[Discussion] 2012 Phenomena Page 3

Started by Livewire August 31st, 2010 7:54 PM
  • 5646 views
  • 90 replies
Age 28
Male
Columbia, Maryland
Seen March 10th, 2011
Posted September 20th, 2010
27 posts
12.7 Years
modern meteorology is a joke compared to what the mayans were capable of doing.
...uh. [citation needed]?

I mean, I'll give you that they were advanced for their time, but to say they could do better than modern-day meteorologists is a gross overstatement, especially when you account in the high measurement error which would occur when using crude methods like stone tables/wooden poles (seems small, but if you're looking at thousands of years later it suddenly gets much bigger). On the other hand, today we have satellites, computers, etc. that give a much smaller percentage error.

But hey, if anything does happen on Dec 21 then feel free to say "I told you so" =P

Livewire

Male
Sunnyshore City
Seen December 3rd, 2022
Posted August 2nd, 2019
14,091 posts
13.8 Years
...uh. [citation needed]?

I mean, I'll give you that they were advanced for their time, but to say they could do better than modern-day meteorologists is a gross overstatement, especially when you account in the high measurement error which would occur when using crude methods like stone tables/wooden poles (seems small, but if you're looking at thousands of years later it suddenly gets much bigger). On the other hand, today we have satellites, computers, etc. that give a much smaller percentage error.

But hey, if anything does happen on Dec 21 then feel free to say "I told you so" =P
Modern meteorologists can barely predict the weather, with all of our advanced technology at their disposal. NASA can barely get a shuttle launch off without a hitch anymore, and it takes them years to discover new planets and star systems. Plus, without those modern advancements, we'd be so outclassed its a bit embarrassing. Mayan astrologists/meteorologists, could identify celestial bodies and predict astrological events thousands of years in the future with nothing more than charts, their calander, and the crude wooden shafts with yarn attached, used to line up the stars in the sky. And they were accurate to the very day. For instance, they predicted the Solar transit of Venus to occur on June 6th, 2012 in our calendar. We didn't figure out that the transit of venus even existed until the 20th century.

Bear

Fascist baby.

Age 30
Female
Under the brow of a sparkling sky.
Seen June 5th, 2014
Posted September 15th, 2012
326 posts
15.5 Years
...uh. [citation needed]?

I mean, I'll give you that they were advanced for their time, but to say they could do better than modern-day meteorologists is a gross overstatement, especially when you account in the high measurement error which would occur when using crude methods like stone tables/wooden poles (seems small, but if you're looking at thousands of years later it suddenly gets much bigger). On the other hand, today we have satellites, computers, etc. that give a much smaller percentage error.
^ This.

Modern meteorologists can barely predict the weather, with all of our advanced technology at their disposal. NASA can barely get a shuttle launch off without a hitch anymore, and it takes them years to discover new planets and star systems. Plus, without those modern advancements, we'd be so outclassed its a bit embarrassing. Mayan astrologists/meteorologists, could identify celestial bodies and predict astrological events thousands of years in the future with nothing more than charts, their calander, and the crude wooden shafts with yarn attached, used to line up the stars in the sky. And they were accurate to the very day.
Could they predict the weather perfectly? I mean I can understand how the Mayans could launch missiles into space flawlessly and discover new planets within minutes, but the weather? o_o

Srsly, this all sounds like myth rather than fact to me. Perhaps you could provide some solid motivation?

Livewire

Male
Sunnyshore City
Seen December 3rd, 2022
Posted August 2nd, 2019
14,091 posts
13.8 Years
^ This.



Could they predict the weather perfectly? I mean I can understand how the Mayans could launch missiles into space flawlessly and discover new planets within minutes, but the weather? o_o

Srsly, this all sounds like myth rather than fact to me. Perhaps you could provide some solid motivation?
Solid motivation? Go read a history book about the Mayans.

You all assume that since they are an ancient civilization, they're incapable of all these supposedly advanced things. Mayans could literally look up in the night sky and discern planets and stars simply by their location in the sky. From the positioning of the stars, they could determine optimal planting times for their crops (judging the sun's position) and kept records of planetary movements to use for future reference. Like i said above, stars and planets, along with constellations, could be tracked and identified easily using the wooden sticks and yarn. They would measure from a finite point, so the only thing moving is the star in question. Then, on a nightly basis, they track the star's movement across the sky, and after a little math, they can tell where its going, because they understood the planets move in an orbit.

