Advertiser Content

Post restrictions

Started by Salzorrah April 20th, 2017 4:18 PM
  • 5 replies


grassium Z

Age 21
Floaroma Town, Sinnoh
Seen 5 Hours Ago
Posted 1 Week Ago
6,371 posts
8.5 Years
Lately there have been games that require you to make x number of posts or face inactivity. Is that a good thing or a bad thing?

Also, you are required to make 3 posts here or else you'll be banned from the UG.


Pokécommunity's Licensed Tree Exorcist

Far Lands
Seen 3 Weeks Ago
Posted August 25th, 2018
1,839 posts
9.4 Years
Here as in Pokecommunity, the Off-Topic Section, the Underground, Discussions or this specific thread? You didn't exactly specify.

On topic, it seems like a decent way of keeping people engaged.

I support:

R.I.P Isaac J. Southerland Jr.
1946 - 2017


Age 27
Youngstown, Ohio
Seen 1 Week Ago
Posted 1 Week Ago
5,440 posts
3.3 Years
I'm fine with it, but I don't like votes not counting towards the total. Some people don't even vote half the time, so that should be included.


Age 23
Seen 3 Hours Ago
Posted 3 Hours Ago
19,755 posts
7.1 Years
I like it since it encourages people to maintain activity which can be a bit of a problem.


Age 21
The Forgotten Crossroads
Seen 2 Days Ago
Posted 1 Week Ago
6,879 posts
8.8 Years
It's both more effective and reasonable than a mandatory vote, as has been the norm in the UG since inactivity began to plague it.

If you're only posting to vote, you're not even playing the game, so that's rather pointless.

Most games I've seen outside of the UG utilize this concept. I don't think it's expecting too much of the players. Players should be expected to actually play, after all.
"Sure, there're probably infinite dimensions, but I'm with you in this one, so why would I try to find them?"
~Neil Hilborn

Advertiser Content