Genetic Engineering

Started by Azonic March 8th, 2009 4:22 PM
  • 1308 views
  • 38 replies

Azonic

hello friends

Age 10
Male
stranger danger
Seen June 4th, 2018
Posted May 4th, 2018
7,123 posts
15.9 Years
Genetic Engineering: The act of adjusting or duplicating one's genetic structure within one's DNA. Includes cloning and customizing the outcome of a child, plant, or animal.

What are your opinions on genetically engineering humans? Do you think it's right to customize your own child? Do you think it's right to clone a human?

Many believe that genetic engineering will help end a numerous amount of genetic diseases, like cancer. This will prevent such diseases from being passed down from one generation to another. However, it seems too good to be true... Repairing and eliminating one's susceptibility to cancer may introduce another flaw. If you replace a letter on the DNA strand, you may remove one's susceptibility to cancer but activate another flaw. So your child may not have cancer, but they might have 3 ears, or six fingers! This is because fixing a code on the DNA works in a domino effect (a gene fixed may cause another flaw, and that flaw can cause another, and another, and so on). Do you think it's worth the risk? What will happen to all the children with "accidents"?

Also onto the topic of cloning: Many support cloning because the clones can be used as test animals or servants. Others want clones to be back-ups in case an organ fails. Do you think this is humane?
~
Genetic engineering, I believe, has just far too many possibilities to ignore and just pass by. Genetically engineering plants with faster growing genes will increase the rate in which our natural plants grow, and increasing the number of foods out there. But we just shouldn't clone humans, in my opinion. :[

Anyways, the world is supposedly going forward with genetic engineering.

- Rumor has it that Korea has cloned a human (which I highly doubt).
- Numerous cloned animals have already been created, including Dolly.
- A couple in Florida purchased a cloned version of their deceased dog not too long ago for $155,000.
- A clinic in California is advertising that they will be offering services to customize the outcome of your child (e.g. If you want sandy blonde hair, you've got it!).

So what are your views? :>

chanchimi

With a Side of Cheddar

Age 29
Female
In a cartoon!
Seen May 10th, 2022
Posted July 23rd, 2011
547 posts
14.8 Years
Genetic engineering..... I did a project on this not too long ago!

I do not agree at all with human cloning, there is not a good enough reason to clone humans, the only reason that genetic engineers actually have is that the clones can be used for their organs. So that the clone would be used to cure illnesses for the original. That's wrong in my opinion, a human clone is still a person, and I don't think that bringing new life on the planet should be used for organ harvesting.

On the other hand, in terms of animal cloning, I feel it should be used within reason and balance. Cloning animals can save a animal species from dying, one day, maybe Giant Pandas won't be endangered anymore with the help of cloning! But I don't believe in transgenic animals, or altering an animal to have DNA from different animals. And of course, balance is important!

So, that's pretty much how I feel about it. But I have to say, if cloning dinosaur became possible, that would be awesome! (Of course we wouldn't want to face the dangers of a REAL Jurassic Park though! ^^; )
The Future Can Be Likeable
The Present is Redeemable
And You Can Be Happy Even if You're

B L U E

Tinhead Bruce

the Neighbour

Age 28
Male
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Seen August 28th, 2014
Posted June 16th, 2010
1,110 posts
14.8 Years
Many support cloning because the clones can be used as test animals or servants.
I think you're being a little ridiculous here. I've researched cloning and other Genetic Engineering experiments, and that is crossing a line. No one one, or only deranged people will you clones as servants.

I'll Edit this or post again when I have time to put up my full opinion.
If I only had a heart...

Banner and Avy Credit I Partner in Crime I Sister I Mentor I Unwilling BDSM Slave
Broseph
Age 30
Male
New York City
Seen May 21st, 2016
Posted May 16th, 2016
3,597 posts
15.9 Years
If we are able to make the "people" unliving husks, then they aren't "people" anymore.
It's like growing organs in a farm. Just saying.

