Pokémon Clubs This forum is for those who wish to start a club within the community. This forum is for Pokémon clubs; Fan Clubs & Groups is for everything else.
New threads in this forum are to be approved by a moderator before they are displayed.

TrollandToad.com
 
 
Thread Tools
  #126    
Old May 26th, 2013 (9:12 PM).
CourageHound's Avatar
CourageHound CourageHound is offline
Trust & Courage. Nothing More
     
    Join Date: Oct 2012
    Location: Florida
    Gender: Male
    Nature: Lonely
    Posts: 823
    Alrigt, well since the topic is pretty static, how about a new one?

    What exactly classifies a pokemon as a normal type? Are there pokemon that arn't normal type that you think should be?

    I think a pokemon is classified as a normal type if there is extreme simplicity in its design or if it is very similar to a real world animal without verging off into an elemental type. Like say Ursaring originating from a land bear with no real outstanding qualities would be normal type as opposed to a Typhlosion who would most likely be normal type if it wern't for its fiery vents. A platypus could be normal/water type like other mammalian pokemon that spend a lot of their time in the water like Biberal.

    No other pokemon who should be normal type immediately come to mind. I'll point some out later if I find some.
    __________________

    Relevant Advertising!

      #127    
    Old May 28th, 2013 (4:55 PM).
    Absol Absol is offline
    • Crystal Tier
     
    Join Date: Jan 2012
    Posts: 1,816
    What exactly classifies a Pokemon as a normal type? Are there pokemon that aren't normal type that you think should be?

    For me I think of a normal type as being, well, normal. There really isn't anything special about them, although most of them are so cute. :D I also think of them as being closely related to real animals without being changed too much. As for Pokemon that should be normal type but aren't... I can't think of any off the top of my head :/
      #128    
    Old May 29th, 2013 (2:14 AM).
    CourageHound's Avatar
    CourageHound CourageHound is offline
    Trust & Courage. Nothing More
       
      Join Date: Oct 2012
      Location: Florida
      Gender: Male
      Nature: Lonely
      Posts: 823
      After thinking about it some, I think Arcanine and growlithe could be normal types. Its not impossible because most all normal types can learn elemental moves and Arcanine's design is simple enough. No fire protruding from anywhere. A change of color to say brown and bam, ya got a normal type Arcanine.
      __________________
        #129    
      Old May 29th, 2013 (3:48 AM).
      ナギ's Avatar
      ナギ ナギ is offline
      P r e p a r e .
         
        Join Date: May 2010
        Location: UTC+2
        Age: 23
        Gender: Female
        Nature: Adamant
        Posts: 345
        can i join?

        NAME: hiinotama
        PARDNERS: Scott the Zigzagoon and Chief the Kecleon.
        WHY JOIN? i didn't want to join at first, but after checking the top post and looking through the NORMALtype Pokémon, i realised there's actually so many of them i absolutely adore. so i had no choice. my favourite Pokémon are always the ones that stand out. and in a way, to me, the NORMALtype stands out exactly because of what it's supposed to be; normal. it's the only type that doesn't really specify what it's about.

        current topic: NORMALtype CHARACTERISTICS? WOULD-BE NORMALtypes?
        like others remarked already, i think what characterizes a NORMALtype would be the fact they're often directly based off real-life animals. for that reason, to make them truly into a Pokémon rather than just an anime-ified animal, they have other quirks that make them 'supernatural'. other types have their typing itself as this quirk, and i think this is what makes NORMALtypes so much fun; they're completely themselves, and don't have anything they need to 'live up to'.
        apart from that, obviously a big characteristic of NORMALtypes is that their attacks are not super-effective to any other type, yet they do have one weakness and one immunity. again, this makes the typing itself very 'simple', exactly because they don't have such a wide scala of (non-)effectiveness.
        right now i can't think of any Pokémon that should be NORMALtyped, but i'll get back to you if i do.

        sorry if i rambled.
        __________________
        -- i don't need promises.
          #130    
        Old June 3rd, 2013 (5:01 PM).
        CourageHound's Avatar
        CourageHound CourageHound is offline
        Trust & Courage. Nothing More
           
          Join Date: Oct 2012
          Location: Florida
          Gender: Male
          Nature: Lonely
          Posts: 823
          Quote:
          Originally Posted by hiinotama View Post
          can i join?

