Novels vs Movies

Started by Sector September 5th, 2012 2:59 PM
  • 1477 views
  • 21 replies

Sector

Banned

Age 32
Male
Ohio
Seen October 9th, 2016
Posted April 30th, 2016
2,331 posts
11.5 Years
As we all know it, there are many adaptations between novels & movies. Such as the popular series of The Hunger Games, Harry Potter, Twilight, the Lord of the Ring, Holes & so on!

So I may not be a huge novel reader, but I have seen from many saying they like the novels better because of this & that. Which do you prefer? Why? How does one get more attention viewers/readers than the other?

Shining Raichu

Expect me like you expect Jesus.

Age 32
Male
Australia
Seen October 17th, 2020
Posted December 21st, 2017
8,958 posts
12.3 Years
The books are always better than the movies. I think that comes by definition because you'll never be able to top the source material from which you created the movie. This is especially true if you read the book before seeing the movie, because people are so precious about the way things happen in the book so if the movie deviates from that even a little bit the fans are not happy campers lol.

Personally though, I like the movies and novels equally when the movies are done right. The Harry Potter movies for example (and the first Bridget Jones movie) were done so masterfully that I love them equally to the books. The books are of course objectively better and I recognise that, but I find that books and films are two different media that are so different that comparisons of 'better and worse' can't exactly be made.
Moderator of General Chat

Golurks Were Meant to Fly

NERF THIS!

Male
America, East Coast
Seen October 4th, 2021
Posted August 5th, 2020
1,273 posts
11.3 Years
I almost always think the books are better. They tend to have more depth, have a more complex plot, you really get to know the character(s) since you are able to hear their thoughts. And while movies can be visually stunning, a lot of times they lack these key elements, dumbing down things and simplifying them for the general public, and introducing strange story arcs.

i will say I prefer The Fellowship of The Ring to the book as the book was incredibly hard for me to get through (though that was years ago, maybe when I was 11?) and I did prefer V for Vendetta in the movie form. Granted, I saw the movie first and didn't completely finish the novel, but I really enjoyed the acting, etc. (If we're counting tv shows) I'll say I prefer Game Of Thrones the tv show to the books as the tv show has Peter Dinklage, and in this case I prefer a bit of simplification as George R. R. martin just likes to hurl a ton of information in your face. Plus, I HATE Davos/Catelyn chapters and there aren't any in the show. :D
Stream Sawayama

Thomas

HAIL HYDRA!

Age 35
Male
Lafayette, LA
Seen February 11th, 2022
Posted November 22nd, 2018
5,984 posts
19.2 Years
It really depends for me, but for the most part I like the book counterpart much better than the movie...as long as the book is the source material for the movie. Movie novelizations are crap and should never have come into existence ever.

Nihilego

[color=#95b4d4]ユービーゼロイチ パラサイト[/color]

Male
scotland
Seen September 28th, 2018
Posted March 16th, 2018
8,874 posts
12.1 Years
Heh, can I say neither? While I don't really read much at all since I find it quite hard to keep track of what's going on in the book, I'm not very good at keeping track of characters and who's who in movies either, lol. But if I had to pick I'd go with movies just because it's more concise. I know that a lot of people don't like movies more than novels for this reason but I guess I'm the other way around. I just want to enjoy it as much as possible without confusing myself and movies are better for that, for me, than novels are.

Esper

California
Seen June 30th, 2018
Posted June 30th, 2018
I like what I'm exposed to first, usually. I'm very pro-book, but even I admit I sometimes like a movie better than the book it's based on if I see the movie first.

Then there are some movies which are just better regardless. The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo (original Swedish version - didn't like the English version as much) was great, but I couldn't get into the book at all. Then there are some movies which expand a lot of what's not in the book, or take the book from a different angle, like The Prestige, and those ones I generally like in different enough ways to say I like the movie as much or more just because there are things you can do with movies you can't do with novels.

Mr Cat Dog

Frasier says it best

Age 32
Male
London, UK
Seen September 29th, 2017
Posted July 12th, 2017
11,344 posts
19.1 Years
For me, an adaptation of a novel is only going to eclipse the source material if it puts a new spin on it and makes it more cinematic, as opposed to novelistic. Out of my favourite films, most of them are original creations, and the ones that aren't have often substantially altered the books they were based on. For example, Stephen King famously hates the film version of The Shining as it stripped away a lot of the psychological subtext he put in the novel. But what's lost from the page comes alive on the screen, as the imagery there is something that King would never be able to come up with in his wildest, most ball-tripping dreams. And Adaptation. is just that, with regards to the book The Orchid Thief. The stuff that goes on in THAT film would never be able to be accomplished in a book.

PlatinumDude

Nyeh?

Age 29
Male
Canada
Seen July 31st, 2020
Posted May 30th, 2020
12,958 posts
12.7 Years
In some movies based on novels, there are times when things are different from the original novel, and that slightly bugs me, so I prefer the novels. But I also like the movies so I can actually see what's going on in the book on the big screen.

