According to a new "interpretation" of what is known as "customary international law," some U.S. judges have ruled that, even though the U.S. Senate and President have never ratified the Convention, it is still binding on American parents. "In the 2002 case of Beharry v. Reno, one federal court said that even though the Convention was never ratified, it still has an 'impact on American law'," Farris explained. "The fact that virtually every other nation in the world has adopted it has made it part of customary international law, and it means that it should be considered part of American jurisprudence."
If everyone else jumped off a bridge, would Judge Farris jump off too?
Originally Posted by Zone
Exactly. Homeschooling could be being done by corrupt parents who will twist around history lessons to make them into people like them.
So are you saying that the possibility that could happen should ruin it for everyone? Does this not work both ways, where public education could be done by a corrupt state government which will twist around history and all other classes to make students into people like them? You know if people are allowed to leave their homes, they might kill others. Does this mean that the government has the right to restrict people to their homes?