Pokemon Bonding or "Gotta Catch em All"?

Started by Infinite Latios July 25th, 2013 11:56 AM
  • 3097 views
  • 40 replies
Age 28
Male
Where do I live?
Seen August 30th, 2013
Posted August 10th, 2013
125 posts
9.8 Years
Am I the only person who thinks that the series goal of catching them all conflicts with getting close to your Pokemon? To catch them all, you have to hold 643 of them in the PC, while only 6 get to come with you. That's not bonding, that's called raising Pikachu in captivity. Which do you guys think is the better or more important goal? Bonding with your Pokemon, or catching them all? I think it's more important to get closer to your Pokemon. Everyone knows that Pikachu act anti-social and aggressive when you breed them in captivity.
Age 25
Male
Maryland
Seen January 30th, 2016
Posted December 19th, 2015
188 posts
9.9 Years
I feel the same as you on this point. I will sometimes only catch 6 or 7 pokemon and stop there. Untill they are you know in the 90s or 80s.
Current Challenges

Ultimate Solo Challenge: Shuppet->Banette
FR: 1/8 HG: 0/8 Ruby: 0/8 Diamond: 0/8 Black 2: 0/8Y: 0/8
Route 49
Seen February 7th, 2016
Posted June 21st, 2015
612 posts
10.5 Years
In answer to your question if you were in a real Pokemon Adventure then I'd suggest bonding with your Pokemon. You don't wan't them to lose friendship otherwise they'll walk away. If you're playing the games I'd suggest catching them all. You might receive a special gift if you catch all the Pokemon in B2W2.
Boilurn, the Scald Pokemon and the evolved form of Hottle. It can burn the holder by the lightest of touches when it boils. It can boil 3 gallons of water in one minute.

PokeChris123

Pokémon Trainer

Age 24
Male
Hoenn Region - Littleroot Town
Seen June 7th, 2018
Posted July 19th, 2016
150 posts
9.8 Years
Well, you don't exactly seem to bond with your Pokemon besides battling and happiness level (and imagination, but not all do that I guess... I do) and it is really hard to "Catch 'em All". I guess it all depends on who you are. If you are a hardcore gamer, then catching them all is the answer. If you have a creative mind for Pokemon, like me, then bonding is the answer. If I had to choose a side, I would go with bonding.
"I like shorts! They're comfy and easy to wear!"

3DS Friend Code: 1590-4725-8396
Playstation Network ID: epic_oreo17
Nintendo Network ID: epic_oreo17

Click here for information about my Super-Secret Base.

Message me if you've added me.

moon

they/them
Seen 11 Hours Ago
Posted 22 Hours Ago
37,443 posts
15.5 Years
"Gotta Catch 'em all" was a concept they dropped as a primary goal in Generation 3 because of the amount of Pokémon... It Hasn't been the motto of Pokémon since Gold, Silver and Crystal.
I didn't know that actually, but it makes sense.

I usually capture all the pokémon I can in the game, but only train 7-8 of them. I guess I think of it more like a game and less like as if I actually have to be nice towards my boxed creatures.

But in RPs and fiction (I guess?) I think I never capture more pokémon than I intend to use. Because there you get to form personalitites for the pokémon and to box them would seem so cold ;; So yeah, I understand what you mean with it's conflicting. The gotta catch 'em all maybe is outdated though, like MasterDraco says. Because now you can't capture all pokémon within one generation's games anymore.

It's the same in the anime, where Unova was the first region Ash really rotated his team on, right? He still makes sure to bond with all of his pokémon (except the permanently 'boxed' ones @ prof Oak) but he's not really ever made an effort to capture them all. Not even in the Kanto/Johto journeys.

In the manga, the only protagonist (except for maybe Green?) who tried to capture them all (and succeeded!) is Crystal. And she didn't capture them for herself, she just captured them for professor Oak while she had her team of 6 pokémon to battle with already.

So I'd say bonding is more important than collecting ;)
paired with Ivysaur

.:batto:.

Pokébreeder

Age 28
Male
Australia
Seen February 23rd, 2014
Posted February 22nd, 2014
266 posts
14.4 Years
i love breeding. so i am bonding with my 'pc pokemon' in a way. but thats exactly what they are. PC pokemon. they all serve the purposes. and i couldnt really care to bond with my 290+ pokemon. but those special 6... now there different. we are a team. and nobody could come between us.

