![]() |
Quote:
About the episodes, maybe they should have other main characters sometimes, not only just Satoshi and his friends. I thought the beginning of the first Pokemon movie was special, not only becasue of the story, but also because it was about Mewtwo and Ai, two other characters. I don't mean they should leave Satoshi out, but every episode does not have to include him. By doing this it will be much easier to create a more non-repeating story, too. Maybe, before they add another character (like they added Haruka and Hikari), why not have this new character travel alone for awhile until she/he meets Satoshi and the rest. And why not put a 'movie' story into some of the episodes. Because the episodes are short deos not mean you cannot have an event extend through several of them. That will make people long for the next episode even more. Some events are during more than one episode, instead of ending during the same as they started in, but its still not like the Pokemon movies. Its not harder (probably even easier) to have a good story in a season of episodes than in a movie. |
I think the game actually looks decent. The environments, trainers and attack effects look pretty good to me.
But the Pokemon in the game are a totally different story. Some look good, even pretty darn good, but some look downright terrible. I fought a Graveler last night, and it looked like the game was glitching out, like when random techno-glitch stuff just pops out of things in video games. Lack of story is sort of an issue for me too, battling is only good for so long. I do like the online battling though, it certainly gives more of a rush than in-game battling. Overall, I'd give it a pretty good, but I think maybe they rushed this a little bit. It definitely could have been spectacular if they had tried a little harder. |
Quote:
It worked with me when they showed those 2 episodes with Groundon battling Kyogre. But I really think they shold try changing all the main characters. You see, Ash is the hero whenever some legendaries appear, and it looks like Ash is te only one that met every single legendary pokemon, for me it sounds like Ash is the most important pokemon trainer of all. Whenever I stop to watch a episode and I see Ash battling I think to myself: "I can do that a thousand of times better." XD Quote:
|
But Kenta was the main character of Legend of Thunder, and he met Raikou. Still, they should make more movies like that one. My favorite will still be the first one (Mewtwo Strikes Back), the part when Mewtwo was the main character
|
Quote:
Though one spot where I have to correct you is that the rental passes ARE customizable. at least to a degree. you can change what pokemon are on the passes by one of two ways. FIrstly, if you own more than one pass you can trade pokemon between passes, and secondly, you can permanently change what pokemon are on a pass by trading them via Trade Battle in Gateway colloseum. so it's not like the rental passes are as stagnant as you claim. |
PBR didn't really impress me like I had hoped. Trainers are easy to beat and I was actually hoping i'd get to catch some Pokemon in it. But overall it's a pretty terrible game.
|
The pokemon look fine there is storage and who really cares if theres a hexagon. the graphics are better than DP the game has wi fi you can dress up your trainer so it's a decent game
|
Quote:
Cause 99% of my favorite pokémon are the same from stadium 2, 64-bits graphics in a 256-bits system.... http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f293/acrof/arcanine.jpg |
Arcof, I thought this thread got closed, due to flaming or something? lol, apparently not.. Which pokemon weren't upgraded for Wii?
|
Battle Revolution
You mentioned the Graphics are terrible. On Youtube, they look much worse than in real life. Although, that Pokeball in the fountainisa hexagon.Anyway, all the other features you said were missing, don't matter(exept for the field destruction, why'd they get rid of THAT???:17:)i do like that they kept the same animations from Stadium, but not that they kept the same graphics.What realy matters is the battles! And the battles are Spectacular.(they would be even better if there was some destruction involved:t057) Anyway, i think it's a good game.But, i don't have wifi for wii:17:.
|
Quote:
I disagree. It seems that the graphics didn't improve from Stadium, but it had to. I think the graphics are still bad, even for the Wii. This is a NEXT GEN SYSTEM! I expect there to be some better graphics, and it being the Wii isn't a good enough excuse. I see PBR as a $50 expansion port. They could've done better. |
Battle Revolution
Quote:
|
I know that, we can't expect too much from the Wii, but still, this is 4th generation of gaming. It being graphically inferior to 360/PS3 is no excuse for some of the systems poor graphics-PBR, for example. Have ya seen Twilight Princess? How bout Resident Evil 4? Those are some pretty games. We can't be so leniant on PBR's visuals, or else they will continue to shell out ugly games.
|
Pokemon Battle Revolution
i guess ur right, Luigi dude.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
No offense to anyone who likes PBR. Just cause you like it doesn't mean your a crazed fanboy. We all like some sort of, well, poor quality games. I for instance like Dynasty Warrior, despite it being extremley reppetitive. |
Wiiiiiiiiiii~..
