Fifth Generation Are Pokémon slaves to humans? Team Plasma thinks so. Travel the Unova region and prove them wrong in Black & White, and then return two years later in Black 2 & White 2.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #26    
Old January 5th, 2012 (9:15 PM).
ZebraikaKnight's Avatar
ZebraikaKnight ZebraikaKnight is offline
     
    Join Date: Sep 2010
    Location: Australia
    Gender: Male
    Nature: Rash
    Posts: 46
    Well, I like to think that Pokémon are formed by a number of different things. Elements, Structures, Ideas, Concepts.. etc.

    The fact that they're all "Pokémon" and can interact the way they do must be because there's a unifying element to them all which MAKES them Pokémon.

    I propose the Pokérus theory. Pokérus is a microscopic life-form that helps Pokémon grow quicker, but could the Pokémon itself be an advanced form of Pokérus?

    Perhaps through natural occurence, or more likely meteor bombardment, the Pokérus travelled to Earth from space, which then set about breeding and multiplying upon the Earth.

    The microscopic life form then bound itself to various things, plants, people, animals, basically any living creature it could use as a host. This includes machines, too.

    Given there's a psychic typing, then naturally some Pokérus sustained itself off psychic energy, which would naturally expose the Pokérus to human concepts and legends and ideas and whatever thought process that being may have had.

    So these various influences, elemental, psychic and physical provided the "image" or basic template of Earth's Pokémon, forms best suited for the environment they were inhabiting.

    The Pokérus then evolved either gradually or suddenly into these forms, and once given a name by a person, or group, the Unown (Who were created directly by Arceus to impart messages to humans) did their stuff and through a mass psychic field sort of hardcoded that name directly to the Pokémon. This process occured during the Arceus event in HG/SS. You see the Unown flying around during the birth of whichever Legend you pick, which incidentally is the only time we ever directly see a Pokémon egg being created, and certainly the Day Care people never see it despite the large amount of eggs being shuffled through every day.

    Pokémon like the first Dialga, Palkia and Giratina, and Arceus were different, being formed from Pokérus in space.

    Deoxys is a special case and I believe it to be evolved Pure Pokérus. It didn't take a form from anything and just kept evolving and evolving on it's own.

    Ditto are "carrier" forms of loose unevolved Pokérus, combining together to survive instead of finding a physical/mental host. These Ditto are more than happy to adapt to the form of whatever Pokémon surrounds them, and use it as a survival technique for whatever environment they need to adapt to.

    So really when I see Pokémon taking the form of Ice Cream, it's no different than it taking the form of anything else. How is Ice Cream more ridiculous than a Pokémon choosing Mr. Mime or Jynx as it's form?

    Different influences create different creatures. Grimer was formed from toxic sludge for crying out loud. The first generation had a lot of weird stuff which people forget due to nostalgia goggles. Hitmonchan having fully formed gloves, clothes and belt with a "P" on it.

    So nobody can say what a Pokémon SHOULD look like, and in universe I'd say the only criteria for a Pokémon even being a Pokémon is it's susceptibility to Pokéballs, ability to be converted into energy and stored in a PC, susceptibility to the microscopic form of Pokérus, and ability to control it's individual natural environment.
    __________________

    Despite my name, I no longer have a Zebraika on my team. Pokémon favouritism is fickle it seems.
    Reply With Quote

    Relevant Advertising!

      #27    
    Old January 5th, 2012 (10:49 PM).
    Deliciousfruit233 Deliciousfruit233 is offline
       
      Join Date: Nov 2010
      Age: 23
      Gender: Male
      Nature: Lax
      Posts: 188
      Ugh, I really hate it when people are like "The new pokemon don't look like Pokemon". Especially because there is no real criteria for what a pokemon should even look like. They don't have to look like animals or plants or anything like that.
      Reply With Quote
        #28    
      Old January 6th, 2012 (12:21 AM).
      OrdealByFire's Avatar
      OrdealByFire OrdealByFire is offline
         
        Join Date: Dec 2011
        Location: Michigan
        Gender: Male
        Posts: 23
        I agree with the OP...