I want am arm sticking out of my chest plzthx
You can't modify something that's already that matured.
lurid/lucid

"I want to tear myself from this place, from this reality, rise up like a cloud and float away, melt into this humid summer night and dissolve somewhere far, over the hills. But I am here, my legs blocks of concrete, my lungs empty of air, my throat burning. There will be no floating away."

Khaled Hosseini

→ Refresh for a different picture
→ White FC: Haruka 0347 0171 1756


whoever disabled my signature:
my signature is not even close to 300px tall.
i dont understand why it was disabled.

Azonic

hello friends

Age 10
Male
stranger danger
Seen June 4th, 2018
Posted May 4th, 2018
7,123 posts
15.9 Years
If we are able to make the "people" unliving husks, then they aren't "people" anymore.
It's like growing organs in a farm. Just saying.
What? Clones are definitely people. They were just created in a different way than other "normal" humans. 8/ They have feelings emotions, and all the characteristics of a "normal" human besides the fact that they were born differently.

txteclipse

The Last

Age 32
Riverside
Seen March 23rd, 2023
Posted November 2nd, 2016
2,322 posts
15.7 Years
If we are able to make the "people" unliving husks, then they aren't "people" anymore.
It's like growing organs in a farm. Just saying.
What defines a "person," in your opinion?

Corvus of the Black Night

Wild Duck Pokémon

Age 30
Non-binary
With the Birds
Seen January 9th, 2015
Posted January 9th, 2015
3,416 posts
14.3 Years
Hmm... I'm not into it. I think that if we did that, that a lot of people would start to have the same traits due to the "chosen aspects" of someone. I wouldn't mind it if it were something used to elimintate genetic disorders, but when you get into the realm of crap like eye colour... that's a bit too much for me.

Plus, it could end up that people who decide not to have their children genetically engineered (or do not have enough money to do so), they would be considered lower in society for being "imperfect".

Future genetisists - just leave human genetic engineering alone.
Age 30
Male
New York City
Seen May 21st, 2016
Posted May 16th, 2016
3,597 posts
15.9 Years
What? Clones are definitely people. They were just created in a different way than other "normal" humans. 8/ They have feelings emotions, and all the characteristics of a "normal" human besides the fact that they were born differently.
Which is exactly why I proposed wiping those humanly qualities.

What defines a "person," in your opinion?
A person is the unity between human cognition, physical form, and being / existence - the mind, body and "soul". With the exception of the body, none of these can exist with the absence of another. I say "soul" vaguely because it's merely the question of "Does the being exist?" rather than a set of variables that make up the being.

"Humankind" is merely conceptual, as, no matter how you put it, people and animals are alike, except through the fact that humans are capable of "higher" understanding. If you replace the mind of a human with that of a turkey, would that being still be human? Not really. If you replaced the mind of an alligator with that of a human, would that being be human? Technically, no, but some may argue.

Hell, humans ARE animals.

The main problem I see is that people are uncomfortable meddling with forms so similar to themselves.

Hmm... I'm not into it. I think that if we did that, that a lot of people would start to have the same traits due to the "chosen aspects" of someone. I wouldn't mind it if it were something used to elimintate genetic disorders, but when you get into the realm of crap like eye colour... that's a bit too much for me.

Plus, it could end up that people who decide not to have their children genetically engineered (or do not have enough money to do so), they would be considered lower in society for being "imperfect".

Future genetisists - just leave human genetic engineering alone.
Ah, mankind's struggle against disease. Of course, with genetic engineering, the possibility of modifying these traits are opened up.
With possibility, there's exploration. With exploration, there's development. With development, there's application. Unless we outlaw superficial modifications, they're bound to happen.

- People were never perfect. They are susceptible to the environment, bacteria, prions, viruses, etc.
- Some people are already genetically "imperfect" because they carry certain genes for sickle-cell or Huntington's, etc.
- People will NEVER be perfect, but ironically are already perfect, because of mutations. While we are able to weed out the weak and breed the "stronger" individuals (resultant of genetic mutations), we are also prone to genetic mutations that destroy our bodies.

