Difference Among Christianity, Judaism, and Islam

Started by Illuminaughty May 28th, 2012 3:21 PM
  • 2350 views
  • 25 replies
Seen June 21st, 2012
Posted June 19th, 2012
95 posts
11 Years
As many of you may know, Lady Gaga's Tour came to a screeching halt in Indonesia after repeated violent threats from Islamic groups as well as political hindering from South Korean and Philippian Christian groups. I don't agree with either group's approach to displaying their condemnation of the singer/performer; however, it inspired some thoughts that are often overlooked. Now these questions require very wide generalizations, but what are your thoughts about any of these?

Why do radical Islamic groups oppress people via violent means more often whereas radical Christian groups are oppressive via political and social means more often? (In the past few decades) What major differences in scripture, if any, affect followers behavior differently among Jews, Christians, and Muslims; think of it this way, if we were to give three indigenous tribes, who have not made any communication or have any knowledge outside of their tribes either a Qoran, Old Testament, or New Testament, and they adopted one of these religions, how do you think each religion would affect these tribes? If you think that these religions are similar, why do we have so much conflict among them?

First thought, well most Europeans and North Americans are Christian, and most Middle Easterns and some western Asians are Muslims. Therefore, it's the difference in government structure, but is it a two way street? Does government affect religion, or does religion affect government? I personally, know Muslim people who live in the United States, and they are pretty darn normal/boring people like the rest of us. I think that government/culture affects most of the differences in religious group actions. However, I think that the governments that exist today were majorly influenced by the religious populations of the past.

Religious population => government => Religious Group Behavior

For the second part, about difference in scripture. I think that the Old Testament and Qoran are pretty similar. So why are Judeo-Christian and Jewish groups so much different in action? I think this goes back to the diagram I made above. Since most Judeo-Christians and Jews live in countries whose religious populations have always been less influenced by the Old Testament and more by the New Testament, the governments structure is different from those with Muslim origins. Therefore, Jews and Judeo-Christians have adopted non-Judeo Christian customs.


All-in-all, I think that history has shaped each religion. I think that given different circumstances or events occurred in history, religion would not be the same it is today. So with the hypothetical tribes, I think that it could affect the tribes in several unpredictable ways; it doesn't matter which book you give them. Although, the New Testament tribe is very slightly more likely to be less harsh or despotic, although it certainly could be just as harsh or despotic as the other two.

Ugh, that was a mouthful. Please try to keep this conversation a "conversation". Please try not to blatantly offend any group. Conversely, try not to take any generalizations personally. If you disagree, please explain in a "friendly" or "philosophical" tone. With that being said, have a nice discussion!
Attention all ingrates, my art gallery has made its debut on the PokeCommunity.
Please ask either of my assistants to direct you to the gallery.

twocows

The not-so-black cat of ill omen

Age 32
Male
Michigan
Seen February 19th, 2023
Posted April 30th, 2021
4,307 posts
14.2 Years
Why do radical Islamic groups oppress people via violent means more often whereas radical Christian groups are oppressive via political and social means more often?
Your single example fails to convince me of the truth of this statement. There have been plenty of violent, militant Christian groups in history. The KKK comes to mind. Also: the Crusades.
VNs are superior to anime, don't @ me
Seen June 21st, 2012
Posted June 19th, 2012
95 posts
11 Years
Your single example fails to convince me of the truth of this statement. There have been plenty of violent, militant Christian groups in history. The KKK comes to mind. Also: the Crusades.
It was meant to be taken as a current status of both religions. But the two examples you mention go back into the history of Christianity, which definitely helps justify the fact that the practice/scripture of Christianity doesn't necessarily inspire more peaceful/diplomatic acts. I personally feel like a group's actions can go either way, but how did we arrive to this current state in which Islamic groups distill physical fear into people on a large scale more so than do Christian groups?

I fixed the main thread to clarify the point to ensure that it is taken as the current state of behaviors.
Attention all ingrates, my art gallery has made its debut on the PokeCommunity.
Please ask either of my assistants to direct you to the gallery.

