Sheep

She/Her
Australia
Seen 2 Hours Ago
Posted 21 Hours Ago
39,243 posts
16.6 Years
Final starter evolutions have become a bit more humanoid lately. Inteleon, Sobble's final evolution from gen VIII, was especially criticized for looking way too human. Cinderace is in a similar boat and, as someone in video content I've watched pointed out before, looks more like a 'shonen anime protagonist' than a Pokémon.

What do you guys think of humanoid starter evolutions? Yay or nay? Do you prefer when they were more animal/monster-like?
I used to dislike them back when I had a more narrow view of what Pokemon should be and look like but I've grown out of that. I consider Braixen and Delphox to be two of the better designed mons period, which isn't an opinion I would've had as a kid. It was silly for me to dislike humanoid Pokemon in the first place since Mewtwo was always one of my favorites.

FeraligatrMaster

Male
Seen 7 Hours Ago
Posted 7 Hours Ago
30,933 posts
6.3 Years
I don't have problems with humanoid Pokemon, including humanoid starter evolutions. I don't get the hate that Pokemon like Incineroar and Inteleon get. Maybe it's partially because they're favourites of mine, but still.
Do you like Pokemon battles? If yes, then come play The Great Pokemon Battle 13!

Fairy

she / they
in the flowers
Seen January 27th, 2023
Posted January 6th, 2023
Wait, humanlike as in monkeys or just bipedal? Cause I think my least favorite starters have always been the monkey-inspired ones. :(

But Totodile is still cute af.
admin
daily artist
m&g
vpp
tcg
art studio

gpxplus
skymin - ivysaur - gardevoir
SW:7755-1826-2784
alt: dreadqueen
devantart: douxette
monster hunter discord

on leave of absence
Age 33
Male
KY (USA)
Seen 1 Hour Ago
Posted 17 Hours Ago
3,377 posts
18.2 Years
I'm not against humanoid designs (I actually adore Zeraora's design; Gallade is also cool), but I don't think most of the humanoid Starter evos are executed that well. Blaziken (my favorite humanoid Starter evo) and Greninja are alright, but that's it for me.

I really wish that Delphox had been quadrupedal. I'm sure they could've expressed the mage theme without making it bipedal...


Avatar by cheerymori

faf

Queen of Dragons

Female
In the treasure trove
Seen 3 Weeks Ago
Posted January 29th, 2023
1,917 posts
8.8 Years
I think it depends on the execution. I remember watching a video on how Gen 1 starters were great because you can imagine them as a group in the wild and give them a personality yourself whereas the humanoid ones it's harder because their characteristics are present. I'm not entirely disagreeing with that but I do think starters who are more humanoid can still be imagined in a herd and have different personalities, even something like Incineroar can be shy despite being based on a wrestler. However, it does get to the point where Pokemon feel less like creatures and more like humans in fursuits, especially with something like Cinderace who feels that way too much. But I second the notion about adding more starters who feels more animal, especially would love to finally see a final stage quadped Fire starter.
|
Pal: Dakota

Roaming Emboar

Unovian Enhtusiast

Age 18
He/him
Aspertia City
Seen March 6th, 2023
Posted February 13th, 2021
104 posts
2.9 Years
Same. I usually go for the starter that looks more animal like in Gen 6 and 7 (Haven't played Gen 8).

TepigLover101

I am a tepig who has hair

he him
WHY U WANNA KNOW?
Seen March 8th, 2023
Posted November 28th, 2022
164 posts
3.3 Years
nay I rather they stay original and not look like wierd humanoide things

VisionofMilotic

Female
Sootopolis City
Seen 11 Hours Ago
Posted 2 Days Ago
Sobble is the pokemon I plan on choosing when I finally get around to playing Sword and Shield, and it's because of the intelleon design actually. I think it's really cool. I also love the design of Braxien/Delphox. Blaziken is a starter I like too. I'd say I'm okay with anthropomorphism in my starter Pokemon or any pokemon. They can be bipedal and/ or have a bearing or facial expression that feels human. Some other Pokemon that I think fit the bill are Lucario, Vespiqueen, Tsareena and Hattarene. All of those I am fond of. As long as pokemon have some features that seem otherworldly or animal-like and truly are a blend like the word humanoid suggests then I don't mind.

