Sixth Generation The Kalos region awaits! Explore a new world, capture new Pokémon, and fight off Team Flare in one of the newer installments of the core Pokémon series.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old January 29th, 2013 (11:21 PM).
Blixy213 Blixy213 is offline
     
    Join Date: Jan 2013
    Gender: Male
    Posts: 3
    As somebody who really enjoys playing pokemon, as well as a ton of other games, at a more competitive level, I've noticed a general trend with a bunch of newer games, which is a system of visible ELO. For people who aren't familiar with an ELO system, it gives you a number which is relative to your skill level, based off you winning or losing battles against other players of similar skill, and you lose and gain points depending on if they were ranked higher or lower than you. It's pretty simple.

    I think it would be great to put this in Pokemon, and have an online ranking system where you can check where you stand in terms of skill. It would dramatically boost Pokemon's online community, I really hate having to use online emulated systems to use a ladder system, and I don't think it's too much trouble to implement a ladder system in game, instead of consistently having to face people that have no clue what they're doing when I spend countless hours legitimately EV training and breeding for a perfect Pokemon. After a few games on a ranking system of some sort, people who put more time into the game would get out of this "Low tier" and eventually start being matched against better who are of similar skill, and would encourage newer players to learn the game further, possibly push Pokemon into the growing Esport scene? That could be a stretch, but I've always dreamed about it

    Thoughts?
    Reply With Quote

    Relevant Advertising!

      #2    
    Old January 30th, 2013 (12:44 AM).
    Whistler's Avatar
    Whistler Whistler is offline
    Questioner
       
      Join Date: Jan 2013
      Gender: Male
      Nature: Gentle
      Posts: 37
      I'd be cool with this. Wi-Fi Pokemon is boring at the moment in my opinion. ;D
      Reply With Quote
        #3    
      Old January 30th, 2013 (3:09 AM).
      Keiran's Avatar
      Keiran Keiran is offline
      Fight Off Your Demons
      • Moderator
       
      Join Date: Apr 2011
      Location: New Jersey
      Age: 25
      Gender: Male
      Nature: Careful
      Posts: 2,421
      Pokemon already has VGC and TCG tournies, but I don't think it will ever become part of the Esports scene. The skillcap is way too low, and random hax like crits would make any serious competition frustrating and unappealing.

      Plus, Pokemon aren't designed with the metagame in mind, and balances come too slowly. This is why arena matches in WoW were decided to no longer be an esport a few years ago.

      An ELO on random matchup would be nice, though.
      __________________
      Mod of Trade Corner| Pair | Trainer Information

      When kings upon the main have clung to pride
      And held themselves as masters of the sea
      I've held them down beneath the crushing tide
      Till they have learned that no one masters me
      Reply With Quote
        #4    
      Old January 30th, 2013 (6:11 AM).
      Blixy213 Blixy213 is offline
         
        Join Date: Jan 2013
        Gender: Male
        Posts: 3
        Quote:
        Originally Posted by Keiran777 View Post
        Pokemon already has VGC and TCG tournies, but I don't think it will ever become part of the Esports scene. The skillcap is way too low, and random hax like crits would make any serious competition frustrating and unappealing.

        Plus, Pokemon aren't designed with the metagame in mind, and balances come too slowly. This is why arena matches in WoW were decided to no longer be an esport a few years ago.

        An ELO on random matchup would be nice, though.
        I don't think many games are designed with a metagame in mind, I think the players are always the ones to figure it out. Those that eventually see metagames form, are ever changing and usually are never 100% concrete, take LoL for example, the changes you see season to season usually differ quite nicely at a nice pace.

        And I think the skill cap is set super high, infact, I think it's quite intimidating for newer players to jump right into learning viable comps, EVs, IVs, Natures, Breeding, Ubers, and tier lists etc, with a ladder system it can really show players where they are, and how to improve based off the abilities of others. Sure, in the end you're just pushing which attack to use, but the strategic aspect behind it is huge, but I do see your argument against it being an Esport, I agree with you there. It's just a dream of mine

        As for balance, it's something that has also been done in the community, using tier lists and different clauses that all the major tournaments universally follow. I think if the company actually stepped in with a ladder system, it would defiantly call for balance patches. Wifi in general right now is much too dull.
        Reply With Quote
          #5    
        Old January 30th, 2013 (6:27 AM).
        Ptzery's Avatar
        Ptzery Ptzery is offline
        Skitty trainer
           
