3rd Gen Is there any reason to play FRLG anymore?

Started by BettyNewbie February 26th, 2016 6:00 PM
  • 5070 views
  • 30 replies
Female
Seen April 22nd, 2018
Posted March 2nd, 2018
895 posts
8.4 Years
Now, knowing that RBY will not only be playable on the 3DS, but also compatible with Pokémon Bank and the upcoming Sun/Moon versions, it seems like the originals have ironically rendered their own remakes obsolete.

Sure, FRLG still have full color, the modern stat system, and Dark/Steel, but they also still lack 3D graphics, Day/Night, Fairies, and Megas just as much as RBY. And, they can't be played on current hardware, nor use Pokémon Bank and directly transfer to any games newer than Gen 4. They also aren't as easy to get a hold of as the RBY VC release. The presence of Gen 2 and 3 Pokémon in FRLG means little when they can't be obtained outside of the postgame.

Funny how this worked out, although GF is very obviously using the RBY re-release as a substitute for RBY or FRLG remakes. How do you feel about this?

mew_nani

Pokécommunity's Licensed Tree Exorcist

Female
Far Lands
Seen May 28th, 2019
Posted August 25th, 2018
1,839 posts
13.4 Years
In a sense a lot of the other games have been rendered obsolete, as you can no longer transfer your mons without paying for Pokemon Bank first. That coupled with the fact that the official servers that the older games used to use are gone, makes them obsolete unless you're playing them for fun or nostalgia.

As for FR/LG in particular, they're still fun to play even though they've been replaced by the originals in terms of transferability.

I support:

R.I.P Isaac J. Southerland Jr.
1946 - 2017

Flowerchild

> 404 usertitle not found

Age 24
She/Her
Hyperspace
Seen 1 Week Ago
Posted July 7th, 2022
8,699 posts
13 Years
I think that most of the Pokémon that I would care about transferring from FRLG are pretty easily obtainable in Gen VI anyways (Kanto starters, Mewtwo, etc.) so it won't really be a mark against the game in my books. I just play Gen III for nostalgia anyways, so no biggie.
(\__/)
(='.'=)
('')_('')
This Is Bunny. Copy And Paste Bunny Into
Your Signature To Help Him Gain World Domination!!!!
PairFamilyPalArt
Male
Seen 2 Weeks Ago
Posted December 22nd, 2022
498 posts
10.2 Years
Sure, FRLG still have full color, the modern stat system, and Dark/Steel, but they also still lack 3D graphics, Day/Night, Fairies, and Megas just as much as RBY.
Missing those isn't necessarily a bad thing at all. The improvements are still there, and they were always the major selling point of the remakes.

SaniOKh

Too old for this stuff

Age 35
Male
Ukraine
Seen 4 Weeks Ago
Posted October 22nd, 2021
591 posts
16.9 Years
I have the Gameboy Player on my Gamecube, so I can use the excuse of being able to play them on TV... this also applies to the original cartridges... shoot... never mind.

I don't have any particular feelings towards GF using VC releases as substitutes for remakes, I find it to be a good thing. Because, you know, time spent on remaking something is time spent not working on a new game, one remake per generation is enough.

I am a little upset they chose RBY though. FRLG would have been a better choice, IMHO: less archaic game mechanics, more content, better graphics... not sure whether the sounds were better, I was not a fan.

Friend codes:
Pokémon GO: 2092-0866-5439 | Electric-type Safari: 4468-2370-5617 (Electrode - Pikachu - Galvantula) | Dark-type Safari: 1134-8222-3179 (Nuzleaf - Cacturne - Liepard)
PM before adding. If you don't mention which code you added, I will NOT add you back.
Female
Seen April 22nd, 2018
Posted March 2nd, 2018
895 posts
8.4 Years
Missing those isn't necessarily a bad thing at all. The improvements are still there, and they were always the major selling point of the remakes.
But, that's my point, those things aren't there. No version of Gen 1/Kanto has Day/Night, a P/S Split, Fairies, or Megas.

I am a little upset they chose RBY though. FRLG would have been a better choice, IMHO: less archaic game mechanics, more content, better graphics... not sure whether the sounds were better, I was not a fan.
Because, then, they would've had to release the games on the Wii U and not the 3DS. Besides, more people have nostalgia for RBY than FRLG, and the 20th Anniversary celebration is mainly about the originals.

Elysieum

Requiescat en pace.

Non-binary
By the lake.
Seen September 8th, 2019
Posted May 1st, 2019
258 posts
9.6 Years
The release of RBY on 3DS undoubtedly reduces the number of reasons to play FRLG presently, but having said that, I don't think the appeal of FRLG has been anything other than nostalgia-based for some time now, so I don't think there is much of an impact.

