LMG Web Design

Started by .LMG. September 14th, 2009 3:21 PM
  • 1156 views
  • 12 replies

.LMG.

Yeah! Custom User Title!

Male
Seen August 7th, 2015
Posted July 28th, 2013
65 posts
13.8 Years
Well this is my site. I'm going to be a web designer when am older so I want to get used to designing. I'm designing free layouts so just contact me. (Not that this site is not complete. I just want to here if the design is good or not)
PLEASE RATE (I give it a 7/10)

Link In Sig

.LMG.

Yeah! Custom User Title!

Male
Seen August 7th, 2015
Posted July 28th, 2013
65 posts
13.8 Years
The layout is really smooth, sleek; attractive. Looks all futuristic. <3 It would look better if the gradient in the background was fixed imo, that's just me. You have... no content at all though. ._.
thanks for the tip and yeah i dont have time to finish it right now

Citrinin

Nephrotoxic.

Age 26
Male
New Zealand
Seen August 2nd, 2010
Posted July 19th, 2010
2,778 posts
13.9 Years
OK, I'm inferring from your post, and your lack of content, that you just want comments about your layout.

It's very sleek and aesthetically appealing. From a design point-of-view, it looks quite spectacular. However, why is the text an image?
~

Faltzer

Male
Seen April 19th, 2020
Posted March 22nd, 2017
1,670 posts
17.6 Years
Why is your content an image? Why are you actively depriving the possibility of visitors being able to ctrl-f, resizing your text, being able to choose a font, and making accessibility a nightmare for them?

Javascript menus for your hover-overs? Why? In my experience, most of the sites that “require” Javascript are just being lazy. There’s no reason you should NEED my browser to support JS solely to do some cute animation or load CSS or display static content. Most of the problems could be solved by putting something useful in the original page source and then changing it with JS when necessary, rather than filling in empty space with JS. We managed static sites just fine ten years ago without any Javascript at all; I don’t see why we need it now.

Granted, if you have some cool doodad that simply cannot work without client-side scripting, then by all means use Javascript all you want. But keep in mind that not everyone has it for one reason or another, and even Google Maps works without it.


.LMG.

Yeah! Custom User Title!

Male
Seen August 7th, 2015
Posted July 28th, 2013
65 posts
13.8 Years
Why is your content an image? Why are you actively depriving the possibility of visitors being able to ctrl-f, resizing your text, being able to choose a font, and making accessibility a nightmare for them?

Javascript menus for your hover-overs? Why? In my experience, most of the sites that “require” Javascript are just being lazy. There’s no reason you should NEED my browser to support JS solely to do some cute animation or load CSS or display static content. Most of the problems could be solved by putting something useful in the original page source and then changing it with JS when necessary, rather than filling in empty space with JS. We managed static sites just fine ten years ago without any Javascript at all; I don’t see why we need it now.

Granted, if you have some cool doodad that simply cannot work without client-side scripting, then by all means use Javascript all you want. But keep in mind that not everyone has it for one reason or another, and even Google Maps works without it.
ok ill try and change the navigation if its that bad
and the text is a picture because it was just a temporary thing. im planning on changing the layout soon an try to look more professional.

(reason for the name: its soon to be my web design company.)
(And there are alot of cons on this page because im only 15 and just started to learn all of this)

Ooka

Cosmic

Age 30
Challenging The E4
Seen September 15th, 2022
Posted January 18th, 2020
2,621 posts
15.7 Years
Not really a fan of the hover, CSS/Javascript or otherwise, I think it's just ugly. The basic layout looks alright, although it looks like you just got lazy with the .PSD so you left the text as an image. Also, I don't understand why your CSS isn't all in the same location? Also, not really a problem, but using <strong> tags should be for text you want to be stressed, as it might be rendered differently in some browsers. Same goes for <em> over <i>, it might be rendered differently, and as such, you should use them sparingly. And even still, you could just add "font-weight: bold;" to whatever class or id you may be defining. Just helping you out for later designs.
Age 62
Male
Melbourne, Australia
Seen April 26th, 2018
Posted June 9th, 2014
11,439 posts
19.7 Years
The gradients are choppy, the heading/navigation font feels juvenile and inappropriate for a professional site, and the layout itself is very generic. The large gap between page heading and text area is not aesthetically pleasing. In addition, your copyright text either uses default font or Times; either way, it does not suit the rest of the site.


"One reason why mathematics enjoys special esteem, above all other sciences, is that its laws are absolutely certain and indisputable, while those of other sciences are to some extent debatable and in constant danger of being overthrown by newly discovered facts."
Albert Einstein

"What science can there be more noble, more excellent, more useful for men, more admirably high and demonstrative than mathematics."
Benjamin Franklin

"Mathematics, rightly viewed, possesses not only truth, but supreme beauty – a beauty cold and austere, like that of sculpture, without appeal to any part of our weaker nature, without the gorgeous trappings of paintings or music, yet sublimely pure and capable of a stern perfection such as only the greatest art can show."
Bertrand Russell

avatar and signature by FoxHound

ANNOY ME AT YOUR PERIL. I am becoming increasingly tired of the unmanly elitism and closed-mindedness of certain members who shall remain unnamed.