Deep Discussion Have a seat at Deep Discussion for in-depth discussions, extended or serious conversations, and current events. From world news to talks on life, growing up, relationships, and issues in society, this is the place to be. Come be a knight.

Ad Content
Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #26   Link to this post, but load the entire thread.  
Old October 11th, 2018 (1:10 PM).
twocows's Avatar
twocows twocows is offline
Primary form of sustenance is cute images
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Michigan
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Nature: Lax
Posts: 4,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivysaur View Post
And I just want to say, if anybody is angry to have a rabid Republican partisan who also happens to be an (attempted) rapist on the Supreme Court, just vote Democratic in November.
I will be, but probably not the way you're hoping.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trev View Post
Ha ha remember when the worst thing about Kavanaugh was his bad financial skills and not that he's probably a rapist, good times.
I feel like we watched a different hearing. Was the person with the sketchy memory (she changed her story several times), the list of witnesses who all said they had no idea what she was talking about, and who was constantly surrounded by DNC politicians, lawyers, and supporters talking into her ear really so convincing? Because I just wasn't feeling it. It seemed like a textbook smear campaign, and given the poll numbers I posted in the other thread (which again, showed weighted and unweighted averages over the course of several weeks, not just one single source), I don't think I'm the only one.

The real irony here is that I'm not a huge fan of Kavanaugh. I agree with Ivysaur's first point: he's absolutely a partisan with clear bias and I think it's a sad joke to nominate him to replace Kennedy, one of the most nuanced and moderate justices on the bench. I think Kavanaugh would have been pushed through no matter what the Democrats did, but I think they would have come out of it looking a lot better to undecided/on the fence voters if they chose to focus more on how he's unprofessional and hyper-partisan. I think all they accomplished with the Ford accusation is making him look more sympathetic to people who aren't fond of false accusations (and considering the Democrats used to be champions of overturning false accusations, that plays well with a lot of former Dems). It was a bad move politically and I think they're going to get hammered at the voting booth for it.
__________________
8values
Political Simulator
Reply With Quote
  #27   Link to this post, but load the entire thread.  
Old October 11th, 2018 (9:47 PM).
Bidoof FTW's Avatar
Bidoof FTW Bidoof FTW is offline
→ Bidoof is Pretty Rad
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: the States
Age: 19
Gender: Male
Nature: Relaxed
Posts: 3,479
Honestly my biggest peeve with the Ford case is that the complete focus of his nomination changed from his competency as a nonpartisan judge to his past as a mukty young adult. I don't want to state an opinion on Ford but I feel like it honestly hurt the dems more than it helped them. Kavanaugh's senate hearings were an absolute joke and instead of throwing his own opinion forward just referenced what the Supreme Court did in the past.

To me, his initial hearing should have been the focus because after seeing his responses to the questioning he was just not fit for the job, but at the end of the day that's just not what happened.

It's a shame.
Reply With Quote
  #28   Link to this post, but load the entire thread.  
Old October 11th, 2018 (10:46 PM).
TailsMK4 TailsMK4 is offline
     
    Join Date: Jun 2018
    Location: Texas
    Age: 28
    Gender: Male
    Nature: Relaxed
    Posts: 372
    I did not have much of an opinion about Kavanaugh (I never had even heard of him until the pick was presented), and just thought that as long as SCOTUS wasn't going to bend to the Democrats' will (I oppose almost everything the Democrats believe in), it didn't matter to me who was on the court. But after what happened with Ford, I just come to the conclusion that if the Democrats don't want a certain something, it MIGHT be ok to have it (though I think the Dems and I do agree that extreme doctrines like communism don't work).
    __________________
    Current VPP: (to evolve into an Umbreon) --------------- Fire Type Emblem Character: Coral
    Reply With Quote
      #29   Link to this post, but load the entire thread.  
    Old October 11th, 2018 (11:16 PM). Edited October 11th, 2018 by colours.
    colours's Avatar
    colours colours is online now
    wandererjustlikeme 🌺
     
    Join Date: Apr 2005
    Location: in an eternal dream
    Gender: Female
    Nature: Jolly
    Posts: 2,957
    Hm.

    While it's possible that the Kavanaugh hearings might've hurt the Democrats, I'm not sure it's quite as bad as some people are making it out to be in this thread. I think what needs to be considered was that throughout this entire debacle, Kavanaugh was a deeply controversial and partisan figure. This goes without saying of course, but I think even among your average everyday voter, his approval ratings are pretty much what you'd expect among both Republicans and Democrats.

    It can also be said that his confirmation can be a boost in motivation for pro-abortion activists. All in all, I'd hesitate in drawing a full picture of gloom and doom for the Dems because the data doesn't quite support that conclusion. Their House chances are about as good as they've ever been, and their Senate chances are about as medicore/bad as they've ever been. The Senate was always going to be a long shot to win, and the House was always going to be Dem-favoured, anyway.

    In short, the Kavanaugh confirmation basically moved the needle in a predictable direction, to the benefit of both Democrats and Republicans. I don't believe this will end up hurting Dems long-term because Net Neutrality is still something that's a sore spot with a lot of people that I think will be stressed ad nauseum, among other issues but not certainly limited to Kavanaugh himself.
    Reply With Quote
      #30   Link to this post, but load the entire thread.  
    Old October 27th, 2018 (4:46 AM). Edited October 27th, 2018 by Trev.
    Trev's Avatar
    Trev Trev is online now
     
    Join Date: May 2012
    Age: 22
    Gender: Male
    Nature: Sassy
    Posts: 1,554
    Y’all literally act like I toted out a neon sign saying “Kavanaugh is a huge rapist.” I said “probably” since there was no official conclusion reached - read my actual words next time.
    __________________






    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Quick Reply

    Join the conversation!

    Create an account to post a reply in this thread, participate in other discussions, and more!

    Create a PokéCommunity Account
    Ad Content
    Thread Tools

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Minimum Characters Per Post: 25

    Forum Jump


    All times are GMT -8. The time now is 9:17 AM.