Middle East Invasion Page 2

Started by Mew Ichigo August 21st, 2009 11:55 AM
  • 1588 views
  • 50 replies

donavannj

Age 32
Male
'cause it get cold like Minnesota
Seen 5 Days Ago
Posted 1 Week Ago
22,513 posts
18.2 Years
Here's an idea.

Let's actually attack the people who caused 9/11, instead of everyone else in the Middle East.
That's why Afghanistan was invaded. ;) The Taliban, which was supporting Al Qaeda, was in power in Afghanistan. By taking out one of the government supporting them, Al Qaeda would be weakened and would be less capable of carrying out another attack (that was the idea, anyway).
whoops
Seen September 18th, 2020
Posted February 18th, 2018
7,741 posts
16.6 Years
Eliminate the US from existence and watch this world's worst problems fade into memory.

Keeping it in one sentence, lest I be scorned, that's what I think.


If you mean Middle East holding a weapon of mass destruction , then no , since when Middlie east holds such a weapon like this ?
American forces assaulted the Middle East in the belief that there were nuclear weapons that present a threat to the US. Since this turned out to be false, with there being no actual threat (as opposed to the ongoing preceived threat) about, people have come to question the value of keeping a proportion of the nation's military on foreign soil, which naturally of course weighs somewhat on the taxpayers' credit balances.
Of course, they don't leave because extremists are still about, but they always will be so why not leave now? But then, it's too late to do that either; see, America has, by force of its own eye-for-an-eye-styled justice ideals, dug the hole deeper.

dc_united

Josh Wicks doesn't like you

Age 31
Male
Maryland
Seen March 13th, 2011
Posted August 18th, 2010
445 posts
14.6 Years
That's why Afghanistan was invaded. ;) The Taliban, which was supporting Al Qaeda, was in power in Afghanistan. By taking out one of the government supporting them, Al Qaeda would be weakened and would be less capable of carrying out another attack (that was the idea, anyway).
Well, we began to put the Taliban in power back in the 80's, when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan (part of Reagan's stupid policy of 'enemies of enemies are friends'). We gave the Taliban weapons and money to fight Communists, then when they kicked the Soviets out and looked at the hellhole that remained of their country and asked US for money, and we backed out on them, pissing off a lot of people.

So the War on Terror is really our fault, especially since many of those shooting Soviets were in MaK (the precursor to Al-Qaeda and the Taliban) and they had the means to violently take power.

Also, things with Osama and Al-Qaeda might be different if Bill Clinton hadn't launched a few missiles at him.
Evolve. Explore. Expand. Exploit. Exterminate. Join us- http://z7.invisionfree.com/tribalrpg/index.php?


i saw a hypno once called "bootysweat"

i lol'ed and traded for it, because it was too funny to not trade for
Age 30
Male
The Hampshire that is new
Seen April 19th, 2010
Posted December 22nd, 2009
199 posts
13.8 Years
I'm all for it. We need to annihilate the terrorists before they they take over our country. Most Americans fail to understand that there are millions of radical Muslims chanting "destroy America" every day. There are kids being trained on how to Jihad. They killed many of us on 9/11. So we need to fight back.


Paired with jigglypuff_96 :)
Brother-in-law of Lady Gaga
Cousin-in-law of aurevesque
Thanks to LEXAcide for the sig

Captain Fabio

Age 33
London, UK
Seen November 4th, 2021
Posted November 2nd, 2021
12,193 posts
17.1 Years
I'm all for it. We need to annihilate the terrorists before they they take over our country. Most Americans fail to understand that there are millions of radical Muslims chanting "destroy America" every day. There are kids being trained on how to Jihad. They killed many of us on 9/11. So we need to fight back.
I didn't know George Bush had an account on PC...
Seen 1 Day Ago
Posted February 5th, 2017
6,779 posts
15.5 Years
I'm all for it. We need to annihilate the terrorists before they they take over our country. Most Americans fail to understand that there are millions of radical Muslims chanting "destroy America" every day. There are kids being trained on how to Jihad. They killed many of us on 9/11. So we need to fight back.
Barely any people were killed in 9/11(3,000 something) and only about 10,000 in the Middle East, if I heard correctly. The government refused to tell the amount of Muslims(both innocent and otherwise) killed, most likely because they don't want to stain their reputation even more. Whatever happened to an eye for an eye?
Age 30
Male
The Hampshire that is new
Seen April 19th, 2010
Posted December 22nd, 2009
199 posts
13.8 Years
But we aren't slaughtering innocent people like a genocide. Sure, there were probably some innocent people killed. But it's war, it happens. And just picture yourself there. You see a bunch of Iraqis, and you don't know if one of them has a bomb strapped to their chest or not.


