Although, No Story Mode. But, it's still a must have Game as stated by others. :D
|
Just for some people's note, Game Freak doesn't develop the home console Pokémon Games, Genius Sonority does.
|
http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f293/acrof/pokball.jpg
I can't believe no one's gotten this yet. That's not a hexagon. It's an octogon. It's got 8 sides. A hexagon has six. I love correcting people mistakes. Anyway, I'm fine with PBR as long as you can battle people who aren't on your friends list with wi-fi. |
Actually if you bother looking at any play videos on Youtube, you sorta realize that people aren't complaining and actually enjoying fighting random people on wi-fi.
I mean, Genius Sonority can't come up with good storylines even if they tried and mediocre graphics are their forte, so why not pick up the game and try to enjoy what you're given? However I'd like to complain about the removal of the Multi-battle function please. I know, I'm acting like a hypocrite. |
Once again, I said I'd stay out, but I have to say this:
Quote:
Oh, one more thing: Quote:
|
There is only one thing in the entire PBR graphic system that really dissapoints me. Typhlosions fire spikes are infact horrible but thats not enough to get me to not buy it. I can't wait to play against my friends!
|
Quote:
Arcof is being a whiny little kid. Heatran, that was just uncalled for. It's NOT A FREAKING RPG!! Get over it! IT'S NOT A STANDALONE GAME!! Get over that as well; if you don't have D/P, this game is not for you. Typhlosion's flame spikes are INTENTIONAL. They're like jets of flame that come out of his back. If they were made of the same fire that Charizard's tail had, THEY WOULDN'T BE SPIKES NOW WOULD THEY. I'm taking a 3D modeling class at UCSD. It's hard stuff. Seriously, to all of you complaining, I'd like to see you make a red-done Arcanine. No? That's what I thought. |
Quote:
It does look like a hexagon, doesn't it... Maybe they forgot to edit it out or something. |
Is it just me, or is the game pretty much usless if you don't own a DS?
|
Quote:
Also, they´ve got extra time to do that because they didn´t work on a story mode or mini-games, and besides it´s not one 3D modeler working alone it´s a whole (well paid) team of 3D moders Quote:
IT´S NOT INTETIONAL BECAUSE IT´S THE SAME 3D MODEL FROM STADIUM 2, I WOULD RECOGNIZE IT ANYWHERE. Even typhlosion´s flame being supposed to have spikes they could have redone it aswell. |
Quote:
Cyndaquil and Quilava resemble small porcupines. When they eventually evolve into Typhlosion, they keep the spikes from being "porcupines". I rest my case. Now shut up about the fire spikes. Edit: Also tell me how they couldv'e improved the fire spikes. Should they've made them rounder? |
They can give it a new texture, that looks like fire, instead of a red and yellow piece of PAPER.
Also it´s not only the flames, the whole pokemon model is square, the same from Stadium 2. |
But what if that's what they were intended to be, no? THIN fire spikes? Or should they look like some hokey spikes torn off of Bowsers evil castle?
|
I will explain what they are doing to explain what they should do.
This: http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f293/acrof/textura.jpg(or something similar) is the texture they are using now, outdated, and don´t have any 3D to it. So when they put this texture in typhlosion´s 3D model, this texture will get the flames shape, like this: http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f293/acrof/fogo.jpg But, if they change the original texture for another one more realistic, like this one: http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f293/acrof/fogo2.jpg The final result would be more realist aswell: http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f293/acrof/fogo3.jpg |
Ooh, diagrams! Yeah... I don't see a large enough difference to make me make a thread about it.
|
...Okay, I've played the game, and I have to say: acrof is an overreacting kid. The graphics are fine, if not better. Most are greatly improved compared to the GCN models.
Oh, and I checked on some of these things that acrof has been bugging us about: Typhlosion's model...not a big deal. "Disappearing" Pokeball...actually doesn't disappear. Check for yourself. Pokeball in background...I haven't noticed yet. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 4:08 AM. |
![]()
© 2002 - 2018 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.
Acknowledgements
Use of PokéCommunity Assets
vB Optimise by DragonByte Technologies Ltd © 2023.