Discussions & Debates Have a seat at Discussions & Debates for in-depth discussions, extended or serious conversations, and current events. From world news to talks on life, growing up, relationships, and issues in society, this is the place to be. Come be a knight.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old March 17th, 2017 (1:57 AM).
gimmepie's Avatar
gimmepie gimmepie is offline
Splash!!!
  • Moderator
  • Platinum Tier
  • PokéCommunity Daily
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Australia
Age: 21
Gender: Male
Nature: Mild
Posts: 15,512
Do wealthier countries have an obligation to provide aid to those that suffer from poverty or that have been hit by a severe disaster? Why/Why not?
__________________
Reply With Quote

Relevant Advertising!

  #2    
Old March 17th, 2017 (8:34 AM).
Esper's Avatar
Esper Esper is offline
  • Silver Tier
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Posts: 10,413
My own belief is that we have a moral obligation to help people in need. But since that's just my personal belief I don't expect others to agree automatically.

I do think that it makes the most sense for the safety of the world and the human species for people to work together to mitigate disasters, whether they are natural (storms, drought, etc.) or human-generated (war, etc.). It's just hard to help people if you don't have much security yourself so we're all mostly afraid to help for fear of losing what little we have.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3    
Old March 17th, 2017 (11:02 AM).
Majestic Electric's Avatar
Majestic Electric Majestic Electric is offline
Shocking the Battlefield!
     
    Join Date: Apr 2014
    Location: Behind you...
    Age: 20
    Gender: Female
    Nature: Serious
    Posts: 315
    Obviously, wealthier countries should try to help less fortunate countries, but they're not really obligated to. The needs of their own citizens needs to come first, in my opinion. Furthermore, the unfortunate reality is that these countries can't rely on foreign aid forever. They need to also do more to help themselves instead of expect someone else to take care of everything.

    However, in the case of a natural disaster, wealthier countries should do everything they can to help those afflicted to rebuild. I see that as being an exception to my prior statement.
    __________________
    "Life is the art of drawing without an eraser."
    -John W. Gardner

    Reply With Quote
      #4    
    Old March 19th, 2017 (8:15 AM).
    BadSheep's Avatar
    BadSheep BadSheep is offline
    I'm baaaaaaaaad
       
      Join Date: Jun 2015
      Location: somewhere (duh)
      Age: 17
      Gender: Male
      Nature: Lax
      Posts: 3,668
      Wealthier countries still have poverty and problems. Until those are taken care of, I wouldnt say there is an obligation. And $1 that goes to a poorer country is a $1 not going to a poor person in America. Not to mention, generally, subsidizing poorer countries helps their government and the elites- not the people. It would be better if we removed that middle man.

      Im also pretty sure there is an economic consensus that dumping a whole bunch of resources into poor countries destroys their domestic production and ensures their reliance on wealthier countries. It would be better to trade or place a limit on how much wealthier countries give them.

      But at an obligation viewpoint... yes and no. I personally believe I have a moral obligation to help others, but I do not believe in forcing my personal moral beliefs on others, nor do i believe others should be able to force their personal moral beliefs on me.
      __________________

      Signature by Nah
      Avatar by Bobbylicious
      Reply With Quote
        #5    
      Old March 21st, 2017 (12:22 AM).
      Hands's Avatar
      Hands Hands is offline
      I was saying Boo-urns
      • Discord Moderoid
       
      Join Date: Aug 2016
      Age: 26
      Gender: Male
      Posts: 1,495
      I believe Europe and Britain definitely have obligations to help the third world countries they ruined with their various Empires.
      __________________
      I don't understand the fad
      Clefairy is a pokemon

      Reply With Quote
        #6    
      Old March 23rd, 2017 (10:13 AM).
      Lipstick Vogue's Avatar
      Lipstick Vogue Lipstick Vogue is offline
      thick steamy gunpla resin
         
        Join Date: Feb 2016
        Location: A place you dread and envy
        Age: 25
        Gender: Male
        Nature: Modest
        Posts: 2,197
        Absolutely, the amount of hoarded wealth in the world is disgusting.
        Reply With Quote
          #7    
        Old April 14th, 2017 (5:07 AM).
        YellowFever159 YellowFever159 is offline
           
          Join Date: Apr 2017
          Posts: 4
          In a way "yes" and many rich countries stole or took advantage of what is now the poorer countries.
          E.G. Europe and USA are guilty of taking riches out of Africa
          Reply With Quote
          Reply
          Quick Reply

          Sponsored Links
          Thread Tools

          Posting Rules
          You may not post new threads
          You may not post replies
          You may not post attachments
          You may not edit your posts

          BB code is On
          Smilies are On
          [IMG] code is On
          HTML code is Off
          Minimum Characters Per Post: 25

          Forum Jump


          All times are GMT -8. The time now is 8:13 AM.