Wikileaks and Julian Assange Page 2

Started by Eliminator Jr. December 12th, 2010 8:51 PM
  • 2680 views
  • 45 replies

Ivysaur

Grass dinosaur extraordinaire

Age 32
He/him
Madrid, Europe
Seen 1 Day Ago
Posted April 5th, 2023
21,076 posts
16.2 Years
I still would like to see where is that information so important for the terrorists. I have only seen behind-the-scenes information explaining the political events all over the world during the last decade from the embassadors' point of view; and information about the US involvement in other countries' home affairs, and information about the US breaking the internatonal treaties and laws on Human Rights, which is something I believe is quite interesting for the everybody to know. Maybe it's just that all the European newspapers have trimmed the vital info about the American troops and all the thing that "put American citizens in danger", but I honestly can't see what a terrorist can do by knowing the views of the US embassador in Argentina about the Argentinian Government.

Honestly, if you want to punish someone, punish the guy who leaked all the stuff to Assange who was just a nobody with a website. You might as well punish Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward for revealing the secrets about the Watergate issue! Plus, it's not like Assange has actually committed a crime on the US nor broken an international law (and several US citizens are seen committing crimes against those in said papers and nothing has happened to them so it would be kind of an injustice), so you have to really twist justice to punish him for anything related to the issue.

But trying to take some incredibly famous information down from the Internet is like trying to kill someone by taking the oxygen out of the city where they live. It just won't work as the hundreds of mirror websites that have spawned all over the Internet, with the help of several hacking groups (4chan is supporting him, for instance).

So yeah, maybe it's just that I'm an European journalist who has bothered to read most of the revealed cables. But I can't see the harm for anything else other than the political prestige of the US... which is kind of their own fault for not being careful enough when badmouthing other countries. And that's what free press is supposed to do, right?

And I'll say it again: show me a cable that actually exposes a vital defense point that could cause any damage to innocent citizens or the death of soldiers on the war. 1112 cables have been released so far, and you can check them all here: http://213.251.145.96/

(You could argue that the Afghanistan war logs released in July are more likely to have vital data... except that 4 famous newspapers trimmed the names and important data to prevent this, and no Afghanistan news since the release of aid info since then have ever mentioned Wikileaks again so... it might be hard to relate both. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/checkpoint-washington/2010/07/wikileaks_afghanistan_war_log.html)

Alice

(>^.(>0.0)>

Age 31
Female
Oregon
Seen April 30th, 2015
Posted April 29th, 2015
3,077 posts
14.2 Years
Honestly, if you want to punish someone, punish the guy who leaked all the stuff to Assange who was just a nobody with a website.
They already did. It was an army private.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Po-VxrDc0s4

twocows

The not-so-black cat of ill omen

Age 32
Male
Michigan
Seen February 19th, 2023
Posted April 30th, 2021
4,307 posts
14.2 Years
It's a tough issue. I can see the arguments for both sides. He's making a bold statement by releasing these documents, namely that a government by the people should never have secrets from those people. I'm not sure whether I agree or not. Some people are saying those documents may have cost lives. I don't know if that's true or not, but even if it is, should we protect an individual's right to free expression if it potentially causes harm to others? I'm inclined to say we should, but I think it's also our obligation to prevent unnecessary loss of life. And should we be doing things that we need to keep secret to begin with? Maybe it would be better policy if we didn't, or maybe that's just naivety.

This is an issue I just can't make my mind up on.
VNs are superior to anime, don't @ me
Age 30
Male
Melbourne, Australia
Seen January 8th, 2013
Posted April 30th, 2012
1,031 posts
14.1 Years
Meet John and Joe the terrorists:
"Hey, Joe, look! This bridge in Michigan is both a high transportation hub and an economic stronghold for the country! They get [x]% of their commerce there! And look, petty security measures will make this a cinch!"
"Yeah, but it IS a big bridge after all. If we want to do any sort of damage we'll need time to gather materials."

It's not like people can grab the secret code, plan a bomb attack, haul their ass over there and set it up in one ****ing night.
1 night =/= 5 months

I'm no fearing cuckoo head or anything but telling publicly insecure parts of a nation's security serve little purpose to inform the public. Tell me HOW this would be interesting to the public in any way.
I don't think documents detailing bridges would be interesting to the public in any way (apart from maybe somebody who wants to make the area more secure or something, I guess), but I don't think these documents unjustify the impacts of all these other secrets that the governments keep from us. Given the option of having Wikileaks or it never to have happened, the former is clearly the right choice. Is it better to be ignorant about that video showing US helicopter pilots firing on journalists? About the planned internet censorship? About the tortured innocent from Germany? I believe human rights and making the public aware of the wrongdoings of their government is more important than silencing these security leaks, which so far haven't killed a single person.

Don't get me wrong, I have no idea why Assange wants to release that information either. But I am much more concerned about the government trying to silence the site altogether, especially when the majority of these security leaks aren't even dangerous anymore.

