Pokémon General The home for theories, clubs, polls, and other discussions involving the Pokémon franchise that aren't covered in any of the other boards.

TrollandToad.com
Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old January 2nd, 2014 (9:19 PM). Edited January 3rd, 2014 by Mirror B.
Mirror B's Avatar
Mirror B Mirror B is offline
     
    Join Date: Dec 2013
    Gender: Male
    Nature: Lonely
    Posts: 9
    Since I heard about the Fairy type and its relations to other types it didn't make sense. I know it's simply for balance purposes but a fairy being immune to dragon?

    So I thought about this for a little while and conjured up something that makes more sense. How about Hero type? In literature heroes commonly slay dragons, making the great advantage to dragon make sense. Heroes also face the darkness(being evil), to justify the effectiveness and resistance. Petty bugs won't do much to a hero. Some protagonists are against fighting, I guess that kinda justifies it.

    The poison weakness can be related to many "poisons" that post a danger to many protagonists(think Snow White and the poison apple, a hero doesn't have to be manly and tough).

    I could pick some other reasons to justify the other type matchups but you get the idea. They will just stay for balance. I don't know what would change to Hero except maybe Aegislash and his family.

    I'm not suggesting a change, I know it won't happen, just had an idea and thought I'd share it. How does it sound?
    __________________
    Yes, I know it's "Miror B" and not "Mirror B".
    Reply With Quote

    Relevant Advertising!

      #2    
    Old January 2nd, 2014 (9:33 PM).
    Kanzler's Avatar
    Kanzler Kanzler is offline
    naughty biscotti
    • Crystal Tier
     
    Join Date: Jul 2008
    Location: Toronto
    Gender: Male
    Nature: Relaxed
    Posts: 5,916
    I have a feeling that a Hero type might be too OP, just as dragons are. It'd be pretty hard to have a "weak" Hero pokemon imo, it just seems contradictory and would be gimmicky meaning they couldn't do it more than a few times. I have a feeling they had the same trouble with the dragon type as well, they watered it down to Flygon and Altaria in 3rd gen, also in 6th gen with Noivern, Tyrantrum, and Dragalge, but they're still powerful pokemon to anyways and they're few additions to what's a very large group of otherwise extremely powerful pokemon. Hero might be even more selectively powerful than dragon, it sounds like a type made for legendaries. It's also anthropomorphic and I'm not really a fan of human-shape pokemon (even inanimate object pokemon feels too much at times).
    Reply With Quote
      #3    
    Old January 3rd, 2014 (2:20 AM).
    GhastlyGastly's Avatar
    GhastlyGastly GhastlyGastly is offline
    Crazy Pokémon Lady
       
      Join Date: Jan 2013
      Location: Lumiose City
      Gender: Female
      Nature: Sassy
      Posts: 128
      Quote:
      Originally Posted by Mirror B View Post
      Since I heard about the Fairy type and its relations to other types it didn't make sense. I know it's simply for balance purposes but a fairy being immune to dragon?

      So I thought about this for a little while and conjured up something that makes more sense. How about Hero type? In literature heroes commonly slay dragons, making the great advantage to dragon make sense. Heroes also face the darkness(being evil), to justify the effectiveness and resistance. Petty bugs won't do much to a hero. Some protagonists are against fighting, I guess that kinda justifies it.

      The poison weakness can be related to many "poisons" that post a danger to many protagonists(think Snow White and the poison apple, a hero doesn't have to be manly and tough).

      I could pick some other reasons to justify the other type matchups but you get the idea. They will just stay for balance. I don't know what would change to Hero except maybe Aegislash and his family.

      I'm not suggesting a change, I know it won't happen, just had an idea and thought I'd share it. How does it sound?

      There already is a "Hero" type.

