B????????L??????????A???????R????????G??????H???????B?????????A???????H???A?????????R??????????????GA?H????????????J?????A?????A????A?

It's nice to finally be a player again. It feels like forever since I died in Get Together Mafia.

Anyway, no leads yet, so [Annihilate] Kitty because dogs > cats.
(nah jk I just put everyone's names into random.org and that's what came up. not joking about dogs > cats though.)

Also...

Sparkin said:

[Annihilate] Johnny

Itching

Click to expand...

Any particular reason why you want to stack votes on Johnny?

Well that escalated quickly...

why

...
...
...
KMS

Ohh LMFAO that was a rookie mistake gone TERRIBLY wrong.

In other news I have 0 leads sadly.

man
0-100 reeeal quick

Yes, things do tend to escalate quickly in Blarzimafia. The GM(s) are brilliant as usual. But seriously! Real talk! What the heck was the logic of shooting day 1?

No comments

Hopefully then you can compose an explaination before day's end.

While adding a fool role to a closed setup is cruel, I can definitely feel that it's not off the table. That being said, the shoot post did reveal him as Sheriff; so yeah there's a high probability he is not also the fool.

Mild scumlean on Johnny for pushing the lynch first. Sparkin should be fullsafe if we're to believe he is a town aligned role.

Johnny said:

In the meantime, I'm changing my vote to [Annihilate]Sparkin for the quick bandwagony post. I doubt that anyone in their right mind would add a fool role in a closed setup so this is my best lead so far, which is pretty good for how early on the game we are.

EDIT: He's also acting way too fool-like. Probably WIFOM.

Click to expand...

Check the gunshot post again. Thank you.

Sparkin was the sheriff (or at least according to the Almighty Blarzigord) but they are definitely acting a little suspect especially with the random decision to shoot someone on D1

Nobody is bandwagoning on you to my knowledge.

But I don't call bandwagons until 3 votes. Sparkin did push a vote but has also been posting about hand control. I wonder if that's crap or a clue.

Still, what was all that bit about not being able to control his hand?

Do we have a brainslug loose or something?

nice shot lul
at least we have a confirmed inno though (even though they are acting scum asf)

It means that I'd rather shoot on D1 than getting killed without using my gun. I'll admit that I should have waited at least more time to gather more thoughts.
About my reason, I looked at how NK was interested in my vote on Johnny, although weak, it's what it is. There's no turning back.

Melody said:

Do we have a brainslug loose or something?

Click to expand...

Let's not.

Eh. Semantics. I usually consider voter #2 to be a "Pusher" and the 3rd and onward as the wagon riders. To put forth a better Metaphor; Vote 1 is the Horse, Vote 2 is the driver and subsequent votes are just passengers. Without any additional votes you don't need the wagon, it can just be a person riding a horse. Effective no less, and brings death as swiftly if no one hitches up another wagon to go after them or another instead.

Sparkin: If you have been acted upon by something in the night; this is a canary. If you do not acknowledge this statement, I will presume the GM has gagged you and you cannot reveal that you have been acted upon.

Bad move, ok, I get it.

If by buddying up, you mean I'm presuming he's not guilty or scum then yes.

If he was forced to do it, that's crucial information too, given the setup is closed and we must figure out if someone is lying when they claim any role. If our scums have the ability to control something, I'd like to find out about it before they kill us!