TRIFORCE89

Guide of Darkness

Age 33
Male
Temple of Light
Seen November 25th, 2017
Posted October 21st, 2016
8,122 posts
19.1 Years
I don't see the KKK as a Christian group. Doing something idiotic in the name of religion, does not make it part of that religion. Given where Jesus lived, I don't think he was a white supremacist. Or that pastor the other day who held the anti-gay sermon. He's Christian (apparently), but that doesn't make his opinion Christian. Jesus said nothing about gay people.

The Crusades were bad, but why do the Catholics always get the sole bad press? They were being persecuted, denied access to Jerusalem, their holy sites destroyed. It was an extreme act of retaliation, which is not to say it was good or entirely justified. A modern example, I'd say would be the Japan bombings America launched during WWII. Horrible. But the country isn't defined by that moment today, and yet Catholic-detractors are always quick to bring up an event from the 11th century.

Regardless... in the modern context, if I had to give a reason, I'd say because Jesus was a preacher and Muhammad was a war hero. Also, Shiria Law is part of the culture like Deadrocks said.

Also, I think there's a bit of a "religious lifecycle". Islam is still relatively new compared to Christianity and Judaism, both of which have violence in their past. Personally, I would have thought those instances were more part of the climate of the times than anything else, and acting that way today in 2012 just seems extreme to me.
Male
None of Your Business
Seen April 23rd, 2013
Posted January 13th, 2013
505 posts
11.9 Years
Ok let's get started....

I personally believe that the environment and government has an impact on religion, vice versa is also true. We see lots of Islamic Terrorist groups, but the truth to be told...Muslims are NOT Terrorists. It is the very group that does the terrorism due to their weak understanding, so it's not fair to claim Islam as a religion is a religion of violence and terrorism. Same thing goes for all other religion, but I used Islam as an example since it's the religion with highest rate of misconceptions.

Government in the Middle East can be the key, the problem is, they have quite huge conflicts at that category. For example, they have a very disturbing scarcity and insufficient education, it is extremely weak and outrageously priced. Putting that in hand, what are the results? Youth who might be unable to build their future and represent their country as a whole. They get slackers, jobless youth, low literacy, and very slow technological concern. The way government organizes things there is disastrous unfortunately. Why am I making all of these claims? Well, as ironic as it may be, their religion...is actually totally against all of these negativity they have, it also offers solutions! But...people just neglect, and they would simply be laughed at :(

Some people might claim it's the religion impact that brought people to this state...but...have you seen American Muslims for example? Have you seen non-arab Muslims? They are PERFECTLY NORMAL and even better! Man, I don't know where I reached :P Anyway, the point is, it's not fair to judge a whole belief out of an individual.

Worst problem here is, the MEDIA. It's simply lies after lies, and the worst is..the ignorant people who follow it. They always tend to target the black spot in the community and present it as "Look, this is how all (insert group here) act" Outrageous!

I also have the same opinion on the other religions. Factually speaking, I do not believe there would be a religion on earth that commands its followers to do something bad! It just doesn't make sense. If you have a doubt about any religious group, just look at their count. Don't you feel suspicious? Billions of people practice Christianity and you expect all of these billions would accept following something claimed by others to be Violent, Pointless, Immoral etc?
Same thing for Judaism. Billions of people follow Islam, yet people make the claim that they are terrorists? Violent? Uncivilized?

To wrap my argument up, simply, separate religion from culture. Do not criticize a religious group out of individuals. And most importantly, If you want to know the true properties of a certain religion, just read it's HOLY BOOK! Read them yourself and ALWAYS BE OBJECTIVE! Seek what's right not what's satisfactory.

BTW, let's face it, those people...who do radical things under the name of Religion and God...are complete idiots. They don't know what they are talking about and they are DEFINITELY not doing something accepted by their religion. On the contrary, they are defying it yet they claim they are right *sigh..*

Esper

California
Seen June 30th, 2018
Posted June 30th, 2018
For the record, you should use a term like Hebrew Bible or Hebrew Scriptures instead of Old Testament since that is a Christian-centric term and carries some assumptions you don't want to make when talking about religion.

There's more to the issue than just religion and government. Take economy for an example. Lots of predominantly Muslim countries are much poorer than your average Christian-majority nation. Look at the United Arab Emirates or Saudi Arabia, two countries with a lot of oil wealth. Not exactly places where armed gangs roam the streets. (They have other problems, of course, but I'm just trying to make a small point.) I also hate to bring up the whole Kony, but that's a pretty good example of Christians today causing violence, and it happens to be across rather impoverished areas.