Now just because you're ill informed, doesn't make it a myth.
Male
At home
Seen December 21st, 2018
Posted December 3rd, 2013
2,006 posts
19.6 Years
I don't mean it's the end, nor am I inclined to believe it's the end, nor do I particularly WANT to believe it's the end. I haven't read anything that has to do with 2012, nor do I intend to. I'm living my life as per normal, since there isn't anything I can do about it if it happens to be true.

Getting back on track, though, what I meant was that people are hyping this up to no end, just like they did during Y2K, and look how that turned out. Perhaps there wasn't anything scientific to prove that Y2K was going to happen, but people will believe what they want to believe, and that goes for everything. I'm sure there's tons of "evidence" that "proves" that 2010 is the Apocalypse, but there's probably also a lot of "evidence" that shows otherwise. Mind you, I'm not believing or disbelieving. I just don't really care, either way.

If we're not talking about end days, Apocalyptic, fire and brimstone stuff here, then I have even less incentive to give a crap.

Belinda

Age 28
Female
Seen March 4th, 2018
Posted November 13th, 2017
2,211 posts
14.8 Years
I don't have any beliefs in the "2012 Phenomena", this subject popping up everywhere can get to the point where it can be annoying, however I manage to deal with it. I do not believe the world will end in 2012 on an exact day either, but I do believe it can end at anytime, any year, if it does I wouldn't be surprised since our planet and global warming is increasingly getting worse if people don't start to care, not saying you guys don't, but you know who I'm talking about. Making a big deal out of this subject is not worth anyone's time.

Livewire

Male
Sunnyshore City
Seen December 3rd, 2022
Posted August 2nd, 2019
14,091 posts
13.8 Years
I don't have any beliefs in the "2012 Phenomena", this subject popping up everywhere can get to the point where it can be annoying, however I manage to deal with it. I do not believe the world will end in 2012 on an exact day either, but I do believe it can end at anytime, any year, if it does I wouldn't be surprised since our planet and global warming is increasingly getting worse if people don't start to care, not saying you guys don't, but you know who I'm talking about. Making a big deal out of this subject is not worth anyone's time.
Well there is a difference here- This thread is supposed to be focusing on the historical/astrological aspect of the 2012 phenomena, not the end of the world crap. (that was another thread that was merged with mine, and ever since the quality of the discussions has pretty much gone down hill)

2012 has nothing to do with the apocalypse, at all. That's a modern invention. But there is infallible historical fact behind the mechanics of 2012- the mayan long count calendar, the planetary alignment, etc. this thread was made to talk about that stuff.
Female
trapped in my own hell now.
Seen October 17th, 2010
Posted October 5th, 2010
80 posts
12.7 Years
with all due respect, i think that the predictions are merely hunches and guesses that people have made. honestly, i don't think the world will end while we are still alive and well. i am one of the sceptics who does not believe nostradamous. i think that the world will end in a few million years when the sun expands into a red giant the size of beteljuce.
Too often we... enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.

Yuoaman

I don't know who I am either.

Age 30
Male
Ontario, Canada
Seen January 28th, 2023
Posted December 12th, 2018
4,582 posts
17.8 Years
Something very important is going to happen that day...

...

...seven billion people will wake up, live their life, and then go to sleep. It's a miracle, really.
"pps new screenie" - No, really shut up yuoaman.

Haaave you read my LP?
Pokémon Quartz - The only one of mine really worth reading.

What about my [Un]Abridged series?
Aquaman the Unabridged Parody Series - Language warning.

Exothermic

Keeper of the Hammer

Male
Mariana Trench
Seen May 3rd, 2021
Posted March 12th, 2018
236 posts
14.6 Years
I don't really believe in these theories. =(

I think that some natural disaster will happen in 2012; but it's definitely not as insane as a world apocalypse. If something like this really happened, we would all be in a state of unrest. Besides, all other previous doomsday dates have been disproved. I'll still be here on that day. ^^

Livewire

Male
Sunnyshore City
Seen December 3rd, 2022
Posted August 2nd, 2019
14,091 posts
13.8 Years
I wouldn't be shocked if something did happen, but in the long run it probably won't matter to me.

Second coming of Christ would be pretty sweet. :P
I just think it would be cool to see, to say after the fact, that I witnessed it or I remember 12/21/2012.

