Double Type Moves and Triple type Pokemon

Started by Chibaymega12 July 31st, 2007 2:28 PM
  • 6245 views
  • 33 replies
  • Poll

Do you think we need double type attacks, and triple type pokemon?(answer to two)

Anti

return of the king

Non-binary
Kobe's Reality
Seen March 6th, 2022
Posted January 17th, 2022
10,818 posts
15.8 Years
Not to rain on the parade, buit that would make things SOOOOOO complicated. If it aint broken, don't fix it. Right? That would ruin pokemon...
Why are the beautiful sick and divided like myself?

Barker

I'm drifting in deep waters..

Age 31
Male
Utah
Seen December 31st, 2016
Posted January 8th, 2013
388 posts
16.3 Years
Not to rain on the parade, buit that would make things SOOOOOO complicated. If it aint broken, don't fix it. Right? That would ruin pokemon...
Agreed. While the double and triple types would be more realistic, it would complicate things too much, in my opinion.

Anti

return of the king

Non-binary
Kobe's Reality
Seen March 6th, 2022
Posted January 17th, 2022
10,818 posts
15.8 Years
I really don't like the double move thing too. I think the physical/special thing in D/P is as close as Nintendo will go.
Why are the beautiful sick and divided like myself?

sims796

We're A-Comin', Princess!

Age 33
Brooklyn, NY (Yeah, I'm a New Yorker, like Luigi)
Seen January 14th, 2014
Posted November 30th, 2012
5,861 posts
16 Years
Or should go. I agree, Muddy Water? What the hell is that? Make up your mind. Is it Ground, Water, or both? Apparently Water. Whatever. Then Thunderpunch. It would be overpowered. Hitting many types. Or underpowered. Not hitting enough. But never "just right".

So to me, the physical/special split is as far as they should go.
This signature has been disabled.
No spoilers allowed in signature.
Please review and fix the issues by reading the signature rules.

You must edit it to meet the limits set by the rules before you may remove the [sig-reason] code from your signature. Removing this tag will re-enable it.

Do not remove the tag until you fix the issues in your signature. You may be infracted for removing this tag if you do not fix the specified issues. Do not use this tag for decoration purposes.

Anti

return of the king

Non-binary
Kobe's Reality
Seen March 6th, 2022
Posted January 17th, 2022
10,818 posts
15.8 Years
It would complicate things too much for younger players and would make pokemon a drag. Are there gonna be gym leaders who use two kinds of pokemon now? I think it is pretty realistic the way it is.
Why are the beautiful sick and divided like myself?

Cherrim

Age 34
she / her
Toronto
Seen 6 Hours Ago
Posted 6 Days Ago
33,049 posts
20.4 Years
Lol, it's complicated enough already trying to get used to attacks being a different type of special or physical. I'm not ready to start memorizing second and third Pokémon types and I'm eighteen. Think of the younger kids who play the games. XD;


paired with professor plum.
Seen February 10th, 2008
Posted February 9th, 2008
1,163 posts
16.4 Years
Nah, I think its a bad idea. If the game was that complicated, it wouldn't be fun. Really it seems kind of silly to me... why do we need more types? Its like putting all the colors of paint in a mix, you end up with a muddy mess, not a rainbow.
Not everything has to be shiny lights, and pretty rainbows, but you do got a point, double types moves are a little too advance to go into, and the strength's and weaknesses of pokemon would have to be relearned all of over again, instead of going with what we have.

Lol, it's complicated enough already trying to get used to attacks being a different type of special or physical. I'm not ready to start memorizing second and third Pokémon types and I'm eighteen. Think of the younger kids who play the games. XD;
Yes, we cant forget the young ones, oh the young ones, lol XD