          Join Date: Dec 2012
          Gender: Male
          Nature: Careful
          Posts: 40
          I would enjoy one, but I would be at +- 100000000000000000th place
          __________________
          Meet a guy that wants to be a rom hacker.
          Just trying... I'm probably not even 1% as good as most people, but I'm trying!
          Also, I have pokemon soulsilver to play, but I do not do trades, battles or anything online.
          Of course, you can ask me stuff, but I won't usually know the answer
          You like my signature? If you do, I owe you 100 bucks. Just messing with ya!
          Oh yeah, I have super pokemon rumble too. All of you guys are awesome
          Skitty smiley!
          Reply With Quote
            #6    
          Old January 30th, 2013 (3:38 PM).
          tente2's Avatar
          tente2 tente2 is offline
          "Outta my way, dammit!"
             
            Join Date: Sep 2009
            Location: Snowpoint City
            Gender: Male
            Nature: Bashful
            Posts: 403
            Quote:
            Originally Posted by Blixy213 View Post
            And I think the skill cap is set super high, infact, I think it's quite intimidating for newer players to jump right into learning viable comps, EVs, IVs, Natures, Breeding, Ubers, and tier lists etc, with a ladder system it can really show players where they are, and how to improve based off the abilities of others. Sure, in the end you're just pushing which attack to use, but the strategic aspect behind it is huge, but I do see your argument against it being an Esport, I agree with you there. It's just a dream of mine :(
            Eh, I see it the other way. First off, if people don't get something about the metagame, they aren't going to learn anything new by being pulverized into last place. Second, I don't know if anybody else disagrees, but I find it slightly demoralizing to give everybody a number that is supposed to represent their battling skills as a person. I wouldn't find having 1000000000th place to be exceptionally encouraging. If anything, it's a reminder to people of how bad at something they are, and especially if they don't fully understand what they're bad at, I imagine most people would just rather quit competitive battling and say, "Ah, I'm bad at this and I don't even understand it" as opposed to "Oooh, I'm in last place but I'll investigate competitive battling more and fight my way to the top!".

            And then there's the case of people who just cheat for the sake of cheating, who would most likely be all the "top" players. If anything, I imagine a ranking system would only encourage more people to illegally hack the game to obtain EV-trained Pokemon, or 31 IV Pokemon, or whatever, as opposed to raising EV Pokemon (and related things) honestly.

            I think a "Top 100" list might be better, but eh, I don't know. I still see so much room for corruption.

            For all intents and purposes, I don't even care about competitive battling, nor do I participate in it anymore (I tried once, but after a month I really just got bored of it). So, if a ranking system of any kind was to be implemented, it would be all right by me! It wouldn't affect me.
            __________________
            Reply With Quote
              #7    
            Old January 30th, 2013 (3:49 PM).
            Mortalis's Avatar
            Mortalis Mortalis is offline
            dreadnaught
            • Crystal Tier
             
            Join Date: May 2010
            Location: Canada
            Age: 20
            Gender: Male
            Nature: Naughty
            Posts: 345
            I don't usually play on Wi-Fi because of it's bland features. Sure, a challenging battle every now and then is fun, but it'd be cool to have more. A ranking system would fit really well, and it'd show who really knows what they're doing.

            The only problem is hacked / modified Pokemon. Hopefully it'd be possible to filter out the fake Pokemon and only allow fairly trained Pokemon. Not sure if this is possible, but it'd have to be for a ranked system. Wouldn't be fair to go up against a Dragonite with a Wonder Guard ability and 999 health.
            Reply With Quote
              #8    
            Old January 30th, 2013 (4:31 PM).
            Seth Rollins's Avatar
            Seth Rollins Seth Rollins is offline
            Holding on to You |-/
            • Silver Tier
             
            Join Date: Dec 2012
            Location: Nah
            Age: 16
            Gender: Male
            Nature: Brave
            Posts: 2,493
            I don't care that much since I don't play Wi-fi that much. But I'm OK with your idea.
            __________________

            The Underground
            Come and play mafia with us! You are always welcome.
            Reply With Quote
              #9    
            Old January 30th, 2013 (5:13 PM).
            Platinum Lucario's Avatar
            Platinum Lucario Platinum Lucario is offline
            The Legendary Master of Light!
            • Crystal Tier
             
            Join Date: Jan 2008
            Location: Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia.
            Gender: Male
            Nature: Calm
            Posts: 1,561
            It would be interesting to see some sort of ladder-like ranking system in Pokémon X and Pokémon Y. I know there is something like that in other games like Mario Kart 7. So I think it could be quite a possibility for it to be implemented into Pokémon X and Pokémon Y.