Paired with jigglypuff_96 :)
Brother-in-law of Lady Gaga
Cousin-in-law of aurevesque
Thanks to LEXAcide for the sig
Seen 1 Day Ago
Posted February 5th, 2017
6,779 posts
15.5 Years
But we aren't slaughtering innocent people like a genocide. Sure, there were probably some innocent people killed. But it's war, it happens. And just picture yourself there. You see a bunch of Iraqis, and you don't know if one of them has a bomb strapped to their chest or not.
Bollocks. Even though there are extremist muslims, there are also extremist christians and extremist jews. The chance that the muslim will have a bomb strapped to them is very low, since the Jihad population is significantly lower than the Muslim population. And just because they hate America, doesn't mean they are terrorists. Do you get that?
Age 30
Male
The Hampshire that is new
Seen April 19th, 2010
Posted December 22nd, 2009
199 posts
13.8 Years
Yeah I get it. But that "slim chance" can be you and your unit's lives. And you think when they're chanting "DESTROY AMERICA", they wouldn't kill every single one they can?


Paired with jigglypuff_96 :)
Brother-in-law of Lady Gaga
Cousin-in-law of aurevesque
Thanks to LEXAcide for the sig
Seen 1 Day Ago
Posted February 5th, 2017
6,779 posts
15.5 Years
Yeah I get it. But that "slim chance" can be you and your unit's lives. And you think when they're chanting "DESTROY AMERICA", they wouldn't kill every single one they can?
No, they wouldn't. I hate China, but I won't get access to nuclear weapons to kill everyone I can.
There is also a slim chance that your neighbor is a serial killer, but it could mean yours and many other lives. The war on terror was a terrible one.
Age 30
Male
The Hampshire that is new
Seen April 19th, 2010
Posted December 22nd, 2009
199 posts
13.8 Years
Exactly. They all do. So these corrupt radical Muslims get in there and tell all the people to go kill Americans for Allah. So they believe they're killing for their god. They think what they're doing is "holy". Honestly, I feel bad for them.


Paired with jigglypuff_96 :)
Brother-in-law of Lady Gaga
Cousin-in-law of aurevesque
Thanks to LEXAcide for the sig
Male
Seen November 2nd, 2013
Posted May 31st, 2013
958 posts
13.9 Years
Exactly. They all do. So these corrupt radical Muslims get in there and tell all the people to go kill Americans for Allah. So they believe they're killing for their god. They think what they're doing is "holy". Honestly, I feel bad for them.

Honestly, your view of the Muslim world is extremely diluted. Every single one of them? I've seen no evidence to support that at all. There no where near that bad, and most every other religion I've seen is just as bad in their own ways.

Timbjerr

T-o-X-i-C

Age 36
Female
Texas
Seen May 30th, 2022
Posted January 28th, 2016
7,415 posts
19.7 Years
No, not every single one of them. I never said that. In my previous post, I meant they all believe in Allah btw.
I thought I was PC's resident right-winger. But by comparison, you make me look like Hilary Clinton. o_0

The whole problem with this "war on terror" is that terrorists rarely organize politically, and the ones that do come out of hiding to blow people up blend in with everyone else. Our soldiers over there can't tell just by looking that this person or that person is a terrorist.

...and believe it or not, not all Muslims are extremists. How would you like it if you were cast-typed as one of the Christian extremists trying to get all forms of media censored to hell every time you tell someone that you're a Christian.
Age 30
Male
The Hampshire that is new
Seen April 19th, 2010
Posted December 22nd, 2009
199 posts
13.8 Years
I suppose so. Again, I never said that every Muslim is a terrorist. And I have nothing against them. It's the terrorists that kill our armed forces that tick me off.


Paired with jigglypuff_96 :)
Brother-in-law of Lady Gaga
Cousin-in-law of aurevesque
Thanks to LEXAcide for the sig
Seen 1 Day Ago
Posted February 5th, 2017
6,779 posts
15.5 Years
I suppose so. Again, I never said that every Muslim is a terrorist. And I have nothing against them. It's the terrorists that kill our armed forces that tick me off.
The armed forces have too much power, just like your modern police. These are the same armed forces that threw a dog over a cliff, not that I care for dogs as much as the average American. Too much power leads to corruption.
Age 30
Male
The Hampshire that is new
Seen April 19th, 2010
Posted December 22nd, 2009
199 posts
13.8 Years
Yeah. I understand. Vietnam would be a good example of that. But we can't just bail out here. Imo, I think Iran is one of the greatest threats to the US atm. They're figuring out how to use nuclear technology, and will not hesitate to use them on us. So we need to concentrate less on Iraq and Afghanistan, and more on Iran before they vaporize the US. Agreed?


Paired with jigglypuff_96 :)
Brother-in-law of Lady Gaga
Cousin-in-law of aurevesque
Thanks to LEXAcide for the sig
Seen 1 Day Ago
Posted February 5th, 2017
6,779 posts
15.5 Years
Yeah. I understand. Vietnam would be a good example of that. But we can't just bail out here. Imo, I think Iran is one of the greatest threats to the US atm. They're figuring out how to use nuclear technology, and will not hesitate to use them on us. So we need to concentrate less on Iraq and Afghanistan, and more on Iran before they vaporize the US. Agreed?
No. I remember seeing news from Iran recently on youtube that it was in the middle of an overthrowing. The crowds went completely wild. However, the country will be weakened to say the least, so an attack wouldn't be out of the question.
But come on, Iran can't vaporize the U.S. The government has more than 300 nuclear bombs in stock. If even one nuke get's sent here, we'll completely obliterate them, and that's considering the fact that extremists will actually get their hands on dangerous technology like that.