      And the Fairy type is justified, in my opinion. In Japanese culture, the concept of yōsei is essentially interchangeable with the Western idea of fairies, sprites, and elves. In ancient European culture (notably Norse and Slavic), fairies and elves were effectively a race of magical beings of neutral ethical alignment (neither good nor evil), but that often delighted in using their magic to create mischief and disarray for humans.

      Another notable trait is that fairies/elves, in Norse mythology, were essentially demigods: superior to humans, and closer to the gods in power (in Slavic and some Norse tales, elves/fairies might even be proper gods and goddesses in their own right). Well, with few exceptions, Norse elves/fairies held dragons on a metaphorical leash: their magical, almost divine powers made them masters of dragons, and impervious to harm from them (while, at the same time, they could be harmed by poisoned water, and iron; hence the Fairy type's weakness to Steel and Poison types).

      Given that many Pokémon of Generation VI are taken from Norse and Slavic mythology (Xerneas, Yveltal, and Zygarde are the three most obvious examples), it's quite reasonable to assume that a Norse/Slavic view of fairies/elves is what was intended for the Fairy type. So the Fairy type, to me, is perfectly justified.

      I hope that clears up a few things
      __________________
      Remember to rate and reply, please!
      Reply With Quote
        #4    
      Old January 3rd, 2014 (4:47 AM).
      bobandbill's Avatar
      bobandbill bobandbill is online now
      shake that booty
      • Administrator
      • PokéCommunity Daily
      • Discord Moderoid
       
      Join Date: Mar 2008
      Location: Central Coast - Australia
      Gender: Male
      Nature: Jolly
      Posts: 13,403
      GhastlyGastly has a fair few good points there explaining it. There's a few other things too from that which can explain at least most of its other weaknesses/strengths (e.g. as also mentioned fairies are linked to nature/the natural world, weak to poison which destroys it, and steel, the typing with links to manmade objects). So IMO Fairy is just fine, and there's no real need to add more least the type system is thrown out of whack again.

      (By the by, Miror B has only two r's, not three.) =(
      __________________
      Reply With Quote
        #5    
      Old January 3rd, 2014 (4:54 AM).
      Nah's Avatar
      Nah Nah is offline
      • Moderator
       
      Join Date: Nov 2013
      Location: over there
      Age: 25
      Gender: Female
      Posts: 11,696
      Fairy might not've been the best name for the type from a Western point of view, since it often conjures up the image a of a derpy little pixie thing one-shotting a dragon. But "Mythical Creatures type" or "Magical Beings type" is a tad bit too long for a type name.

      And some aspects of the type chart don't make sense. Rock should resist Electric, Ice should be super effective against Bug and Rock, and Flying types should be immune to Sky Drop. But it isn't actually that way in the games.

      But GhastlyGastly said it best: Fairy types are supposed to represent powerful magical beings, not derpy pixie things. Makes more sense that way.
      __________________
      NAH

      "Heh, I'm not scared of you!"

      D&D6th Gen
      Reply With Quote
        #6    
      Old January 3rd, 2014 (5:13 PM).
      bobandbill's Avatar
      bobandbill bobandbill is online now
      shake that booty
      • Administrator
      • PokéCommunity Daily
      • Discord Moderoid
       
      Join Date: Mar 2008
      Location: Central Coast - Australia
      Gender: Male
      Nature: Jolly
      Posts: 13,403
      Quote:
      Fairy might not've been the best name for the type from a Western point of view, since it often conjures up the image a of a derpy little pixie thing one-shotting a dragon. But "Mythical Creatures type" or "Magical Beings type" is a tad bit too long for a type name
      Mystic type, maybe? Not too bad a sound to it. But oh well, western ideas of fairies be hanged, it's what we have and they won't change the name of the type now.
      __________________
      Reply With Quote
        #7    
      Old January 3rd, 2014 (5:29 PM).
      BadPokemon's Avatar
      BadPokemon BadPokemon is offline
      Child of Christ
         
        Join Date: Nov 2013
        Location: Somewhere in the universe
        Gender: Male
        Nature: Calm
        Posts: 667
        Some of the fairy pokemon are derpy little pixie things... Cough Slurpuff cough. So, I guess they wanted to add a bit of irony. Fairy isn't a bad name, though. Light could have fit.
        __________________
        For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that who ever believe in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. - John 3:16

        I believe in Jesus Christ my Savior. If you do too, and aren't scared to admit it, then copy and paste this in your signature.