          NAME: hiinotama
          PARDNERS: Scott the Zigzagoon and Chief the Kecleon.
          WHY JOIN? i didn't want to join at first, but after checking the top post and looking through the NORMALtype Pokémon, i realised there's actually so many of them i absolutely adore. so i had no choice. my favourite Pokémon are always the ones that stand out. and in a way, to me, the NORMALtype stands out exactly because of what it's supposed to be; normal. it's the only type that doesn't really specify what it's about.

          current topic: NORMALtype CHARACTERISTICS? WOULD-BE NORMALtypes?
          like others remarked already, i think what characterizes a NORMALtype would be the fact they're often directly based off real-life animals. for that reason, to make them truly into a Pokémon rather than just an anime-ified animal, they have other quirks that make them 'supernatural'. other types have their typing itself as this quirk, and i think this is what makes NORMALtypes so much fun; they're completely themselves, and don't have anything they need to 'live up to'.
          apart from that, obviously a big characteristic of NORMALtypes is that their attacks are not super-effective to any other type, yet they do have one weakness and one immunity. again, this makes the typing itself very 'simple', exactly because they don't have such a wide scala of (non-)effectiveness.
          right now i can't think of any Pokémon that should be NORMALtyped, but i'll get back to you if i do.

          sorry if i rambled.
          Welcome to the club! Don't worry about it, its always nice when people go into detail~

          Sorry for the late response. Final exams are underway and whatnot...

          Anyway, i agree on the fact that most normal types are based on real life animals. But ya know alot of pokemon in the "Field"/"Ground" egg group are predominantly based off real life animals. Another pokemon that could be normal type that's another type(that's also based off an animal) is Mightyena. When you look at it, there seems to be little that could be atributed to its pure dark typing besides it coloration. Now say if you take its shiny form(which is brown) and substituted that for its primary coloration, then there really wouldnt be much sense in it being a dark type.

          Another animal like pokemon with barely any alteration from its natural animal is Arbok. It looks like your average giant snake. But its poison type because it has that special quality of having venom. This indicates that normal types might require no more than a general/simple design or origin. I can imagine how challenging it could be to turn animals into pokemon though while keeping a certain theme or tone in your designs.
          __________________
            #131    
          Old June 3rd, 2013 (8:12 PM).
          crimsonskarmory's Avatar
          crimsonskarmory crimsonskarmory is offline
          Alchemist
             
            Join Date: Mar 2012
            Location: Alabama
            Gender: Male
            Nature: Relaxed
            Posts: 28
            Could I join?

            Name: crimsonskarmory
            Partner: Jake the Snubbull, Hamlet the Ambipom
            Why I want to join: Well I just really wanted to be part of a fan club really, and Ambipom is one of my favorite Pokémon. So I thought why not join a normal type fan club..

            What exactly classifies a pokemon as a normal type? Are there pokemon that arn't normal type that you think should be?
            Well most people have already said it but its because they are just normal Pokémon. They are usually based on real life animals. One Pokémon that comes to mind that I think should be a normal type is Stunky and its evolution. Like I said normal types are usually based on real life animals and Stunky is based on a skunk. To me a Poison and Normal type more suits it.
              #132    
            Old June 4th, 2013 (9:29 AM).
            ナギ's Avatar
            ナギ ナギ is offline
            P r e p a r e .
               
              Join Date: May 2010
              Location: UTC+2
              Age: 23
              Gender: Female
              Nature: Adamant
              Posts: 345
              Quote:
              Originally Posted by CourageHound View Post
              Anyway, i agree on the fact that most normal types are based on real life animals. But ya know alot of pokemon in the "Field"/"Ground" egg group are predominantly based off real life animals. Another pokemon that could be normal type that's another type(that's also based off an animal) is Mightyena. When you look at it, there seems to be little that could be atributed to its pure dark typing besides it coloration. Now say if you take its shiny form(which is brown) and substituted that for its primary coloration, then there really wouldnt be much sense in it being a dark type.