Her

Age 29
Seen 5 Hours Ago
Posted 4 Days Ago
I personally don't believe anything will happen, it seems too farfetch'd (oh im so witty) to be plausible. I admit I'm curious as to if anything special will be on that day, but the only thing that comes to the mind that it may be the most watched/talked about day in human history. It just seems like it'll be another Y2K, a fluke!

Livewire

Male
Sunnyshore City
Seen December 3rd, 2022
Posted August 2nd, 2019
14,091 posts
13.8 Years
I'm sure I've posted in several threads similar to this before, but I'll say it again: The hysteria surrounding the date will far overshadow what actually happens on that date.
That's pretty much it in a nutshell, really.
Male
Where do you think?
Seen July 14th, 2017
Posted June 13th, 2011
34 posts
12.8 Years
I agree with Hawo... um hoekaw... Oh whatever! The guy two posts above me.
If anyone needs further convincing, go here: http://www.2012hoax.org
it gives scientific reasons why all of the doomsday theories are false.
It also tells stories about people so depressed about 2012 that they either thought about or actually took their own lives. Some of them were children.

Another thing, it's impossible for the earth to horizontally align exactly with the galactic core. It's off by about 11 diameters of the sun.
Screw the Rules, I have Money!




Current Challenges
Spoiler:
Ultimate Water Monotype:
Kanto- Done!
Johto- Done!
Hoenn- Done!
Sinnoh- Halted

Livewire

Male
Sunnyshore City
Seen December 3rd, 2022
Posted August 2nd, 2019
14,091 posts
13.8 Years
I agree with Hawo... um hoekaw... Oh whatever! The guy two posts above me.
If anyone needs further convincing, go here: http://www.2012hoax.org
it gives scientific reasons why all of the doomsday theories are false.
It also tells stories about people so depressed about 2012 that they either thought about or actually took their own lives. Some of them were children.

Another thing, it's impossible for the earth to horizontally align exactly with the galactic core. It's off by about 11 diameters of the sun.
Well for starters, if the Kids on that website became that depressed about 2012, their parents should be charged for Child Endangerment and Negligent Homicide. Just bad parenting there. And i wouldnr exactly uses that that website as the premier way to de-bunk 2012, there are far more scholarly sites to use if you choose that side of the argument.

I'm not disagreeing with you, but the Earth isn't even aligning at all- The Sun is.

Tater Tot

I used to be popular here~

Age 15
Male
Seen January 15th, 2017
Posted June 24th, 2016
2,572 posts
17.9 Years
2012 WILL BE THE WORST CHRISTMAS SEASON EVER. THE MAYANS RUINED IT. WHY COULDN'T THEY HAVE STOPPED THE CALENDER AT AUGUST OR SOMETHING. NOBODY GIVES A CRAP ABOUT AUGUST!

I think something big might happen but idk if it will be the end of the world.

But seriously, 2012's Christmas season is gonna be a mess because everyone will be running around like chickens with their heads cut off thinking it's their last month on the earth. SERIOUSLY WHY COULDN'T THEY LET US GET THROUGH CHRISTMAS? ;-;

Livewire

Male
Sunnyshore City
Seen December 3rd, 2022
Posted August 2nd, 2019
14,091 posts
13.8 Years
2012 WILL BE THE WORST CHRISTMAS SEASON EVER. THE MAYANS RUINED IT. WHY COULDN'T THEY HAVE STOPPED THE CALENDER AT AUGUST OR SOMETHING. NOBODY GIVES A CRAP ABOUT AUGUST!

I think something big might happen but idk if it will be the end of the world.

But seriously, 2012's Christmas season is gonna be a mess because everyone will be running around like chickens with their heads cut off thinking it's their last month on the earth. SERIOUSLY WHY COULDN'T THEY LET US GET THROUGH CHRISTMAS? ;-;
Oh I think the whole year will be screwed up. By the time December 2012 gets here, There could be riots and stuff. Maybe worse than that. Martial Law being declared wouldn't surprise me.