        There are some seriously stupid looking Pokemon, and it just seems obvious that they're running out of ideas. I can't imagine what they'll look like if Pokemon is still around in another 10 years.

        I know there's not general consensus as to what a Pokemon should look like, but come on... Vanillite and its evolved forms really come to mind as ones that just make me shake my head.

        And it's like the Pokemon people were like, "Alright... this Pokemon looks goofy as hell, so we HAVE to make it pretty powerful to make up for it."

        I'm not sure what I'm saying. It's late.

        But I will say the first generation of Pokemon will always be my favorite ... most likely because of the nostalgia factor. Ah... bias.
        Reply With Quote
          #29    
        Old January 6th, 2012 (12:44 AM).
        Raichupacabra Raichupacabra is offline
        Villain
           
          Join Date: Apr 2010
          Location: Antelope Valley, CA
          Gender: Male
          Nature: Hasty
          Posts: 565
          Some Pokemon such as Vanilluxe look like they were made by the mastermind behind Pokemon Quartz, *coughBarocough*.
          Reply With Quote
            #30    
          Old January 6th, 2012 (10:52 AM).
          Mr's Avatar
          Mr Mr is offline
          Just call me Mister
             
            Join Date: Jun 2009
            Location: USA
            Gender: Male
            Nature: Jolly
            Posts: 58
            The older Pokemon were usually based off or real plants and animals. (or fusions of them ... Squirtle = Squirrel + Turtle)
            They felt more natural this way.
            The new Pokemon are more imaginative. It just takes some getting used to I guess. I prefer the older Pokemon though. I liked it when they looked more natural than imaginative.
            Reply With Quote
              #31    
            Old January 6th, 2012 (7:12 PM).
            Mortalis's Avatar
            Mortalis Mortalis is offline
            dreadnaught
            • Crystal Tier
             
            Join Date: May 2010
            Location: Canada
            Age: 20
            Gender: Male
            Nature: Naughty
            Posts: 345
            I think the fifth generation Pokémon may not look like the previous generations, but they definitely look like Pokémon. I like when they're very different to previous generations, it makes owning them more of a unique experience.
            Reply With Quote
              #32    
            Old January 8th, 2012 (5:31 AM).
            dannyboy601 dannyboy601 is offline
               
              Join Date: Mar 2011
              Posts: 107
              Of course here are some that don't look a thing like animals or plants (which is what most people think Pokémon should look like), but let us not forget how much the old gens have introduced as well. For example, Jynx, Grimer, the Regis, Porygon etc (Note how most of these are from gen I). I'm just saying that gen V has introduced Pokémon that are just as bad as the other gens (except for gen II, that was actually alright), the only difference is it introduced more because they're running out of organic things to base them on. That plus the fact that none of them are related to old Pokémon must make it very difficult. I'm actually surprised they did as well as they did.
              Reply With Quote
                #33    
              Old January 9th, 2012 (8:04 PM).
              Patchisou Yutohru's Avatar
              Patchisou Yutohru Patchisou Yutohru is offline
              • Developer
              • Platinum Tier
               
              Join Date: Oct 2004
              Location: New Jersey
              Gender: Male
              Nature: Quirky
              Posts: 17,265
              I think this sometimes, but then I ask myself:

              Quote:
              Originally Posted by Pokemon Trainer Kevin View Post
              So, what exactly are Pokemon supposed to look like?
              I don't really like how an overwhelmingly majority of them are humanoids / mechanical inspired.
              Reply With Quote
                #34    
              Old January 9th, 2012 (9:09 PM).
              Halcyon's Avatar
              Halcyon Halcyon is offline
              peace and serenity
                 