              Another animal like pokemon with barely any alteration from its natural animal is Arbok. It looks like your average giant snake. But its poison type because it has that special quality of having venom. This indicates that normal types might require no more than a general/simple design or origin. I can imagine how challenging it could be to turn animals into pokemon though while keeping a certain theme or tone in your designs.
              i'm not sure if you're agreeing or disagreeing with what i said now
              but yeah, i agree with what you're saying. nearly all Pokémon are somehow based on animals in the first place, but i think NORMALtype is the only one who just doesn't need to undergo any 'typification' - mostly colouration. Mightyena is indeed labeled as a DARKtype for its black and grey colours, but honestly as far as i'm concerned even in its normal form it could've been NORMAL/DARKtyped, like Liepard.
              as for Arbok, i'm less inclined to agree because its POISONtype-ification is its colour IMO. i've never seen a purple cobra... but i see what you're saying.


              Quote:
              Originally Posted by crimsonskarmory View Post
              One Pokémon that comes to mind that I think should be a normal type is Stunky and its evolution. Like I said normal types are usually based on real life animals and Stunky is based on a skunk. To me a Poison and Normal type more suits it.
              Stunky could've been a NORMALtype yes, but i do think Skuntank definitely has that evil characteristic to it that makes it a DARKtype. Stunky is still slightly more on the cute side i suppose, closer to the actual animal that couldve made it a NORMALtype.
              but i guess somewhere that Stunky naughtiness could still amount to a DARKtype... or maybe a complete type change was too much of a change for the developers. i don't think i've ever seen a Pokémon actually change types over evolution, they always just get added or removed, no?
              __________________
              -- i don't need promises.
                #133    
              Old June 5th, 2013 (6:00 PM).
              crimsonskarmory's Avatar
              crimsonskarmory crimsonskarmory is offline
              Alchemist
                 
                Join Date: Mar 2012
                Location: Alabama
                Gender: Male
                Nature: Relaxed
                Posts: 28
                Yeah that would be really weird to have the type change completely. And now that I think of it I have never seen a Pokémon change types either. I completely agree with your statement.
                  #134    
                Old June 9th, 2013 (2:00 PM).
                Absol Absol is offline
                • Crystal Tier
                 
                Join Date: Jan 2012
                Posts: 1,816
                There is at least one Normal type Pokemon that changes types completely when it evolves. Eevee is a Normal type but all of it's evolutions are completely different types. I dunno if that's what you actually meant though about type changes lol
                  #135    
                Old June 16th, 2013 (8:18 AM).
                CloysterOyster's Avatar
                CloysterOyster CloysterOyster is offline
                Master of Ice
                   
                  Join Date: Feb 2013
                  Location: United States
                  Gender: Male
                  Nature: Lax
                  Posts: 849
                  Username: CloysterOyster
                  Partner Pokémon: Eevee and Porygon
                  My reason for joining: Normal types are underrated and need some love
                  Current topic: I chose Eevee because of the fact it can evolve into 7 other Pokémon. I also chose Porygon because it's overlooked.
                  Favorite Normal type move: Hyper Beam
                    #136    
                  Old June 18th, 2013 (1:54 PM).
                  Regeneration's Avatar
                  Regeneration Regeneration is offline
                  meow
                  • Silver Tier
                   
                  Join Date: Nov 2010
                  Location: Somewhere I Belong
                  Gender: Male
                  Nature: Calm
                  Posts: 1,423
                  Name: Regeneration
                  Partner Pokemon: Togepi
                  Why I joined: The topics here sounded interesting.

                  What exactly classifies a pokemon as a normal type? Are there pokemon that aren't normal type that you think should be?
                  I'm guessing cause they have nothing special? That ought to get some shoes thrown at me here. Pokemon that should be normal types.. nothing comes to mind. ;____;
                    #137    
                  Old June 20th, 2013 (7:07 AM).
                  Olli's Avatar
                  Olli Olli is offline
                  I am still bathing in a summer's afterglow
                  • Silver Tier
                   
                  Join Date: Aug 2010
                  Location: Skyloft
                  Gender: Male
                  Nature: Quiet
                  Posts: 2,613
                  What exactly classifies a Pokemon as a normal type? Are there pokemon that aren't normal type that you think should be?