But that's not what I was referring. That kind of information is good. Needless stuff like what a random diplomat thinks of the equivalent of the French first lady? No, now you're just a **** disturber

One does not justify, the other
I don't like In Through The Out Door, does that mean I should stop listening to Led Zeppelin? What I'm saying is that why does this matter? "Oh no, Julian, stop releasing this pointless information on what diplomats think of each other, you might bore me to death!" I don't get how the pointless information unjustifies the important leaks detailing civilian deaths and bad government.
Age 28
Male
Oregon
Seen September 24th, 2018
Posted July 3rd, 2018
17,520 posts
13.1 Years
I wonder if the so called Wikileak supporters (the hackers) will continue the "Cyber war" or if they will be stopped...
I'm currently working on some novels. If you're interested you can read them here:
https://www.wattpad.com/user/ImperialSun

TRIFORCE89

Guide of Darkness

Age 33
Male
Temple of Light
Seen November 25th, 2017
Posted October 21st, 2016
8,122 posts
19.1 Years
I don't like In Through The Out Door, does that mean I should stop listening to Led Zeppelin? What I'm saying is that why does this matter? "Oh no, Julian, stop releasing this pointless information on what diplomats think of each other, you might bore me to death!" I don't get how the pointless information unjustifies the important leaks detailing civilian deaths and bad government.
I didn't say it unjustifies it. I made a follow up post for clarification.

I'm good with the whistleblowing stuff.

But, in my eyes, the "useless" information is more for attention-grabbing and does endanger those diplomats and affects relations. Also, even if they're government employees - I see such information as private opinions. So, why someone's personal opinion should be forced into the public and then have it reflect on country is beyond me. I think it discredits his whole operation.

He should filter what he posts.

Livewire

Male
Sunnyshore City
Seen December 3rd, 2022
Posted August 2nd, 2019
14,091 posts
13.8 Years

I didn't say it unjustifies it. I made a follow up post for clarification.

I'm good with the whistleblowing stuff.

But, in my eyes, the "useless" information is more for attention-grabbing and does endanger those diplomats and affects relations. Also, even if they're government employees - I see such information as private opinions. So, why someone's personal opinion should be forced into the public and then have it reflect on country is beyond me. I think it discredits his whole operation.

He should filter what he posts.
I agree with you. I'm still a bit on the fence on this one, because like you mentioned, it kinda seems like attention grabbing, or that he has some motive to release all this info. But on the other hand, It's making governments accountable, and he's risking his personal freedom in the process.

Ivysaur

Grass dinosaur extraordinaire

Age 32
He/him
Madrid, Europe
Seen 1 Day Ago
Posted April 5th, 2023
21,076 posts
16.2 Years

He should filter what he posts.
Again, that's why he gave the information to five different newspapers, the most prestigious around the US and Europe, weeks before posting the leaks. So professionals could filter and put some context on the material instead of just uploading it at once.
Seen January 4th, 2013
Posted October 21st, 2011
1,804 posts
13.8 Years
these aren't just dirty little secrets that are being revealed. he's not "starting drama," some of these leaks point to some serious corruption that go on behind the scenes that the public deserves to know about.

http://sowhyiswikileaksagoodthingagain.com/

what Assange has done isn't illegal, and the rape charge doesn't seem legitimate. also, free bradley manning etc.

tbqh imho, citizens under the care of a corrupt government are just as entitled to understand some of the inner goings-on* as an individual is entitled to their petty secrets.


champagnepapi

exile

Male
new england
Seen September 4th, 2016
Posted June 25th, 2016
1,795 posts
12.5 Years
I'm going to start by saying that the execution talk is pretty much ridiculous, you would think, in this day and age we would be a tad more civilized. As for Wikileaks, there is a difference between people "deserving the right to know" and exposing documents that put the US at risk. What I would really like to know, is what exactly is Assange's motivation for posting these documents, is it to give people access to information he feels they should know, or is it simply an attempt at internet fame? I think that the government does cover up their own faults such as a navy seal dying during training or a soldier in Iraq being killed by friendly fire, which is really no different than a kid setting a rug on fire and hiding the match, imho, While joining the military arm of the United States may be a confidential commitment, these are real people they are sending into war, and I believe their families and friends deserve to know every detail of their loved one's brave sacrifice. I consider Assange a journalist, rather than a terrorist as he could have easily sold these documents and footage to an extremist group in a private deal upon obtaining them. I do believe Assange has crossed the line, by releasing anything other than the aforementioned that pertains to the privacy of the US government. I do apologize if I've rambled a bit.