The pokemon that are more difficult for me to bond with are the ones that look almost exactly human and nothing about them has changed like Mr. Mime. Blaziken has a red body like a rooster and claws, or greninja still has amphibian attributes, but Mimey is just a man dressed as a mime. When pokemon just look straight up like people it's a little more unsettling because it makes me feels like I have enslaved another human being. I think it's also just a more imaginative use of design than to have a regular fighter or a clown or a woman with a wig as a pokemon without anything else to distinguish them.

I don't think any of the starters fall into that category though of being quite that literal, all of them have something that makes them distinct.

Name: Narcissus
Adopt one yourself! @Pokémon Orphanage



I got Haxorus on "What Dragon-Type Pokemon are you?" https://quotev.com/quiz/5077163

colours

she/her
gracidea fields
Seen December 30th, 2022
Posted December 29th, 2022
8,974 posts
18.1 Years
i feel like i... don't feel strongly about them? i certainly don't hate them like some people do, but i don't care much for them, either. i do feel bad for fire starter fans who haven't gotten a quadruped since forever, though. :x

PageEmp

I can’t do money puns. It just doesn’t make any cents.

Male
with an axe
Seen 15 Hours Ago
Posted 4 Weeks Ago
12,445 posts
7.8 Years
Really don’t care about it.
I… might put something interesting here eventually.
Seen 1 Day Ago
Posted 1 Day Ago
990 posts
2.6 Years
I don't like the current trend of starters trying to be more like "characters" than animal or monster species.

Infernape is human-like, but it makes sense for being an ape, and it still looks like an animal species so it's fine. Feraligatr is a bipedal alligator, but does look and behave like a monster.

However, from Gen 6 onwards (well, add Blaziken I guess), there's Greninja: a literal ninja in the body of a frog, Incineroar: a tiger-skinned wrestler, Cinderace: a soccer player with a bunny cosplay, and... the "Secret Agent" Pokémon, seriously come on.

I mean, look at these:

https://pokemon-project.com/espadaescudo/img/pokemon/815.png
https://assets.pokemon.com/assets/cms2/img/pokedex/full/818.png

These don't look like monster/animal stances. I don't think the designs are the issue, but the too humanized poses, traits and movements. They try so hard to give new starters a strong personality to stand out that they end up making them look more like (human) characters than actual Pokémon.
Seen March 7th, 2022
Posted February 13th, 2022
15 posts
1.4 Years
Since this recently got resurrected anyway, may as well respond!

I very much love every single other starter besides the six I consider my least favorites, (strikethrough -four-) three of which are Fire-Fighting and two of which are from Galar. In order from liked to disliked, they're Combusken, Infernape, Rillaboom, Inteleon, Emboar, and Incineroar. The other five in that list are only placed there because they're just meh for me—which when compared to all of the great starters, ranks them super low!—but I actually can't help but dislike Incineroarnot just because it is the fourth fire-fighting [or not... heheh...], but because it's incredibly overexaggeratedly humanoid. [Edit2: just a few short days later and it’s already starting go grow on me to the point where I don’t outwardly dislike it anymore. I still don’t rank it very highly, but a lot of my initial distaste was dispelled when I saw it in International PvP Champs—was the first time I’d ever seen its animations.] It may be a low meh if it were just a Pokémon in the background, but it is (imagine this is strikethrough -very-) out of place as a starter Pokémon in my eyes.

Other than in Incineroar, it's not the humanoid features of these Pokémon I dislike. After all, the humanoid starters Greninja, Cinderace, and Delphox are among my very favorites! [EDIT: I originally included Decidueye in this list—not sure I think it's humanoid enough.] I think Pokémon starters are just becoming increasingly polarized to be hits or misses, for a reason I'd assume is related to marketing, burnout, or having to compete with other Pokémon for our attention. The starters are meant to be the stars of each generation alongside their respective legendaries, so there's a lot of pressure to prevent the starters from feeling same-y compared to the previous starters, in addition to needing to stand out among all of the other Pokémon introduced in that generation.

Despite all that, I'm still really optimistic that Pokémon will end up doing fine, and that there will always be at least one starter in every future generation that gets me to smile!
Male
In a Rabbit
Seen July 13th, 2022
Posted June 9th, 2022
824 posts
9.8 Years
In general, I like it when starters provide variety. I would be a lot more favorable towards anthro starters if they didn't theme all 3 starters to being anthro hybrids. So something like one starter line that is anthro and two which aren't would be fine, because then there's a variety. So we each pick what we like, and then when fans come together to talk about which starter they each picked and why, this is all part of the fun.