Arylett Charnoa

No one in particular.

Age 31
Female
Seen January 5th, 2023
Posted October 18th, 2017
1,130 posts
9.3 Years
I don't really see much of a reason to play it myself, to be honest. Having no real love or caring of Generation III, plus the fact that transferring all the way from there is a pain in the ass, I'd rather just go with the old Gen I clunkers on virtual console. I find something strangely enjoyable about these broken systems and their simplicity when compared to the shinier but still not fully refined remakes. And I don't even have much nostalgia for Gen I games because my first ones were Gen II.

But they still exist as a nice option for Gen III enthusiasts or those who really cannot stand the primitive graphics of the originals. (Can't say I blame you: some of those sprites are atrocious lyrics ugly.) So I suppose those are reasons to play them.

Squirrel

Age 28
Male
Seen 1 Week Ago
Posted July 10th, 2021
9,551 posts
11.7 Years
The games have some cool quirks and interesting features so I don't really think the re-releases of RB will remove those aspects, but I guess there are only so many times you can play an old game before wanting to move on to something a bit more fresh. Personally I still play FRLG quite regularly, but that's mostly just because it's the easiest ROM to use on my phone and I'm not a big fan of lectures!
Female
Seen April 22nd, 2018
Posted March 2nd, 2018
895 posts
8.4 Years
I don't really see much of a reason to play it myself, to be honest. Having no real love or caring of Generation III, plus the fact that transferring all the way from there is a pain in the ass, I'd rather just go with the old Gen I clunkers on virtual console. I find something strangely enjoyable about these broken systems and their simplicity when compared to the shinier but still not fully refined remakes. And I don't even have much nostalgia for Gen I games because my first ones were Gen II.
This is mostly how I feel, too. The original RBY have an old school charm to them, and the ability to transfer to Sun/Moon is a huge bonus.

In fact, that latter part, I think, is one of the biggest issues with FRLG nowadays. Let's face it, the games were never really made with anything but National Dex completion in mind, so while FRLG served a very useful purpose in the Gen 3/early Gen 4 days, they instantly became obsolete as soon as HGSS came out (which had all the Gen 1-2 Pokémon that couldn't be obtained in DPP). The fact that the DSi and 3DS dropped GBA compatibility didn't help matters either.

I guess FRLG are still worth it if you're nostalgic for Gen 3 or really hate RBY's graphics, but otherwise, you're really better off just getting the originals on the VC.
Male
Seen 2 Weeks Ago
Posted December 22nd, 2022
498 posts
10.2 Years
But, that's my point, those things aren't there.
What things? And like I said, the improvements the remakes provided are still there.

No version of Gen 1/Kanto has Day/Night, a P/S Split, Fairies, or Megas.
So...? The games don't need those (specially Mega Evolutions), and nothing has changed in that regard. The situation is the same as last month/year/decade.

Al3x

Pokémon Fan

Male
Canada
Seen 2 Weeks Ago
Posted February 24th, 2018
279 posts
13.9 Years
Only reason to play FireRed imo is for trading really. I personally like Pokemon Colosseum and recently played through it again, I traded over some pokemon to my FireRed so I could use some of the move tutors and the TMs that aren't available in Colosseum.

Female
Seen April 22nd, 2018
Posted March 2nd, 2018
895 posts
8.4 Years
What things? And like I said, the improvements the remakes provided are still there.
I'd need more than just washed-out GBA graphics to want to go hunt down a 10 year old game (and handheld) on eBay. ;) RBY can be played on a 3DS and will be compatible with Pokémon Bank and Sun/Moon. Who cares if the sprites are ugly when it's actually compatible with the latest and greatest?
Age 28
Female
Melbourne, Australia
Seen January 19th, 2019
Posted October 6th, 2017
46 posts
7.3 Years
FireRed and LeafGreen are probably my second favourite games in the series (BW2 being the first) and I always enjoy them when I playthrough them. As much as I love the original games, I don't think I can go all the way back to Gen 1 because of how slow it is and the game mechanics. I'm still wondering if I should get them on the Virtual Console.

These games definitely still have relevance, especially if you're still playing Generation IV and V and own the older DS with the GBA slot. They're very fun to play.

Elysieum

Requiescat en pace.

Non-binary
By the lake.
Seen September 8th, 2019
Posted May 1st, 2019
258 posts
9.6 Years
I'd need more than just washed-out GBA graphics to want to go hunt down a 10 year old game (and handheld) on eBay. ;)
Well the nice thing about GBA games these days is that they can be played on your smart phone using an emulator app. No need to go find the hardware if you are a fan.
Male
Seen 2 Weeks Ago
Posted December 22nd, 2022
498 posts
10.2 Years
I'd need more than just washed-out GBA graphics to want to go hunt down a 10 year old game (and handheld) on eBay.
There would have to be washed-out GBA graphics to begin with, which is not the case.