            It would be so cool to continue battling trainers to gain more points in a way and even lose them every time you win or lose.
            __________________
            [Platinum Lucario's Signature]
            If you need to disable my signature, please give me some advice on how to improve the CSS-DIV code. Thanks!
            Signature Status: Strikes: 1/3 | Infractions: 0/3
            It's time to change the future...
            to a positive direction!

            Let's prevent things from getting bad!

            I'm a ROM and ISO Researcher
            Current Project: Researching Pokémon Mystery Dungeon Adventure Squad games (WiiWare)
            Reply With Quote
              #10    
            Old January 30th, 2013 (5:26 PM).
            Forever's Avatar
            Forever Forever is online now
            SACRED FIRE
            • Moderator
            • Crystal Tier
            • EOEvent Organizer
             
            Join Date: Nov 2005
            Location: Queensland
            Age: 25
            Gender: Female
            Nature: Bold
            Posts: 35,395
            Quote:
            Originally Posted by tente2 View Post
            Eh, I see it the other way. First off, if people don't get something about the metagame, they aren't going to learn anything new by being pulverized into last place. Second, I don't know if anybody else disagrees, but I find it slightly demoralizing to give everybody a number that is supposed to represent their battling skills as a person. I wouldn't find having 1000000000th place to be exceptionally encouraging. If anything, it's a reminder to people of how bad at something they are, and especially if they don't fully understand what they're bad at, I imagine most people would just rather quit competitive battling and say, "Ah, I'm bad at this and I don't even understand it" as opposed to "Oooh, I'm in last place but I'll investigate competitive battling more and fight my way to the top!".

            And then there's the case of people who just cheat for the sake of cheating, who would most likely be all the "top" players. If anything, I imagine a ranking system would only encourage more people to illegally hack the game to obtain EV-trained Pokemon, or 31 IV Pokemon, or whatever, as opposed to raising EV Pokemon (and related things) honestly.

            I think a "Top 100" list might be better, but eh, I don't know. I still see so much room for corruption.

            For all intents and purposes, I don't even care about competitive battling, nor do I participate in it anymore (I tried once, but after a month I really just got bored of it). So, if a ranking system of any kind was to be implemented, it would be all right by me! It wouldn't affect me.
            Yeah I'm agreeing with a top 100 more than anything because it would allow the best to get their acknowledgement and everyone else doesn't need to feel bad about their score.

            Also people can still use RNG to obtain those mons, and some people do work hard on EV training and getting 31 IV Pokemon (I has many with 31 IV in at least one stat just from ~luck~), and generally the offline community don't really use hacks that often because if anyone it'd likely be someone from the online sphere due to the knowledge about it all on here.

            Quote:
            Originally Posted by Ptzery View Post
            I would enjoy one, but I would be at +- 100000000000000000th place :t300:
            Nah if you tried really hard I'm sure you'd be much higher up. Anyone can do well with lots of practice!

            Quote:
            Originally Posted by SooperTrooper View Post
            The only problem is hacked / modified Pokemon. Hopefully it'd be possible to filter out the fake Pokemon and only allow fairly trained Pokemon. Not sure if this is possible, but it'd have to be for a ranked system. Wouldn't be fair to go up against a Dragonite with a Wonder Guard ability and 999 health.
            Honestly I don't even think they'd allow that now (the mega hacked mons!), and I guess obviously hacked Pokemon shouldn't count when calculating stats.
            __________________

            Celebrating Gold and Silver's Upcoming Virtual Console Release!
            moderator of the following games
            [ ]
            Reply With Quote
              #11    
            Old January 30th, 2013 (5:38 PM).
            HaloSonic's Avatar
            HaloSonic HaloSonic is offline
            NOM NOM NOM
               