I think something that will get across my point better is to describe what I mean by "variety in general". For example, I like how Chikorita provides a gentle and feminine option among the johto starters. It's the type of thing I wouldn't appreciate if all three were feminine choices (e.g., Chikorita, Fennekin, Popplio), but it's something that works when its part of the variety of the three starters. Conversations where Chikorita doesn't get as much love is also part of the fun of the fans coming together, and that's thanks to the variety.

Gen 4 was a case where there were two anthro starters and a choice of non-anthro quadruped Torterra. That's something I'd like to see more of. 2:1 worked very well because we hadn't really seen anthro hybrid starters yet. In an upcoming Generation 9, I would rather see a 1:2 or 0:3.
3DS FC: 4914-3495-9756 (IGN: Shrew)

BDSP Final Team:


Roni

Age 24
he/him
Philippines
Seen 3 Days Ago
Posted 3 Days Ago
19,088 posts
10.1 Years
Not that I dislike them, but I prefer Pokemon that (1) on all fours (2) resemble inanimate objects, and (3) are abstract in terms of body structure.
Paired with Starlight
Flair & Profile
Crafted by the lovely Fairy
Seen March 7th, 2022
Posted February 13th, 2022
15 posts
1.4 Years
In general, I like it when starters provide variety. I would be a lot more favorable towards anthro starters if they didn't theme all 3 starters to being anthro hybrids. So something like one starter line that is anthro and two which aren't would be fine, because then there's a variety. So we each pick what we like, and then when fans come together to talk about which starter they each picked and why, this is all part of the fun.

I think something that will get across my point better is to describe what I mean by "variety in general". For example, I like how Chikorita provides a gentle and feminine option among the johto starters. It's the type of thing I wouldn't appreciate if all three were feminine choices (e.g., Chikorita, Fennekin, Popplio), but it's something that works when its part of the variety of the three starters. Conversations where Chikorita doesn't get as much love is also part of the fun of the fans coming together, and that's thanks to the variety.

Gen 4 was a case where there were two anthro starters and a choice of non-anthro quadruped Torterra. That's something I'd like to see more of. 2:1 worked very well because we hadn't really seen anthro hybrid starters yet. In an upcoming Generation 9, I would rather see a 1:2 or 0:3.
I agree with the notion I'm super sorry to reply with such a short response, but now I'm intrigued: How is Empoleon Anthro?

I wouldn't even say Infernape is anthro. In my eyes, none of the Gen 4 starters seem anthro. You said we hadn't really seen anthro ones before then, but Combusken (Gen 3), to me, is far more anthro than Infernape!

Out of curiosity, which Pokémon do you consider to be anthro? For me, it's only Combusken, Delphox, Greninja, Incineroar, Cinderace, and Inteleon!
Male
Tennessee
Seen 3 Weeks Ago
Posted 3 Weeks Ago
5,620 posts
13 Years
I don't mind it too much, but I don't like when the pokemon have clothing on. It is a huge region I am not a fan of Sawk, Throh, and Pignite. I also don't like Raboot and Cinderace because of that, but I like them more than the other to Sword/Shield starters.

The thing that annoys me the most if that almost every Fire Starter has bee more human like and I just don't like it. Braxien I hate, but I love Delphox. So it just depends on the design I guess.

And I don't mind pokemon wearing clothing, but I don't like when it is apparently how the pokemon was born like with Sawk and Throh.
Male
In a Rabbit
Seen July 13th, 2022
Posted June 9th, 2022
824 posts
9.8 Years
I agree with the notion I'm super sorry to reply with such a short response, but now I'm intrigued: How is Empoleon Anthro?

I wouldn't even say Infernape is anthro. In my eyes, none of the Gen 4 starters seem anthro. You said we hadn't really seen anthro ones before then, but Combusken (Gen 3), to me, is far more anthro than Infernape!

Out of curiosity, which Pokémon do you consider to be anthro? For me, it's only Combusken, Delphox, Greninja, Incineroar, Cinderace, and Inteleon!
I consider Empoleon anthro because its features are hybridized heavily with an emperorm having a crown, swords, and a royal outfit. (Can't remember the name of the clothing, but its the white clothing Empoleon dons.)