EDIT: Poopnoodle, that link that you posted has pretty much convinced me to be 50-50 on this matter.

paired to kaori & vrai

Livewire

Male
Sunnyshore City
Seen December 3rd, 2022
Posted August 2nd, 2019
14,091 posts
13.8 Years
While I agree that transparency in the Government is a good thing, I still stand by what I mentioned earlier. Wikileaks won't end the corruption. Does it expose the tyranny and corruption? Yes. Will it magically end it? No. Especially not if they bag Assange on those bogus charges, which I agree is a horrible attempt to silence an innocent man.
Age 35
Male
Pennsylvania
Seen August 14th, 2012
Posted March 29th, 2012
954 posts
16.4 Years


I don't necessarily think Assange is deliberately blackmailing anybody either, but I do think that's how it comes off as to the Americans, especially if he's threatening to release more information if he's arrested. (Information I'm curious to see)

But if he has no motive, then why go through such great lengths to get this information out? Considering he's risking his own personal freedom in the process, unless he can get to Switzerland.
Well, the way I see it, he's a simple activist. Truth activist, freedom of speech activist, information activist, whatever you want to call it. The threats to release more information may seem like blackmail or "terrorism" to the common American, but I feel that's a pretty wise thing to do when you've got Americans saying he should be murdered. Most activists don't mind going to jail or whatever because it can make them seem like a martyr, but what they don't realize is that it renders their resources pointless. Assange is just ensuring that he can keep doing what he's doing without having to worry about his life or freedom.

In other words, if you have a means of getting your views across to people, would you risk losing that means to prove a point? Isn't the greater point to keep using your means at all costs? I always thought that's what makes a good (and intelligent) activist.
Exterminate All Rational Thought

Richard
0215 9525 7958
Section Eight
Seen May 19th, 2012
Posted May 18th, 2012
1,069 posts
13 Years
I'm sorry, but I must break in with this quote from sowhyiswikileaksagoodthingagain.com...

WikiLeaks has revealed the National Socialist Movement's neo-nazi internal workings.
...I'm sorry, but I really had to laugh at that one. I know that "National Socialist"=/=HITLAH NAZEEZ!, but...

Come on. On paper, it sounds funny.


Also, why haven't I heard of anything else on this site? Only the "Bush lied!" stuff actually makes any headlines, apparently.

Ooh, ooh, and another edit...

US troops, and battlefield decisions =/= US government.
Hillary Clinton gave orders to spy on UN diplomats...?


"I don't find my name tasteful next to Shanghai Alice."
-STRATOS99
Age 28
Male
Oregon
Seen September 24th, 2018
Posted July 3rd, 2018
17,520 posts
13.1 Years
I read that they let Julian Assange out on bail finally and that he's going to stay in a mansion in England where he will work on his site...I wonder if his site will survive the angry us government...
I'm currently working on some novels. If you're interested you can read them here:
https://www.wattpad.com/user/ImperialSun

Livewire

Male
Sunnyshore City
Seen December 3rd, 2022
Posted August 2nd, 2019
14,091 posts
13.8 Years
I read that they let Julian Assange out on bail finally and that he's going to stay in a mansion in England where he will work on his site...I wonder if his site will survive the angry us government...
Well the worst they could do is block it (as far as I know) Even then, a skilled hacker or computersmith could work around that easily.
Seen June 21st, 2016
Posted April 7th, 2016
420 posts
16.4 Years
People should not fear their government. Government should fear their people.
When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.
etc.

Julian Assange - Chaotic Good

stuff
i like your post. i don't think there's much else to be said, which is probably why i'm ending my post here.

Livewire

Male
Sunnyshore City
Seen December 3rd, 2022
Posted August 2nd, 2019
14,091 posts
13.8 Years
etc.

Julian Assange - Chaotic Good



i like your post. i don't think there's much else to be said, which is probably why i'm ending my post here.
But what does that change? The governments will continue thier typical routine, Assange hasn't changed how they operate.

Hyperion09

fancy pretentious words

Age 30
Female
Sydney, Australia
Seen March 15th, 2011
Posted February 5th, 2011
37 posts
12.4 Years
I find this whole thing very amusing, at the least - I'll be honest and say that part of my support for Wikileaks is due to my distaste and disgust with the US government and those that play sycophant towards it (like ours).

To be honest.. I've never even heard of Wikileaks ._.

It's been operating since 2006 IIRC (main servers are in Sweden); it's not always government-related stuff they leak, they released a bunch of Scientology documents during the height of the Chanology raids/protests in early 2008.

It's only under attack by the US government now because they're the ones whose turn it is to be exposed and embarrassed - before that, they weren't heavily implicated in any prior documents, therefore they had little inclination to care about WL's operations (which says a lot about said government imo, but that's another topic).

The governments of the world say "nothing to fear, nothing to hide" - let's see it play out when it's applied to them.

ps. Assange is Australian.

I hope he gets all his WikiLeaks websites taken down for good, along with all the information he has

You're right, we should just continue to be cowed into complacency and ignorance by corrupt power-mongers!

Ugh.
<tekiraboshi> This Christmas I asked Santa for Pokémon names that everyone loved and not a single person would complain or say they hated them
<tekiraboshi> why, Santa

Pokémon Black Mono-Fighting Challenge