The Wii has the most potential for the next gen consoles... except... the Wii ISN'T next gen... well in the way that PS3 and 360 are. All three are indeed the next generation of their predecessors. The Wii isn't near the graphical standards of the other 2. This has been an issue NIntendo has always had, was pushing the envelope graphically. They come up with new ideas, but graphics aren't their strong point in the least.
So while I personally have no opinion on the graphics in PBR, as well, i don't ever get hopes up for graphics in Pokemon games.. lol.. I've been into pokemon too long to know the graphics aren't going to catchup to the current standard, or even half way catchup. But yeah, Nintendo slacks off sometimes when it comes to trying hard, any of us that play Pokemon are surely not shocked by this... are we? I mean, come on, yellow's only changes graphically were the opponent pokemon graphic changed, color, and slight animations. From there Gold/Silver and even crystal didn't change much.. except color mainly. Ruby and Sapphire were more upgraded for the GBA, but if you've played Golden Sun.. yeah that had WAY better graphics.. And OMG a story! -gasp- Emerald was the same, except less irritatingly sized font, and animations again.. cuz for some reason they got left out ouf R/S.. -cough- slackers -cough cough- .. While I respect everyone's opinion, thinking or hoping the graphics for PBR on the Wii were gonna be anything like Gears of War, Viva Pinata, Metal gear Solid 4.. You gotta keep perspective of the companies, their focus and the potential of the machines themselves. P.S. the only game i've seen to have decent graphics for the Wii so far is ... -shock- Mario Galaxy and Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess.. Flagship titles for Nintendo.. As where Pokemon is coowned by Gamefreaks.. with payouts to Satoshi Tajiri. This is my opinion, and opinions are as prevelant as the things we sit on. |
Now I agree with everything that ya said, but we know that the Wii's graphical prowess are inferior to 360/PS3, but it should still be ahead of it's past system. Think of it like food. If a three star restaraunt can make decent looking food [Gamecube], then a four star restaraunt should be more appealing [Wii]. You wouldn't wanna eat food that looks & smells like vomit, no matter how delicious it taste.
|
wtf? How do you eat Wiis?
The Wii is about a different way to play, in the PBR case it is Wi-Fi, not food. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
For what I have seen in PBR, this game could run in a standard gamecube without pushing it to it´s limits. If people consider that PBR´s graphics aren´t the most important part of the game, for me it looks like it´s one of the most important, because without amazing moves and some remodeled pokémon this game would be a complete fiasco. Remove the "amazing graphics" of this game and you will probably realise that a remake of Stadium 2 with wi-fi would be much more fun than PBR, even when it comes to "the amazing graphics" PBR fails for being using 3D models from Stadium 1 and 2. About the Wii: SNES was 2 times more powerfull than a NES N64 was 2 times more powerfull than a SNES GameCube was 2 times more powerfull than a N64 The Wii is about 3 times more powerfull than a GameCube (although a PS3 is about 42 times more powerfull than a PS2 XD), so I think the problem is not with the console itself but in the companies that create games for it. Even if you forget that the graphics aren´t the strong of the Wii, try to remember what is the most important thing then... Could it be... The motion sensitive controler? Yes, that´s it! Without it the Wii would be a portable GameCube with no graphical differences in the games, in other ways, it wouldn´t sell. And tell me 1 feature in PBR that you mustuse this feature to play? Final conclusion, PBR don´t take on advantage of almost everything that a Wii can offer, the only advantage is the wi-fi connection and that´s all. I hope Game Freak realise that if they keep in this rhythm we will ( literally :laugh:) pay for the consequences. |
Heh, not that I'm expecting Halo 3 on Wii. The Point & Click Controller-Wiimote, sorry-just about makes up for this. Resident Evil 4 is the best on the Wii, cause I can actually shoot those jerks in the face with a real motion sensor gun-dang it, I mean Wiimote. But some things are just cheap tack-ons. PBR, IMO, is one of them. All it is is seeing them hit eachother in three-dimension. That, to me, isn't worth $50 dollars. When they make it cheaper, say, $30, then I'll buy it.
|
Okay, I can pretty much say this thread's gotten out of hand. I've had to delete posts, warn users for their extreme stupidity in making off-topic posts and for flaming.
xXscytherXx, you've been warned for having a pretty much annoying attitude towards sims796. One thing you have to do on this forum is respect people. Closed~ |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 4:08 AM. |
![]()
© 2002 - 2018 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.
Acknowledgements
Use of PokéCommunity Assets
vB Optimise by DragonByte Technologies Ltd © 2023.