Female
Philippines
Seen February 19th, 2013
Posted February 19th, 2013
114 posts
10.7 Years
Novels! As a novel reader I've read many that are turned into movies (Jurassic Park, A Walk to Remember, Harry Potter) and I prefer the book versions more because they are more detailed, plus you can let your imagination depict the looks of the characters/locations.
Plus some movies change the plot of the book altogether. See Michael Crichton's the Lost World for an example.
Although I may be biased-my sister told me, when she read a walk to remember and then watched the movie she liked it but was a bit disappointed because there where scenes that were not in the movie.

Treecko

the princess without voice

Age 31
He/Him
St.Louis,Missouri
Seen November 30th, 2021
Posted November 29th, 2021
6,311 posts
11.2 Years
In general, I prefer the books more than the movies. The movies movie doesn't usually cover the entire book so I can't get the entire story. They sometimes cut out parts that are important to the plot.
"Unable to perceive the shape of You, I find You all around me. Your presence fills my eyes with Your love, It humbles my heart, For You are everywhere"

Kura

twitter.com/puccarts

Age 33
Female
London, UK (orig. Toronto, Canada)
Seen August 30th, 2021
Posted August 24th, 2021
10,993 posts
18.7 Years
I generally like novels a lot better. I like being able to visualize, for myself, the people and the worlds in the story. I like to take my own pacing for novels, too.
~Yuugiou Fan~
~Kamen Rider Fan~
♡(´・ω・`)LOVE! ☆

Hannah

beep bop boop

Age 22
Female
Seen November 16th, 2021
Posted October 9th, 2017
1,150 posts
10.6 Years
I prefer to read novels and books rather than movies. When I read the book, I understand it much better. It seems so clearer than the movies. For instance, when I watched Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, I didn't quite understand it. When I finally read the book, I got it. The film adaptions also show some scenes that aren't really in the book, therefore it actually ruins the reader's perception of the plot. Like in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2, I don't remember reading a part where Harry and Lord Voldemort fall into this weird cliff thing. That just proves my point.

beep bop boop

Hikamaru

Age 30
Female
Australia
Seen January 24th, 2019
Posted September 4th, 2018
50,214 posts
12.2 Years
I usually prefer the books cos like AWsquared said, movies sometimes don't cover the whole book.

Also, the book gives a better understanding of the story.
Gone forever for personal reasons.
Visit my Tumblr page if you wish to contact me.

http://daikenkki.tumblr.com/

Synerjee

Atra du evarinya ono varda.

Everywhere and anywhere.
Seen May 28th, 2016
Posted February 25th, 2016
2,901 posts
10.6 Years
I am a reader, so naturally I prefer reading. If there is a movie that is made after a novel, I will try to watch the movie first, and then read the novel. This way, I can get to understand much more about the movie and get to know the characters more in depth. For example, I found the Hunger Games novels much better than the movie. They have so much more description and kinda misses out important scenes in the novel. After reading the novel, everything became so much clearer.

Zozma

I'm a blur

Female
California
Seen December 17th, 2012
Posted December 17th, 2012
31 posts
10.7 Years
Books, books, books, all the way books. I can't remember ever seeing a movie based on a book that I actually liked. Howl's Moving Castle? Ella Enchanted? Coraline? City of Ember? Harry Potter? The Hunger Games? Loved all the books. Hated all the movies. The movies always seem to just miss the point of the books and suck all the magic right out of it for me.

My websites:

LividZephyr

Oxymoron, not a moron, thanks

Male
Wisconsin, USA
Seen September 21st, 2017
Posted May 10th, 2015
445 posts
10.6 Years
Books go in to richer detail and character development, making them a more thorough, invigorating experience.

Movies are enough to get through in one sitting and are much easier to take in and enjoy for what they are, without necessity for interpretation of occurrence.

Thus, I prefer each for certain reasons. I like books for complexity, but I like movies for simplicity. And sometimes, the movies are worlds better than the books on which they're based - especially if they're modernizations. There are a lot of factors here...
This'll do for now.

Credit to whomever drew that Hilda picture. Lemme know if that's you.


~*~ 3DS FC: 3540-0366-4191 ||| Mii name: Andy ||| IGN: Amanda ~*~

Mr. Magius

  

Male
... ;)
Seen 1 Day Ago
Posted May 21st, 2022
244 posts
15.8 Years
Both writing a novel and producing a movie are different works of art. It just depends on who does it.

If I had to choose, I would say I prefer novels because you learn a lot more, and there is so much more detail and information in them. A book can be endless, whereas as a movie is quite limited.
:|

mikey

Age 30
Male
Seen 8 Hours Ago
Posted 4 Days Ago
6,229 posts
14.1 Years
I always prefer the books more than the movies, such as with The Huger Games trilogy. The movie did not live up to the book. Not to say that movie adaptions are bad, but I like the books better!

Moderator
of Brilliant Diamond & Shining Pearl
Discord Moderator