Double Type Moves and Triple type Pokemon Page 2

Started by Chibaymega12 July 31st, 2007 2:28 PM
  • 6245 views
  • 33 replies
  • Poll

Do you think we need double type attacks, and triple type pokemon?(answer to two)

Seen February 10th, 2008
Posted February 9th, 2008
1,163 posts
16.4 Years
Yeah, I got into pokemon in third grade. I wouldn't have understood it if there were triple types and double-moves.
Yes, pokemon always has, and always will appeal to the younger crowd more, thus we make it simple, its a fact of life.

Shiny Umbreon

光るブラッキー

Age 30
Watching you from the shadows...
Seen May 2nd, 2016
Posted December 18th, 2010
3,656 posts
18.2 Years
If a single-type attack can do damage x4, it's kind of risky to grow that.

Imagine a Fire-Flying move (Fire Spin maybe) against a Bug/Grass Pokémon. It would do ridiculous damage, as well as a Fire-Fighting move against a Water-Poison Pokémon.

Cherrim

Age 34
she / her
Toronto
Seen 6 Hours Ago
Posted 6 Days Ago
33,049 posts
20.4 Years
Yeah...when you start getting into using double attacks against double Pokémon with weaknesses and advantages all over the place...it'd get way too complicated. While Pokémon is simple enough for kids to get it, it's also already complicated enough for more mature players what with IV/EVs and such.

And that's not even considering the "triple type" suggested, either. :x


paired with professor plum.

Xerion

Snap, Crack, Break!

Seen January 7th, 2008
Posted August 4th, 2007
18 posts
15.8 Years
Lol, it's complicated enough already trying to get used to attacks being a different type of special or physical. I'm not ready to start memorizing second and third Pokémon types and I'm eighteen. Think of the younger kids who play the games. XD;
Agreed. It's already hard with mixed types, I don't need mixed moves either.

-Xerion
Well, I was thinking a guy, yes guy as in male