Animal rights group PETA exposed via graphic pictures
View Single Post
April 7th, 2013 (11:31 AM).
Join Date: Jul 2008
I suppose it's still "ethical treatment", that a life of suffering is a life not worth living? But that to me puts animals up to human standards, which I don't believe in <-- still have to understand why. I think to animals, our cities is just another concrete jungle, and animals suffer no matter where their habitat is - but animals wandering around cities is a nuisance/threat to human business. But again, these are domestic animals so standards for wild animals don't apply to them, either. There are just so many ethical questions entangled in this issue and who knows where to begin to tease them apart?
Also Known As:
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Kanzler
Find all posts by Kanzler
Find threads started by Kanzler