Without making my post too long I would just like to say that I think you get more violence the poorer your country is and the more religious its leadership is, regardless of the religion. I think that a relative lack of violence in Europe etc., is due to our relatively high levels of secularism and the fact that people are comfortable enough that they don't want to be violent.

I don't see the KKK as a Christian group. Doing something idiotic in the name of religion, does not make it part of that religion.
I'm not just saying this to be argumentative, and I don't mean to get off topic, but why not? How do you (not you specifically) decide what is part of a religion and what isn't?
Age 32
Male
Georgia
Seen November 23rd, 2019
Posted September 4th, 2014
325 posts
11.6 Years
I'm not just saying this to be argumentative, and I don't mean to get off topic, but why not? How do you (not you specifically) decide what is part of a religion and what isn't?
As a Christian myself, they are a mis-representation of Christianity. Though you could obviously argue the opposite. I don't believe Christians kill in the name of God or Jesus.

Or that pastor the other day who held the anti-gay sermon. He's Christian (apparently), but that doesn't make his opinion Christian. Jesus said nothing about gay people.
As a Christian I too don't believe in homosexuality. No Jesus doesn't say anything about it, but it referred to in the Old Testament/ Hebrew Bible. However, I do not condone how most Christian treat homosexuals, calling them names, telling them they are going to go to hell, etc. God hates sin, I don't believe he hates people.

TRIFORCE89

Guide of Darkness

Age 33
Male
Temple of Light
Seen November 25th, 2017
Posted October 21st, 2016
8,122 posts
19.1 Years
For the record, you should use a term like Hebrew Bible or Hebrew Scriptures instead of Old Testament since that is a Christian-centric term and carries some assumptions you don't want to make when talking about religion.

There's more to the issue than just religion and government. Take economy for an example. Lots of predominantly Muslim countries are much poorer than your average Christian-majority nation. Look at the United Arab Emirates or Saudi Arabia, two countries with a lot of oil wealth. Not exactly places where armed gangs roam the streets. (They have other problems, of course, but I'm just trying to make a small point.) I also hate to bring up the whole Kony, but that's a pretty good example of Christians today causing violence, and it happens to be across rather impoverished areas.

Without making my post too long I would just like to say that I think you get more violence the poorer your country is and the more religious its leadership is, regardless of the religion. I think that a relative lack of violence in Europe etc., is due to our relatively high levels of secularism and the fact that people are comfortable enough that they don't want to be violent.


I'm not just saying this to be argumentative, and I don't mean to get off topic, but why not? How do you (not you specifically) decide what is part of a religion and what isn't?
I'll try to rephrase it. They may be Christian (probably applies to other religions too, but I'll speak for my own) in that they were raised as such or converted on their own. They may perform some atrocity in the name of their religion, but that doesn't make it a religious act. If the action is counter religious teaching, then it is contradictory.


As a Christian myself, they are a mis-representation of Christianity. Though you could obviously argue the opposite. I don't believe Christians kill in the name of God or Jesus.



As a Christian I too don't believe in homosexuality. No Jesus doesn't say anything about it, but it referred to in the Old Testament/ Hebrew Bible. However, I do not condone how most Christian treat homosexuals, calling them names, telling them they are going to go to hell, etc. God hates sin, I don't believe he hates people.
What do you mean you don't believe it? It's a thing.

Anyway, one can hold that viewpoint I suppose. But, the preacher said to round them up and electrify them. I would say that goes against the faith. Love thy neighbour and all that jazz. Not killing people.
Seen June 21st, 2012
Posted June 19th, 2012
95 posts
11 Years

I'll try to rephrase it. They may be Christian (probably applies to other religions too, but I'll speak for my own) in that they were raised as such or converted on their own. They may perform some atrocity in the name of their religion, but that doesn't make it a religious act. If the action is counter religious teaching, then it is contradictory.
I see where you are getting at, but let's say that we have 2 people who interpret their faiths in different ways:

1) Believe homosexuality is wrong.
2) Believe homosexuality is all right.

Many churches teach 1; many churches teach 2.

