So basically, if I went ahead and showcased pixel art/photography work/etc and I got good ratings on a few sites then they would instantly be 'good'? Your logic is flawed.Sawyer said:We call such a thing minimalism in flaring. I don't really know what your problem is with me, considering this got me a proffesional grade on 4 other websites.
Now where do you get that from? So if someone criticizes your work and/or disagree with the common opinion of it, they are jealous? Again, your logic is flawed.Sawyer said:Either you're jealous, or perfectionistic. And I could have sworn that you and I were good friends.
I wasn't referring to PC, in general I was talking about pertained sites that deal with the individual categories.Sawyer said:At your first comment - Well, considering this isn't an art website, absolutely not. I realize that this forum is biased, which is why I did not show my latest piece.
What's there to look deeper into? From my point of view, you're just being too arrogant.Sawyer said:You can call my logic flawed, but clearly yours is flawed as well; you cannot see past any statement, look any deeper than you already are.
What he said was that he did not like your vector. That is his opinion.Sawyer said:And to your second comment - I respect other people's criticizing, as I live by it. But everybody prefers constructive criticism. When Nic tells me that he "does not like the vector", how the hell do you expect me to learn from that?
There is nothing to look a 'wee bit harder' at. Calling me a liberator sure isn't going to help you either.Sawyer said:So please, Mr. Liberator, be a good moderator and look a wee bit harder, hmm?
If you don't like the way people criticise your work, it doesn't make much sense to continue posting it. :\Sawyer said:See, on the forums I go to, people actually rate art. They tell you what to fix, they tell you the high points, they tell you the low points. And, on most of the graphics sites that I run, I do not allow /10 ratings.