Also, so you're a fan of animal engineering. Read above on why I think humans / animals are the same.
lurid/lucid

"I want to tear myself from this place, from this reality, rise up like a cloud and float away, melt into this humid summer night and dissolve somewhere far, over the hills. But I am here, my legs blocks of concrete, my lungs empty of air, my throat burning. There will be no floating away."

Khaled Hosseini

→ Refresh for a different picture
→ White FC: Haruka 0347 0171 1756


whoever disabled my signature:
my signature is not even close to 300px tall.
i dont understand why it was disabled.
Age 32
Male
Vermillion City
Seen February 20th, 2016
Posted February 16th, 2014
1,726 posts
17.1 Years
Genetic cloning humans: No.

Genetics cloning animals: varies on level of cloning, use for special circumstances/to help a species survive.

Genetics to choose what your child looks like: Meh, not for me, but if other people don't like the surprise then go for it.

Genetics to predict genetic disorders/mental disability: Yes, definitely.


Friend Code

BHwolfgang

kamikorosu

Age 28
Male
Virginia
Seen February 24th, 2014
Posted May 9th, 2013
3,905 posts
14.2 Years
What? Clones are definitely people. They were just created in a different way than other "normal" humans. 8/ They have feelings emotions, and all the characteristics of a "normal" human besides the fact that they were born differently.
If the clone really have all that, then would they really just sit around and wait for the day that the original owner might need their heart or... something else? No, most definitely not.

I think that cloning food is the only, right way in this cloning thing. Everything is extremely delicate and one thing can lead to another.

However, if for example, you clone a corn and the genetics made the corn blue. I'll say that's kinda cool, in my opinion.
Age 30
Male
New York City
Seen May 21st, 2016
Posted May 16th, 2016
3,597 posts
15.9 Years
Are you suggesting that we remove all clones' ability to live and feel? Because that's completely inhumane. Unless I misunderstood...
You're relating this to removing an already-living person's mind.

If they never had it, then it's not so inhumane.
It's comparable to growing bacteria culture in a lab, except on a large scale.
lurid/lucid

"I want to tear myself from this place, from this reality, rise up like a cloud and float away, melt into this humid summer night and dissolve somewhere far, over the hills. But I am here, my legs blocks of concrete, my lungs empty of air, my throat burning. There will be no floating away."

Khaled Hosseini

→ Refresh for a different picture
→ White FC: Haruka 0347 0171 1756


whoever disabled my signature:
my signature is not even close to 300px tall.
i dont understand why it was disabled.

Zet

Age 33
Male
Brisbane, Australia
Seen September 29th, 2021
Posted May 16th, 2020
7,687 posts
15.7 Years
Genetic cloning humans: No.

Genetics cloning animals: varies on level of cloning, use for special circumstances/to help a species survive.

Genetics to choose what your child looks like: Meh, not for me, but if other people don't like the surprise then go for it.

Genetics to predict genetic disorders/mental disability: Yes, definitely.
cannibals would approve of cloning humans, they need to survive as well and why clone animals? we can live off plants and such. In my opinion I would approve of genetic engineering in every way possible, we could live longer and crap
Age 29
Male
California
Seen October 21st, 2010
Posted October 20th, 2010
520 posts
15.9 Years
If we are able to make the "people" unliving husks, then they aren't "people" anymore.
It's like growing organs in a farm. Just saying.
Clones aren't "husks" of the subject which had been cloned. A clone is an individual living organism.
A clone of a subject would live a separate life apart from the subject that had been cloned.

The cloning of a human or an animal is called reproductive cloning. Scientists transfer genetic material from the nucleus of a donor adult cell to an egg whose nucleus, and thus its genetic material, has been removed. The reconstructed egg containing the DNA from a donor cell must be treated with chemicals or electric current in order to stimulate cell division. Once the cloned embryo reaches a suitable stage, it is transferred to the uterus of a female host where it continues to develop until birth.