Brolijah

Secretly (Not) Active

Male
US Central
Seen August 13th, 2022
Posted July 26th, 2018
151 posts
14.2 Years
You must be the incarnation of Lord Natural... And I do see what you mean. In recents, my primary goal has in a sense been catch few and befriend your partners. That still doesn't change the fact that I'm still an EV trainer and battler. Ooh, how conflicting at times. And such has been hardwired into my head.
Furthermore, as I saw someone state above. "Gotta catch 'em all" really was dropped after 3rd gen. They still have neato features if you do obtain all pokémon, but never have I thought it really be the effort.
What did you expect from me?

Hyzenthlay

running with the wolves tonight

Age 23
Rito Village
Seen 16 Hours Ago
Posted 16 Hours Ago
7,802 posts
10.5 Years
I have five or six Pokemon in my team for the whole adventure, but I catch some HM slaves and if I see a wild Pokemon I want to catch, I do. And of course I always go for the legendaries but store them into the PC.
I forget how emotions dance when they aren't inside of me
I forget how the sun feels when she isn't around me
And my dreams become sweeter when something is missing
I'm in love with the hunt itself
It makes me feel alive

🌲💞🍀
on reduced activity!
Age 32
Male
Seen August 21st, 2021
Posted August 19th, 2021
2,334 posts
15 Years
I think both are important to a degree, why is it one or the other? I like collecting as many pokemon as I can...I completed my pokedex in Soul Silver for the first time. Which was really satisfying.

Now that in Pokemon X & Y we don't need to have a pokemon in our pokedex to request it on the GTS. Filling your pokedex might become fairly trivial if you breed some starters to trade away.
Looking for X & Y friends, friend code is: 2964-8571-0102
Send me a pm if you add me.
Seen October 2nd, 2020
Posted July 12th, 2014
483 posts
10.4 Years
I can see how it could be the case that the two conflict if I only used six pokemon AND tried to catch 'em all, so ended up with a PC full of pokemon I never did and never would use, but I don't play that way.

I balance the two. I catch a lot of pokemon in the course of a normal game, but I generally use almost all of them at least a bit, and I end up with a couple of dozen or so that I use regularly, rotating them in and out of my party as I need to or simply want to. And if I keep playing through the post-game, that can expand out to dozens or sometimes even hundreds of pokemon that I not only catch, but use, train and evolve.

Sableye~

Back to PC~

Male
Seen January 4th, 2018
Posted October 11th, 2015
4,016 posts
10.5 Years
How would one 'bond' with pixels?

Anyway. I do have a nearly-full PC box but they don't really mean much to me. I'm a bit of a 'mon hoarder. ]:

During the first playthrough, I just catch Pokemon I particularly like or want to be in my team. For the most part, at least.
I can't think of a good signature.
Male
Australia
Seen November 21st, 2013
Posted October 5th, 2013
105 posts
9.8 Years
wut.jpg
I don't really care about having hundreds of pokemon in boxes, after all, it is just a game.. Not like Animal Protection services are gonna knock through my do-... Hey what's that siren outside?! Oh no! it's the Po Po! *Jumps out closed window*

Anyway, I am the one for catching them all, if I haven't caught it, I soon will. It isss the main point of the game after all (In my opinion at least..), I don't use all of them in my team though, only the chosen ones. But of course, nowadays in newer Pokemon games, if you're expecting to catch every single Pokemon, you're gonna have a bad time. But when I was a little boy, catching all 151 was possible and a worthy challenge! :D

Darkrai666

ThatscaryFreakyguywhoisDa rkrai

Age 22
Male
Seen December 21st, 2014
Posted November 13th, 2013
120 posts
9.8 Years
Well..I never went for pokemon bonding..I caught pokemon like ratata or Zigzagoon I just ignored them And put em in the PC..I mean It's definitely "gotta catch em all" But that's just how I like it..But in the anime It's Like Ash catches pokemon he uses them for a while and Dumps them forever except for pikachu all ash bonds with Is pikachu...But Ash Is a loser so It depends on how You like it..
This signature has been disabled.
exceeds 350px height limit -- please decrease so no scrollbars appear
Please review and fix the issues by reading the signature rules.

