• There is an important update regarding account security and 2FA. Please click here for more information.
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
  • Imgur has blocked certain regions from viewing any images uploaded to their site. If you use Imgur, please consider replacing any image links/embeds you may have on PokéCommunity so everyone can see your images. Click here to learn more.

which natures do you think should have been included?

  • 898
    Posts
    19
    Years
    • Seen Mar 25, 2008
    which natures do you think should have been included in the nature pool that wasnt? i definitely think curious nature, aggressive nature, and confident/cocky nature should have been included.
     
    Same, you know I think the agressive and the naughty natures are kind of the same bu it's just my idea.
    I would sure put talky ;)
     
    Cute or loving nature woud have been lovely. I like the idea of sweet too. Maybe sensitive too n_n
     
    I think aggressive would have been a cool nature. X3~ Something like spiteful or vengeful would have been neat too. XDD I also agree with ~Strawberry Vulpix~ and think they should have added loving as a nature. :3

    ~Kelsey
     
    A sly nature or a self-centered nature would be okay too.
     
    Hmm...would weird be considered a nature? n_n'

    I think a thoughtful/intelligent nature would have been interesting....
     
    lol what about senile!! :laugh: or nieve(or is that already on there?....)helpful?stingy?Romantic?charming?(wait...no...that was there as soon as I played...:laugh: )
     
    CopyCat said:
    Maybe consedied or outspoken? Or egotisitical? And definatly Obnoxious or loud...

    Pokemon don't really speak. Well...at least that humans understand. I think outspoken would be a waste but that's just me. o.O
     
    probably means like,to come up with the ideas,which could also mean that the poke'mon could also have more moves accosiated with teams(two on two)


    I have no idea what I just said....
     
    I liked the curious nature.. but just can't seem to think of which status a curious nature would be stronger at..
     
    miyo said:
    I liked the curious nature.. but just can't seem to think of which status a curious nature would be stronger at..

    maybe hit-points? o_o

    I was thinking cunning would be good. (we used to have it as a nature on this forum. it seemed like a good one...)
     
    Back
    Top