Belinda

Age 28
Female
Seen March 4th, 2018
Posted November 13th, 2017
2,211 posts
14.8 Years
Just found a news article on Yahoo! and I hope it brings some good news for believers:
"Stephanie Pappas
LiveScience Senior Writer
LiveScience.com – Tue Oct 19, 7:35 am ET
It's a good news/bad news situation for believers in the 2012 Mayan apocalypse. The good news is that the Mayan "Long Count" calendar may not end on Dec. 21, 2012 (and, by extension, the world may not end along with it). The bad news for prophecy believers? If the calendar doesn't end in December 2012, no one knows when it actually will - or if it has already.
A new critique, published as a chapter in the new textbook "Calendars and Years II: Astronomy and Time in the Ancient and Medieval World" (Oxbow Books, 2010), argues that the accepted conversions of dates from Mayan to the modern calendar may be off by as much as 50 or 100 years. That would throw the supposed and overhyped 2012 apocalypse off by decades and cast into doubt the dates of historical Mayan events. (The doomsday worries are based on the fact that the Mayan calendar ends in 2012, much as our year ends on Dec. 31.)
The Mayan calendar was converted to today's Gregorian calendar using a calculation called the GMT constant, named for the last initials of three early Mayanist researchers. Much of the work emphasized dates recovered from colonial documents that were written in the Mayan language in the Latin alphabet, according to the chapter's author, Gerardo Aldana, University of California, Santa Barbara professor of Chicana and Chicano Studies.

Later, the GMT constant was bolstered by American linguist and anthropologist Floyd Lounsbury, who used data in the Dresden Codex Venus Table, a Mayan calendar and almanac that charts dates relative to the movements of Venus.
"He took the position that his work removed the last obstacle to fully accepting the GMT constant," Aldana said in a statement. "Others took his work even further, suggesting that he had proven the GMT constant to be correct."
But according to Aldana, Lounsbury's evidence is far from irrefutable.
"If the Venus Table cannot be used to prove the FMT as Lounsbury suggests, its acceptance depends on the reliability of the corroborating data," he said. That historical data, he said, is less reliable than the Table itself, causing the argument for the GMT constant to fall "like a stack of cards."
Aldana doesn't have any answers as to what the correct calendar conversion might be, preferring to focus on why the current interpretation may be wrong. Looks like end-of-the-world theorists may need to find another ancient calendar on which to pin their apocalyptic hopes."
What do you think about this article?
Age 34
Female
Australia
Seen December 29th, 2011
Posted November 3rd, 2010
352 posts
12.9 Years
Hmm although I don't believe anything specific is going to happen to earth on that particular day, I do believe something will happen very soon!
I've been reading about how we're due for another ice-age also there's a star over in the next galaxy ready to explode and die and its apparently 20 years over due and could happen any year now and the blast from its explosion could wipe away our ozone.

Anyway lots of doom and gloom is coming our way I believe :(
This signature has been disabled.
No spoilers allowed in signature.
Please review and fix the issues by reading the signature rules.

You must edit it to meet the limits set by the rules before you may remove the [sig-reason] code from your signature. Removing this tag will re-enable it.

Do not remove the tag until you fix the issues in your signature. You may be infracted for removing this tag if you do not fix the specified issues. Do not use this tag for decoration purposes.

Amai

やった! 私はあまい

Age 30
Male
東京
Seen November 13th, 2020
Posted December 13th, 2010
137 posts
12.6 Years
Hmm although I don't believe anything specific is going to happen to earth on that particular day, I do believe something will happen very soon!
I've been reading about how we're due for another ice-age also there's a star over in the next galaxy ready to explode and die and its apparently 20 years over due and could happen any year now and the blast from its explosion could wipe away our ozone.

Anyway lots of doom and gloom is coming our way I believe :(
What does a star in another galaxy needing to explode have to do with anything? Stars explode in our own galaxy every single day (this is a proven fact) and nothing happens to us.

We are only in danger if it is near by, or if the star is pointing directly at us, the second one is EXTREMELY rare to occur. The first one, just isn't happening right now.

I think whoever told you that a star in another galaxy can wipe out our ozone is completely BSing you, or they just don't know what they're talking about.