        Member of the Christian Community!
        Reply With Quote
          #8    
        Old January 3rd, 2014 (5:36 PM). Edited January 4th, 2014 by bobandbill.
        bobandbill's Avatar
        bobandbill bobandbill is online now
        shake that booty
        • Administrator
        • PokéCommunity Daily
        • Discord Moderoid
         
        Join Date: Mar 2008
        Location: Central Coast - Australia
        Gender: Male
        Nature: Jolly
        Posts: 13,403
        Quote:
        Light could have fit.
        Not really, imo, at least not for the Pokemon choices. Granbull, Mr Mime, etc fit fairies better than light type. (And if you look at GhastlyGastly's thread, there's a solid explanation as to why there shouldn't be a light type either, iirc).
        __________________
        Reply With Quote
          #9    
        Old January 3rd, 2014 (8:14 PM). Edited January 3rd, 2014 by Mirror B.
        Mirror B's Avatar
        Mirror B Mirror B is offline
           
          Join Date: Dec 2013
          Gender: Male
          Nature: Lonely
          Posts: 9
          (I edited the post since I can't put URLs ATM)
          Quote:
          Originally Posted by GhastlyGastly View Post


          ...

          And the Fairy type is justified, in my opinion. In Japanese culture, the concept of yōsei is essentially interchangeable with the Western idea of fairies, sprites, and elves. In ancient European culture (notably Norse and Slavic), fairies and elves were effectively a race of magical beings of neutral ethical alignment (neither good nor evil), but that often delighted in using their magic to create mischief and disarray for humans.

          Another notable trait is that fairies/elves, in Norse mythology, were essentially demigods: superior to humans, and closer to the gods in power (in Slavic and some Norse tales, elves/fairies might even be proper gods and goddesses in their own right). Well, with few exceptions, Norse elves/fairies held dragons on a metaphorical leash: their magical, almost divine powers made them masters of dragons, and impervious to harm from them (while, at the same time, they could be harmed by poisoned water, and iron; hence the Fairy type's weakness to Steel and Poison types).

          Given that many Pokémon of Generation VI are taken from Norse and Slavic mythology (Xerneas, Yveltal, and Zygarde are the three most obvious examples), it's quite reasonable to assume that a Norse/Slavic view of fairies/elves is what was intended for the Fairy type. So the Fairy type, to me, is perfectly justified.

          I hope that clears up a few things
          OK, that makes sense. And I am from western culture as everyone now probably knows and my image of fairies are the frilly little butterfly-looking thing that throws dust around, so my image of it was swayed. Since all of that is true in a culture I was ignorant about I understand the reasoning behind fairy's relations to other types, and I learned a lot, thanks.

          Quote:
          Originally Posted by bobandbill View Post
          So IMO Fairy is just fine, and there's no real need to add more least the type system is thrown out of whack again.
          I wasn't implying a change, like I said in my original post, I was just throwing an idea out there to see if it made sense to others. I don't(or I guess I should say didn't) hate the fact that there were Fairy types, it just didn't makes sense to me based on what I knew about them, but it has been contested so whatever.

