• Our software update is now concluded. You will need to reset your password to log in. In order to do this, you will have to click "Log in" in the top right corner and then "Forgot your password?".
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

Homepage Layout

Trev

[span="font-size: 8px; color: white;"][font="Monts
1,505
Posts
11
Years
  • Age 27
  • Seen Nov 15, 2023
Order of Fan-Made Games Section

The Fan-Made Games Section's current order is a bit weird. If you switch ROM Hacking and Game Development then it'll be a bit more organized, so that all the ROM hacking stuff is all together in one little part and then the Game Development stuff is all together in little part. Community ROM hack can probably stay at the bottom as it'll see significantly less activity.

EDIT: Literally changed as soon as I posted this. Basically the ROM Hacking stuff should be closer to together and game development should kept together. If they're all intermixed, people could get lost very easily.
 
Last edited:

Anemone

break through the sky
74
Posts
14
Years
(sorry i wrote so much!)

hello. i was just looking at the new PC front page layout, and i wanted to ask about some of the placement choices? i thought it best to list my thoughts while you are still considering the reordering, so please don't see these as a list of complaints, but just as my two cents to hopefully ease your decision-making process. of course i invite discussion and rebuttal, should there be good reason for it <3

1. i really think the main introductory forums for new users should be at the top of the page. i realisethat most people visit PC to engage in game-related discussion, but for me it is imperative as a new user to have clear and easy access to the rules and introduction boards. once people become more acquainted with the website, they can easily be condensed with the minimize button anyway, thereby placing the Pokemon forums on top.

2. i quite like the horizontal display of Pokemon boards per gen! to give one suggestion; i feel perhaps it would be helpful if each got their own icon? currently (on my screen at least) they all just have the default PC icon and then their gen number written out fully, which actually threw me off momentarily cause they're also in reverse order (6-1), and i had to do a double-take to realise where Gen 7 was... this may be just me and take some getting used to, but with just a few tweaks maybe it could be made even more handy and intuitive.
perhaps even put PGC at the top of the Pokemon forums, and then add Gen 7 in with the horizontal list?

3. while i agree that the off-topic forums should be kept aside from the Pokémon forums, i don't believe the manner in which this was attempted now is very good... i'd prefer if all the forums currently tucked under the single "off-topic" forum instead received their own section, similar to the Create & Discover section. that way, they will remain clearly visible and separated to those who use them, while again being easily tucked away under a minimize button for those who don't. the way it is now, "Off-Topic" seems extremely cluttered, and i worry that the forums will lose significant activity as well, having been reduced to sub-forums.
also, it seems strange to me that all these are tucked away, but the equally off-topic forum games (playground and UG) do still keep their own forums? i understand that these probably receive more traffic, though.

keep in mind that i all other things i haven't mentioned, i approve of! it has been a while since i visited PC, specifically its homepage, but i couldn't resist at least commenting. i am not alleric to change at all, but there are some fundamentals that i feel shouldn't be tampered with.

in a nutshell: my primary concern is that the main introductory forums, imperative for new users, are not clearly presented at the top of the page. i would argue to put them ("Community Square") up top, with the exclusion of the "Off-topic" forum, which i think would be better off as a section of its own at the bottom.
 
5,256
Posts
16
Years
(sorry i wrote so much!)
Don't feel the need to apologise! Feedback is definitely encouraged, and we appreciate your calm tone. Do note that I'm just answering this post as a guy, not necessarily as a representation of the staff team as a whole or in any "official" capacity.

hello. i was just looking at the new PC front page layout, and i wanted to ask about some of the placement choices? i thought it best to list my thoughts while you are still considering the reordering, so please don't see these as a list of complaints, but just as my two cents to hopefully ease your decision-making process. of course i invite discussion and rebuttal, should there be good reason for it <3

1. i really think the main introductory forums for new users should be at the top of the page. i realisethat most people visit PC to engage in game-related discussion, but for me it is imperative as a new user to have clear and easy access to the rules and introduction boards. once people become more acquainted with the website, they can easily be condensed with the minimize button anyway, thereby placing the Pokemon forums on top.
This was quite the contested discussion before the changes were pushed through in the staff forums and honestly I'm not sure where I personally stand on it. Ultimately though, with regards to the actually important information, the Rules, that's at the top of every page on PC in the navigation bar (at least on most styles and it should be in the upcoming UI update). That isn't to downplay the role of the introductory forums, but it's worth noting that newly registered users have a notice pinned to the top of the index which they have to manually close to hide which links them to the introductions forum, so it shouldn't be too hard to find for those who want it, and for those who just want to discuss Pokémon there are no distractions.

