[quot
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paolo_MaSter
SCV Bro, you don't know what you are talking about, just close this thread, that is why xLIVENUDESx is not posting no more, bye, and I may not know a lot about checking pokemon, but i've been collecting events for like 6 months, I stopped due to virus on my computer, and I don't know if I'll be back, but bro, stop, you really don't know what you are talking about.
|
xLIVENUDESx asked for me to go more into depth, I did. I uploaded a video demonstrating the code that the game runs to prevent mystery gift shinys. I posted an explanation to guide everyone who is not experienced in reading ASM as to what the important lines do. Then I gave instructions so that anyone can verify that code is actually in the game and not something that I put there and made this up.
You may have been collecting pokemon for 6 months but I have had years of programming experience and have been studying the code in pokemon Diamond and Pearl for longer than that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by randomspot555
However, I've yet to see anyone offer evidence other than "it can happen" in regards to the various Woner Card distribution/Mystery Gift received events. Hell, the event list in the trade board still says Movie Shaymin can't be shiny, but it's constantly traded here. While livenudes and Color Me Evil may have evidence, they've yet to present it, or say how one obtains a shiny of these events, or why the conversation I quoted on page one is wrong.
|
I will add to this that I added on the first post that something that some people say can't be shiny can be shiny.
I also posted a video proving it and an explanation as to what is required for this to happen.
xLIVENUDESx and Color Me Evil have not done that for mystery gift shinys. Why? Because they can't and the proof is in the first post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Color Me Evil
Lalalala.
|
Please notice the NOTICE on SHC. It says
Notice: Remember, that even though your pokemon do have the Pal Park/WC data they should be checked with Pokesav by someone experience.
I am such a person (someone more experienced) and I am saying that they are not legit and the proof is in the first post.
SHC's programmer know that trash bytes are not a reliable way of checking a pokemon. That is why that notice is there.
Color Me Evil, did you watch the video? Did you read the explanation? Did you verify that the code is in the ROM like I say it is.
Let me add that relying on SHC is not a good thing to do. It only checks for so called trash bytes which are very easy to figure out. Its even easier to get around it than to get around legal.exe or pAC.
A hack checking program is only as knowledgeable as the person who coded it. When SHC was programmed I had not confirmed that mystery gift pokemon can not be shiny. That is one reason why it comes out as legit on SHC.
Why do you trust SHC, rather than the code from the game?
Also I know there are a few people who think I had something to do with the creation of pokesav. I did not, but lets suppose that I did.
Why would that be a reason to not trust my analysis? Wouldn't it be a reason to be sure I know what I am talking about. After it take a person very knowledgeable to write such a program. You almost surely use pokesav to get pokemon files, right Color Me Evil? Or do you know how to extract the pokemon from the save yourself and decrypt them to view the correct data?