View Single Post
Old April 2nd, 2013 (7:57 AM). Edited April 2nd, 2013 by OmegaRuby and AlphaSapphire.
OmegaRuby and AlphaSapphire's Avatar
OmegaRuby and AlphaSapphire OmegaRuby and AlphaSapphire is offline
10000 year Emperor of Hoenn
    Join Date: Apr 2010
    Location: Oregon
    Age: 23
    Gender: Male
    Nature: Careful
    Posts: 17,505
    We're repeating old Pokémon we want evolutions again...which shows just how much demand exists for these Pokémon mentioned to evolve xD.
    I believe it's based on a winged can be better though ... give it an evolution where it's Ground/Flying Gamefreak

    Originally Posted by Radio Rebel View Post
    I don't understand why people think Bouffalant should be a Tauros evo. So they're both bipedal brown horned mammals, that means they should be related? They're counterparts, like Machop and Timburr, or Geodude and Roggenrola. That's not a "troll connection", it's just people jumping to unreasonable conclusions.

    I agree about Luvdisc though. They don't really work as counterparts when one is more complex in design and has better stats. I suspect Alomomola was originally meant as a Luvdisc evo in Gen IV but got left out; since BW didn't have any evos of old Pokémon, they had to make it a standalone. Which was a really stupid decision imo, but they won't change it now.

    I agree with all of these. Also, Houndoom needs a cerberus evo. Also, I'm sure it's been said a lot, but Mawile and Sableye need evos too.
    Uh Bouffalant and Tauros are quadpedal (walk on all fours) not by bipedal (walk on all twos). Your point still stands however, I don't see the connection between those two...
    Speaking of bipedal how about Tauros evolves into a minotaur?
    I'm currently working on some novels. If you're interested you can read them here:
    Reply With Quote