                Join Date: Nov 2007
                Location: Rhythm Heaven
                Age: 22
                Gender: Male
                Nature: Quirky
                Posts: 1,217
                I feel that when creating Pokémon, there shouldn't be any boundaries on what Pokémon should look like. Even if they still look like "Pokémon", people might start on complaining how they all lack originality and creativity, blablabla. I know people are entitled to their opinions, but it's like a never-ending cycle to me - not everyone would be happy and satisfied with their designs. After all, they are Pokémon at the end of the day.
                __________________
                White 2 FC: 1206-7028-2268
                Pokémon Diamond Team [2nd Run]


                Reply With Quote
                  #35    
                Old January 12th, 2012 (4:34 PM).
                Ω Ruby and α Sapphire's Avatar
                Ω Ruby and α Sapphire Ω Ruby and α Sapphire is offline
                Hope will never die! ~Lucina
                   
                  Join Date: Apr 2011
                  Location: Victoria, Australia
                  Gender: Male
                  Nature: Quiet
                  Posts: 735
                  I think the difference between gen I and gen 5 is what they are based on. If i remember correctly, almost all the gen I pokemon were based on animals. Gen five seem to be based on animals and objects. Personally i like gen I the best, and gen 4 the least.
                  __________________
                  Reply With Quote
                    #36    
                  Old January 14th, 2012 (12:40 PM).
                  Darthrai's Avatar
                  Darthrai Darthrai is offline
                  Dragon Tamer
                     
                    Join Date: Feb 2011
                    Age: 25
                    Gender: Male
                    Nature: Lonely
                    Posts: 65
                    Quote:
                    Originally Posted by Cassino View Post
                    I call Druddigon the Lego Dragon because of how it looks. I like it anyway but it wouldn't immediately strike me as a Pokemon.

                    You've all seen this image, right? That is the difference between older and newer generations. Newer monsters have more 'pointless' features; spikes, stripes, fluffy bits, etc. What's good or bad is a matter of opinion, but there is generally a clear distinction between early and recent generations.
                    I think I'm gonna have trouble sleeping tonight... >.> That Garchomp and Charizard look pretty scary.

                    Anyone look at Gyarados and Arcanine though? Or Klink and Vanilluxe? There are exceptions to the rule.
                    __________________
                    Instagram | Facebook | deviantART
                    Reply With Quote
                      #37    
                    Old January 14th, 2012 (8:00 PM).
                    2Cool4Mewtwo's Avatar
                    2Cool4Mewtwo 2Cool4Mewtwo is offline
                    Pwning in Ubers since 1996.
                    • Gold Tier
                     
                    Join Date: Apr 2011
                    Location: Cerulean Cave
                    Age: 23
                    Gender: Male
                    Nature: Rash
                    Posts: 1,183
                    Gen V pokemon have more features than those of Gen I, because as time goes, developers have more room for improving and adding more features, because of better technology available. It really isn't a difficult concept to understand.
                    __________________


                    Reply With Quote
                      #38    
                    Old January 14th, 2012 (9:14 PM).
                    scprepschool's Avatar
                    scprepschool scprepschool is offline
                       
                      Join Date: Mar 2009
                      Location: Mo f*%#$'n Pallet Town
                      Gender:
                      Nature: Jolly
                      Posts: 412
                      Im happy with unovas cast of pokemon. At first I found it strange that there are floating snowcones riddled about driftveil. Small trashbags around nimbasa walking around. I still am bitter with sawk andthroh. Yet now that I have played it abutt load of times I came up with a theory.

                      Gf looked ay gen 4 and noticed that they had created a fiasco with spending over 15 pokedex entries on evolved forms of previous pokes ( fail )

                      So they reduced it to its most simple form amd decided to reconstruct.
                      Imo I think gen 6 will be the best yet if we get to see it
                      Reply With Quote
                        #39    
                      Old January 14th, 2012 (10:41 PM).
                      pryce10's Avatar
                      pryce10 pryce10 is offline
                         
                        Join Date: Nov 2009
                        Gender: Male
                        Posts: 180
                        rule of thumb in Pokemon... WHAT EVER ARCEUS ( GAMEFREAK) SAYS ITS A POKEMON IT IS A POKEMON!. there end of disscussion.
                        __________________
                        " Willow is my middle name, Willows are fixable and not easly broken, I'm not giving up."