RBY can be played on a 3DS and will be compatible with Pokémon Bank and Sun/Moon. Who cares if the sprites are ugly when it's actually compatible with the latest and greatest?
That's a flawed logic. Why not play what you call "latest and greatest" then? We are talking about the game itself, not what's compatible with. That's an extra.
Female
Seen April 22nd, 2018
Posted March 2nd, 2018
895 posts
8.4 Years
Well the nice thing about GBA games these days is that they can be played on your smart phone using an emulator app. No need to go find the hardware if you are a fan.
Yeah, but that's not entirely "legal," you know. ;)

There would have to be washed-out GBA graphics to begin with, which is not the case.
You're seriously going to argue that this looks as good as this or even this? I mean, yeah, FRLG have nicer graphics than RBY, but that's an extremely low bar. The Gen 3 games, in general, had mediocre graphics even for the time, and they look even worse nowadays.

That's a flawed logic. Why not play what you call "latest and greatest" then? We are talking about the game itself, not what's compatible with. That's an extra.
Because, *gasp* some of us actually like both RBY AND the latest and greatest! :rolleyes2:

And, I find it mightily ironic that you're using this argument to defend FRLG when FRLG were made for the sole reason of, wait for it, compatibility. RBY/GSC couldn't trade with RS, so there needed to be a way to get the older Pokémon into the newest games, hence FRLG. If compatibility really wasn't that big of an issue, then FRLG would've never been made in the first place (especially since RBY/GSC were, otherwise, far more playable in 2004 than FRLG is nowadays... the games were still less than a decade old--as old as HGSS and BW are nowadays--and they could still be played on the then current GBA).
Male
Obscure cities, that are dark.
Seen July 4th, 2016
Posted July 4th, 2016
611 posts
8.5 Years
And, I find it mightily ironic that you're using this argument to defend FRLG when FRLG were made for the sole reason of, wait for it, compatibility.
This is misleading. Compatibility, which could just as well be made up for by including Pokémon in a game, wouldn't necessarily lead to a whole sequence of two games, being by itself a fairly minor point, which were rather also there to bring attention to those games, possibly update them, etc. 'Sole' may overstate the case here. In any case, FR/LG is other than this just an 'updated' version of R/B, while the current version is not, so if people were so drawn to the newer games they might well think that FR/LG are better games, whether or not they also find R/B useful - and presumably that would depend on how much they care about completing their Pokédex in S&M. It's not reducible to compatibility, and may be more entertaining, just as S&M may not be reducible to its abbreviation, if less entertaining. They didn't just try to put in the R/B Pokémon, and then change the graphics, features, etc., by accident.

That's a flawed logic. Why not play what you call "latest and greatest" then? We are talking about the game itself, not what's compatible with. That's an extra.
To be fair, you suspect that's mostly just phrases, Sun and Moon aren't even released yet. If someone liked R/S/E, of course, then they needn't also like Sun and Moon, but may prefer FR/LG, in which case most of this does not apply. FR/LG is, of course, a more modern game than R/B, so if that's what you're looking for then it's hardly out-dated.

Touching on Elysieum's post, the 'latest and greatest' is what you'd be paying for, presumably, so like if you really want to encourage the team of Sun and Moon...

Some people who like R/B might be alright with them taking a break by this point.

It might be possible for people to consider R/B and FR/LG as games independently, without feeling a compulsive need to bypass these entirely to transfer to S&M. If people were just settling for a lesser game, but they could transfer things to use them elsewhere (and not receive more modern types, generally, so this is mostly one-way), then they are settling, and this doesn't worsen the other games. It just becomes a feeder game, which is surely a lesser role for a game to play. It seems a bit strange to think that new features and graphics that are likeable have only been added since D/P.

So...? The games don't need those (specially Mega Evolutions), and nothing has changed in that regard. The situation is the same as last month/year/decade.
By R/S/E, etc,. the games did have new features and graphics, so it seems a bit unnecessary to just point out that they didn't have the features that they don't have. If you were playing for features, then FR/LG have a few new ones. You wonder if pressing both R/S/E and R/B into just being suppliers of Pokémon for the modern versions isn't a bit degrading, though.
When it dawns that Keats' idea of 'negative capability' is basically reducible to the public perception of Lucario.


Male
Seen 2 Weeks Ago
Posted December 22nd, 2022
498 posts
10.2 Years
You're seriously going to argue that this looks as good as this or even this?
Yes, I do. Like I said, sprites do age better than low-res 3D graphics.

