Pokémon Trading Card Game The forum for the Pokémon TCG and Pokemon TCG Online. Post your deck to get rated, rate other decks, ask questions, talk about strategy, etc.

Draconius GO
Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old September 17th, 2012 (6:17 PM).
AshMasterFlash AshMasterFlash is offline
    TCGO:
     
    Join Date: Aug 2012
    Gender: Male
    Posts: 3
    Hey,

    I figured this would be a better place than any to settle this question I have. Is a holographic Charizard card more rare than a holographic Alakazam? When I was a kid, my entire school was under the impression Alakazam was the best card. But people nowadays tell me Charizard was. If I remember right, when listed in the decks, Alakazam was 1, Blastoise was 2, and Charizard was 3. Anybody know a definitive answer?
    Reply With Quote

    Relevant Advertising!

      #2    
    Old September 17th, 2012 (9:44 PM).
    donavannj's Avatar
    donavannj donavannj is offline
    • Moderator
    • Crystal Tier
    TCGO: donavannj
     
    Join Date: Mar 2005
    Location: 'cause it get cold like Minnesota
    Age: 27
    Gender: Male
    Posts: 21,257
    Charizard is considerably more valuable than Alakazam right now (and Charizard always has been more valuable - it's Pokemon Power and its HP and its attack made it so in demand), the only reason Alakazam was listed first is because the sets would list the Pokemon by alphabetical order within the rarity applied to them. Alakazam just happened to come first alphabetically, hence why its collector's number is 1 in the Base Set, and Zapdos's collector's number is 16 in the Base Set. And that's why Beedrill, a step down in rarity from the rare holo cards like Charizard, Alakazam, and Zapdos, has a collector's number of 17.
    __________________
    idol trash and game nerd
    Reply With Quote
      #3    
    Old September 18th, 2012 (3:18 AM).
    Tanaki's Avatar
    Tanaki Tanaki is offline
    ←Lazy ADHD Trainer
      TCGO:
       
      Join Date: Aug 2009
      Location: Corombasu, Ohayo!
      Age: 26
      Gender: Male
      Nature: Quirky
      Posts: 264
      In terms of gameplay, Charizard and Alakazam were lacking in power compared to Blastoise and even cards like Electabuzz and Hitmonchan. Blastoise had the means to pump up water pokemon to use powerful attacks, and Hitmonchan and Electabuzz would whittle your HP down turn by turn. Also Blastoise would always defeat Charizard due to weakness, and Charizard's slow-as-hell attack needs.

      In terms of value, Charizard is still the most expensive solely because it's Charizard. I don't see it as much today, but the mere mention of Charizard made kids go berserk back in the day.

      Blastoise is second because it has value in throwback decks. And coz it's blastoise.

      Alakazam was the second most valuable card at the time, but the other 2 are worth more for the aforementioned reasons.
      __________________

      White: 0433-0461-0045
      Soulsilver: 1334-9895-4497
      Reply With Quote
        #4    
      Old September 18th, 2012 (8:45 AM).
      donavannj's Avatar
      donavannj donavannj is offline
      • Moderator
      • Crystal Tier
      TCGO: donavannj
       
      Join Date: Mar 2005
      Location: 'cause it get cold like Minnesota
      Age: 27
      Gender: Male
      Posts: 21,257
      Alakazam was always more of a support Pokemon back in the day because of Damage Swap.
      __________________
      idol trash and game nerd
      Reply With Quote
      Reply

      Quick Reply

      Join the conversation!

      Create an account to post a reply in this thread, participate in other discussions, and more!

      Create a PokéCommunity Account

      Sponsored Links
      Thread Tools

      Posting Rules
      You may not post new threads
      You may not post replies
      You may not post attachments
      You may not edit your posts

      BB code is On
      Smilies are On
      [IMG] code is On
      HTML code is Off

      Forum Jump


      All times are GMT -8. The time now is 7:45 AM.