Discussions & Debates Have a seat at Discussions & Debates for in-depth discussions, extended or serious conversations, and current events. From world news to talks on life, growing up, relationships, and issues in society, this is the place to be. Come be a knight.

TrollandToad.com
Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old March 17th, 2017 (1:57 AM).
gimmepie's Avatar
gimmepie gimmepie is offline
Forest's Curse
  • Moderator
  • Platinum Tier
  • PokéCommunity Daily
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Australia
Age: 22
Gender: Male
Nature: Mild
Posts: 16,277
Do wealthier countries have an obligation to provide aid to those that suffer from poverty or that have been hit by a severe disaster? Why/Why not?
__________________
 
PHANTUMP

Reply With Quote

Relevant Advertising!

  #2    
Old March 17th, 2017 (8:34 AM).
Esper's Avatar
Esper Esper is offline
  • Silver Tier
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Posts: 10,621
My own belief is that we have a moral obligation to help people in need. But since that's just my personal belief I don't expect others to agree automatically.

I do think that it makes the most sense for the safety of the world and the human species for people to work together to mitigate disasters, whether they are natural (storms, drought, etc.) or human-generated (war, etc.). It's just hard to help people if you don't have much security yourself so we're all mostly afraid to help for fear of losing what little we have.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3    
Old March 17th, 2017 (11:02 AM).
Majestic Electric's Avatar
Majestic Electric Majestic Electric is offline
Shocking the Battlefield!
     
    Join Date: Apr 2014
    Location: Behind you...
    Age: 20
    Gender: Female
    Nature: Serious
    Posts: 327
    Obviously, wealthier countries should try to help less fortunate countries, but they're not really obligated to. The needs of their own citizens needs to come first, in my opinion. Furthermore, the unfortunate reality is that these countries can't rely on foreign aid forever. They need to also do more to help themselves instead of expect someone else to take care of everything.

    However, in the case of a natural disaster, wealthier countries should do everything they can to help those afflicted to rebuild. I see that as being an exception to my prior statement.
    __________________
    "Life is the art of drawing without an eraser."
    -John W. Gardner

    Reply With Quote
      #4    
    Old March 19th, 2017 (8:15 AM).
    BadSheep's Avatar
    BadSheep BadSheep is offline
    I'm baaaaaaaaad
       
      Join Date: Jun 2015
      Location: somewhere (duh)
      Age: 17
      Gender: Male
      Nature: Lax
      Posts: 4,162
      Wealthier countries still have poverty and problems. Until those are taken care of, I wouldnt say there is an obligation. And $1 that goes to a poorer country is a $1 not going to a poor person in America. Not to mention, generally, subsidizing poorer countries helps their government and the elites- not the people. It would be better if we removed that middle man.

      Im also pretty sure there is an economic consensus that dumping a whole bunch of resources into poor countries destroys their domestic production and ensures their reliance on wealthier countries. It would be better to trade or place a limit on how much wealthier countries give them.

      But at an obligation viewpoint... yes and no. I personally believe I have a moral obligation to help others, but I do not believe in forcing my personal moral beliefs on others, nor do i believe others should be able to force their personal moral beliefs on me.
      __________________

      Signature by Nah
      Avatar by Bobbylicious
      Reply With Quote
        #5    
      Old March 21st, 2017 (12:22 AM).
      Hands's Avatar
      Hands Hands is offline
      I was saying Boo-urns
         
        Join Date: Aug 2016
        Age: 27
        Gender: Male
        Posts: 1,559
        I believe Europe and Britain definitely have obligations to help the third world countries they ruined with their various Empires.
        __________________
        Reply With Quote
          #6    
        Old March 23rd, 2017 (10:13 AM).
        Lipstick Vogue's Avatar
        Lipstick Vogue Lipstick Vogue is online now
        thick steamy gunpla resin
           
          Join Date: Feb 2016
          Location: A place you dread and envy
          Age: 26
          Gender: Male
          Nature: Modest
          Posts: 2,445
          Absolutely, the amount of hoarded wealth in the world is disgusting.
          Reply With Quote
            #7    
          Old April 14th, 2017 (5:07 AM).
          YellowFever159 YellowFever159 is offline
             
            Join Date: Apr 2017
            Posts: 8
            In a way "yes" and many rich countries stole or took advantage of what is now the poorer countries.
            E.G. Europe and USA are guilty of taking riches out of Africa
            Reply With Quote
            Reply

            Quick Reply

            Join the conversation!

            Create an account to post a reply in this thread, participate in other discussions, and more!

            Create a PokéCommunity Account

            Sponsored Links
            Thread Tools

            Posting Rules
            You may not post new threads
            You may not post replies
            You may not post attachments
            You may not edit your posts

            BB code is On
            Smilies are On
            [IMG] code is On
            HTML code is Off
            Minimum Characters Per Post: 25

            Forum Jump


            All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:23 AM.