The Gen 3 games, in general, had mediocre graphics even for the time, and they look even worse nowadays.
No, they didn't.

Because, *gasp* some of us actually like both RBY AND the latest and greatest! :rolleyes2:
You just answered your own OP.

And, I find it mightily ironic that you're using this argument to defend FRLG when FRLG were made for the sole reason of, wait for it, compatibility.
I'm not defending anything. You're the one pretending the remakes are obsolete when they aren't. Just like the originals were not obsolete when the remakes were released. And no, the remakes weren't made for the sole reason of compatibility. You don't need to remake anything in order to make Kanto Pokémon available. They chose to remake it and in doing so, Kanto Pokémon were made available. That was a consequence, not the cause.

RBY/GSC couldn't trade with RS, so there needed to be a way to get the older Pokémon into the newest games, hence FRLG.
Again, flawed logic. Trading wasn't a reason to release any game ever. Not FR/LG, nor HG/SS, nor OR/AS.

If compatibility really wasn't that big of an issue, then FRLG would've never been made in the first place (especially since RBY/GSC were, otherwise, far more playable in 2004 than FRLG is nowadays... the games were still less than a decade old--as old as HGSS and BW are nowadays--and they could still be played on the then current GBA).
Opinion (not fact) noted. That doesn't make it true though.
Female
Seen April 22nd, 2018
Posted March 2nd, 2018
895 posts
8.4 Years
This seems to happen every time somebody says something "negative" about FRLG, doesn't it? LusoTrainer gets his feelings hurt and starts trying to pick a fight and waste peoples' time. :rolleyes2:

And no, the remakes weren't made for the sole reason of compatibility. You don't need to remake anything in order to make Kanto Pokémon available. They chose to remake it and in doing so, Kanto Pokémon were made available. That was a consequence, not the cause.
This is so hilariously wrong, it's not even funny. There was literally NO way to obtain over half of the Gen 1 and 2 Pokémon in Ruby and Sapphire before FRLG came out! The games couldn't trade or transfer anything from RBY/GSC, and none of those Pokémon could be caught in the games without Gameshark. GF couldn't just leave all of those older Pokémon out in the cold. They had to be made obtainable in the newest games, and remaking Gen 1 on RS' engine was a quick, easy solution to that.

Elysieum

Requiescat en pace.

Non-binary
By the lake.
Seen September 8th, 2019
Posted May 1st, 2019
258 posts
9.6 Years
Well the nice thing about GBA games these days is that they can be played on your smart phone using an emulator app. No need to go find the hardware if you are a fan.
Yeah, but that's not entirely "legal," you know. ;)
You are hardly in any danger to do so. GBA games have been discontinued for such a long time now - no one is going to be in trouble for enjoying these games in a modern way. Nintendo ought to wear it as a badge of pride that I choose to play Fire Red on my phone to this day. ;)
Female
Seen April 22nd, 2018
Posted March 2nd, 2018
895 posts
8.4 Years
You are hardly in any danger to do so. GBA games have been discontinued for such a long time now - no one is going to be in trouble for enjoying these games in a modern way. Nintendo ought to wear it as a badge of pride that I choose to play Fire Red on my phone to this day.
Oh, I know that Nintendo's unlikely to crack down, but still think about it from the perspective of a more casual player. More hardcore players know all about ROMs and emulators, but most casuals aren't going to touch anything they can't easily buy from the eShop or Wally World. They're going to just buy the VC RBY and play it on their 3DS, as well as transfer a few things to Sun/Moon later down the road.

There's a decent chance that the NX will be powerful enough to emulate GBA and DS games, so we might see all of Gens 3-5 (including FRLG) put on the VC come Gen 8, but that's still pretty far off into the future (no sooner than 2019, at least).

Raburesu

Technology is incredible!

Non-binary
Seen February 14th, 2023
Posted January 26th, 2018
73 posts
7.5 Years
I think FRLG are worth playing solely for the Leftovers Game Freak added under each Snorlax after you catch it. Just use your Itemfinder, and there ya go! ;)

I seem to hear nothing but negative things about these games, but I really enjoyed them. I thought the change in graphical style and different colours gave them a distinct atmosphere when compared to their source material, and I actually appreciated the Sevii Islands post game a lot!
This signature has been disabled.
signature exceeds height limits
Please review and fix the issues by reading the signature rules.

You must edit it to meet the limits set by the rules before you may remove the [sig-reason] code from your signature. Removing this tag will re-enable it.

Do not remove the tag until you fix the issues in your signature. You may be infracted for removing this tag if you do not fix the specified issues. Do not use this tag for decoration purposes.