                  As most people already mentioned, what makes them Normal types, is basically the fact that they're "normal". A lot of them are based on real-life animals, however it also seems as though it's the go-to typing for Pokemon that just don't really fit in anywhere, so while not all of them are based on animals and other creatures we're familiar with, they make up like 90% of Normal types. And I kinda agree with Regeneration here, that most of them actually don't have anything special to them, but some of the most special Pokemon in my opinion are also Normal types, so it's kinda mixed. I mean, Pokemon like Eevee, Castform and the Porygon line are definitely special with their unique evolutions and abilities, so yeah, can't claim that all of them aren't special.

                  But yeah, just because they aren't based on some kind of awesome mythological, it doesn't mean they're any less cool ;) Pidgey ftw!
                  __________________
                  Not removing this from my signature!

                    #138    
                  Old June 20th, 2013 (8:06 PM).
                  Squirrel's Avatar
                  Squirrel Squirrel is offline
                  D-I-N-O-S-A
                  • Crystal Tier
                   
                  Join Date: Sep 2011
                  Location: England
                  Age: 23
                  Gender: Male
                  Nature: Quirky
                  Posts: 9,512
                  I always saw Normal type as being the "this pokemon doesn't have any notable elements associated with it" type, but that was somewhat ruined by the addition of Pokémon such as Sawsbuck that're given both Normal and an elemental typing haha (unless the Normal is there to indicate an 'affinity' to the typing rather than having 'elemental powers' from it?). I think Normal types now mean a much more general type of Pokémon - beast/animal like Pokémon perhaps? Or perhaps just something that if you kick it it'll do lots of damage :p

                  I think Olli summarised well, bar the Pidgey comment. ;)
                  __________________
                    #139    
                  Old June 21st, 2013 (10:18 PM).
                  Starlight Wind's Avatar
                  Starlight Wind Starlight Wind is online now
                  Show Your Victory!
                  • Crystal Tier
                   
                  Join Date: Dec 2012
                  Location: Liberty Garden
                  Age: 24
                  Gender: Male
                  Nature: Modest
                  Posts: 8,402
                  What exactly classifies a Pokemon as a normal type? Are there pokemon that aren't normal type that you think should be?
                  I think Pokemon could be classified as a normal type because its generally have some real-life animal feel, with some exceptions. They generally don't specialize in any types, so it's recognizable.
                  __________________
                    #140    
                  Old June 22nd, 2013 (11:58 PM).
                  Aslan's Avatar
                  Aslan Aslan is online now
                  the pretender
                  • Gold Tier
                   
                  Join Date: Mar 2013
                  Location: Sydney
                  Age: 15
                  Gender: Female
                  Nature: Modest
                  Posts: 2,245
                  What exactly classifies a Pokemon as a normal type? Are there pokemon that aren't normal type that you think should be?

                  Normal-types to me are Pokemon that don't possess any sort of unnatural look to them. They're just that, normal. They don't have huge wings, claws or can breathe fire- something which only remains in legends. They're realistic creatures generally, in my opinion. For example Bibarel is exactly like a beaver in a sense, it builds in dams, does hard work etc. Normal types to me are Pokemon that just don't have that supernatural look or quality to them with a few exceptions.

                  As for any Pokemon being retyped into normal, I honestly can't think of any at the moment. :p
                  __________________
                   

                  Quick Reply

                  Join the conversation!

                  Create an account to post a reply in this thread, participate in other discussions, and more!

                  Create a PokéCommunity Account

                  Sponsored Links
                  Thread Tools

                  Posting Rules
                  You may not post new threads
                  You may not post replies
                  You may not post attachments
                  You may not edit your posts

                  BB code is On
                  Smilies are On
                  [IMG] code is On
                  HTML code is Off

                  Forum Jump


                  All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:06 PM.