Can't shoot a pokémon

Started by moon November 10th, 2013 4:14 AM
  • 1387 views
  • 13 replies

moon

they/them
Seen 11 Hours Ago
Posted 22 Hours Ago
37,443 posts
15.5 Years
Based this thread on an argument brought up in the Roleplay Corner Discussion thread.

Do man made weapons like guns have a place in the pokémon world or not? Could they even harm a pokémon and if so, are some pokémon less or more vulnerable?

In the anime, they don't show guns from what I remember. It's a very children-friendly show though, but the games never mention them either unless I've missed something. Pokémon are used for battling, warring, threatening etc. If guns were effective, wouldn't the evil teams use some form of them?
paired with Ivysaur

Flushed

never eat raspberries

Seen November 4th, 2017
Posted May 18th, 2017
2,301 posts
9.7 Years
Maybe not guns, but the only weapons I remember are like those shocking cages they used in Pokemon 2000 to restrain the legendary birds. And if I remember correctly, Team Rocket also uses a bunch of weird contraptions to capture Pikachu. Point is, Pokemon are vulnerable to outside weaponry. Besides, what is a gun shot besides a fire, or a steel type move? Because it is a kid-friendly show is pretty good reason to not include guns specifically though.

Esper

California
Seen June 30th, 2018
Posted June 30th, 2018
I know there was a banned episode that had a gun in it. http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/EP035 Banned in the US at least.



It seems like that kind of stuff, guns and so on, isn't common in the Pokemon world. Pokemon seem to be able to be burned, electrocuted, smashed by boulders, and all sorts of things that you would expect would permanently injure or kill an animal, but Pokemon just have to get healed up at the Pokemon Center and they're fine. So either 1) Pokemon are especially tough, or 2) the Pokemon world is made of foam and rubber and nothing there is especially harmful since even people can be burned, electrocuted, etc.

Hiatus

Seen 1 Day Ago
Posted July 24th, 2021
12,283 posts
10.8 Years
Guns are rarely mentioned in Pokémon, because, well, the franchise is aimed mostly towards children. If they made too many references to these kind of things, lots of parents would be upset; they might even have a lawsuit heading their way. If teens and adults were their main audience, though, then that probably wouldn't have been an issue. d:

I've never seen any type of weapons in the game. In the anime, however, I've seen it only once. In season one, we had an episode called Tentacool & Tentacruel. There was a lady known as Nastina, who, with the help of her army, tried to get rid of the Tentacool that was bothering them. To scare it away, they've all used assault rifles.

Brendino

The Ruins of Alph
Seen 3 Days Ago
Posted April 6th, 2023
8,567 posts
13.4 Years
Weapons of some sort must exist, not only because of the past anime references as seen above, but then there are other things like Team Rocket killing a mother Marowak back in the original games. And since Pokemon can't die in battle, it must've been some outside force that caused her to die- likely a weapon of some sort.

Despite this, I don't think that weaponry is quite as prevalent in the Pokemon world as it is here. A majority of the time, Pokemon can defend themselves using their attacks, and have even been known to fight in wars throughout the Pokemon world's history. And probably the biggest reason we never here about it is because the franchise is marketed towards a younger audience, despite the fact the main premise of the series is pitting Pokemon against each other in battles.
Age 48
Female
Seattle
Seen January 31st, 2014
Posted December 28th, 2013
311 posts
9.6 Years
For a moment let's pretend, since that's what this is all about anyway, that the Pokemon world is reality. Could a human made weapon harm a pokemon? Logic states that yes, they battle until the knock each other out, but human made weapons aim to kill, and we know pokemon can die.

XY Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Then there's the XY story which actually has a weapon that does kill pokemon. I hope I did the spoiler tags correctly for those not wanting to see this.


This means that pokemon can be killed as well. So if one such weapon exists that can kill them, and it's made by humans, then other human made weapons probably hurt them just as much. When they are battling, they do not intend to kill each other, a strange ecosystem where life does not need to feed on sentient life at all.

But .... that's all up for grabs, because it is all just pretend.
If you add me, please message me so I can reciprocate. No, garbage does not make a cute Pokemon, and it smells funny.

Join me on IRC, synirc.net #PokemonTactics, for friendly discussions on tactics and strategies.
Seen September 18th, 2020
Posted February 18th, 2018
7,741 posts
16.6 Years
I suppose that, even while guns may be as effective as in the real world, Pokemon themselves are far more useful as tools of violence, so there is basically little reason to use other weapons. It is a spin-off game, but I do wish to point out that even in Pokemon Conquest nobody carries a weapon, while they do all partner with monsters and do all wear armour, which given the lack of weapons one can only presume protects them from the attacks of monsters (or is entirely for show and worn as a badge of warrior status). Note also that in XY when AZ recounts the war, the scene shown depicts monsters and not human soldiers.