                        Strength of ICE!
                        Reply With Quote
                          #40    
                        Old January 14th, 2012 (11:23 PM).
                        WhiteExterior's Avatar
                        WhiteExterior WhiteExterior is offline
                        Back from Beyond
                           
                          Join Date: Jan 2012
                          Location: In the Darkest Corners of Your Mind
                          Age: 24
                          Gender: Female
                          Nature: Calm
                          Posts: 25
                          This is coming from an artist personally, but I love the designs of most the Pokemon, even in the new generation. I think a lot of people are focused on the Pokemon just looking pleasing as far as the design is concerned, I.E. being "cute" or "cool", but that there are some that aren't makes it that much more awesome to me, and more "realistic". Not all real animals are good looking, after all.

                          And yeah, I'm not too fond of some of the ones you mentioned above either (well, most that you mentioned) but every generation has those sort of characters and that doesn't mean that they're any less of Pokemon.

                          :3 Point is that I love the diversity, and no, I do think that the Pokemon in the new generation look like Pokemon. I love the designs of all of them...except Cryogonal, his design is really retarded to me. XD
                          __________________
                          Art ThreadDeviantArt

                          Forever Wandering
                          <br><br>
                          Reply With Quote
                            #41    
                          Old January 14th, 2012 (11:58 PM).
                          Cid's Avatar
                          Cid Cid is offline
                          Find your niche.
                          • Platinum Tier
                           
                          Join Date: Mar 2008
                          Location: Beneath the sky.
                          Age: 22
                          Gender: Male
                          Nature: Calm
                          Posts: 2,529
                          What do I think? Honestly, I thought the Generation V Pokémon looked odd when they first saw the light of day, especially if I delve into comparing their designs to the previous generations. I'm guessing that those sentiments sum up the feelings of the original poster, that some of the new Pokémon don't look like Pokémon from the first four generations.

                          Fans originally had a specific number of Pokémon among the myriad creatures that are surely present in the in-game universe. That's the problem: our opinion of how Pokémon should look like is shaped by the first [relatively] few Pokémon that we encountered for the past four generations. I can't deny how some of the new Pokémon look different design-wise. Yet I agree with most of the people who responded to this thread; Pokémon don't have to look a certain way, they just have to be identified as Pokémon by the creators.

                          "So what are Pokémon supposed to look like?"
                          To take the thread's question as it is, I'll respond with that generic rhetorical question. But if I were asked by what I assume (but I don't really know) the original poster's intentions were, then I'd say that some of the new Pokémon don't look like they came from the first four generations.
                          __________________
                          Reply With Quote
                            #42    
                          Old January 15th, 2012 (3:48 AM).
                          bobandbill's Avatar
                          bobandbill bobandbill is offline
                          shake that booty
                          • Administrator
                          • PokéCommunity Daily
                          • Discord Moderoid
                           
                          Join Date: Mar 2008
                          Location: Central Coast - Australia
                          Gender: Male
                          Nature: Jolly
                          Posts: 13,170
                          Quote:
                          There are some seriously stupid looking Pokemon, and it just seems obvious that they're running out of ideas.
                          So Magnemite's evoltuon being...three Magnemite, and this concept repeated with Diglett wasn't 'running out of ideas' too?
                          Quote:
                          You've all seen this image, right? That is the difference between older and newer generations. Newer monsters have more 'pointless' features; spikes, stripes, fluffy bits, etc. What's good or bad is a matter of opinion, but there is generally a clear distinction between early and recent generations.
                          Part of that may have been due also to the improved capabilities of the systems; the first few games were limited even in the number of colours Pokemon had in their sprites. As that evolved no wonder things got more fancy, and I'd assume that art styles of Sugimori and co changed as well over the about decade-and-half Pokemon has been around for.
                          __________________
                          Reply With Quote
                            #43    
                          Old January 15th, 2012 (12:28 PM).
                          Oshakpop's Avatar
                          Oshakpop Oshakpop is offline
                             
                            Join Date: Jun 2009
                            Posts: 126
                            There is no way a Pokémon should look.. we all know that. So all Pokémon look like Pokémon because they are Pokémon.