The process of birth the clone goes through is just like the normal birth process of a human or an animal.
When born, clones have emotions, thoughts, and rights of actions just as any human or animal does.

In conclusion, you cannot simply wipe a clone's emotions, thoughts, and actions before it is born.
Have you even stopped to think if that's even logically possible or are you just rambling on about it
like a psychopathic person?

I'm not trying to be rude; I'm at least trying to make a logical point.
I didn't put more than an hour worth of research into this post
for nothing. If your going to argue this, at least show more
effort of thought in your posts.
Age 30
Male
New York City
Seen May 21st, 2016
Posted May 16th, 2016
3,597 posts
15.9 Years
Clones aren't "husks" of the subject which had been cloned. A clone is an individual living organism.
A clone of a subject would live a separate life apart from the subject that had been cloned.

The cloning of a human or an animal is called reproductive cloning. Scientists transfer genetic material from the nucleus of a donor adult cell to an egg whose nucleus, and thus its genetic material, has been removed. The reconstructed egg containing the DNA from a donor cell must be treated with chemicals or electric current in order to stimulate cell division. Once the cloned embryo reaches a suitable stage, it is transferred to the uterus of a female host where it continues to develop until birth.

The process of birth the clone goes through is just like the normal birth process of a human or an animal.
When born, clones have emotions, thoughts, and rights of actions just as any human or animal does.

In conclusion, you cannot simply wipe a clone's emotions, thoughts, and actions before it is born.
Have you even stopped to think if that's even logically possible or are you just rambling on about it
like a psychopathic person?

I'm not trying to be rude; I'm at least trying to make a logical point.
I didn't put more than an hour worth of research into this post
for nothing. If your going to argue this, at least show more
effort of thought in your posts.
Yes, you can.

You can inhibit the passage of electricity throughout the nervous system to cause the body to be thrown into a vegetative state, then you can regulate the body to your discretion using only vital signals.

It's easier if you think about clones as bacteria. You give them nutrients on an agar plate and watch as colonies grow. You can wipe out whatever you want, sample whatever you want, transform their DNA, induce conjugation, separate and culture and overall control their lives. Disease and environmental factors affect bacteria the same way they affect humans. Metaphorically speaking, humans are just huge, specialized bacterial colonies, but our agar plates are somewhat more varied than that of bacteria's.

And hey, you. I never said it was practical with the technology we have today.
lurid/lucid

"I want to tear myself from this place, from this reality, rise up like a cloud and float away, melt into this humid summer night and dissolve somewhere far, over the hills. But I am here, my legs blocks of concrete, my lungs empty of air, my throat burning. There will be no floating away."

Khaled Hosseini

→ Refresh for a different picture
→ White FC: Haruka 0347 0171 1756


whoever disabled my signature:
my signature is not even close to 300px tall.
i dont understand why it was disabled.
Age 34
Female
Karnac (in RL, The UK)
Seen March 14th, 2010
Posted February 8th, 2010
761 posts
14.7 Years
This is one of those issues that is incredibly frought with legal and ethical issues. In some situations, genetic counselling (changing an embyo's DNA in the lab to match an existing child) and other genetic engineering could be used for good - from treating things such as destructive cancers or to more everyday things like diabetes type 1 by growing a new pancreas for the sufferer without a chance of rejection. This would have to be totally controlled and carefully monitored, but there is always the chance this would be abused.

On this vein, the idea of someone violating this discovery by twisting it for their own gain scares me somewhat. We could be looking at a world where parents choose the eye colour of their children, the sex, the blood type, or where governments pick and choose embryo's for strength and stamina for soldiers. Note I said COULD.

This trouble with this kind of genetic modification is that the possibilities really are endless for both the positive side of it and the negative side of it.