So if you are a 2, the 1's might seem contradictory to faith, but they are still acting in the faith in which has been interpreted for them, whether we agree or not; we cannot claim they are not taking a religious action, since we cannot define religious beliefs for all people within a given sect.

This side discussion aside, I have to agree with Scarf's observation about economics. I wonder if it's because of the religion of the people that they are usually more poor, or if it's the other way around. What makes people from "Muslim" countries more susceptible to poverty than "Christian" nations? The scriptures or the way in which they are interpreted?
Attention all ingrates, my art gallery has made its debut on the PokeCommunity.
Please ask either of my assistants to direct you to the gallery.

droomph

weeb

Age 26
Male
nowhere spectacular
Seen February 1st, 2017
Posted January 3rd, 2017
4,282 posts
11.7 Years
Just as many people say that born-again anti-gay Christians aren't exactly Christian I have heard Muslims say that the extremists who hate America aren't exactly Muslim.

It's just that we give bigger press to them because they hate AMERICA, and we don't like it that way and we'll embarrass them into defeat. Which is not working.
did u no there r 21 letters in the alphabet
o i forgot 5
uraqt


TRIFORCE89

Guide of Darkness

Age 33
Male
Temple of Light
Seen November 25th, 2017
Posted October 21st, 2016
8,122 posts
19.1 Years
I see where you are getting at, but let's say that we have 2 people who interpret their faiths in different ways:

1) Believe homosexuality is wrong.
2) Believe homosexuality is all right.

Many churches teach 1; many churches teach 2.

So if you are a 2, the 1's might seem contradictory to faith, but they are still acting in the faith in which has been interpreted for them, whether we agree or not; we cannot claim they are not taking a religious action, since we cannot define religious beliefs for all people within a given sect.

This side discussion aside, I have to agree with Scarf's observation about economics. I wonder if it's because of the religion of the people that they are usually more poor, or if it's the other way around. What makes people from "Muslim" countries more susceptible to poverty than "Christian" nations? The scriptures or the way in which they are interpreted?
I don't have a problem if someone says it is wrong. That is technically true to the faith, even if I don't like it. My problem would come from "Well, then we should kill them". No, no you shouldn't. "Thou shalt not kill". If you kill in the name of any religion, when that religion teaches against it, then you have not committed a religious act. So, I conclude the KKK were not a Christian group.

Anywho, I'd say the economics have more to do with the people in charge and how they want to control their people. Lots of dictators in the mideast. But lots of oil too. They entire country could be very wealthy. From the leadership and the culture also comes discrimination against women. They could be educated and working, but they're not. I don't think that inherently part of Islam the faith, but rather Islamic culture. Like the burqa. Not a mandatory item as dictated in the Koran, but they chose to wear it as a cultural item of faith. Like Italians wearing a cross around their neck... if that cross we're gigantic and covered their entire body. It's culture.

So, we could argue interpretation I guess. It's culture, but religious culture - even if not religious doctrine.

diab_low

#SmashingTheMaroons

Age 29
Male
Sydney NSW Australia
Seen June 28th, 2016
Posted February 17th, 2014
630 posts
10.9 Years
I think most radical Islamic groups follow Shiria Law.
Hi im actully a muslim and your kinda wrong. The way we (muslims) see it, sharia law is the ruling of god Allah. we would not be good muslims if we did not follow sharia law. Its our way of life. its like how the christians and the jews and any other religon following what god has set out for them. you see you just cant call us radical because we are following our religon. And the thing that hurts us the mist is that we try to show the world how good of a nation we are, but the government and media all help each other to demoralise us, and for what.


Posted from Pokecommunity.com App for Android
Age 28
Male
Oregon
Seen September 24th, 2018
Posted July 3rd, 2018
17,520 posts
13.1 Years
Well I beleive the differences come the evolution of the religions. They all started at different times though can be traces back to Abraham. Islam just like Christianity of the Crusades period is going under a radical period due to popular radical figures who abuse the image of Allah (or God in the case of the Crusades) to wage war for their own political gain.

Also not all Muslims are terrorists, there's some religious centric bias against them, after the media discovered that the guy in Norway wasn't a Muslim they ceased to call him a Terrorist...
I'm currently working on some novels. If you're interested you can read them here:
https://www.wattpad.com/user/ImperialSun
Seen June 21st, 2012
Posted June 19th, 2012
95 posts
11 Years
Some issues don't even relate to terrorism or war, they are domestic.