                            Simple as that.
                            Reply With Quote
                              #44    
                            Old January 15th, 2012 (2:05 PM).
                            WishCookie's Avatar
                            WishCookie WishCookie is offline
                            ヽ(*・ω・)ノNo berries for you!
                               
                              Join Date: Jun 2011
                              Location: Sweden
                              Age: 20
                              Gender: Male
                              Nature: Jolly
                              Posts: 465
                              Well, I dont like that some legendaries doesnt even look like pokemon creatures. I mean take a look at Meloetta for example.
                              __________________
                              Diamond: 3782 4821 8857
                              HeartGold: 3740 9024 2026
                              Black: 3181 8256 6904
                              Black 2: 4599 8904 2318

                              Y/AlphaSapphire: 1993 8202 9620
                              Reply With Quote
                                #45    
                              Old January 25th, 2012 (7:21 AM).
                              Beee's Avatar
                              Beee Beee is offline
                                 
                                Join Date: Jan 2012
                                Location: Brisbane
                                Age: 27
                                Gender: Female
                                Nature: Quirky
                                Posts: 13
                                I suppose with first gen, they could create anything. When creating the new gen pokemon, they had to try and not make them too similar to the old ones. That's why they seem so different and strange. That's what makes it so interesting.
                                Reply With Quote
                                  #46    
                                Old January 25th, 2012 (8:55 AM).
                                (Duzzy<3)'s Avatar
                                (Duzzy<3) (Duzzy<3) is offline
                                ღ Fairy Wind ღ
                                • Silver Tier
                                 
                                Join Date: Jan 2012
                                Location: Laverre City
                                Age: 24
                                Gender: Male
                                Nature: Modest
                                Posts: 2,654
                                I agree with Beee. I mean, why do people say they don't look original? Does Voltorb or Electrode look original? What about Diglet? THAT seriously looks like a 3 year old drew it more than Druddigon.
                                Each generation has it's failures and successes, but all I can see is a success, in my opinion. Finally they strayed away from making new evolutions for old Pokemon, Baby Pokemon for ones that shouldn't even have one, and finally no more weak Caterpie/Weedle idea (yes, there is Venipede and Sewaddle, but at least their evolutions are somewhat useful).
                                I like this generation, a lot. And if people are saying that the new ones look more like Digimon, and that they should just buy a Digimon game, why haven't they? Why are they still playing Pokemon Black/White?
                                __________________
                                "I've been able to see spirits since I was born!" - Jesse Anderson
                                Instagram
                                Reply With Quote
                                  #47    
                                Old January 25th, 2012 (9:09 AM). Edited January 28th, 2012 by GreenBeece.
                                GreenBeece's Avatar
                                GreenBeece GreenBeece is offline
                                   
                                  Join Date: Mar 2011
                                  Gender: Male
                                  Nature: Calm
                                  Posts: 38
                                  All Unova Pokemon look like Pokemon and I love most of them. To me, Hoenn Pokemon look less like Pokemon: Many of them are ugly, weird or just sickening. But there are some good species: Wingull, Spheal, Lotad, Seedot, Ralts, Swablu, Numel and Aron families are all lovely.
                                  __________________
                                  Sweet success or so they say is never quite you'd imagine.
                                  Reply With Quote
                                    #48    
                                  Old January 25th, 2012 (10:27 AM).
                                  arbok's Avatar
                                  arbok arbok is offline
                                  cobra pokemon
                                     
