The Massacre Challenge

Started by Talon November 10th, 2013 12:25 PM
  • 966 views
  • 3 replies

Talon

Hidden From Mind

Age 24
Male
Somewhere that is nowhere
Seen May 25th, 2017
Posted May 7th, 2017
1,080 posts
9.5 Years
The Massacre Challenge

Welcome.
Welcome to The Massacre Challenge. I know, the name of this challenge seems needlessly graphic, however, it fits the challenge (Don't worry, it's not that bad.). The basic premise of this challenge is to defeat everything. Nothing will survive. You must fight ever wild pokemon you find, and every trainer in the game.

Rules
  • You may NOT hack in any way, or for any reason. You don't have a reason to, anyways.
  • Emulators are allowed
  • If you're able, please use pictures to show your progress.
  • You can not run from a wild battle. You must defeat it (Or lose, but not on purpose).
  • Your challenge is complete when you: Defeat every possible Legendary, The E4 at least twice, and all Post-Game bosses (If any)

Single, Full, Augmented
Single Challenge - Complete a Massacre on 1 game.
Augmented Challenge - Complete a Massacre 2 or more games of your choice.
Full Challenge - Complete a Massacre on all games. (X/Y are optional, because I never bought them.)

Sign up for the Massacre.
Use this form to sign up.

Name -
Challenge -
Game(s) -
My Sign Up
Spoiler:

Name - Lowvyr
Challenge - Augmented
Game(s) - LG --> G --> Sa --> FR --> Si --> R --> C --> E


Massacres
Earning Them:
Each time you complete a region, (Defeating all legendaries possible, the E4 twice, and all Post-Game bosses.) you are awarded a "Massacre", denoted by a "Ж"

Massacres:
Lowvyr 0Ж

Challengers
Spoiler:

Lowvyr - LG (0/5 Legendaries, 0/8 Gyms, 0/2 E4 Victories, 0/0 Post-Game Bosses)

Sydian

fake your death.

Age 30
they/them
Georgia
Seen May 22nd, 2022
Posted November 29th, 2021
33,354 posts
15.2 Years
Lv. 100 Houndoom on team - 15 pts
Lv. 100 Skarmory on team - 15 pts
Lv. 100 Dragonite on team - 15 pts
Lv. 100 Tyranitar on team - 15 pts
Lv. 100 Aggron on team - 15 pts
Why these Pokemon specifically? Are these your favorites or something? Cause not everyone may want to raise these, or have them available, which would ruin the chance to get as many points as possible. Thought I'd ask.
BURY ME SIX FEET DEEP COVER ME IN CONCRETE
twitter | twitch | youtube

Talon

Hidden From Mind

Age 24
Male
Somewhere that is nowhere
Seen May 25th, 2017
Posted May 7th, 2017
1,080 posts
9.5 Years
Why these Pokemon specifically? Are these your favorites or something? Cause not everyone may want to raise these, or have them available, which would ruin the chance to get as many points as possible. Thought I'd ask.
Yes, they are my favorites, but I'll probably just make them 1 point instead, so that they don't ruin the points, like you said. Or just make it say "Any Lv100 pokemon", to make it better. Thanks for the advice!
"Life is so wonderful, Life is so beautiful, just smile, no one gets out alive."
"To the world you may be one person, but to one person you may be the world."
"Everybody wants to go to Heaven, but nobody wants to die."

"A man said to the universe,
'Sir! I exist!'
'However,' replied the universe,
'the fact has not created in me a sense of obligation.'
~ Stephen Crane
how many trainers are there in total for each game? i mean, if no one knows, then we will have situations where, for example, one would claim a massacre only after 120 trainers defeated, where the total is actually 230 (note that i'm just using these numbers as an example, i myself do not know).. It may or may not even include "battle facility" trainers *and* event-based/special ones (such as the extra trainers you get to fight with an e-reader on gen 3)

in such cases, you cannot call it dishonesty for the person could not have known... and you can't blame them for not knowing either, since I myself can't find a trainer list in the internet. I just find it unfair, inconvenient and inconsistent at the same time, over the long run. If such list does not exist, then perhaps -if i may suggest- place a specific number of defeated trainers instead on both the "clear a route" and 200pt rule