For instance, the bible and quran both have passages about women, and where their place in society is. It's interesting how the sentiments are vastly different between the two, although the passages are quite similar.
Attention all ingrates, my art gallery has made its debut on the PokeCommunity.
Please ask either of my assistants to direct you to the gallery.

Livewire

Male
Sunnyshore City
Seen December 3rd, 2022
Posted August 2nd, 2019
14,091 posts
13.8 Years
Part of it is that Islamism (extremist Islam) and to another extent, the Islamic world, is still in its infancy in terms of development & technology compared to Judaism & Roman Catholicism. It's just that Christianity & Judaism have already gone through their violent phases for the most part. Islam is catching up, on account of being the newest and youngest of the three great Monotheistic faiths. When heath standards rise, when education rates rise, when the theocratic fanticism & censorship wanes, the violence too will wane.

Kung Fu Ferret

Derp

He/Him
Digital World
Seen 13 Hours Ago
Posted 2 Days Ago
1,337 posts
17.7 Years
Not all Muslims are terrorists, but most terrorists these days ARE Muslim.
Individual people like Saddam Hussein or Osama bin Laden were the reason a lot of people in the United States felt a sort of prejudice toward all Muslims. That is what I think.
I also recall that I read somewhere that Muhammad wanted Islam to be a peaceful religion.

KingCharizard

C++ Developer Extraordinaire

Age 34
Male
Pennsylvania
Seen May 14th, 2016
Posted May 14th, 2016
1,229 posts
13.4 Years
I dont see the difference between them, dont know why people like to.. also stop calling people terroists who aren't Saddam Hussein was a dictator he only became a "Terrorist" when we went into his country and picked a fight. Osama bin Laden was a scapegoat not a "Terrorist"

It is true, "History is written by the Victor"

NarutoActor

The rocks cry out to me

Age 29
Female
Brooklyn/Marlboro
Seen April 2nd, 2016
Posted March 22nd, 2016
1,974 posts
14.4 Years
Your single example fails to convince me of the truth of this statement. There have been plenty of violent, militant Christian groups in history. The KKK comes to mind. Also: the Crusades.
First off the crusades, was a catholic effort. Which is a type of Christianity. Second the KKK were not christian. It doesn't matter what you claim to be, what matters is how you act, and they did not act very Christian.

Christianity is not a religion, it is a theology/philosophy. The catholic church, and Lutheranism are forms of religion.
~There are those people who understand hex, F the rest

Esper

California
Seen June 30th, 2018
Posted June 30th, 2018
Part of it is that Islamism (extremist Islam) and to another extent, the Islamic world, is still in its infancy in terms of development & technology compared to Judaism & Roman Catholicism. It's just that Christianity & Judaism have already gone through their violent phases for the most part. Islam is catching up, on account of being the newest and youngest of the three great Monotheistic faiths. When heath standards rise, when education rates rise, when the theocratic fanticism & censorship wanes, the violence too will wane.
While I agree that low living standards and corrupt governments contribute to violence, I find the assertion that religions have a "violence phase" they go through and that it takes a long time to get over this phase troubling.

It assumes violence is inherent to these religions irrespective of the time, place, and culture in which it is practiced. Going by your own statement of the trouble a lack of health standards and education causes one could simply state that the "phases" of Christianity and Judaism are merely a reflection of the living standards in the past which, compared to today, were not very high. It also seems to assume that a "new" religion (Islam and Christianity are both over a millennium old) can't be peaceful, but there are plenty of modern religions which are just that.

Osama bin Laden was a scapegoat not a "Terrorist"
As much as the word "terrorist" gets thrown around way more than it should, I think bin Laden perfectly encapsulates the meaning of the word.

First off the crusades, was a catholic effort. Which is a type of Christianity. Second the KKK were not christian. It doesn't matter what you claim to be, what matters is how you act, and they did not act very Christian.