You must edit it to meet the limits set by the rules before you may remove the [sig-reason] code from your signature. Removing this tag will re-enable it.

Do not remove the tag until you fix the issues in your signature. You may be infracted for removing this tag if you do not fix the specified issues. Do not use this tag for decoration purposes.

BubbleBeams

Defeating Champions Since 1999

Age 33
Female
Iowa
Seen October 26th, 2021
Posted September 23rd, 2016
221 posts
9.8 Years
I still like to catch as many as I can for the sake of filling the Pokedex. But I do usually make it a point to figure out which six Pokemon I want on my team and I stick with them. I definitely like to bond with my Pokemon. I actually have a hard time with the idea of erasing my game to start a new one. I usually won't restart a game on my physical cartridges, and if I want to do a replay of one of the games I download a ROM instead. I get very attached to my Pokemon.

Realistically speaking, if Pokemon were real and I were a Pokemon trainer, I wouldn't catch a heapload of them. I probably wouldn't stick with just 6, but I wouldn't go overboard with it either. I also like to think if Pokemon were real it'd be like in the anime where, say, Ash's Pokemon are sent to Prof. Oak's lab where they're still able to run free and be taken care of instead of sitting in a PC box, rotting away.
CURRENT CHALLENGE
Ultimate Grass Monotype

Fire Red (8/8) | Soul Silver (16/16) | Sapphire (8/8) | Pearl (0/8) | Black (0/8) | Y (0/8)
Last Updated: 09.14.16

KorpiklaaniVodka

KID BUU PAWAA

Age 24
Male
Eastern Europe
Seen September 26th, 2016
Posted September 26th, 2016
3,318 posts
9.9 Years
I prefer to bond with my Pokemon. I don't really bother filling the Pokedex.
PokeCheats | Serebii | AMA | Rock-type Club | Legendary Club #Respect4Rhyperior #Respect4Garbodor #Respect4Tangrowth #FreeGenesect2016 #FreeHoopa-U2016

Brendino

The Ruins of Alph
Seen 3 Days Ago
Posted April 6th, 2023
8,567 posts
13.4 Years
I've always preferred raising a smaller group of Pokemon rather than worrying about trying to catch them all. The only time I even bothered completing my Pokedex was on FireRed, and that was because it was the only Pokemon game I had that wasn't missing for the longest time, and you can only beat the Elite Four so many times before you need something else to do.

At least when I train a select few Pokemon (usually no more than a box full), I can switch between them for an extended period of time without getting bored. And if I ever decide I want to train different Pokemon, I'd rather go searching for one than just taking one out of the PC that's been sitting there for a year or two.

Amore

Seen 8 Hours Ago
Posted 4 Days Ago
5,237 posts
13.7 Years
I only ever raise a small group (last couple of years that hasn't necessarily been restricted to 6 anymore), but I have no qualms with capturing tons of pokémon - it's just a game after all. If it were real, I'd just do like Paul in the anime and release most of the pokémon I capture yet don't intend to use.

Tom Cruise

Pokémon Master

Male
Magnolia
Seen August 6th, 2013
Posted August 2nd, 2013
5 posts
9.8 Years
I understand what you mean so I've tried to create a system in which I continuously change my team up and play with just about all my Pokemon. This of course is a difficult task to accomplish as I catch so many Pokemon.
| Skype: yoloswagggg |
| Pm me for GT | Email: [email protected] |

ErikaInRainbowCity

Everyday I'm Tumblin'

Age 28
Female
U.S.A.
Seen August 13th, 2016
Posted August 26th, 2013
72 posts
9.8 Years
It depends on what I get for finishing the Pokedex :P Anything useful? Then no I prefer to bond with my pokemon. It wouldn't really matter because I usually try to fill the Pokedex post-game. I always catch a few pokemon aside from the ones in my team though

PhotoSYNTHESIS

Jumpleet

Rise Above The Rest

Male
Cleveland, OH
Seen June 16th, 2014
Posted February 22nd, 2014
40 posts
9.8 Years
I always only use 6 with the occasional slave until I beat the game, then I continuously train more and more Pokemon. Although maybe I'm not one to talk about bonding with Pokemon considering I unapologetically use a Pokemon just to get rid of obstacles.