The PokéCommunity Forums Pokémon: General Discussions Pokémon General
The right size of a Pokedex

Pokémon General The home for theories, clubs, polls, and other discussions involving the Pokémon franchise that aren't covered in any of the other boards.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old 5 Days Ago (6:00 PM).
Boynsy Boynsy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 105
I'm curious to see what other people think on this topic. How many Pokemon should the ideal Pokedex contain, and how many of these should be from each generation and how many new?

Did Gen V introduce too many, with its brand new dex? I don't mind it too much, because I limit myself to using new Pokemon only in my in game team. I had a bigger problem with X and Y having 450 or so to catch, with such a diluted pool of new mons.

To my mind, the right number of new Pokemon would be around 40 good new families - "good" referring to no PikaClones or overly gimmicky mons - totalling around 100 new mons. Then add in another 100 to 200 old Pokemon from past generations so that the mix is around 30 to 40% new and the rest returning.
__________________
1607-5369-0056
Reply With Quote

Relevant Advertising!

  #2    
Old 4 Days Ago (10:18 AM).
BlazingCobaltX's Avatar
BlazingCobaltX BlazingCobaltX is offline
.
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Age: 19
Gender: Female
Nature: Hardy
Posts: 200
100+. We're talking an entirely new generation here, it shouldn't be a watered down version of the previous gens but instead hold enough Pokémon to fill most of the region with them. That's what I liked a lot about Gen V and less about Gen II.
Reply With Quote
  #3    
Old 4 Days Ago (11:35 AM).
Radiating's Avatar
Radiating Radiating is online now
Looking up at the sky
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: United States
Gender: Male
Nature: Calm
Posts: 1,188
I prefer a regional dex of around 200 Pokemon, similar to Platinum's. (Albeit with less legendaries and more multiple evolution lines.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4    
Old 1 Day Ago (10:32 PM).
Brendino's Avatar
Brendino Brendino is offline
Ti-i-i-ime is on my side.
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Seven Bridges Road
Nature: Quiet
Posts: 7,119
I've actually enjoyed the smaller Pokedexes that we've gotten in both Kalos and Alola. We're already sitting at over 800 Pokemon, so I'm cool if they just want to add 70-80 Pokemon at a time rather than 150.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5    
Old 19 Hours Ago (10:50 PM).
colours's Avatar
colours colours is online now
→weARElimitless
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Gender: Female
Nature: Quiet
Posts: 28,465
I've always been a fan of bigger Pokedexes. To this day, I still feel conflicted about Alola's smaller Pokedex size. On one hand, an argument can be made that each Pokemon can be made more unique and memorable (less is more, etc), but that's subjective anyway. We certainly didn't have trouble memorizing 151 Pokemon as kids during Gen I, so why is it that we have to settle for less? Wouldn't having a larger Pokedex mean that you would have a wider variety of Pokemon to choose from in that particular region?

It's for this reason that I lean slightly more towards having a bigger regional Pokedex. I like having lots and lots of options as far as what kind of Pokemon I can have; it makes my adventure more fulfilling and fun.
__________________
infinite colours

we're living limitless

Reply With Quote
  #6    
Old 18 Hours Ago (11:33 PM).
Meyneth's Avatar
Meyneth Meyneth is offline
Foolish fools.
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: U.K.
Gender: Other
Nature: Quiet
Posts: 7,394
All of them. The right size of Pokedex is the National Pokedex.

I know trading has always been a major factor in Pokemon, and why we've had two versions for every generation. I realise that catching 'em all has become a monumental task now with 800+of the things, but honestly? A part of me always feels like the games are an incomplete experience just because not everything is in there to be caught, and I have to waste time and effort trawling back through older games for specific Pokemon...usually a very large percentage of them, even.

All the way back to Gen II I've felt this. I like being able to "catch 'em all" as the old slogan goes, that's why Blue Rescue Team remains my favourite Pokemon game.

And you know what makes Pokemon games enjoyable or tedious? Variety. The more variety there is, the more chance you'll enjoy yourself, because you'll get to use Pokemon you like, and there will be more ways for you to build your team to your satisfaction. It's very rigid and restrictive to limit the number of Pokemon in a game, to force the player to use things they may not necessarily like or find useful...this is why I struggled with Black and Sun, and why despite disliking it I managed to play through X without much difficulty. Lack of variety for the former, and abundance for the latter.

Regional Pokedexes should be abolished. I'm not saying over-saturate the routes with Pokemon like they did with X and Y, but...we have Day and Night. We have Seasons. We have two versions, and day of the week events, and grass rustling, and gift Pokemon, and Pokemon Radars, and so on. There are PLENTY of ways that they could include every Pokemon in a single generation without oversaturating the routes with them.

If you're asking about the right number of Pokemon in a generation, all I have to say is that there is no right size. Quality is more valuable than quantity, and a bigger number of new Pokemon does not mean anything in proportion to the quality of those new Pokemon. It all comes down to personal preference. In that instance, I'm fine with whatever.
Reply With Quote
  #7    
Old 3 Hours Ago (3:02 PM).
Amore Amore is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Age: 22
Posts: 3,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meyneth View Post
All of them. The right size of Pokedex is the National Pokedex.
I like the idea - especially given how I've never been able to complete the pokédex apart from the golden period between the release of HgSs and the end of the GTS in Gen IV - but I feel like in practicality it wouldn't work unless we're making a game the length of something like Assassin's Creed on a console. In your average sized pokémon game wee'd go from arguably having far too little variety in many games, to having like 8 different species of pokémon in the first route alone.

Personally I think the Platinum and HeartGold / SoulSilver regional pokédexes with ~250 pokémon each work quite well for playability - you get a good selection of different species of differing levels of power, and even have a choice between non-starter Fire-types!
__________________
Still working on a better signature
Reply With Quote
Reply
Quick Reply

Sponsored Links
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 6:09 PM.