Off-Topic Hang out with people and talk about whatever. Feel free to suggest a better description for this forum as everyone seems to have an opinion. :D

TrollandToad.com
Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old December 3rd, 2013 (5:45 PM).
antemortem's Avatar
antemortem antemortem is offline
farewell, fated few
  • Crystal Tier
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Texas
Gender: Male
Nature: Naughty
Posts: 7,589
Which is more impressive to you: a large number of #1 singles that tend to drop out of the top spots after a short amount of time (one-two weeks) or fewer hit singles that remain at the top for four+ weeks? Beyonce and Christina Aguilera are known for having fewer singles than Rihanna, for instance, but their hit singles tend to have more longevity at the top. Is being able to say 'I have twenty hit singles' better than saying 'I have three' even though those three were at the top for weeks on end?
__________________
TURN ON THE BRIGHT LIGHTS
Reply With Quote

Relevant Advertising!

  #2    
Old December 3rd, 2013 (7:43 PM).
pompayyy's Avatar
pompayyy pompayyy is offline
Forever and Ever
     
    Join Date: Feb 2013
    Location: In a White Room with Black Curtains
    Gender: Male
    Nature: Relaxed
    Posts: 487
    I've kinda haven't believed in either - a ton of great music goes under the radar. But, if I had to choose one it'd have to be longevity. I find a bit more impressive when a song is in the #1 chart for 4 months than 4 #1 singles in 4 months.
    __________________


    Pink Moon is on its way.

    Reply With Quote
      #3    
    Old December 4th, 2013 (12:46 PM).
    Esper's Avatar
    Esper Esper is offline
    • Silver Tier
     
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Location: California
    Posts: 10,621
    Yeah, I don't really hold stock with either, but each is kind of impressive in its own way. If you're the artist responsible for 20 hits (meaning you wrote the music and lyrics and didn't have a team do all that) then that's pretty wow even if they don't last. If you've got 3 or 4 that last for a month that's, well, less impressive since you might just have landed during a dry spell.
    __________________
    Reply With Quote
      #4    
    Old December 28th, 2013 (7:24 PM).
    antemortem's Avatar
    antemortem antemortem is offline
    farewell, fated few
    • Crystal Tier
     
    Join Date: Jan 2012
    Location: Texas
    Gender: Male
    Nature: Naughty
    Posts: 7,589
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Esper View Post
    Yeah, I don't really hold stock with either, but each is kind of impressive in its own way. If you're the artist responsible for 20 hits (meaning you wrote the music and lyrics and didn't have a team do all that) then that's pretty wow even if they don't last. If you've got 3 or 4 that last for a month that's, well, less impressive since you might just have landed during a dry spell.
    What if the artist co-wrote the songs with a team? Is that any less impressive? What if the artist didn't write at all? Isn't 20 singles still pretty impressive?

    I think it's pretty impressive to have more singles than fewer, because longevity doesn't mean the song is any better than other, it just means that it's what the world's idea of trendy is at the time. For instance, people weren't looking for the kind of song Blurred Lines was in 2013, it just made it big because people realized it was the kind of song they wanted to listen to... over and over and over and over. As for having more hit singles, that means your songs are consistently popular, even if not for a long time, because people transition into and out of interest, so.
    Reply With Quote
      #5    
    Old December 28th, 2013 (10:05 PM).
    au bon's Avatar
    au bon au bon is offline
    • Developer
    • Platinum Tier
     
    Join Date: Oct 2004
    Location: New Jersey
    Gender: Male
    Nature: Quirky
    Posts: 17,313
    Honestly, I'm not impressed by neither. The EDM hits on the radio today are absolutely dreadful. Artists like Rihanna bloom in the charts and the reason for that is the people and the people who buy and request her music on the radio are people I don't think have very great taste in music.

    Even when it comes to the EDM artists that I do like (really, these days, it's only Lady Gaga), her music is fun and all but nothing I think is all that impressive.
    Reply With Quote
      #6    
    Old December 29th, 2013 (12:33 PM).
    Controversial?'s Avatar
    Controversial? Controversial? is offline
    DEFINITELY needs to stop now
       
      Join Date: Dec 2010
      Location: leeds/london. sometimes i travel.
      Age: 21
      Gender: Female
      Nature: Naughty
      Posts: 641
      Longevity is more memorable. But most #1 singles suck anyways. I'm waiting for the day this dance-pop/electropop/EDM mainstream scene dies like disco.
      __________________
      ???
      Reply With Quote
        #7    
      Old January 27th, 2014 (10:11 PM).
      jigglypuffisaduck's Avatar
      jigglypuffisaduck jigglypuffisaduck is offline
      [
      • Crystal Tier
       
      Join Date: Oct 2013
      Nature: Rash
      Posts: 3,807
      Singles that remain at the top are my favorite. Classics that have been at the top for long amounts of time should get more praise than a burst a short lived classics.
      __________________
      ]
      Reply With Quote
      Reply

      Quick Reply

      Join the conversation!

      Create an account to post a reply in this thread, participate in other discussions, and more!

      Create a PokéCommunity Account

      Sponsored Links
      Thread Tools

      Posting Rules
      You may not post new threads
      You may not post replies
      You may not post attachments
      You may not edit your posts

      BB code is On
      Smilies are On
      [IMG] code is On
      HTML code is Off

      Forum Jump


      All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:31 PM.