Friend Code

A Darker Day

Team Destiny



Theme

Zet

Age 33
Male
Brisbane, Australia
Seen September 29th, 2021
Posted May 16th, 2020
7,687 posts
15.7 Years
Is letting a child be born with a genetic disorder, that can be fixed with genetic engineering, humane?
yes it is humane

Genetic Engineering is one thing I agree with, but cloning? No way. It's just scary and cruel. We won't be using clones as equals, that's for sure.
wait, how is it scary and cruel? I mean like if a man goes to war and dies he could wish to have a clone so his family won't be crying over the loss
Age 31
Male
Seen November 9th, 2021
Posted March 17th, 2015
3,517 posts
18.2 Years
You can't modify something that's already that matured.
Couldn't you just cut an arm off and sew it on to my chest? :>
wait, how is it scary and cruel? I mean like if a man goes to war and dies he could wish to have a clone so his family won't be crying over the loss
Couldn't we just send the clone to war? lolz
Ten year old account


Never expect me to post


Except when I do
Age 30
Male
New York City
Seen May 21st, 2016
Posted May 16th, 2016
3,597 posts
15.9 Years
yes it is humane


wait, how is it scary and cruel? I mean like if a man goes to war and dies he could wish to have a clone so his family won't be crying over the loss
"Humanly" more than "humane".

The clone would be a very different person from the original.
lurid/lucid

"I want to tear myself from this place, from this reality, rise up like a cloud and float away, melt into this humid summer night and dissolve somewhere far, over the hills. But I am here, my legs blocks of concrete, my lungs empty of air, my throat burning. There will be no floating away."

Khaled Hosseini

→ Refresh for a different picture
→ White FC: Haruka 0347 0171 1756


whoever disabled my signature:
my signature is not even close to 300px tall.
i dont understand why it was disabled.

Azonic

hello friends

Age 10
Male
stranger danger
Seen June 4th, 2018
Posted May 4th, 2018
7,123 posts
15.9 Years
You're relating this to removing an already-living person's mind.

If they never had it, then it's not so inhumane.
It's comparable to growing bacteria culture in a lab, except on a large scale.
Okay, removing a person's ability to live and experience life is definitely inhumane. A clone of a person makes it a person too; simple logic. And since that clone is human, that clone should be entitled to all the basic Human Rights.

Besides, if we were to leave a clone dormant for his / her whole life, the organs wouldn't be nearly as healthy enough to transfer.
Is letting a child be born with a genetic disorder, that can be fixed with genetic engineering, humane?
Yes. Fixing a gene could make another flaw in the child, anyways.

cannibals would approve of cloning humans, they need to survive as well and why clone animals? we can live off plants and such. In my opinion I would approve of genetic engineering in every way possible, we could live longer and crap
Just pointing out that there will be disasters before the miracle. First, they'd have to find out which genes control the life span (if any). Then, we'd still have the risk of fixing that gene and messing up another characteristic about the human.

yes it is humane


wait, how is it scary and cruel? I mean like if a man goes to war and dies he could wish to have a clone so his family won't be crying over the loss
The personality of a human isn't determined by genetics, and the clone won't get the same personality because a personality is determined by what one experiences. Would the clone get education, anyways? The clone will be completely different, aside from the physical appearance.

Also, scientific research tells us that the rate for a successful clone is between 0.01 - 3%. So for every 1000 clones, there could be only 1 useful / successful clone. That's a complete waste, not to mention the expenses involved.

Spinor

<i><font color="b1373f">The Lonely Physicist</font></i>

Age 27
Male
Seen February 13th, 2019
Posted October 4th, 2015
5,175 posts
17.3 Years
Couldn't you just cut an arm off and sew it on to my chest? :>
Couldn't we just send the clone to war? lolz
Spoiler:


That cup gives you an arm on your chest too!

First of all, I really don't care what happens with Genetic Engineering as long as it doesn't get to cloning humans.

However, and only if however, there was a way to clone and hibernate human organs for backup, then I would totally support that. Just not whole arms for Mac's abuse @[email protected]

Animals have already been cloned. I remember the woman tha got cloned versions of her dog. I believe this could actually become a common service.

And for some reason, this thread reminds me of "The Island" XD.