Atomic Pirate

I always win.

Male
Somewhere.
Seen September 22nd, 2014
Posted July 10th, 2014
930 posts
12 Years
I doubt guns would be necessary if Pokemon were real. Ghost-type Pokemon kill people by absorbing their souls, Fire-type Pokemon can burn people to death, Fighting-types can bludgeon them, Ice-types can freeze them to death, Poison-types can do just what their type suggests, many Pokemon have sharp claws and teeth, Aggron is covered in pointy bits of metal and is pretty much literally a tank, Electrode can explode like a bomb, Houndoom's flame causes a burn that won't stop burning, Sharpedo can tear through steel ship hulls with just its teeth, Aerodactyl goes right for peoples' throats, and the list goes on.

Though guns probably would exist, they wouldn't be that dangerous compared to the Pokemon.
FC: 2148-8142-2372

PM me if you add me.

My Friend Safari is Water-type, with Gyarados, Azumarill, and Octillery.

Juno

OK I PULL UP

Age 28
Female
Seen 4 Hours Ago
Posted 4 Days Ago
4,561 posts
9.5 Years
They do exist, and it makes no sense to me. Pokemon suffer from (seemingly) lethal elemental attacks every day and only "faint" from them, so how can a hunk of metal cause permanent damage? The only way it would make sense is if Pokemon attacks are really not as strong as they look or something like that, even though several Pokedex entries insist they do kill. Even Ash has suffered more burns and electrocutions from Pokemon than humanly possible, but he's still alive and well. Even the Kanto legendaries couldn't kill him, and he got a full blast of their attacks.

But I digress. I know of at least one instance where a Pokemon was killed by a man-made weapon, in addition to the one in X/Y mentioned in a previous post.
Spoiler:
This was also mentioned in the thread, the reference to the mother Marowak in R/B, but I'm spoiler tagging because this is a Pokemon Origins scene.

The Marowak wasn't killed on-screen, but it's heavily implied she was killed by the Team Rocket grunt using the baton he was holding.


Which, to me at least, doesn't look so lethal if you consider all the burning and earth shattering moves Pokemon regularly use to attack one another.

isthatyoudan

doesn't work well with others...

Female
At my desk on the computer
Seen October 4th, 2014
Posted September 1st, 2014
395 posts
9.5 Years
This is a really deep subject... All I can picture now is a bunch of people going out on the weekend to hunt Sawsbuck or Stantler. That's just not right! :'(
Hmmm... another subject... there are no regular animals in the pokemon world. Does that mean that people eat... POKEMON MEATS? The entire world can't be vegetarians! This is too disturbing! I don't want Miltank steak!
All About Dan! (at the moment, at least)
Deep Thoughts...
The people of the Pokémon world aren't too creative. They named Pokémon after what sound they make. If we were like them, a cow would be called a "moo".

I'm Reading...
Just finished a volume of Soul Eater, volume 14. At this point, it has become very different compared to the anime, and I kind of like it. Some of the characters have gotten a lot more fleshed out (specifically the meister team of Ox, Kilik, and Kim), and things are happening quite differently. An exciting read.

I'm Playing...
The iPod music game, Cytus. While I may not know very many of the songs, I really like its music, and the gameplay is easy to pick up yet takes quite a while to master. A friend has seen me play it and he says I make it look easy, but I am still having a fun and challenging time. Definitely worth the price.

Juno

OK I PULL UP

Age 28
Female
Seen 4 Hours Ago
Posted 4 Days Ago
4,561 posts
9.5 Years
This is a really deep subject... All I can picture now is a bunch of people going out on the weekend to hunt Sawsbuck or Stantler. That's just not right! :'(
Hmmm... another subject... there are no regular animals in the pokemon world. Does that mean that people eat... POKEMON MEATS? The entire world can't be vegetarians! This is too disturbing! I don't want Miltank steak!
There's a lot of evidence for that people eat Pokemon - in the games, Slowpoke Tail is considered a delicacy, and the Pokedex in the anime says that Farfetch'd are "delicious". That's just two off the top of my head, but I know there's more instances where it's explicitly stated that Pokemon are food.

...but we're getting off topic, sorry OP! :3c
Seen February 26th, 2015
Posted February 8th, 2015
1,908 posts
10.3 Years
This is very possible, projectiles and shorthand alike. As many before mentioned, there are a lot of references for this and a Episode was even banned for this (it aired two years later though if I remember). Team Rocket did cut SlowpokeTail too, right? So it's not a far-off theory. It's a type of violence that I wouldn't dwell into, but I think that they wouldn't dare sell weapons like this in public.
~