Should Certain Pokemon Have Other Types?

RocketAdmin.

Custom User Title. :)
    • 130
    Posts
    15
    Years
    • Seen Jul 12, 2011
    Hey, I was thinking; why don't some Pokemon have another type available?

    Like Shinys, only an even smaller chance of finding one. They would have slight changes to their appearance along with colours suited to their "second types." (Some could even have a third type.)

    This would only apply to around 100-150 of the Pokemon including NONE of the legendaries, as this would make the legendaries even more annoying (no-one would really want them either) and only please the noobs who use them.

    They would have slightly different stats too, and you wouldn't be able to switch between their type (like Deoxys+meteor)

    Personally I think the coolest would be a "Winter Torterra" or an Dark and Ice-type Salamence :D
     
    No. I think that types are set in stone for each Pokemon, bar a few exceptions like Castform, Ditto, Kecleon, Eevee (sort of) - exceptions that prove the rule.
     
    Yeah, but still - it would give you more to do when you've finished most of the game :)

    C'mon guys! Surely you must have something to say!
     
    Uhh Sudowoodo should be part Grass like Cradily

    Palkia should be Dragon/Steel too, water doesn't make any sense

    The Porygon line should be Electric/Psychic, something along the lines of that.
     
    Ah, I didn't mean like that :/ I mean like a rock type Pikachu that's really rare etc.. (:
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.
    Back
    Top