              Join Date: Nov 2009
              Location: West Indies.
              Age: 27
              Gender: Male
              Nature: Quiet
              Posts: 580
              I don't play online meta-game, though I would consider breeding pokemon for other people to use in it. the best I can manage in the Nimbasa training hall is about 500 points, (then again, I don't prepare my pokemon well for them,so maybe I'm actually better than that) so I wouldn't last very long on metagame. although, from my years of playing pokemon, I find there is a rather limited pool of about 50 pokemon that are always used in serious fighting out of 650. so to change things up from the regular teirs, maybe they should have single type metagame tournaments (all fighting, all grass, etc) and have rankings based on that as well as the standard ones?
              __________________

              Its either real or its a dream, there's nothing that is inbetween, Twiiiiiliiiiiight
              Reply With Quote
                #12    
              Old January 31st, 2013 (12:14 AM).
              Blixy213 Blixy213 is offline
                 
                Join Date: Jan 2013
                Gender: Male
                Posts: 3
                Quote:
                Originally Posted by tente2 View Post
                Eh, I see it the other way. First off, if people don't get something about the metagame, they aren't going to learn anything new by being pulverized into last place. Second, I don't know if anybody else disagrees, but I find it slightly demoralizing to give everybody a number that is supposed to represent their battling skills as a person. I wouldn't find having 1000000000th place to be exceptionally encouraging. If anything, it's a reminder to people of how bad at something they are, and especially if they don't fully understand what they're bad at, I imagine most people would just rather quit competitive battling and say, "Ah, I'm bad at this and I don't even understand it" as opposed to "Oooh, I'm in last place but I'll investigate competitive battling more and fight my way to the top!".
                I think the easiest way around that is to just have an "Unranked" battle option.

                But reading what other people wrote, I really have to agree that there has to be a system in place to catch any hacked pokemon caught or bred unfairly. Hopefully if they do commit to a ladder system, they can force you to patch up your game when you go into Wifi to fix the latest bugs and such.

                I don't know how I feel about a ban system in pokemon, but I think it wouldn't be out of question when there is competitive play on the line.
                Reply With Quote
                  #13    
                Old January 31st, 2013 (6:44 AM).
                Forever's Avatar
                Forever Forever is online now
                SACRED FIRE
                • Moderator
                • Crystal Tier
                • EOEvent Organizer
                 
                Join Date: Nov 2005
                Location: Queensland
                Age: 25
                Gender: Female
                Nature: Bold
                Posts: 35,395
                Quote:
                Originally Posted by Blixy213 View Post
                I think the easiest way around that is to just have an "Unranked" battle option.

                But reading what other people wrote, I really have to agree that there has to be a system in place to catch any hacked pokemon caught or bred unfairly. Hopefully if they do commit to a ladder system, they can force you to patch up your game when you go into Wifi to fix the latest bugs and such.

                I don't know how I feel about a ban system in pokemon, but I think it wouldn't be out of question when there is competitive play on the line.
                Banning is also a point, if it were to appear in these games (which I'm starting to think is more likely, given their tournaments during B/W and random matchup ranks on Global Link etc) chances are it'll only ban legendaries, which will make it different to Smogon's tiers, and thus a lot easier to abuse imo. Like just make a sand team (with Excadrill!) or a drizzle team (with swift swimmersss) and you're set basically. ;(
                __________________

                Celebrating Gold and Silver's Upcoming Virtual Console Release!
                moderator of the following games
                [ ]
                Reply With Quote
                  #14    
                Old January 31st, 2013 (2:20 PM).
                vaporeon7's Avatar
                vaporeon7 vaporeon7 is offline
                My life would suck without you
                • Crystal Tier
                 
                Join Date: Aug 2010
                Location: Preparing for trouble and making it double.
                Gender: Male
                Nature: Adamant
                Posts: 5,154
                I think this feature would be very useful, especially for countries that don't have VGC like Australia. Though I agree with Nica, there would need to be a customise rules feature or something.
                __________________
                Reply With Quote
                Reply
                Quick Reply

                Sponsored Links
                Thread Tools

                Posting Rules
                You may not post new threads
                You may not post replies
                You may not post attachments
                You may not edit your posts

                BB code is On
                Smilies are On
                [IMG] code is On
                HTML code is Off

                Forum Jump


                All times are GMT -8. The time now is 7:58 PM.