Christianity is not a religion, it is a theology/philosophy. The catholic church, and Lutheranism are forms of religion.
I would say that anyone who claims to be and feels that they are Christian is a Christian. So the KKK, Crusaders, and that guy who killed dozens of people in Norway last year are all Christians. It might sting to have people and groups who share an identity with you doing things (or having done things in the past) that you don't like, but their identity is something you have to accept as a fact. You don't, however, have to accept their theology or actions.

Just to clarify, I consider myself an environmentalist, but that doesn't mean I agree with everything Greenpeace does. I do accept that they're also environmentalists, just not the same kind as I am. Their actions don't reflect on me even if we share some ideas. It's only if and when the ideas and the actions they inspire are in agreement with my own that it's okay to make a big comparison between them and me.

Livewire

Male
Sunnyshore City
Seen December 3rd, 2022
Posted August 2nd, 2019
14,091 posts
13.8 Years
While I agree that low living standards and corrupt governments contribute to violence, I find the assertion that religions have a "violence phase" they go through and that it takes a long time to get over this phase troubling.

It assumes violence is inherent to these religions irrespective of the time, place, and culture in which it is practiced. Going by your own statement of the trouble a lack of health standards and education causes one could simply state that the "phases" of Christianity and Judaism are merely a reflection of the living standards in the past which, compared to today, were not very high. It also seems to assume that a "new" religion (Islam and Christianity are both over a millennium old) can't be peaceful, but there are plenty of modern religions which are just that.
The three great montheistic faiths are all guilty of spreading their dogma by swordpoint and some point in their histories, some in the recent past, others today. The Israelites did it to settle the Canaan area and to subdue other tribes - assert Israelite dominance in the area. The Christians did it in the form of the Crusades and the Inquisition in order to expand Geopolitical influence and to root out heretics and undesirables from within. Islam has been embroiled in endless war of rightful secession since the 7th century, right after Muhammed died and left no heirs, root of the Sunni and Shia conflict. The three great monotheistic faith's histories are soaked in blood.

Lt. Col. Fantastic

The Arianator

Age 27
Male
America
Seen August 7th, 2014
Posted August 4th, 2014
698 posts
11.1 Years
I personally believe that Islam, Christian, and Jew beliefs are all denominations of the same god.

I know, they are really different, but hear me out.

If I were god, I wouldn't just want to spread religion in one area, I would go worldwide. But from a business point of view, different cultures will have different reactions to certain things. So if I want to advertise in all regions, I wouldn't use the same commercial, would I? The Islam religion would be tailored for, well, the middle eastern areas, while Judaism would go well in...wherever Jews originated from. (Im sorry, I cant remember for the life of me...something about Abraham leading them somewhere) Christianity was to get people who weren't already jewish to believe in me too, and I would have to use different methods (send Jesus, the people will love that). Its kinda like when a company uses different gimmicks and promotions for different audiences. Now, how come we don't all get along? Well, simply because Humans are jackasses. Really. If people don't like what you like, send an army to take over their land. Forget living with then, they are bad people. <- thats pretty much how I imagine the crusades.

Now, I know this is a half-baked, sideways theory, but its how I've always imagined religion. For polytheism, I think it was just years and years of cultural changes morphing into it. Because from what I remember of 8th grade history, those civilizations were around for a long time, or derived from civilizations that had evolved, so to say. Jesus, Muhammed, Abraham, those are just reminders of what happened.

If this offends anyone, I'm sorry. You don't have to agree with me.


Mr. Aladdin sir! Have a wish or two or three!

droomph

weeb

Age 26
Male
nowhere spectacular
Seen February 1st, 2017
Posted January 3rd, 2017
4,282 posts
11.7 Years
Hey guys, I saw this video earlier. I know it's a comedy video, and it's probably not very PC friendly, but if you'll bear with me...I think it's very relevant to this discussion...

Spoiler:
[if not PC friendly please remove it :)]

So basically, I think that they're just some time behind from us - we're down the same road, and we're past that spot where we're violent about our religion.

I find that to be very true - think back, 600 years ago, how much time the Muslims are behind of us. The 1400s. The Inquisition. That was a very violent situation. And then the Crusades - that's the modern-day equivalent of 9/11 and that "Jihad" thing that most Muslims can tell aren't for real. And neither were the Crusades. No, that was for personal glory rather than "in the name of God".
did u no there r 21 letters in the alphabet
o i forgot 5
uraqt