          Quote:
          (By the by, Miror B has only two r's, not three.) =(
          I changed my signature right after posting this so it didn't show for that post. I am aware, thanks anyway.
          __________________
          Yes, I know it's "Miror B" and not "Mirror B".
          Reply With Quote
            #10    
          Old January 4th, 2014 (12:19 AM).
          Elaitenstile's Avatar
          Elaitenstile Elaitenstile is offline
          I am legend
             
            Join Date: Feb 2013
            Posts: 1,909
            In my honest opinion, there's not a need for a name change in general. You'll all think how a puny Fairy beats a mighty dragon, but you're thinking big. Let's think small. Fairy type, as far as I know, is based on powerful magical creatures, or magic to be exact. Kids won't be impressed if they went around naming Xerneas a 'Magic' type, as there is enough magic in Pokémon already, so they went with Fairy I guess.
            __________________
            ~
            Reply With Quote
              #11    
            Old January 4th, 2014 (1:59 PM).
            Chr. Draco's Avatar
            Chr. Draco Chr. Draco is offline
            Doctrina's Shiny Hunter
               
              Join Date: Nov 2008
              Gender: Male
              Nature: Quiet
              Posts: 803
              Maybe fairy type was the fittest name at that moment considering all the explanation that have been stated above.
              __________________
              Shiny Hunter
              Reply With Quote
                #12    
              Old January 6th, 2014 (2:20 PM).
              Fitzsy's Avatar
              Fitzsy Fitzsy is offline
              authentic cool guy
                 
                Join Date: Apr 2013
                Location: Drury Lane
                Gender: Male
                Nature: Impish
                Posts: 70
                Besides, why does frilly and cute have to be a bad thing? I love having an entire Type full of Pokémon like Cleffa and Flabébé, especially one so viable! It adds variety to things in my opinion. The "strongest Pokémon" (in general, not necessarily in the metagame) category it seems has traditionally been dominated by the likes of Garchomp and Scizor, the cool and badass Pokémon, but now we're seeing Azumarill and Sylveon in those ranks and it's pretty killer to me!
                __________________
                Man by day, Robocop by night
                Reply With Quote
                  #13    
                Old January 7th, 2014 (1:40 AM).
                Bestintheworld's Avatar
                Bestintheworld Bestintheworld is offline
                Capo de tutti capo
                   
                  Join Date: Oct 2013
                  Location: New York
                  Gender: Male
                  Nature: Naughty
                  Posts: 207
                  What kind of pokemon would be hero types and what would the weakness, etc. be? Doesn't really fit in with the monsters and other types are natural forces(grass, fire, water, electricity, poison,),elements(rock, steel, ice,ground,) ability force(physic, dark, fighting,normal, fairy) than dragon is like a beast or animal type sorta like bug. To me hero doesn't fit the typing mold.
                  __________________
                  3ds FC: 4742-6969-1716
                  White 2 FC: 0133-4568-1465
                  BEST IN THE WORLD!!!
                  Reply With Quote
                    #14    
                  Old February 3rd, 2014 (2:16 PM).
                  jigglypuffisaduck's Avatar
                  jigglypuffisaduck jigglypuffisaduck is offline
                  [
                  • Crystal Tier
                   
                  Join Date: Oct 2013
                  Nature: Rash
                  Posts: 3,807
                  Nah, I'd rather have a fairy type. Imo I think that fairy type is a bit too op in Gen 6 battling. I don't think that GameFreak should have made the fairy type immune to dragon, instead they should've made is 0.5 effective. I think that would've balanced it out, making Fairy type completely immune to thedragon was too far imo. Dragons did dominate in Gen 5 but it's not like they were the gods of pokemon or anything.
                  __________________
                  ]
                  Reply With Quote
                  Reply

                  Quick Reply

                  Join the conversation!

                  Create an account to post a reply in this thread, participate in other discussions, and more!

                  Create a PokéCommunity Account

                  Sponsored Links
                  Thread Tools

                  Posting Rules
                  You may not post new threads
                  You may not post replies
                  You may not post attachments
                  You may not edit your posts

                  BB code is On
                  Smilies are On
                  [IMG] code is On
                  HTML code is Off

                  Forum Jump


                  All times are GMT -8. The time now is 5:48 PM.