I refuse to do that. This is an administrative matter.
Why don't you just do your job and I do mine?
How's that sound?
Then I'm afraid that doesn't sound like a plan, Stan. :(
The HQ forum description states: [...]This section should house, but isn't limited to,
moderator supervision,[...]
moderator supervision
moderator supervision
moderator supervision
moderator supervision
moderator supervision
So I'm going to bring it back to what we said before: If you want to review the moderators (or even the smods), you need to do it the right way. Review moderators in HQ, review us smods in PAD with the rest of the admins. You can't go around doing things just because you may think that's how they should be. Removing Sydian and Fabio was completely unnecessary and uncalled for just because you found their attitudes to be undesirable. It is not an administrative matter, it's an HQ matter and should be treated as such. Things have been that way for years and we've never had a problem with the way things operate. Simply because you disagree with it isn't enough of a reason for me to think that that's how things should be. This is not a tyranny, this is an oligarchy.
Now I'm done with this. Once an admin sees what you did, they'll probably reverse it and fix the problem anyway.