The ones which I consider anthro are any starters which are hybridized with a human role: Infernape with son wukong, Empoleon with napoleon or an emperor, Serperior with european knight like The Rose of Versailles, Samurott with facial hair and as a samurai, Emboar with military general Zhang Fei and Zhu Bajie, Chesnaught with a paladin, Delphox with a mage, Greninja with a rogue, Decidueye with a bipedal archer, Incineroar with a heel masked wrestler, Primarina with the human qualities of a mermaid such as hair, Inteleon with a bipedal spy, Rillaboom with a rocker with a rocker's hairdo, and Cinderace with a soccer player.

Comparing something like Noctowl to Decidueye or Dewgong to Primarina might give insight to why my list is as extensive as it is. Here's a page that discusses the Gen 5 starters having human roles incorporated into their designs.
3DS FC: 4914-3495-9756 (IGN: Shrew)

BDSP Final Team:


Seen 1 Day Ago
Posted 1 Day Ago
990 posts
2.6 Years
I wouldn't even say Infernape is anthro. In my eyes, none of the Gen 4 starters seem anthro. You said we hadn't really seen anthro ones before then, but Combusken (Gen 3), to me, is far more anthro than Infernape!
Yeah, I agree. I mean, Infernape has to be anthro because it's a monkey. And Empoleon is just bipedal because so are penguins, and unlike Blaziken it doesn't even have arms.

But it's not just an aesthetic thing anyway. Final starter evos in recent gens have shown a big tendency towards more human traits. Older starters used to be "a turtle", "a dinosaur", "a crocodile", now they're still based on animals but their main trait is to represent a human role/job. Cinderace could have been a rabbit, a monkey, or a bear... it wouldn't matter because it's just a human concept applied to a random animal.
Seen March 7th, 2022
Posted February 13th, 2022
15 posts
1.4 Years
Thanks! I guess I’ve strayed so far from what English class taught me anthropomorphism meant that I forgot “to be anthro” can mean things other than what it does in furry lingo—I was thinking far more anatomically in my original response. As for the overly characterized starters of late, I definitely agree. I’d much rather just have starter Pokémon be creatures, “anthro” (humanoid in shape) or not, and leave all the hyper-characterized ones to be other Pokémon in the wild or legendaries. I don’t want any future starters to feel like they could be characters in Pirate101. That being said, I don’t think there are many starters that have taken this to the extreme enough to be dislikable to me—the onky exception I think is Incineroar. Serperior, Samurott, Cinderace, Decidueye, Delphox, and Empoleon pull it off quite nicely, I think, while Incineroar, Infernape, Emboar, and Inteleon are quite off-putting. Greninja and Rillaboom are somewhere in the middle. Were Blastoise to be designed nowadays, they’d make him into some sort of naval officer.

Hyzenthlay

running with the wolves tonight

Age 23
Rito Village
Seen 16 Hours Ago
Posted 16 Hours Ago
7,802 posts
10.5 Years
The "furry bait" label doesn't stop me from liking Pokémon such as Zeraora, Lopunny, Braixen etc., I'm really fond of these and most others but I don't consider myself furry - I just like how they're designed. I have a slight preference for them because I write Pokémon Mystery Dungeon fanfics and it's more freeing when the characters stand on two feet and have hands, haha. Though, purely from a design standpoint, I always prefer designs that are more animal-like!

It's just... scary searching up humanoid Pokémon sometimes. I've been scarred a few times as a kid. 😔
I forget how emotions dance when they aren't inside of me
I forget how the sun feels when she isn't around me
And my dreams become sweeter when something is missing
I'm in love with the hunt itself
It makes me feel alive

🌲💞🍀
on reduced activity!

Sheep

She/Her
Australia
Seen 2 Hours Ago
Posted 21 Hours Ago
39,243 posts
16.6 Years
Haha, I never search humanoid Pokémon unless I absolutely have to… the internet can be a scary place.

But I’ll have to agree with you, Hyzenthlay! Normally I prefer animal-like ones a bit more just because many designs I like are in that category, but some of the humanoid ones are also nice. Even Inteleon has grown on me and I disliked it quite a bit at first.