                                    Join Date: Jan 2012
                                    Age: 22
                                    Gender: Male
                                    Posts: 196
                                    I'm not a big fan of Black and White pokemon. I've gotten used to it but I think my main problem was how most of them were just replacements woobat? Why not zubat? Roggenrola? Why not Geodude? and so on. I missed how it completly departed from the older pokemon. yeah I thought Icecream and rubbish bags were odd at first but I've began to accept them (I never had an issue with the gears though). There are 'freak' pokemon in every gen really not just B+W, in fact, I prefer the trubbish to Mr. Mime right now.
                                    To me pokemon resemble animals in my eyes rather then people or objects but really there's no law about it, it's rather what we're used to.
                                    __________________
                                    my Kanto poison team

                                    Bulbasaur-Ivysaur-Venusaur
                                    Ekans-Arbok
                                    Zubat-Golbat-(with nat. dex)Crobat
                                    Nidoran(M)-Nidorino-Nidoking
                                    Gastly-Haunter-Gengar
                                    Tentacool-Tentacruel
                                    Reply With Quote
                                      #49    
                                    Old January 25th, 2012 (10:45 AM). Edited January 25th, 2012 by Forever.
                                    HyperXhydra's Avatar
                                    HyperXhydra HyperXhydra is offline
                                       
                                      Join Date: Oct 2011
                                      Gender: Male
                                      Posts: 331
                                      Quote:
                                      Originally Posted by OrdealByFire View Post
                                      I agree with the OP...

                                      There are some seriously stupid looking Pokemon, and it just seems obvious that they're running out of ideas. I can't imagine what they'll look like if Pokemon is still around in another 10 years.

                                      I know there's not general consensus as to what a Pokemon should look like, but come on... Vanillite and its evolved forms really come to mind as ones that just make me shake my head.

                                      And it's like the Pokemon people were like, "Alright... this Pokemon looks goofy as hell, so we HAVE to make it pretty powerful to make up for it."

                                      I'm not sure what I'm saying. It's late.

                                      But I will say the first generation of Pokemon will always be my favorite ... most likely because of the nostalgia factor. Ah... bias.
                                      There's stupid looking Pokemon in Gen 1 like Exeegcute the egg Pokemon that evolves into a Coconut, how does make that sense?, at least vanilite still evolves into an ice cream cone.
                                      This is what happen if the generations were reversed (language warning):
                                      Spoiler:

                                      IMO I like all the generations and my favorites are gen3 and 5.
                                      Reply With Quote
                                        #50    
                                      Old January 25th, 2012 (1:47 PM).
                                      Xander Olivieri's Avatar
                                      Xander Olivieri Xander Olivieri is offline
                                         
                                        Join Date: Jun 2010
                                        Gender: Other
                                        Nature: Hasty
                                        Posts: 5,601
                                        A Pokemon looks like anything that Gamefreak put its credit on.

                                        Anything other than that is possibly a Digimon. Or Hello Kitty.


                                        As an Admin of a Pokemon RP that supports Fakemon, this question sends me into the deepest of primal rages. As its been stated there IS NO set design on what a Pokemon is or isn't. If its from Gamefreak, its a Pokemon no matter WHAT any fan says. So roughly, everything you think that DOESN'T look like a Pokemon....Looks like a Pokemon.

                                        As for a few complaints:

                                        Trubbish: Grimer is living sludge and Koffing is a floating ball of explosive gas. Both are basically designed on Pollution. Trubbish adds to this.

                                        Klink: Magnemite, Porygon, Bronzor, all artificial life forms made form objects or even from nothing.

                                        Vanilite: Cherubi is a Cherry. There was living food before Gen 5 XD


                                        The games themselves are maturing, its normal for the creatures to reflect this in design. They aren't all going to be the pudgy, doe eye'd fluffballs we know and love.
                                        __________________
                                        Reply With Quote
                                        Reply
                                        Quick Reply

                                        Sponsored Links
                                        Thread Tools

                                        Posting Rules
                                        You may not post new threads
                                        You may not post replies
                                        You may not post attachments
                                        You may not edit your posts

                                        BB code is On
                                        Smilies are On
                                        [IMG] code is On
                                        HTML code is Off

                                        Forum Jump


                                        All times are GMT -8. The time now is 7:22 AM.