And please don't name some random unprovable source. If you're going to argue against me, provide proof, like this proof saying there is no threat:

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/supernova_threat_021216.html

Then there is this, which I can't link to because it has bad stoof too:

Spoiler:

As I mentioned in an earlier post, I attended the first few days of the American Astronomical Society meeting this week. I went as a member of the press, as I have for the past few years. The press room is a fun place; lots of old friends, banter across the table, and, of course, the press releases.
I had a stack in my mailbox, so I poked through them. One in particular caught my eye. And how could it not? In oversized, bold print the headline ran: "THE LONG OVERDUE RECURRENT NOVA T PYXIDIS: SOON TO BE A TYPE Ia SUPERNOVA?"
Hmmm. Recurrent novae are binary systems, where a dense white dwarf is stealing matter from its companion. The matter piles up, and eventually detonates, causing a huge flash of light (that’s the nova part). After time, the system settles down, the matter starts piling up, and the cycle starts again (that’s the recurrent part). Lots of recurrent novae are known, and are fairly well understood.
T Pyxidis is a fairly regular nova, blowing its lid every 20 years or so. It’s currently overdue, since the last event was in 1967. Using ultraviolet observations and new models of the system, astronomer Edward Sion and his team concluded it may actually explode soon as a supernova, an event far more energetic than a mere nova. Worse, their models indicate the system is "much closer" than previously thought: about 3300 light years away. In the last paragraph of their press release, it says:

An interesting, if a bit scary, speculative sidelight is that if a Type Ia supernova explosion occurs within [that distance] of Earth, then the gamma radiation emitted by the supernova would fry the Earth, dumping as much gamma radiation (~100,000 erg/square centimeter) into our planet [sic], which is equivalent to the gamma ray input of 1000 solar flares simultaneously.

AIIIIEEEEE!!! We’re all gonna die!
[SIZE=-1"]Hubble’s view of T Pyxidis from 1997, showing a shell of expanding matter from an earlier eruption.[/SIZE]

Ahem. Except, really, no. I rolled my eyes when I read that bit. A Type Ia does put out more high-energy radiation than a Type II supernova, which is caused when a massive star’s core collapses and the outer layers are ejected. That’s what most people think of when they hear about a supernova. Those have to be really close to hurt us, certainly closer than 25 light years. But even with their added power, a Type Ia just doesn’t have the oomph needed to destroy our ozone layer (as the press release indicates) from 3300 light years away. It would have to be far closer than that.
I missed that press conference, but oh, how I wish I had been there! My friend Ian O’Neill was able to track down some details, and found out that astronomers (including another friend, Alex Filippenko, who is an expert’s expert on supernovae) at the meeting took Sion to task for this claim. It looks like Sion used the wrong numbers for the gamma ray emission for a Type Ia event, instead using the emission from a gamma-ray burst… a far, far, far more energetic event, and dangerous from several thousand light years away.
I don’t generally have too big an issue with a scientist getting a number wrong, but it depends on the circumstance. Issuing a press release saying, essentially, we’re all gonna die means they should do some due diligence. And in this specific case — they used the phrase "fry the Earth" for Pete’s sake! — means I am less willing to cut them slack. People get scared from stuff like this, and it’s simply wrong to feed that fire without making really sure you have your numbers straight first.
I’ll note that scientists tend not to write press releases, and it can be hard to rein in the PR author if they are not that familiar with the science (which I’ve seen many times). But even if the numbers in the PR were correct, the phrasing of that last paragraph is unacceptable. Whoever wrote the release should have known the media would zero in on that phrase.
My buddy Ian O’Neil, in his post at Discovery News, points out The Daily Telegraph did just that, printing an article with the headline, "Earth ‘to be wiped out’ by supernova explosion". The UK paper The Sun — which is so awful fish complain when you wrap them in it — had a similar article with the tagline, "A star primed to explode in a blast that could wipe out the Earth was revealed by astronomers yesterday."
Sheesh.
It’s too bad. There was no need to disaster-porn this release up the way it was done. Recurrent novae and Type Ia supernovae are fascinating, well worth our attention for any number of reasons including of course their potential danger. But it’s a not-too-fine line between piquing interest and tarting up the science.

My Shiny Pokemon
Recent Shiny
Munna
36 eggs hatched
Day 1

Currently Hunting
Tsutarja
600 eggs hatched
Day 8
Chobomaki
30 eggs hatched
Day 1

Livewire

Male
Sunnyshore City
Seen December 3rd, 2022
Posted August 2nd, 2019
14,091 posts
13.8 Years
^ The nearest Star to earth, aside form the sun, is Alpha Centari, which i don't think could harm us, even if it went Supernova or turned into a GRB. (Note: I'm not certain it even can become a GRB)

But If a star was close enough, then yes, a GRB or a Supernova would be in issue to our continuity. But there aren't any, to our knowledge.