2. i quite like the horizontal display of Pokemon boards per gen! to give one suggestion; i feel perhaps it would be helpful if each got their own icon? currently (on my screen at least) they all just have the default PC icon and then their gen number written out fully, which actually threw me off momentarily cause they're also in reverse order (6-1), and i had to do a double-take to realise where Gen 7 was... this may be just me and take some getting used to, but with just a few tweaks maybe it could be made even more handy and intuitive.
perhaps even put PGC at the top of the Pokemon forums, and then add Gen 7 in with the horizontal list?
I feel like any aesthetic changes like this would be under the jurisdiction of the upcoming UI update which isn't really the same thing as the layout changes that just happened. I'm not involved in that though so I can't speak for whether this would be considered: personally I think it's a nice idea, though.

For your third point I don't really have an answer as I wasn't really involved in that decision and it doesn't affect how I personally use PC either, but I'm sure others will be able to respond to you. Hope I've helped clear some things up at least, though. Thanks for your feedback!
 

Her

11,468
Posts
15
Years
  • Age 30
  • Seen yesterday
3. while i agree that the off-topic forums should be kept aside from the Pokémon forums, i don't believe the manner in which this was attempted now is very good... i'd prefer if all the forums currently tucked under the single "off-topic" forum instead received their own section, similar to the Create & Discover section. that way, they will remain clearly visible and separated to those who use them, while again being easily tucked away under a minimize button for those who don't. the way it is now, "Off-Topic" seems extremely cluttered, and i worry that the forums will lose significant activity as well, having been reduced to sub-forums.

There are still some kinks being worked out! It may turn out that some of the forums will end up becoming one with me the Off Topic section in order to give the place even more purpose while simultaneously reducing clutter.

In any case, the issue of activity has definitely been noted and all involved are going to keep an eye on the sections, but I have faith that this will only help all the sections that have the good fortune to be included under the Off Topic category. Your concern is appreciated, however.

also, it seems strange to me that all these are tucked away, but the equally off-topic forum games (playground and UG) do still keep their own forums? i understand that these probably receive more traffic, though.

These are off-topic in the sense that they are game-based and operate on an entirely different level than the Off Topic section itself, it would not make sense to put them in a forum revolving around humanity and its output, which is essentially what Off Topic is.
 

Aquacorde

⟡ dig down, dig down ⟡
12,498
Posts
19
Years
I really like the horizontal layout for the games! I'd prefer it personally if we stacked up like...
-> PGC
-> SuMo
-> horizontal line
I feel like PGC gets lost, that's all.

I get what y'all are saying about the new users stuff, that there are banners and quick links all over. I think, though, that those should be made more obvious- but then again, maybe at this point I just tune out the quick links bars and that. I'd like to see some feedback from newer people on that particular matter because they're more relevant than I am on that lmao.

The main thing I really don't much like is how everything is positioned under Treehouse. The divide I'd rather have seen would have been

-> Treehouse
-- Mall?
-- VIP
-- Roundtable
-- New Leaf
-> General Entertainment
-- Video Games
-- Anime & Manga
-- Lab?

im kind of up in the air on Lab and personally I would prefer the Mall to be merged back into Treehouse, but that's not particularly relevant here. :P But I would prefer GE to be there to house a few things and keep the look of TT and its subforums tidier, you know?
 

EC

5,502
Posts
8
Years
  • Age 32
  • Seen Jul 1, 2022
Can you do to the off-topic sections what you did to the Pokemon generations sections but include the most recently posted-in thread underneath each?
 

Klippy

L E G E N D of
16,405
Posts
18
Years
They will not always be the mods there. Temporary.

As for why Off-Topic is how it is, I can just quote admin response from the staff thread on this.

Optimistically we aim for the Offtopic area to become and self-evolve into a singular, more-involved, and more engaged community. Right now there's a perception that the Treehouse is seen as a spamfest/****post zone, which McCree and Frieza are actively working to alter. Part of putting these forums as subforums is to draw more people to 1) the main Offtopic area, 2) other offtopic areas, and 3) to grow them as a community again, rather than a pile of random forums with little connectivity. Treehouse has a bounty of visitors who never go elsewhere as well as a content problem, while the other offtopic areas have a bounty of content but fewer visitors. Putting them together as a hub of offtopic discussion aims to benefit each in kind with an increase in traffic AND more fluid, less thin content.

In the same vein, as we see the dynamics and community of Offtopic change or grow, we can also be dynamic in shaping what subforums exist underneath it a la Forum Frontier. If we see a huge rise of a topic and decide to try out a subforum, we can more dynamically engage the community without resorting to poorly considered Frontier areas that have more often than not failed.

