The PokéCommunity Forums Off-Topic Discussions Off-Topic
"Chess 2" and Asymmetric Game Balance

Off-Topic Hang out with people and talk about whatever. Feel free to suggest a better description for this forum as everyone seems to have an opinion. :D

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old November 4th, 2013 (3:18 PM). Edited November 4th, 2013 by EB.
EB's Avatar
EB EB is offline
Re: World
  • Crystal Tier
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Florida
Age: 23
Nature: Calm
Posts: 93
This might belong moreso in Game Development, but as a current event, I find this section more promising. Feel free to move if applicable.



Chess 2: The Sequel - How a street fightin' man fixed the world's most famous game



Others and I came across this bit of news in a competitive SSBM Facebook group and our chatter has since developed into an interesting discussion about game theory, innovation, and balance. So, what are all your guys' thoughts? Does this game look promising? Does Sirlin accurately define the elements of top-level chess? How do you feel about the Asymmetric approach to game development? Is this really the future of chess, and most of all, would you play it?

Discuss.


=


As I feel obligated to share my opinion as well, I've quoted some of my Facebook comments below.

Spoiler:
"Chess isn't bad, and Chess 2 isn't a declaration of inferiority. The man simply loves what he loves and made a version of chess that complimented that. If memorization and book-to-play is a person's style (which is something that dominates at the grandmaster level, at least from what I've seen), all the power to them for loving chess."

"... I do not agree with how Chess 2 theoretically fixes chess -- at all. Either used as a dynamic banner for the article, or the creator's unfortunate misunderstanding of the scope of his idea, Sirlin is merely appealing to his personal view of what makes a game satisfying. Tbh, I share his interest in regards to Chess 2's game elements, without any need to compare the game to Chess 1, as I find no discernible reason to degrade or eliminate something that isn't a direct threat to humanity."

"From a semantic viewpoint, outside of abiding by a game's rules, the player is free to choose how to express themselves in any way they so desire."
Reply With Quote

Relevant Advertising!

  #2    
Old November 4th, 2013 (3:41 PM).
Shizzable's Avatar
Shizzable Shizzable is offline
The Derpiest One Of All
     
    Join Date: Aug 2013
    Location: In your closet.
    Gender: Male
    Nature: Jolly
    Posts: 217
    I'm just gonna leave this video here. It explains this whole "asymmetric gameplay thing" perfectly.

    __________________
    Ermahgerd! I evolved!
    My Friend Code: 4742-6506-2434
    Reply With Quote
      #3    
    Old November 5th, 2013 (9:40 AM).
    Esper's Avatar
    Esper Esper is offline
    • Silver Tier
     
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Location: California
    Posts: 10,350
    This topic will probably get better responses in the Video Games forum which seems like a better home for it. So... moved.
    __________________
    Reply With Quote
    Reply
    Quick Reply

    Sponsored Links
    Thread Tools

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off

    Forum Jump


    All times are GMT -8. The time now is 8:20 PM.