Treehouse will be the main Offtopic area, while its subforums are there as defined topical zones that are popular and prevalent enough to organizationally warrant separation. Sort of akin to a city (Treehouse) and its districts (subforums). We want to see the cultures of them merge to a degree while also keeping the organizational benefit of them being separate.
 

PiaCRT

[i]Orange Dev[/i]
936
Posts
13
Years
Why would you put introductions at the bottom of the page? Literally makes zero sense when you have people deciding to make this their very first forum board and it should be the first thing they see to familiarize themselves.

And really, merging Game Dev with ROM Hacking.

Sorry, I ran a rom hack board for years and we did this. It caused even more confusion than there already is with the difference between hacks and fangames.

It might look nice to some of you guys but seriously shafting two very different communities together is just asking for trouble.

/rant

@Goku :^) no title now shouldnt be an issue. if I have to explain my points more thoroughly please just let me know
 
Last edited:

Klippy

L E G E N D of
16,405
Posts
18
Years
Why is introductions at the bottom?
Overall we feel location has little to do with Meet & Greet's activity. People who want to introduce themselves will do so regardless of location (and Jake is working on a new member onboarding page which will direct them to M&G as well). Unfortunately past their introduction, M&G is not relevant to most members. Currently there are few active regular greeters aside from the staff, while Treehouse is at the bottom and has the most active regulars of any forum on PC. Location clearly isn't hurting that area AND being much closer to Treehouse may help increase traffic in M&G as well by simply being right next to such an active hub.

The same response applies for City Hall. The only time members need to go there is if they have a question, feedback, or issue. With such a shortened index, it will be immediately more available to them and they will be able to quickly post what they need. If you look at other sites, BMGf has a singular intro and help area. Serebii has only one thread for all forum questions. Smogon has a single thread for questions/suggestions and no intro area at all.

We feel the new location will be more beneficial overall for Feedback and Meet & Greet.
 

Meganium

[i]memento mori[/i]
17,226
Posts
13
Years
Guys, all this is just a work in progress. What y'all see is not the final product.

Although quite honestly I am peeved the M&G section is at the bottom but if there is something being worked on for that section alone, then by all means. xD
 

PiaCRT

[i]Orange Dev[/i]
936
Posts
13
Years
I'm not as concerned about the intro changes as I am the fangame board changes (which yes until you have these new "features" added is dumb bc new members generally do not use bulletin posts to navigate).

I don't understand who thought the merging of those boards was a good idea. Anyone who has been active in those forums the last, idk, 7 years would know people constantly confuse the two as it was, and game dev wasnt even close to the RH boards. Needs more clarification or, yknow, just give game dev its own board.
 

Charlie Brown

[font=lato]coolcoolcool[/font]
4,240
Posts
12
Years
New members tend to skim over the welcomes forum, though.

^ I mentioned this in the staff thread but didn't get a reply so moving it here, but can we use data like heatmaps to verify these things? I don't think big changes to UI/UX should just be made based on assumptions or our thoughts, but should start with data.
 

Dragon

lover of milotics
11,151
Posts
10
Years
New members tend to skim over the notices, though. Just an observation on my part since I've ran a forum similar to PC before over the course of 3 years.

New members do read the notice here, though. o:

I had my fair share of seeing introduction posts over the years where new members claim that they were send to the board because of it. But maybe if it was more noticeable, that can help. ^^
 

Aquacorde

⟡ dig down, dig down ⟡
12,498
Posts
19
Years
I still think it makes sense to separate entertainment-based stuff and like, life-oriented stuff while still keeping them close to each other (under the overall banner of Community Square). There's enough under that particular topic to warrant that separation from Off Topic, and it makes it easier to find the content instead of the content-based sections being lost in the list of subforums. bc really like... how is a list of subforums any different than a list on the main index, for finding things?
 

PiaCRT

[i]Orange Dev[/i]
936
Posts
13
Years
Despite me being a negative nancy i hope the changes as a whole will be good. I do foresee some reverts in the future though.
 
22,952
Posts
19
Years
I still think it makes sense to separate entertainment-based stuff and like, life-oriented stuff while still keeping them close to each other (under the overall banner of Community Square). There's enough under that particular topic to warrant that separation from Off Topic, and it makes it easier to find the content instead of the content-based sections being lost in the list of subforums. bc really like... how is a list of subforums any different than a list on the main index, for finding things?

It's more compact, really, and less overwhelming by size for prospective new members. We had 39 standalone boards on the index for normal members before, IIRC. And, if I've counted right, there's 21 now. That's a reduction of page length by a not insignificant amount.
 
Back
Top